I confused lot in oracle about schema, user and functional id. Let consider my two different cases
Case I :
Let us consider SCOTT#ORCL.If we think SCOTT is user. while creating user alone it ll create a schema. Correct me If i am wrong. In this case while we were creating SCOTT user alone SCOTT schema was created. Suppose If we create another schema say X . Is this possible to SCOTT user owns X schema ?
Case II :
Let us consider SCOTT#ORCL.If we think SCOTT is schema alone i-e which is created by schema command alone. If it is so then what is the use of schema w/o any user who is going to own it.
I heard oracle function ID is one which will connect several user/schema(i don't know whether I can put schema/user here ) in a data base. is there is difference b/w oracle functional ID with user/schema ?
Many people find this topic confusing, because we tend to bandy around USER and SCHEMA interchangeably, when they are in fact separate if related entities.
A schema is the collection of database objects owned by a user. When we create a user we create their schema at the same time. Initially their schema is empty.
It is easy to demonstrate that USER and SCHEMA are distinct, because we change the current schema in the session. This just means we can reference objects in another user's schema without prefixing them with the owner's name.
SQL> desc t1
Name Null? Type
----------------------------------------- -------- -------------
ID NUMBER
SQL> alter session set current_schema=APC
2 /
Session altered.
SQL> desc t1
ERROR:
ORA-04043: object t1 does not exist
SQL> sho user
USER is "X"
SQL>
In this case, either APC doesn't have a table called T1 or he hasn't granted it to X. The only way X can see her own table is to prefix it with her own name, or switch the current schema back to herself.
To answer your first question, the schema always has the same name as the user. So it is not possible for SCOTT to own schema X; schema X is owned by user X.
To answer your second question, it is impossible to create a schema without a user.
True, there is a CREATE SCHEMA command, but this requires the prior creation of the user. It is actually not creating a schema but creating several database objects. In effect it is more of a ADD OBJECTS TO SCHEMA command.
SQL> conn sys as sysdba
Enter password:
Connected.
SQL> create user x identified by x
2 default tablespace users quota 10m on users
3 /
User created.
SQL> grant create session, create table to x
2 /
Grant succeeded.
SQL> conn x/x
Connected.
SQL> create schema authorization x
2 create table t1 (id number)
3 create table t2 (id number)
4 /
Schema created.
SQL> select table_name from user_tables
2 /
TABLE_NAME
------------------------------
T1
T2
SQL>
The CREATE SCHEMA command is pretty limited: we can create tables, views and indexes, and grant privileges on objects. The advantage of it is simply that we can create several objects in a single transaction, so that all the creates are rolled back if one fails. This is not possible when we run each create statement separately.
Not sure what you're thinking off when you mention "function ID". It's not a standard piece of Oracle functionality.
This does not define the difference between an owner and schema.
But I have always struggled with the idea that I create N number of users....when I want each of these users to "consume" (aka, use) a single schema.
This guy shows how to do this (have N number of users...get "redirected" to a single schema.
I will paste his code as well, on the off-chance the URL link dies in the future.
http://www.oracle-base.com/articles/misc/schema-owners-and-application-users.php
He has a second "synonym" approach. But I am only pasting the CURRENT_SCHEMA version.
AGAIN, I take NO credit for this. I just hate when someone says "your answer is at this link" and BOOM, the link is dead. :<
......................................................
(from http://www.oracle-base.com/articles/misc/schema-owners-and-application-users.php)
CURRENT_SCHEMA Approach
This method uses the CURRENT_SCHEMA session attribute to automatically point application users to the correct schema.
First, we create the schema owner and an application user.
CONN sys/password AS SYSDBA
-- Remove existing users and roles with the same names.
DROP USER schema_owner CASCADE;
DROP USER app_user CASCADE;
DROP ROLE schema_rw_role;
DROP ROLE schema_ro_role;
-- Schema owner.
CREATE USER schema_owner IDENTIFIED BY password
DEFAULT TABLESPACE users
TEMPORARY TABLESPACE temp
QUOTA UNLIMITED ON users;
GRANT CONNECT, CREATE TABLE TO schema_owner;
-- Application user.
CREATE USER app_user IDENTIFIED BY password
DEFAULT TABLESPACE users
TEMPORARY TABLESPACE temp;
GRANT CONNECT TO app_user;
Notice that the application user can connect, but does not have any tablespace quotas or privileges to create objects.
Next, we create some roles to allow read-write and read-only access.
CREATE ROLE schema_rw_role;
CREATE ROLE schema_ro_role;
We want to give our application user read-write access to the schema objects, so we grant the relevant role.
GRANT schema_rw_role TO app_user;
We need to make sure the application user has its default schema pointing to the schema owner, so we create an AFTER LOGON trigger to do this for us.
CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER app_user.after_logon_trg
AFTER LOGON ON app_user.SCHEMA
BEGIN
DBMS_APPLICATION_INFO.set_module(USER, 'Initialized');
EXECUTE IMMEDIATE 'ALTER SESSION SET current_schema=SCHEMA_OWNER';
END;
/
Now we are ready to create an object in the schema owner.
CONN schema_owner/password
CREATE TABLE test_tab (
id NUMBER,
description VARCHAR2(50),
CONSTRAINT test_tab_pk PRIMARY KEY (id)
);
GRANT SELECT ON test_tab TO schema_ro_role;
GRANT SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE ON test_tab TO schema_rw_role;
Notice how the privileges are granted to the relevant roles. Without this, the objects would not be visible to the application user. We now have a functioning schema owner and application user.
SQL> CONN app_user/password
Connected.
SQL> DESC test_tab
Name Null? Type
----------------------------------------------------- -------- ------------------------------------
ID NOT NULL NUMBER
DESCRIPTION VARCHAR2(50)
SQL>
This method is ideal where the application user is simply an alternative entry point to the main schema, requiring no objects of its own.
Related
I'm using Oracle 11g(11.2.0.1.0). I created about 20 tablespaces and users. And the data came by [Tools] - [Database Copy] on Oracle SQL Developer.
Somehow I found that a user is using SELECT query on the table from another schema. I want to prevent it for security. How should I change my grant options?
I read "Oracle Database Security Guide 11g Release 2(11.2)", but couldn't find the solution clearly.
Here are my creating and granting queries.
create user [USER_NAME]
identified by [PASSWORD]
default tablespace [TABLESPACE_NAME]
temporary tablespace TEMP;
grant create session,
create database link,
create materialized view,
create procedure,
create public synonym,
create role,
create sequence,
create synonym,
create table,
drop any table,
create trigger,
create type,
create view to [USER_NAME];
alter user [USER_NAME] quota unlimited on [TABLESPACE_NAME];
And here is the SELECT result of session_privs on a user.
SQL> SELECT * FROM session_privs;
PRIVILEGE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CREATE SESSION
CREATE TABLE
DROP ANY TABLE
CREATE SYNONYM
CREATE PUBLIC SYNONYM
CREATE VIEW
CREATE SEQUENCE
CREATE DATABASE LINK
CREATE ROLE
CREATE PROCEDURE
CREATE TRIGGER
PRIVILEGE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW
CREATE TYPE
13 rows selected.
I want to prevent a user from querying SELECT on other schemas.
For example, the following query
-- connected with USER1
SELECT *
FROM USER2.table1;
should make an error like:
ERROR: USER1 doesn't have SELECT privilege on USER2.
Edited:
Use appropriate terms (changed some words from tablespace to schema)
Add SELECT result of session_privs on a user
Add the method of how the data came by.
It was my fault. I missed that I had added some roles.
To copy data using Oracle SQL Developer, I added predefined roles to users. The roles were exp_full_database and imp_full_database.
According to Oracle Database Security Guide: Configuring Privilege and Role Authorization, exp_full_database contains these privileges:
SELECT ANY TABLE
BACKUP ANY TABLE
EXECUTE ANY PROCEDURE
EXECUTE ANY TYPE
ADMINISTER RESOURCE MANAGER
INSERT, DELETE, UPDATE ON SYS.INCVID, SYS.INCFIL AND SYS.INCEXP
and roles:
EXECUTE_CATALOG_ROLE
SELECT_CATALOG_ROLE
Those roles are not required now. So the answer is removing them from users.
REVOKE exp_full_database, imp_full_databsae FROM USER1;
And I get the result I wanted.
-- connected with USER1
SELECT * FROM USER2.TABLE1;
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01031: insufficient privileges
I use windows 7 and oracle 11g , so when i created user test and give an him create table privilege:
grant create table to test;
I notice that this user can also do select,insert,delete on the table that he created but i don't give him any object privileges.
is create table privilege mean all object privileges are granted?
Table owner can do everything with that table - all DML and DDL actions (selects, inserts, updates, deletes, alters, drops, ... everything).
If you want to let other users do something with your tables, then you'll have to grant those privileges to them.
I'm creating a USER on Oracle 12 c database, using TOAD.
After creating the TABLESPACE, I'm creating the USER. I'm a little confusing about the many ROLES and PRIVILEGES that can be given to a USER.
What are the minimum/standard roles and privileges a user must be given in order to perform CRUD operation and being able to 'edit' the database (create or delete table, DROP the schema ecc) from TOAD?
Thank you
It depends on what operations are you going to perform. If you want to work only with tables in your own db schema, then the following privileges are usually enough to start:
grant create session to <your_user>;
grant create table to <your_user>;
You have the default rights to insert/update/delete/select tables which you own.
Tablespace quota:
alter user <your_user> quota unlimited on <your_tablespace_name>;
It's better to set the default tablespace for the user. In this case you can omit the tablespace name in a create table statement.
alter user <your_user> default tablespace <your_tablespace_name>;
A link to the documentation - Privileges
Grant the user the following privileges:
CREATE SESSION (in order to allow the user to connect to the database)
INSERT
UPDATE
DELETE
SELECT
Use the below command to grant privileges to the user (you need to login as SYS or SYSTEM or another user that has GRANT privilege):
GRANT CREATE SESSION, SELECT, UPDATE, DETETE, INSERT TO user_name
Here's a suggestion you might (or might not) want to follow.
As a privileged user (such as SYS), check tablespaces available in your database. I'm using 11g XE (Express Edition) which shows the following:
SQL> show user
USER is "SYS"
SQL> select tablespace_name from dba_tablespaces;
TABLESPACE_NAME
------------------------------
SYSTEM
SYSAUX
UNDOTBS1
TEMP --> temporary
USERS --> my data
Now, create a user:
SQL> create user mdp identified by pdm
2 default tablespace users
3 temporary tablespace temp
4 quota unlimited on users;
User created.
Quite a long time ago, there were two popular predefined roles named CONNECT and RESOURCE which were granted some of the most frequent privileges so people just loved to grant those roles to newly created users.
Nowadays, you shouldn't be doing that: grant only minimal set of privileges your user might need. The first one is CREATE SESSION; without it, your user won't even be able to establish a connection.
SQL> grant create session to mdp;
Grant succeeded.
Then, you'll want to create some tables so - grant it:
SQL> grant create table to mdp;
Grant succeeded.
OK, let's connect as newly created user and do something:
SQL> connect mdp/pdm#xe
Connected.
SQL> create table test (id number);
Table created.
SQL> insert into test id values (1);
1 row created.
SQL> drop table test;
Table dropped.
SQL>
Nice; I can create tables, insert/update/delete/select from them. For beginning, that's quite enough. However, when it turns out that you'd want to, for example, create a view, it won't work until you grant it that privilege:
SQL> create view v_dual as select * From dual;
create view v_dual as select * From dual
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01031: insufficient privileges
SQL> connect sys#xe as sysdba
Enter password:
Connected.
SQL> grant create view to mdp;
Grant succeeded.
SQL> connect mdp/pdm#xe
Connected.
SQL> create view v_dual as select * From dual;
View created.
SQL>
And so forth; don't grant anything just because you might need it - grant it if & when you need it. Especially pay attention to system privileges which can potentially be dangerous if you don't know what you're doing.
In the documentation for all_constraints table it says that the "owner" column gives us information about "Owner of the constraint definition". But when examining the living example I found that to be false.
select user from dual; --gives EXAMPLE_USER
create table example_user.example_table(id number);
Now I will change user to SYS.
select user from dual --gives SYS
alter table example_user.example_table add constraint ex_constrain check(id > 10);
Now the best part:
select owner from all_constraints where constraint_name = 'EX_CONSTRAINT';
--gives EXAMPLE_USER and not SYS.
My question is simple: why?
Tested on: Oracle Database 11g EE 11.2.0.4.0
Well, SYS is special, it owns the database and can do anything.
If you wanted to do the same with another user (for example, SCOTT, and let it try to create constraint for EXAMPLE_USER's table), you'd fail unless privileged user grants SCOTT ALTER ANY TABLE system privilege. Doing so, that user will be able to alter any table (which belongs to any user), and that includes creating constraints.
If you'd want to create a primary key constraint, that privilege won't be enough - you'll need CREATE ANY INDEX privilege as well (as primary key creates index as well).
Just like CREATE ANY TABLE system privilege, which allows you to create a table in any other user's schema, but that table will then belong to the schema owner, the same goes for a constraint - yes, you created it in behalf of another user, but the constraint is still owned by the table owner, not the creator.
Therefore, dictionary isn't lying, it is you who misunderstood how it goes.
I have a grant alter sequence to a user. But I have to specify the schema name to alter the sequence otherwise it comes back with error sequence does not exist. Is it possible to do the grant in a way so I don't have to specify the schema name? I can do select/insert/update without specifying the schema name.
Name resolution and access privileges are separate concepts. The grant gives you permission to alter the schema, but you're still constrained by the namespace you're in. There are four ways to make a name in one schema resolve in another:
Reference the schema with the object name: select schema_name.sequence_name.nextval from dual;
Alter the current session to resolve names as if you were in the other schema: alter session set current_schema = schema_name;
Create a synonym for the object in the current schema: create synonym sequence_name for schema_name.sequence_name;
Create a public synonym for the object: create public synonym sequence_name for schema_name.sequence_name;
It sounds like you're connected to your database as a different user than the one that owns the sequence. In that case, you will need to preface the sequence with the schema, otherwise it's ambiguous as to what sequence you're talking about.
If you are connected to your database as the owning user, you do not need the schema qualifier:
SQL> create sequence foo;
Sequence created.
SQL> grant alter on foo to hr;
Grant succeeded.
you may:
ALTER SESSION SET CURRENT_SCHEMA myschema..
then you can reference all items without the qualifier.