I have created a project in Eclipse for Selenium automation using testNG framework. I have never used any user extension file in the past, but I heard that we need to use an user extension file. As since I am unsure of the proper use of this file I have never used it and my project runs smoothly. The question now arises is that later on will I have any issues because of not using an user-extension file? Please give me some ideas on the user extension file and let me know whether its mandatory to use in selenium RC project.
thanks in advance
No, the user-extensions.js file is not required. But you may indeed need to use it, if your existing tests depend on an extension that is in it. Obviously, at that point you need to use the version of the file that the test author used.
I am not quite sure what your question is but I think the answer is No anyway, you do not need to have any "user extension files" in order to use selenium API in any JAVA testing environment. You just call API from your testNG or other testing frameworks. see http://release.seleniumhq.org/selenium-remote-control/1.0-beta-2/doc/java/
Related
I'm currently trying to make UI-Tests in Xamarin, where i want the app to be tested against different server versions.
Originally i wanted to do this like i did in unit-tests with parametrized tests by using [Theory] and [ClassData].
Unfortunately i haven't found anything about this in the web so far regarding this nUnit construct.
Is this even possible? or is there another way to tell my xamarin UI-Test to run all my tests once for each server version?.
Many thanks in advance.
Mav
Soo, the mistake i made was to assume that i could use xunit blocks for nunit tests.
My bad.
The solution is pretty simple and can be looked up here in the gitHub projects documentation:
https://github.com/nunit/docs/wiki/TestFixtureData
I have a DMN which calculates (a common unit of work), which I want to plug-in in another DMN. Is there an example for this in kogito examples?
Can someone help me to get me an example.
No, there's no example.
Included models are not supported on DMN editor when it's running on the online version or the VSCode version. This feature will be available soon, so you can keep track of this by looking at KOGITO-697.
However, Included models are supported on DMN editor when it's running on Business Central. So you can create your models there, and execute them on Kogito (just for now) - as #tarilabs said, the runtime already supports it.
I'm involved in developing a sandboxed Microsoft Dynamics CRM 2011 Online plugin and have a set of tests that I can drive from a xUnit front end on my local machine given that I right-click the Package and select the Deploy option (and resort to using the plugin loader sample when that doesn't work).
I'd like to be able to automate the running of my tests on my CI rig, where I'll need it to upload a fresh binary as part of each run.
We've looked at http://pluginregcrm2011.codeplex.com/ but it has bugs that prevent it working for Online and in short looks like it's no longer being maintained and I'm not keen to take ownership of what should be a fundamental tool that a platform/ecosystem should just have.
Is anyone using that tool or another plugin uploader non-interactively? Am I missing something?
I know I'm late with my answer and I`m pretty sure that you already have found a solution which is working for you.
However I felt the same pain and I have hacked a small application which could be used to simply update the plugin assembly, without doing any configuration work.
PluginAssemblyLoader -f "C:\MyPlugin.dll" -c "Url=http://crmserver/org;"
Please see http://msdyncrm-contrib.github.io/PluginAssemblyLoader
There isn't an easy OOB experience with this but the CRM 2011 Developer Toolkit just uses a set of MSBuild targets that you can call yourself. It's just MSBuild, so you could hook it into your CI build if required. If you install or just extract the Developer Toolkit MSI in the SDK you'll find the following two files in there...
Microsoft.CrmdeveloperTools.CrmClient.dll
Microsoft.CrmdeveloperTools.CrmClient.targets
As an aside it would be nice if MS would open source this as the current implementation uses predominantly sealed and internal classes within the custom tasks.
my current work tasking requires creating a firefox plugin. I've done this relatively easily on Linux but porting to windows has exposed a peculiar problem. To do the port, I refactored the basic windows example given in the mozilla source tree. I did this operation slowly and methodically, testing as I went. Aside from the occasional OS dependent glitch everything seemed to be going fine until I finally changed the output name of the plugin dll. So, instead of creating a dll called npbasic.dll, the filename was fubar.dll. This immediately caused the plugin to stop working: it did not get picked up in Firefox about:plugins. Changing the filename back to npbasic.dll allowed the firefox plugin tab to "see" the plugin again.
Is anyone aware of an aspect of dll linking/functionality which could be causing this observed dependency?, any help or pointers would be greatly appreciated.
Well, I've done some more research and it's clear that my approach of painstakingly refactoring the example plugin was flawed, the best strategy is to use something like firebreath, as described here : How to write a C++ FireFox 3 plugin (not extension) on Windows?
Is there any GUI based debugger for Ruby? Just a debugger. I do not want a full IDE like NetBeans because they tend to get your project dirty with extra files.
thanks!
Check out Mr. Guid, which uses GTK+ and is cross-platform.
In netbeans you can tell it to put the netbeans project files in a separate directory or you can easily ignore the nbproject directory with your project's vcs. Netbeans has by far the best integrated debugging I have seen and there are many other great reasons to give it a try. Don't worry about netbeans using a project folder. I highly doubt you'll be able to find a better free GUI debugger.
If the code completion stuff gets in your way with netbeans it is easy to turn off and only request code completion when you want it (ctrl+space). That was my biggest gripe with netbeans.
I haven't used it in about a year, but I liked Arachno Ruby