Need draw a complex graph where will be 3 types of edges, and several predefined node-types.
Is possible somewhat define more (e.g. not only one default) "edge type" (or node-type) for the later use?
mean something like:
edge [colorscheme=paired12, color=8, fontsize=11, fontname="Arial narrow"];
edge2 [colorscheme=paired12, color=3, fontsize=11, fontname="Arial narrow", style=bold];
edge3 [colorscheme=paired12, color=5, fontsize=14, fontname="Arial narrow"];
node1 -> node2; /* will use the default edge definition from the above */
node2 -> node3 [edgetype=edge2]; /* will use the second edge definition */
node2 -> node4 [edgetype=edge3]; /* and so on... */
The above, ofc, is not correct - only for explanation...
Using gvpr is simple, if you figure out the basics:
input.dot
digraph test {
node1 -> node2[label="test 1"]; /* will use the default edge definition from the above */
node2 -> node3 [label="test 2", edgetype="edge2"]; /* will use the second edge definition */
node2 -> node4 [label="test 3", edgetype="edge3"]; /* and so on... */
}
filter.gvpr
E {
color="red";
fontsize=11;
fontname="Arial narrow"
}
E[edgetype == "edge2"] {
color="green";
fontsize=11;
fontname="Arial narrow";
style="bold"
}
E[edgetype == "edge3"] {
color="blue";
fontsize=14;
fontname="Arial narrow"
}
With command
gvpr -c -f filter.gvpr -o output.dot input.dot
will produce the output.dot file:
digraph test {
node1 -> node2 [color=red,
fontname="Arial narrow",
fontsize=11,
label="test 1"];
node2 -> node3 [color=green,
edgetype=edge2,
fontname="Arial narrow",
fontsize=11,
label="test 2",
style=bold];
node2 -> node4 [color=blue,
edgetype=edge3,
fontname="Arial narrow",
fontsize=14,
label="test 3"];
}
No, that is not possible.
I often group edge definitions by their type, and redefine the default before each group. For example:
// type 1 edges
edge [colorscheme=paired12, color=8, fontsize=11, fontname="Arial narrow"];
n1 -> n2;
n3 -> n4;
...
// type 2 edges
edge [colorscheme=paired12, color=3, fontsize=11, fontname="Arial narrow", style=bold];
n10 -> n11;
...
// type 3 edges
edge [colorscheme=paired12, color=5, fontsize=14, fontname="Arial narrow"];
...
An other - more complicated - possibility would be to use a tool like gvpr which lets you manipulate a graph, and add edge attributes at that moment.
Related
I have this graph:
digraph G{
rankdir = TB;
hyb[label="Hybrid calculation"];
k1[label=<k<SUB>1</SUB>>];
k2[label=<k<SUB>2</SUB>>];
kn[label=<k<SUB>n</SUB>>];
// subgraph cluster_k1q {
k1q1[label=<q<SUB>1</SUB>>];
k1q2[label=<q<SUB>2</SUB>>];
k1qn[label=<q<SUB>n</SUB>>];
graph[style=dotted];
{rank=same; k1q1;k1q2;k1qn}
// }
// subgraph cluster_k2q {
k2q1[label=<q<SUB>1</SUB>>];
k2q2[label=<q<SUB>2</SUB>>];
k2qm[label=<q<SUB>m</SUB>>];
graph[style=dotted];
{rank=same; k2q1;k2q2;k2qm}
// }
// subgraph cluster_knq {
knq1[label=<q<SUB>1</SUB>>];
knq2[label=<q<SUB>2</SUB>>];
knql[label=<q<SUB>l</SUB>>];
graph[style=dotted];
{rank=same; knq1;knq2;knql}
// }
hyb -> k1;
hyb -> k2;
hyb -> kn;
k1 -> k1q1;
k1 -> k1q2;
k1 -> k1qn;
k2 -> k2q1;
k2 -> k2q2;
k2 -> k2qm;
kn -> knq1;
kn -> knq2;
kn -> knql;
bands1 -> k1q2;
bands1 -> k2qm;
bands1 -> knq1
bands2 -> k1qn;
bands2 -> knq1;
bands3 -> knql;
bands3 -> k1q1;
{edge[ style=invis];
k1->k2->kn;
k1q1->k1q2->k1qn->k2q1->k2q2->k2qm->knq1->knq2->knql;
}
{ rank=min; hyb}
{ rank=same; k1;k2;kn}
{ rank=same; k1q1;k1q2;k1qn;k2q1;k2q1;k2qm;knq1;knq2;knql}
{ rank=max; bands1;bands2;bands3}
}
Resulting in this graph:
All the ks are on one level, all the qs are one level and so are the bands. Then I would like to draw some boxes around the qs using clusters. So if I uncomment the subgraph in above code I have to comment this line:
{ rank=same; k1q1;k1q2;k1qn;k2q1;k2q1;k2qm;knq1;knq2;knql}
and I get:
Here the bands get thrown in same level with the qs. How can I get the levels from the top graph with the nice boxes from the bottom graph?
add this: newrank=true
See: https://graphviz.org/docs/attrs/newrank/
(you could also probably accomplish it by changing the direction of the bandX->qY edges, like so: k1q2->bands1 [dir=back])
In the following example, the nodes in the subgraphs are ordered from the bottom to the top instead of from top to bottom. How can that be reversed, so that the start is top-left and the nodes in the subgraphs are ordered from top to bottom (A1-A4 and B1-B4)?
digraph ab
{
rankdir=LR
splines=ortho
ranksep=1
node[shape = record]
subgraph cluster_0
{
label="A"
{
rank = "same"
state0_anchor [label="", style=invis, width=0]
state0_step0 [label="A1"]
state0_step1 [label="A2"]
state0_step2 [label="A3"]
state0_step3 [label="A4"]
}
state0_anchor->state0_step0[style = invis]
state0_step0 -> state0_step1 -> state0_step2 -> state0_step3
}
state0_step3 -> state0_step0 [constraint=false]
state0_step3 -> state1_step0 [constraint=false]
subgraph cluster_state1
{
label="B"
{
rank = "same"
state1_anchor [label="", style=invis, width=0, height=0]
state1_step0 [label="B1"]
state1_step1 [label="B2"]
state1_step2 [label="B3"]
state1_step3 [label="B4"]
}
state1_anchor->state1_step0[style = invis]
state1_step0 -> state1_step1 -> state1_step2 -> state1_step3
}
state1_step3 -> state0_step0 [constraint=false]
state0_anchor -> state1_anchor[style = invis]
start -> state0_step0
}
In your example, when direction of the edges within the subgraphs are reversed, the nodes will be ordered the way you'd like. Something like this:
state0_step3 -> state0_step2 [dir=rev]
state0_step2 -> state0_step1 [dir=rev]
state0_step1 -> state0_step0 [dir=rev]
state0_step0 -> state0_anchor [style = invis]
The same for state1-nodes.
Details about transformations when going LR can be found in https://stackoverflow.com/a/9592856/63733
I'm trying to get the following dot file to output two subgraphs. I want the bLoop node in cluster0 to align with the ISR struct in cluster 2. I'm using an invisible node to do this now, but with the unintended consequence of lot of gray space left in cluster0.
Is there a way to do what I want without the invisible node?
I can't post images yet, so here's the link.
digraph G {
ranksep=.75;
nodesep = 1.5;
node [shape = none]
node[fontsize=16,fixedsize=false,width=0.7,shape=rectangle];
edge[fontsize=16];
ratio=fill;
splines=false;
compound=true;
subgraph cluster0 {
node [style=filled];
style=filled;
color=lightgrey;
label = "Setup and Background Loop";
a0[label = "Peripheral Configs"];
a1[label = "Solar Library Block Configs"];
a2[label = "Enable Interrupts"];
bgLoop[label = "Start Background Loop"];
e0[shape=rectangle, style=invis, fixedsize=true, width=.01];
a0 -> a1 -> a2 -> bgLoop;
bgLoop ->e0[style=invis]
}
subgraph cluster1 {
node [style=filled, shape = "doublecircle"];
start
style="invis"
}
subgraph cluster2 {
node [shape=record,color=white];
style=filled;
color=lightgrey;
label = "ISRs";
struct1 [shape = record, color=white, label="{<f1> Slow ISR | <f2> Fast ISR }"];
}
concentrate = true;
struct1 -> bgLoop[lhead=cluster0, ltail=cluster4, constraint=true];
bgLoop -> struct1[lhead=cluster4, ltail=cluster0, constraint=true];
struct1 -> e0[style=invis, constraint=true];
start -> a0[lhead=cluster0];
}
you need helper nodes to get the correct rank for struct1.
digraph G {
ranksep=.75;
nodesep = 1.5;
node[fontsize=16,fixedsize=false,width=0.7,shape=rectangle];
edge[fontsize=16];
compound=true
subgraph cluster2 { rank="max"
node [shape=record,color=white];
style=filled;
color=lightgrey;
label = "ISRs";
struct1 [shape = record, color=white, label="{<f1> Slow ISR | <f2> Fast ISR }"];
}
subgraph cluster0 {
node [style=filled];
style=filled;
color=lightgrey;
label = "Setup and Background Loop";
a0[label = "Peripheral Configs"];
a1[label = "Solar Library Block Configs"];
a2[label = "Enable Interrupts"];
bgLoop[label = "Start Background Loop"];
a0 -> a1 -> a2 -> bgLoop;
}
subgraph cluster1 {
node [style=filled, shape = "doublecircle"];
start
style="invis"
}
{node [style=invis]; 0; 1; 2; 3; }
{edge [style=invis]; 0->1->2->3->struct1; }
struct1 -> bgLoop[lhead=cluster0, ltail=cluster2, constraint=false];
bgLoop -> struct1[lhead=cluster2, ltail=cluster0, constraint=false];
start -> a0[lhead=cluster0];
}
The diagram below is laid out almost perfectly, apart from the edge from the left "named pipe" node to "cat", which takes a long circuitous route, instead of the obvious short one I've marked with red on the diagram below. Is there a way to direct dot to use the short edge path? Note that the sequence diagram on the diagram's bottom, must be rendered as it currently appears, i.e. in the left to right order.
This is the code that draws the diagram.
digraph D {
fontname="Arial";
subgraph cluster_async {
label="Asynchronous processes";
style=filled;
color=lightgrey;
node [shape=box, style=solid, fillcolor=white, fontname="Arial"];
{
rank=same;
npi_0_0_0 [label="named\npipe"];
npi_0_3_0 [label="named\npipe"];
npi_0_2_0 [label="named\npipe"];
}
node [shape=box, style=bold];
tee [label="sgsh-tee"];
"ls -l" -> tee;
tee -> npi_0_0_0;
tee -> npi_0_3_0;
tee -> npi_0_2_0;
NBYTES [label="sgsh-writeval -s NBYTES"];
npi_0_3_0 -> "awk '{s += $5} END {print s}'" -> NBYTES;
NDIRS [label="sgsh-writeval -s NDIRS"];
npi_0_2_0 -> "grep -c '^d'" -> NDIRS;
// Put some order in the appearance
{
rank=same;
NDIRS;
NBYTES;
}
}
subgraph clustersync {
label="Synchronous sequence";
style=dashed;
start [shape=circle, style=filled, label="", fillcolor=black, width=.2];
node [shape=box, style=bold, fontname="Arial"];
npi_0_0_0:sw -> cat:nw [constraint=false];
"sgsh-readval -s NDIRS" -> echo;
"sgsh-readval -s NBYTES" -> echo;
NBYTES -> "sgsh-readval -s NBYTES";
NDIRS -> "sgsh-readval -s NDIRS";
end [shape=doublecircle, style=filled, label="", fillcolor=black, width=.2];
{
rank=same;
edge [arrowhead=open];
start -> cat -> echo -> end;
}
}
}
(In case you're interested, the diagram illustrates the setup of an example from sgsh.)
For this graph, setting splines=ortho will produce a desirable result.
I am drawing a graph with graphviz. Even though I have penwidth=0 for the nodes, I still see the node boundary. How do I get rid of the node boundary?
My annotation in dot is something like this:
strict graph {
graph [bgcolor=white];
0 [fillcolor=red,
style=filled,
shape=octagon,
penwidht=0,
fontsize=10,
fixedsize=True,
width=0.5,
height=0.5,
type=3];
2 [shape=octagon,
style=filled,
fillcolor=gray,
penwidth=0];
0 -- 2 [penwidth=0.5,
color=gray];
}
This works for me:
node [shape=plaintext]
Source: https://renenyffenegger.ch/notes/tools/Graphviz/examples/index
The issue is you have a typo.
penwidht should be penwidth
strict graph {
graph [bgcolor=white];
0 [fillcolor=red,
style=filled,
shape=octagon,
penwidth=0,
fontsize=10,
fixedsize=True,
width=0.5,
height=0.5,
type=3];
2 [shape=octagon,
style=filled,
fillcolor=gray,
penwidth=0];
0 -- 2 [penwidth=0.5,
color=gray];
}
setlinewidth works for me:
strict graph {
graph [bgcolor=white];
0 [fillcolor=red,
style="filled,setlinewidth(0)",
shape=octagon,
penwidht=0,
fontsize=10,
fixedsize=True,
width=0.5,
height=0.5,
type=3];
2 [shape=octagon,
style=filled,
fillcolor=gray,
penwidth=0];
0 -- 2 [penwidth=0.5,
color=gray];
}