My code is working nicelly but I would like to know if you can suggest something more performatic to get the values frm my dynamic controls.
public class Obj
{
public int ID { get; set; }
public int Quantity { get; set; }
public List<int> getValues (List<Obj> myList)
{
List<Obj> listQuatity = new List<Obj>();
foreach (Obj item in myList)
{
listQuatity.Add(new Obj
{
ID = item.ID,
Quantity = Request.Params["codControl" + item.ID].Trim().Equals("")
? 0
: Convert.ToInt32(Request.Params["codControl" + item.ID])
});
}
}
}
There is no much space for optimization, your loop is pretty simple and straightforward.
One thing I would improve - caching of the Request.Param value instead accessing it twice:
(This could be rewritten using LINQ so would look more elegant but it would not be faster)
public List<int> getValues(List<Obj> myList)
{
List<Obj> listQuatity = new List<Obj>();
foreach (Obj item in myList)
{
// access it once so code would be slightly faster
// but much clear
var requestParam = Request.Params["codControl" + item.ID].Trim();
listQuatity.Add(new Obj
{
ID = item.ID,
Quantity = requestParam.Equals(String.Empty)
? 0
: Convert.ToInt32(requestParam)
});
}
}
Let's see how LINQ query would look:
List<Obj> listQuatity =
myList.Select(i => new {
Id = i.ID,
Param = Request.Params["codControl" + item.ID].Trim(),
})
.Select(i => new Obj {
ID = i.Id,
Quantity = Param.Equals(String.Empty)
? 0
: Convert.ToInt32(i.Param)
})
.ToList();
Related
Thanks in advance. I can get required output when using var but i want to get required output by using Distinct in List<>.
InventoryDetails.cs
public class InventoryDetails
{
public int? PersonalInventoryGroupId { get; set; }
public int? PersonalInventoryBinId { get; set; }
}
InventoryController.cs
[HttpGet("GetInventory")]
public IActionResult GetInventory(int id)
{
//Below code will return distinct record
var inventory = (from i in _context.TempTbl
where i.TempId == id
select new
{
PersonalInventoryBinId = i.PersonalInventoryBinId,
PersonalInventoryGroupId = i.PersonalInventoryGroupId,
}).ToList().Distinct().ToList();
//Below code is not doing distinct
List<InventoryDetails> inventory = (from i in _context.TempTbl
where i.TempId == id
select new InventoryDetails
{
PersonalInventoryBinId = i.PersonalInventoryBinId,
PersonalInventoryGroupId = i.PersonalInventoryGroupId,
}).ToList().Distinct().ToList();
}
If i use var as return type, then i am able to get distinct records. Could some one assist it.
Please try like this it may help.
IList<InventoryDetails> inventory = _context.InventoryDetails.Where(x=>x.TempId == id).GroupBy(p => new {p.PersonalInventoryGroupId, p.PersonalInventoryBinId } )
.Select(g => g.First())
.ToList();
You need to override Equals and GetHashCode.
First, let's see the AnonymousType vs InventoryDetails
var AnonymousTypeObj1 = new { PersonalInventoryGroupId = 1, PersonalInventoryBinId = 1 };
var AnonymousTypeObj2 = new { PersonalInventoryGroupId = 1, PersonalInventoryBinId = 1 };
Console.WriteLine(AnonymousTypeObj1.Equals(AnonymousTypeObj2)); // True
var InventoryDetailsObj1 = new InventoryDetails { PersonalInventoryBinId = 1, PersonalInventoryGroupId = 1 };
var InvertoryDetailsObj2 = new InventoryDetails { PersonalInventoryBinId = 1, PersonalInventoryGroupId = 1 };
Console.WriteLine(InventoryDetailsObj1.Equals(InvertoryDetailsObj2)); // False
You can see the Equals behave differently which make Distinct behave differently. The problem is not var you mentioned in your question but AnonoymizeType
To make Distinct works as you expect, you need to override Equals and GetHashCode
public class InventoryDetails
{
public int? PersonalInventoryGroupId { get; set; }
public int? PersonalInventoryBinId { get; set; }
public override bool Equals(object obj)
{
if (obj == null) return false;
if (obj is InventoryDetails)
{
if (PersonalInventoryGroupId == (obj as InventoryDetails).PersonalInventoryGroupId
&& PersonalInventoryBinId == (obj as InventoryDetails).PersonalInventoryBinId)
return true;
}
return false;
}
public override int GetHashCode()
{
int hash = 17;
hash = hash * 23 + PersonalInventoryBinId.GetHashCode();
hash = hash * 23 + PersonalInventoryGroupId.GetHashCode();
return hash;
}
}
Another approach would be
List<InventoryDetails> inventory = (from i in TempTbl
where i.TempId == id
select new InventoryDetails
{
PersonalInventoryBinId = i.PersonalInventoryBinId,
PersonalInventoryGroupId = i.PersonalInventoryGroupId,
}).AsQueryable().ToList().Distinct(new customComparer()).ToList();
public class customComparer:IEqualityComparer<InventoryDetails>
{
public bool Equals(InventoryDetails x, InventoryDetails y)
{
if (x.TempId == y.TempId && x.PersonalInventoryBinId == y.PersonalInventoryBinId
&& x.PersonalInventoryGroupId == y.PersonalInventoryGroupId)
{
return true;
}
return false;
}
public int GetHashCode(InventoryDetails obj)
{
return string.Concat(obj.PersonalInventoryBinId.ToString(),
obj.PersonalInventoryGroupId.ToString(),
obj.TempId.ToString()).GetHashCode();
}
}
As said in a comment by Ivan, you make your life difficult by calling ToList before Distinct. This prevents the SQL provider from incorporating the Distinct call into the generated SQL statement. But that leaves the question: what causes the difference?
The first query generates anonymous type instances. As per the C# specification, by default anonymous types (in C#) are equal when their properties and property values are equal (structural equality). Conversely, by default, reference types (like InventoryDetails) are equal when their reference (say memory address) is equal (reference equality or identity). They can be made equal by overriding their Equals and GetHashcode methods, as some people suggested to do.
But that's not necessary if you remove the first ToList():
var inventory = (from i in _context.TempTbl
where i.TempId == id
select new InventoryDetails
{
PersonalInventoryBinId = i.PersonalInventoryBinId,
PersonalInventoryGroupId = i.PersonalInventoryGroupId,
}).Distinct().ToList();
Now the whole statement until ToList() is an IQueryable that can be translated into SQL. The SQL is executed and the database returns a distinct result set of raw records from which EF materializes InventoryDetails objects. The C# runtime code was even never aware of duplicates!
Lets say I have a list of asteroid objects like so:
9_Amphitrite
24_Themis
259_Aletheia
31_Euphrosyne
511_Davida
87_Sylvia
9_Metis
41_Daphne
Each asteroid has a title, a StartRoationPeriod, and a EndRoationPeriod.
I need to concatenate their names based on how close the current asteroid StartRoationPeriod and previous asteroid EndRoationPeriod are to an orbital constant and then spit out the concatenated title.
So with the above list, the final objects may look like this:
9_Amphitrite
24_Themis;259_Aletheia
31_Euphrosyne;511_Davida;87_Sylvia
9_Metis
41_Daphne
This requires me to keep track of both the current and previous asteroids.
I started to write the loop, but I'm unsure of where or even how to check the current asteroids start rotation period against the previous asteroids end rotation period...basically, it just gets messy fast...
string asteroid_title = string.Empty;
Asteroid prev_asteroid = null;
foreach (var asteroid in SolarSystem)
{
if (prev_asteroid != null)
{
if (asteroid.StartRoationPeriod + OrbitalConstant >= prev_asteroid.EndRoationPeriod)
{
asteroid_title = asteroid_title + asteroid.Title;
} else {
asteroid_title = asteroid.Title;
yield return CreateTitle();
}
}
prev_evt = evt;
}
I think this should work for you (If aggregate looks too complex try to convert it to a foreach,it's easy)
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
namespace Program
{
class Asteroid
{
public int EndRoationPeriod { get; internal set; }
public string Name { get; internal set; }
public int StartRoationPeriod { get; internal set; }
}
class AsteroidGroup
{
public int EndRoationPeriod { get; internal set; }
public string Names { get; internal set; }
}
internal class Program
{
private static void Main(string[] args)
{
int OrbitalConstant = 10;
List<Asteroid> SolarSystem = new List<Asteroid>()
{
new Asteroid() { Name= "9_Amphitrite" ,StartRoationPeriod=10 ,EndRoationPeriod=50},
new Asteroid() { Name= "24_Themis" ,StartRoationPeriod=45,EndRoationPeriod=100},
new Asteroid() { Name= "259_Aletheia",StartRoationPeriod=40 ,EndRoationPeriod=150},
new Asteroid() { Name= "31_Euphrosyne" ,StartRoationPeriod=60,EndRoationPeriod=200},
new Asteroid() { Name= "511_Davida" ,StartRoationPeriod=195,EndRoationPeriod=250},
new Asteroid() { Name= "87_Sylvia" ,StartRoationPeriod=90,EndRoationPeriod=300},
new Asteroid() { Name= "9_Metis" ,StartRoationPeriod=100,EndRoationPeriod=350},
new Asteroid() { Name= "41_Daphne" ,StartRoationPeriod=110,EndRoationPeriod=400},
};
var result = //I skip the first element because I initialize a new list with that element in the next step
SolarSystem.Skip(1)
//The first argument of Aggregate is a new List with your first element
.Aggregate(new List<AsteroidGroup>() { new AsteroidGroup { Names = SolarSystem[0].Name, EndRoationPeriod = SolarSystem[0].EndRoationPeriod } },
//foreach item in your list this method is called,l=your list and a=the current element
//the method must return a list
(l, a) =>
{
//Now this is your algorithm
//Should be easy to undrestand
var last = l.LastOrDefault();
if (a.StartRoationPeriod + OrbitalConstant >= last.EndRoationPeriod)
{
last.Names += " " + a.Name;
last.EndRoationPeriod = a.EndRoationPeriod;
}
else
l.Add(new AsteroidGroup { Names = a.Name, EndRoationPeriod = a.EndRoationPeriod });
//Return the updated list so it can be used in the next iteration
return l;
});
A more compact solution
var result = SolarSystem
.Skip(1)
.Aggregate( SolarSystem.Take(1).ToList(),
(l, a) => (a.StartRoationPeriod + OrbitalConstant >= l[l.Count - 1].EndRoationPeriod) ?
(l.Take(l.Count - 1)).Concat(new List<Asteroid> { new Asteroid() { Name = l[l.Count - 1].Name += " " + a.Name, EndRoationPeriod = a.EndRoationPeriod } }).ToList() :
l.Concat(new List<Asteroid> { a }).ToList()
);
I am having a difficult time finding a proper Linq query to utilize the group output.
I want to populate an existing students List where Student class has 2 properties ID and and int[] Repeats array (can be a list too) to keep how many times they took any of the 4 lectures (L101,L201,L202,L203). So if student takes L101 twice, L202 and L203 once, and but didn't take L201 this should be {2,0,1,1,}
class Student{
public string ID{get;set;}
public int[] Repeats{get;set;} //int[0]->L101, int[1]->L201...
}
In my main class I do this basic operation for this task:
foreach (var student in students)
{
var countL101 = from s in rawData
where student.Id==s.Id & s.Lecture =="L101"
select; //do for each lecture
student.Repeats = new int[4];
student.Repeats[0] = countL101.Count(); //do for each lecture
}
This works; but I wonder how do you make it practically using Linq in case where there are 100s of lectures?
I am using Lamba Expressions rather than query syntax. Then assuming rawData is IEnumerable<T> where T looks something like...
class DataRow
{
/// <summary>
/// Id of Student taking lecture
/// </summary>
public string Id { get; set; }
public string Lecture { get; set;}
}
Then you could do something like...
var lectures = rawData.Select(x => x.Lecture).Distinct().ToList();
int i = 0;
lectures.ForEach(l =>
{
students.ForEach(s =>
{
if (s.Repeats == null)
s.Repeats = new int[lectures.Count];
s.Repeats[i] = rawData.Count(x => x.Id == s.Id && x.Lecture == l);
});
i++;
});
Now if Repeats could just be of type IList<int> instead of int[] then...
var lectures = rawData.Select(x => x.Lecture).Distinct().ToList();
lectures.ForEach(l =>
{
students.ForEach(s =>
{
if (s.Repeats == null)
s.Repeats = new List<int>();
s.Repeats.Add(rawData.Count(x => x.Id == s.Id && x.Lecture == l));
});
});
Things are further simplified if Repeats could just be instantiated to a new List<int> in the Student constructor...
class Student
{
public Student()
{
Repeats = new List<int>();
}
public string Id { get; set; }
public IList<int> Repeats { get; private set; }
}
Then you can do it in one line...
rawData.Select(x => x.Lecture).Distinct().ToList()
.ForEach(l =>
{
students.ForEach(s =>
{
s.Repeats.Add(rawData.Count(x => x.Id == s.Id && x.Lecture == l));
});
});
I am performing a select query using the following Linq expression:
Table<Tbl_Movement> movements = context.Tbl_Movement;
var query = from m in movements
select new MovementSummary
{
Id = m.DocketId,
Created = m.DateTimeStamp,
CreatedBy = m.Tbl_User.FullName,
DocketNumber = m.DocketNumber,
DocketTypeDescription = m.Ref_DocketType.DocketType,
DocketTypeId = m.DocketTypeId,
Site = new Site()
{
Id = m.Tbl_Site.SiteId,
FirstLine = m.Tbl_Site.FirstLine,
Postcode = m.Tbl_Site.Postcode,
SiteName = m.Tbl_Site.SiteName,
TownCity = m.Tbl_Site.TownCity,
Brewery = new Brewery()
{
Id = m.Tbl_Site.Ref_Brewery.BreweryId,
BreweryName = m.Tbl_Site.Ref_Brewery.BreweryName
},
Region = new Region()
{
Description = m.Tbl_Site.Ref_Region.Description,
Id = m.Tbl_Site.Ref_Region.RegionId
}
}
};
I am also passing in an IFilter class into the method where this select is performed.
public interface IJobFilter
{
int? PersonId { get; set; }
int? RegionId { get; set; }
int? SiteId { get; set; }
int? AssetId { get; set; }
}
How do I add these where parameters into my SQL expression? Preferably I'd like this done in another method as the filtering will be re-used across multiple repositories.
Unfortunately when I do query.Where it has become an IQueryable<MovementSummary>. I'm assuming it has become this as I'm returning an IEnumerable<MovementSummary>. I've only just started learning LINQ, so be gentle.
Answer:
private IQueryable<Tbl_Docket> BuildQuery(IQueryable<Tbl_Docket> movements, IMovementFilter filter)
{
if (filter != null)
{
if (filter.PersonId.HasValue) movements = movements.Where(m => m.UserId == filter.PersonId);
if (filter.SiteId.HasValue) ...
}
return movements;
}
Which is called like follows:
var query = from m in this.BuildQuery(movements, filter)
select new... {}
You have to call the where statement before you fire your select statement, e.g.:
IQueryable<Tbl_Movement> movements = context.Tbl_Movement;
if (filter != null)
{
if (filter.PersonId != null) movements = movements.Where(m => m....PersonId == filter.PersonId);
if (filter.RegionId != null) movements = movements.Where(m => m....RegionId == filter.RegionId);
if (filter.SiteId != null) movements = movements.Where(m => m...SiteId == filter.SiteId);
if (filter.AssetId != null) movements = movements.Where(m => m...AssetId == filter.AssetId);
}
var query = m from movements...
As opposed to using this IFilter class, you might want to consider a Fluent Pipe-based Repository structure, e.g.:
var movements = new MovementsPipe()
.FindSiteId(1)
.FindAssetIds(1, 2, 3)
.FindRegionId(m => m > 10)
.ToMovementSummaryList();
Hope this helps. Let me know if you have any questions.
If you have a simple Linq query like:
var result = from record in db.Customer
select new { Text = record.Name,
Value = record.ID.ToString() };
which is returning an object that can be mapped to a Drop Down List, is it possible to dynamically specify which fields map to Text and Value?
Of course, you could do a big case (switch) statement, then code each Linq query separately but this isn't very elegant. What would be nice would be something like:
(pseudo code)
var myTextField = db.Customer["Name"]; // Could be an enumeration??
var myValueField = db.Customer["ID"]; // Idea: choose the field outside the query
var result = from record in db.Customer
select new { Text = myTextField,
Value = myValueField };
Right way to do this is with closures.
Func<Customer, string> myTextField = (Customer c) => c["Name"];
Func<Customer, int> myValueField = (Customer c) => c["ID"];
var result = from record in db.Customer
select new { Text = myTextField(record),
Value = myValueField(record) };
The one limitation is that your definition of myTextField always needs to return a string.
You could try something like
class Customer
{
public int ID { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public string Surname { get; set; }
}
var dict = new Dictionary<string, Func<Customer, string>>
{ { "ID", (Customer c) => c.ID.ToString() },
{ "Name", (Customer c) => c.Name},
{ "Surname", (Customer c) => c.Surname } };
List<Customer> rows = new List<Customer>();
rows.Add(new Customer { ID = 1, Name = "Foo", Surname = "Bar"});
var list = from r in rows
select new { Text = dict["ID"](r), Value = dict["Name"](r) };
To try to access the properties dynamically, you could try something like
var dict = new Dictionary<string, Func<Customer, string>>
{ { "ID", (Customer c) => c.GetType().GetProperty("ID").GetValue(c,null).ToString() },
{ "Name", (Customer c) => c.GetType().GetProperty("Name").GetValue(c,null).ToString()},
{ "Surname", (Customer c) => c.GetType().GetProperty("Surname").GetValue(c,null).ToString() } };