I've got a hash of the format:
{key1 => [a, b, c], key2 => [d, e, f]}
and I want to end up with:
{ a => key1, b => key1, c => key1, d => key2 ... }
What's the easiest way of achieving this?
I'm using Ruby on Rails.
UPDATE
OK I managed to extract the real object from the server log, it is being pushed via AJAX.
Parameters: {"status"=>{"1"=>["1", "14"], "2"=>["7", "12", "8", "13"]}}
hash = {:key1 => ["a", "b", "c"], :key2 => ["d", "e", "f"]}
first variant
hash.map{|k, v| v.map{|f| {f => k}}}.flatten
#=> [{"a"=>:key1}, {"b"=>:key1}, {"c"=>:key1}, {"d"=>:key2}, {"e"=>:key2}, {"f"=>:key2}]
or
hash.inject({}){|h, (k,v)| v.map{|f| h[f] = k}; h}
#=> {"a"=>:key1, "b"=>:key1, "c"=>:key1, "d"=>:key2, "e"=>:key2, "f"=>:key2}
UPD
ok, your hash is:
hash = {"status"=>{"1"=>["1", "14"], "2"=>["7", "12", "8", "13"]}}
hash["status"].inject({}){|h, (k,v)| v.map{|f| h[f] = k}; h}
#=> {"12"=>"2", "7"=>"2", "13"=>"2", "8"=>"2", "14"=>"1", "1"=>"1"}
Lots of other good answers. Just wanted to toss this one in too for Ruby 2.0 and 1.9.3:
hash = {apple: [1, 14], orange: [7, 12, 8, 13]}
Hash[hash.flat_map{ |k, v| v.map{ |i| [i, k] } }]
# => {1=>:apple, 14=>:apple, 7=>:orange, 12=>:orange, 8=>:orange, 13=>:orange}
This is leveraging: Hash::[] and Enumerable#flat_map
Also in these new versions there is Enumerable::each_with_object which is very similar to Enumerable::inject/Enumerable::reduce:
hash.each_with_object(Hash.new){ |(k, v), inverse|
v.each{ |e| inverse[e] = k }
}
Performing a quick benchmark (Ruby 2.0.0p0; 2012 Macbook Air) using an original hash with 100 keys, each with 100 distinct values:
Hash::[] w/ Enumerable#flat_map
155.7 (±9.0%) i/s - 780 in 5.066286s
Enumerable#each_with_object w/ Enumerable#each
199.7 (±21.0%) i/s - 940 in 5.068926s
Shows that the each_with_object variant is faster for that data set.
Ok, let's guess. You say you have an array but I agree with Benoit that what you probably have is a hash. A functional approach:
h = {:key1 => ["a", "b", "c"], :key2 => ["d", "e", "f"]}
h.map { |k, vs| Hash[vs.map { |v| [v, k] }] }.inject(:merge)
#=> {"a"=>:key1, "b"=>:key1, "c"=>:key1, "d"=>:key2, "e"=>:key2, "f"=>:key2}
Also:
h.map { |k, vs| Hash[vs.product([k])] }.inject(:merge)
#=> {"a"=>:key1, "b"=>:key1, "c"=>:key1, "d"=>:key2, "e"=>:key2, "f"=>:key2}
In the case where a value corresponds to more than one key, like "c" in this example...
{ :key1 => ["a", "b", "c"], :key2 => ["c", "d", "e"]}
...some of the other answers will not give the expected result. We will need the reversed hash to store the keys in arrays, like so:
{ "a" => [:key1], "b" => [:key1], "c" => [:key1, :key2], "d" => [:key2], "e" => [:key2] }
This should do the trick:
reverse = {}
hash.each{ |k,vs|
vs.each{ |v|
reverse[v] ||= []
reverse[v] << k
}
}
This was my use case, and I would have defined my problem much the same way as the OP (in fact, a search for a similar phrase got me here), so I suspect this answer may help other searchers.
If you're looking to reverse a hash formatted like this, the following may help you:
a = {:key1 => ["a", "b", "c"], :key2 => ["d", "e", "f"]}
a.inject({}) do |memo, (key, values)|
values.each {|value| memo[value] = key }
memo
end
this returns:
{"a"=>:key1, "b"=>:key1, "c"=>:key1, "d"=>:key2, "e"=>:key2, "f"=>:key2}
new_hash={}
hash = {"key1" => ['a', 'b', 'c'], "key2" => ['d','e','f']}
hash.each_pair{|key, val|val.each{|v| new_hash[v] = key }}
This gives
new_hash # {"a"=>"key1", "b"=>"key1", "c"=>"key1", "d"=>"key2", "e"=>"key2", "f"=>"key2"}
If you want to correctly deal with duplicate values, then you should use the Hash#inverse
from Facets of Ruby
Hash#inverse preserves duplicate values,
e.g. it ensures that hash.inverse.inverse == hash
either:
use Hash#inverse from here: http://www.unixgods.org/Ruby/invert_hash.html
use Hash#inverse from FacetsOfRuby library 'facets'
usage like this:
require 'facets'
h = {:key1 => [:a, :b, :c], :key2 => [:d, :e, :f]}
=> {:key1=>[:a, :b, :c], :key2=>[:d, :e, :f]}
h.inverse
=> {:a=>:key1, :b=>:key1, :c=>:key1, :d=>:key2, :e=>:key2, :f=>:key2}
The code looks like this:
# this doesn't looks quite as elegant as the other solutions here,
# but if you call inverse twice, it will preserve the elements of the original hash
# true inversion of Ruby Hash / preserves all elements in original hash
# e.g. hash.inverse.inverse ~ h
class Hash
def inverse
i = Hash.new
self.each_pair{ |k,v|
if (v.class == Array)
v.each{ |x|
i[x] = i.has_key?(x) ? [k,i[x]].flatten : k
}
else
i[v] = i.has_key?(v) ? [k,i[v]].flatten : k
end
}
return i
end
end
h = {:key1 => [:a, :b, :c], :key2 => [:d, :e, :f]}
=> {:key1=>[:a, :b, :c], :key2=>[:d, :e, :f]}
h.inverse
=> {:a=>:key1, :b=>:key1, :c=>:key1, :d=>:key2, :e=>:key2, :f=>:key2}
One way to achieve what you're looking for:
arr = [{["k1"] => ["a", "b", "c"]}, {["k2"] => ["d", "e", "f"]}]
results_arr = []
arr.each do |hsh|
hsh.values.flatten.each do |val|
results_arr << { [val] => hsh.keys.first }···
end
end
Result: [{["a"]=>["k1"]}, {["b"]=>["k1"]}, {["c"]=>["k1"]}, {["d"]=>["k2"]}, {["e"]=>["k2"]}, {["f"]=>["k2"]}]
Related
I have a hash with keys and values as follows:
hash = {"lili" => [] , "john" => ["a", "b"], "andrew" => [], "megh" => ["b","e"]}
As we can see some of the keys have values as empty arrays.
Some keys have array values where there are actual values in the array.
I want to loop over the hash and generate a new hash that includes only those keys which have values in their arrays (not the ones which have empty arrays). How can I do that?
The title says:
PRINT only the keys, but reading the post you are trying to generate a hash subset given a hash.
The solution for the TITLE of the POST:
hash.each {|k,v| p k unless v.empty? }
If you want to generate a new hash subset give the original hash:
hash.reject { |k,v| v.nil? || v.empty? }
If you want to PRINT the subset generated give the original hash:
hash.reject { |k,v| v.nil? || v.empty? }.each { |k,v| p k }
You could use reject to filter out those elements in your hash where the value is an empty array or the value is nil and then iterate to print their content;
{:lili=>[], :john=>[:a, :b], :andrew=>[], :megh=>[:b, :e], :other=>nil}
.reject { (_2 || []).empty? }
.each { puts "#{_1} has the value(s) #{_2}" }
that prints
john has the value(s) [:a, :b]
megh has the value(s) [:b, :e]
Unsure of your desired output or exact data structure, but you can simply use reject along with empty? to remove any hash value that contains an empty array:
hash = {"lili" => [] , "john" => ["a", "b"], "andrew" => [], "megh" => ["b","e"]}
hash.reject {|k, v| v.empty?}
#=> {"john"=>["a", "b"], "megh"=>["b", "e"]}
It should however be noted that this approach will not work if any hash values are nil. To address that situation, I would recommend either using compact to remove any hash elements with nil values prior to using reject OR by testing for either nil? or empty? (and in that order):
hash = {"lili" => [] , "john" => ["a", "b"], "andrew" => [], "megh" => ["b","e"], "other" => nil}
hash.reject {|k, v| v.empty?}
#=> Evaluation Error: Ruby NoMethodError: undefined method `empty?' for nil:NilClass
hash.compact.reject {|k, v| v.empty?}
#=> {"john"=>["a", "b"], "megh"=>["b", "e"]}
hash.reject {|k, v| v.empty? or v.nil?}
#=> Evaluation Error: Ruby NoMethodError: undefined method `empty?' for nil:NilClass
hash.reject {|k, v| v.nil? or v.empty?}
#=> {"john"=>["a", "b"], "megh"=>["b", "e"]}
hash.reject {|k, v| v.empty? || v.nil?}
#=> Evaluation Error: Ruby NoMethodError: undefined method `empty?' for nil:NilClass
hash.reject {|k, v| v.nil? || v.empty?}
#=> {"john"=>["a", "b"], "megh"=>["b", "e"]}
I'm trying to count occurrences of unique values matching a regex pattern in a hash.
If there's three different values, multiple times, I want to know how much each value occurs.
This is the code I've developed to achieve that so far:
def trim(results)
open = []
results.map { |k, v| v }.each { |n| open << n.to_s.scan(/^closed/) }
puts open.size
end
For some reason, it returns the length of all the values, not just the ones I tried a match on. I've also tried using results.each_value, to no avail.
Another way:
hash = {a: 'foo', b: 'bar', c: 'baz', d: 'foo'}
hash.each_with_object(Hash.new(0)) {|(k,v),h| h[v]+=1 if v.start_with?('foo')}
#=> {"foo"=>2}
or
hash.each_with_object(Hash.new(0)) {|(k,v),h| h[v]+=1 if v =~ /^foo|bar/}
#=> {"foo"=>2, "bar"=>1}
Something like this?
hash = {a: 'foo', b: 'bar', c: 'baz', d: 'foo'}
groups = hash.group_by{ |k, v| v[/(?:foo|bar)/] }
# => {"foo"=>[[:a, "foo"], [:d, "foo"]],
# "bar"=>[[:b, "bar"]],
# nil=>[[:c, "baz"]]}
Notice that there is a nil key, which means the regex didn't match anything. We can get rid of it because we (probably) don't care. Or maybe you do care, in which case, don't get rid of it.
groups.delete(nil)
This counts the number of matching "hits":
groups.map{ |k, v| [k, v.size] }
# => [["foo", 2], ["bar", 1]]
group_by is a magical method and well worthy of learning.
def count(hash, pattern)
hash.each_with_object({}) do |(k, v), counts|
counts[k] = v.count{|s| s.to_s =~ pattern}
end
end
h = { a: ['open', 'closed'], b: ['closed'] }
count(h, /^closed/)
=> {:a=>1, :b=>1}
Does that work for you?
I think it worths to update for RUBY_VERSION #=> "2.7.0" which introduces Enumerable#tally:
h = {a: 'foo', b: 'bar', c: 'baz', d: 'foo'}
h.values.tally #=> {"foo"=>2, "bar"=>1, "baz"=>1}
h.values.tally.select{ |k, _| k=~ /^foo|bar/ } #=> {"foo"=>2, "bar"=>1}
I have this array of pairs:
[{"a"=>"1"}, {"b"=>"2"}, {"a"=>"3"}, {"b"=>"4"}, {"a"=>"5"}]
I would like a method to merge the keys in common with multiple values to:
[{"a"=>["1","3","5"]}, {"b"=>["2","4"]}]
Improved following Marc-Andre's suggestion.
array = [{"a"=>"1"}, {"b"=>"2"}, {"a"=>"3"}, {"b"=>"4"}, {"a"=>"5"}]
array.group_by(&:keys).map{|k, v| {k.first => v.flat_map(&:values)}}
Or
array.group_by{|h| h.keys.first}.each_value{|a| a.map!{|h| h.values.first}}
Haven't tried it yet, but something like that should also works
a.each_with_object( Hash.new{ |h,k| h[k] = [] } ) do |x, hash|
hash[x.keys.first] << x.values.first
end
edit: For a one liner, and the same output :
[a.each_with_object( Hash.new{ |h,k| h[k] = [] } ) { |x, hash| hash[x.keys.first] << x.values.first }]
A solution to your problem:
array.map(&:first).group_by(&:first).map{|k, v| {k => v.map(&:last)}}
I'm curious as to why you start and end with hashes containing only one key-pair. Arrays would be better suited. E.g.:
other = [["a", "1"], ["b", "2"], ["a", "3"], ["b", "4"], ["a", "5"]]
r = other.group_by(&:first).map{|k, v| [k => v.map(&:last)]}
r # => [["a", ["1", "3", "5"]], ["b", ["2", "4"]]]
Hash[r] # => {"a"=>["1", "3", "5"], "b"=>["2", "4"]}
array = [{"a"=>"1"}, {"b"=>"2"}, {"a"=>"3"}, {"b"=>"4"}, {"a"=>"5"}]
{}.tap{ |r| array.each{ |h| h.each{ |k,v| (r[k]||=[]) << v } } }
Not sure if you're giving out awards for brevity, but I like this way. The merge function with a block is ideally suited for this:
new = {}
array.each {|p| new.merge!(p) {|k,l,r| [l,r].flatten }}
We have the following datastructures:
{:a => ["val1", "val2"], :b => ["valb1", "valb2"], ...}
And I want to turn that into
[{:a => "val1", :b => "valb1"}, {:a => "val2", :b => "valb2"}, ...]
And then back into the first form. Anybody with a nice looking implementation?
This solution works with arbitrary numbers of values (val1, val2...valN):
{:a => ["val1", "val2"], :b => ["valb1", "valb2"]}.inject([]){|a, (k,vs)|
vs.each_with_index{|v,i| (a[i] ||= {})[k] = v}
a
}
# => [{:a=>"val1", :b=>"valb1"}, {:a=>"val2", :b=>"valb2"}]
[{:a=>"val1", :b=>"valb1"}, {:a=>"val2", :b=>"valb2"}].inject({}){|a, h|
h.each_pair{|k,v| (a[k] ||= []) << v}
a
}
# => {:a=>["val1", "val2"], :b=>["valb1", "valb2"]}
Using a functional approach (see Enumerable):
hs = h.values.transpose.map { |vs| h.keys.zip(vs).to_h }
#=> [{:a=>"val1", :b=>"valb1"}, {:a=>"val2", :b=>"valb2"}]
And back:
h_again = hs.first.keys.zip(hs.map(&:values).transpose).to_h
#=> {:a=>["val1", "val2"], :b=>["valb1", "valb2"]}
Let's look closely what the data structure we are trying to convert between:
#Format A
[
["val1", "val2"], :a
["valb1", "valb2"], :b
["valc1", "valc2"] :c
]
#Format B
[ :a :b :c
["val1", "valb1", "valc1"],
["val2", "valb2", "valc3"]
]
It is not diffculty to find Format B is the transpose of Format A in essential , then we can come up with this solution:
h={:a => ["vala1", "vala2"], :b => ["valb1", "valb2"], :c => ["valc1", "valc2"]}
sorted_keys = h.keys.sort_by {|a,b| a.to_s <=> b.to_s}
puts sorted_keys.inject([]) {|s,e| s << h[e]}.transpose.inject([]) {|r, a| r << Hash[*sorted_keys.zip(a).flatten]}.inspect
#[{:b=>"valb1", :c=>"valc1", :a=>"vala1"}, {:b=>"valb2", :c=>"valc2", :a=>"vala2"}]
m = {}
a,b = Array(h).transpose
b.transpose.map { |y| [a, y].transpose.inject(m) { |m,x| m.merge Hash[*x] }}
My attempt, perhaps slightly more compact.
h = { :a => ["val1", "val2"], :b => ["valb1", "valb2"] }
h.values.transpose.map { |s| Hash[h.keys.zip(s)] }
Should work in Ruby 1.9.3 or later.
Explanation:
First, 'combine' the corresponding values into 'rows'
h.values.transpose
# => [["val1", "valb1"], ["val2", "valb2"]]
Each iteration in the map block will produce one of these:
h.keys.zip(s)
# => [[:a, "val1"], [:b, "valb1"]]
and Hash[] will turn them into hashes:
Hash[h.keys.zip(s)]
# => {:a=>"val1", :b=>"valb1"} (for each iteration)
This will work assuming all the arrays in the original hash are the same size:
hash_array = hash.first[1].map { {} }
hash.each do |key,arr|
hash_array.zip(arr).each {|inner_hash, val| inner_hash[key] = val}
end
You could use inject to build an array of hashes.
hash = { :a => ["val1", "val2"], :b => ["valb1", "valb2"] }
array = hash.inject([]) do |pairs, pair|
pairs << { pair[0] => pair[1] }
pairs
end
array.inspect # => "[{:a=>["val1", "val2"]}, {:b=>["valb1", "valb2"]}]"
Ruby documentation has a few more examples of working with inject.
That is pretty easy with a plain hash like
{:a => "a", :b => "b"}
which would translate into
"a=a&b=b"
But what do you do with something more complex like
{:a => "a", :b => ["c", "d", "e"]}
which should translate into
"a=a&b[0]=c&b[1]=d&b[2]=e"
Or even worse, (what to do) with something like:
{:a => "a", :b => [{:c => "c", :d => "d"}, {:e => "e", :f => "f"}]
Thanks for the much appreciated help with that!
For basic, non-nested hashes, Rails/ActiveSupport has Object#to_query.
>> {:a => "a", :b => ["c", "d", "e"]}.to_query
=> "a=a&b%5B%5D=c&b%5B%5D=d&b%5B%5D=e"
>> CGI.unescape({:a => "a", :b => ["c", "d", "e"]}.to_query)
=> "a=a&b[]=c&b[]=d&b[]=e"
http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/Object.html#method-i-to_query
If you are using Ruby 1.9.2 or later, you can use URI.encode_www_form if you don't need arrays.
E.g. (from the Ruby docs in 1.9.3):
URI.encode_www_form([["q", "ruby"], ["lang", "en"]])
#=> "q=ruby&lang=en"
URI.encode_www_form("q" => "ruby", "lang" => "en")
#=> "q=ruby&lang=en"
URI.encode_www_form("q" => ["ruby", "perl"], "lang" => "en")
#=> "q=ruby&q=perl&lang=en"
URI.encode_www_form([["q", "ruby"], ["q", "perl"], ["lang", "en"]])
#=> "q=ruby&q=perl&lang=en"
You'll notice that array values are not set with key names containing [] like we've all become used to in query strings. The spec that encode_www_form uses is in accordance with the HTML5 definition of application/x-www-form-urlencoded data.
Update: This functionality was removed from the gem.
Julien, your self-answer is a good one, and I've shameless borrowed from it, but it doesn't properly escape reserved characters, and there are a few other edge cases where it breaks down.
require "addressable/uri"
uri = Addressable::URI.new
uri.query_values = {:a => "a", :b => ["c", "d", "e"]}
uri.query
# => "a=a&b[0]=c&b[1]=d&b[2]=e"
uri.query_values = {:a => "a", :b => [{:c => "c", :d => "d"}, {:e => "e", :f => "f"}]}
uri.query
# => "a=a&b[0][c]=c&b[0][d]=d&b[1][e]=e&b[1][f]=f"
uri.query_values = {:a => "a", :b => {:c => "c", :d => "d"}}
uri.query
# => "a=a&b[c]=c&b[d]=d"
uri.query_values = {:a => "a", :b => {:c => "c", :d => true}}
uri.query
# => "a=a&b[c]=c&b[d]"
uri.query_values = {:a => "a", :b => {:c => "c", :d => true}, :e => []}
uri.query
# => "a=a&b[c]=c&b[d]"
The gem is 'addressable'
gem install addressable
No need to load up the bloated ActiveSupport or roll your own, you can use Rack::Utils.build_query and Rack::Utils.build_nested_query. Here's a blog post that gives a good example:
require 'rack'
Rack::Utils.build_query(
authorization_token: "foo",
access_level: "moderator",
previous: "index"
)
# => "authorization_token=foo&access_level=moderator&previous=index"
It even handles arrays:
Rack::Utils.build_query( {:a => "a", :b => ["c", "d", "e"]} )
# => "a=a&b=c&b=d&b=e"
Rack::Utils.parse_query _
# => {"a"=>"a", "b"=>["c", "d", "e"]}
Or the more difficult nested stuff:
Rack::Utils.build_nested_query( {:a => "a", :b => [{:c => "c", :d => "d"}, {:e => "e", :f => "f"}] } )
# => "a=a&b[][c]=c&b[][d]=d&b[][e]=e&b[][f]=f"
Rack::Utils.parse_nested_query _
# => {"a"=>"a", "b"=>[{"c"=>"c", "d"=>"d", "e"=>"e", "f"=>"f"}]}
Here's a short and sweet one liner if you only need to support simple ASCII key/value query strings:
hash = {"foo" => "bar", "fooz" => 123}
# => {"foo"=>"bar", "fooz"=>123}
query_string = hash.to_a.map { |x| "#{x[0]}=#{x[1]}" }.join("&")
# => "foo=bar&fooz=123"
Steal from Merb:
# File merb/core_ext/hash.rb, line 87
def to_params
params = ''
stack = []
each do |k, v|
if v.is_a?(Hash)
stack << [k,v]
else
params << "#{k}=#{v}&"
end
end
stack.each do |parent, hash|
hash.each do |k, v|
if v.is_a?(Hash)
stack << ["#{parent}[#{k}]", v]
else
params << "#{parent}[#{k}]=#{v}&"
end
end
end
params.chop! # trailing &
params
end
See http://noobkit.com/show/ruby/gems/development/merb/hash/to_params.html
class Hash
def to_params
params = ''
stack = []
each do |k, v|
if v.is_a?(Hash)
stack << [k,v]
elsif v.is_a?(Array)
stack << [k,Hash.from_array(v)]
else
params << "#{k}=#{v}&"
end
end
stack.each do |parent, hash|
hash.each do |k, v|
if v.is_a?(Hash)
stack << ["#{parent}[#{k}]", v]
else
params << "#{parent}[#{k}]=#{v}&"
end
end
end
params.chop!
params
end
def self.from_array(array = [])
h = Hash.new
array.size.times do |t|
h[t] = array[t]
end
h
end
end
I know this is an old question, but I just wanted to post this bit of code as I could not find a simple gem to do just this task for me.
module QueryParams
def self.encode(value, key = nil)
case value
when Hash then value.map { |k,v| encode(v, append_key(key,k)) }.join('&')
when Array then value.map { |v| encode(v, "#{key}[]") }.join('&')
when nil then ''
else
"#{key}=#{CGI.escape(value.to_s)}"
end
end
private
def self.append_key(root_key, key)
root_key.nil? ? key : "#{root_key}[#{key.to_s}]"
end
end
Rolled up as gem here: https://github.com/simen/queryparams
{:a=>"a", :b=>"b", :c=>"c"}.map{ |x,v| "#{x}=#{v}" }.reduce{|x,v| "#{x}&#{v}" }
"a=a&b=b&c=c"
Here's another way. For simple queries.
The best approach it is to use Hash.to_params which is the one working fine with arrays.
{a: 1, b: [1,2,3]}.to_param
"a=1&b[]=1&b[]=2&b[]=3"
require 'uri'
class Hash
def to_query_hash(key)
reduce({}) do |h, (k, v)|
new_key = key.nil? ? k : "#{key}[#{k}]"
v = Hash[v.each_with_index.to_a.map(&:reverse)] if v.is_a?(Array)
if v.is_a?(Hash)
h.merge!(v.to_query_hash(new_key))
else
h[new_key] = v
end
h
end
end
def to_query(key = nil)
URI.encode_www_form(to_query_hash(key))
end
end
2.4.2 :019 > {:a => "a", :b => "b"}.to_query_hash(nil)
=> {:a=>"a", :b=>"b"}
2.4.2 :020 > {:a => "a", :b => "b"}.to_query
=> "a=a&b=b"
2.4.2 :021 > {:a => "a", :b => ["c", "d", "e"]}.to_query_hash(nil)
=> {:a=>"a", "b[0]"=>"c", "b[1]"=>"d", "b[2]"=>"e"}
2.4.2 :022 > {:a => "a", :b => ["c", "d", "e"]}.to_query
=> "a=a&b%5B0%5D=c&b%5B1%5D=d&b%5B2%5D=e"
If you are in the context of a Faraday request, you can also just pass the params hash as the second argument and faraday takes care of making proper param URL part out of it:
faraday_instance.get(url, params_hsh)
I like using this gem:
https://rubygems.org/gems/php_http_build_query
Sample usage:
puts PHP.http_build_query({"a"=>"b","c"=>"d","e"=>[{"hello"=>"world","bah"=>"black"},{"hello"=>"world","bah"=>"black"}]})
# a=b&c=d&e%5B0%5D%5Bbah%5D=black&e%5B0%5D%5Bhello%5D=world&e%5B1%5D%5Bbah%5D=black&e%5B1%5D%5Bhello%5D=world
2.6.3 :001 > hash = {:a => "a", :b => ["c", "d", "e"]}
=> {:a=>"a", :b=>["c", "d", "e"]}
2.6.3 :002 > hash.to_a.map { |x| "#{x[0]}=#{x[1].class == Array ? x[1].join(",") : x[1]}"
}.join("&")
=> "a=a&b=c,d,e"