If any one has got an explanation for why does flickering occur on a UI (for windows form) when it incorporates more sub controls (like, data grid's, images etc).
Thanks in advance.
Flickering is usually a problem that has to do with intensive graphics operations or custom draws. The best way to solve it is to make the flickering controls double buffered. Since you don't give us much to go by, that would be an obvious first choice. You could also manually invalidate controls triggered by certain events.
Here's an article that should get you started:
Double Buffering Windows Forms
Related
I already tried multiple ways of rendering simple animations on winapi windows using wingdi, and realized that its fairly slow even for primitive animations, and inconsistent if i do it by spamming SendMessageW when there are no events for this window. So I thought that instead of rendering when I can i should schedule it with a fixed interval hence improving framerate and quality of the animation. I now wondering if this can be done with registering some callback with windows or there is no such functionality and i do have to spin another thread to function as a timer? Is it generally a better idea? What is the commonly accepted way to do things like this, when event triggered redraws just wont cut it?
Concerning the scheduled animations, there is SetTimer() and KillTimer(), if I remember their names correctly. In any case, "timer" is what you're looking for.
Concerning the painting in the timer callbacks, don't. Instead, adjust animation parameters (positions, colours etc) and trigger a redraw using InvalidateRect(). This will in turn invoke the regular drawing event handler. The difference is that this will not waste any CPU if your window is hidden or minimized. Also, in any case, when the window is un-hidden, the drawing event handler has to be able to draw the right window content anyway.
There is a derived version of this where you update an image in a memory DC and only blit to the window in the drawing event handler. It's unclear whether that is necessary in your case though. It's only when drawing takes an extended amount of time and you want to keep your UI responsive.
Well as my luck usually goes i found this article on MSDN, and it has a very nice example. Putting it here if someone will have same question
I'm experimenting with creating a metro style app with Visual Studio 2012, I am not the most experienced designer but one thing with my applications is confusing me.
I have been working with 'basic pages' instead of blank ones for the different pages in my application for design consistency, however it seems that these 'basic pages' have a strange behaviour. Every item I place on the page (buttons, text boxes, etc) will all slide in one by one when the page opens. For example if I run the application and navigate to a page with 10 buttons, it will do a brief animation where each button will slide in from the right side to the left side. When dealing with a large number of items on one page this can take a lot of time as each item slides in seperatley.
Looking at the properties for each item I have been able to change the direction it slides in while loading the page by changing the flow direction. Also with a bit of research I am thinking it could potentially be due to either the metro style 'enterPage' or 'enterContent' animations, though I can not be certain.
I have tried to experiment and figure this out, and search to find out what causes this so I can modify it (Ideally I would like to just group items together to slide in with each other) however it's kind of a difficult thing to search with vague words, so I'm asking here.
What is causing this and how might I go about modifying it?
EnterPage shouldn't be sequencing the animations. They do offset some of the animations of a number of elements, but it shouldn't be each one sequentially.
Are you using WinJS navigation?
Well after a bit of experimentation I figured out that putting all my page content inside a grid made them all come in at once like I wanted. I probably should have tried that earlier but everything was already inside an outer grid for the page, so I thought that woulda handled it.
I don't quite understand it fully, but that works for now.
I am working with flex for the last two years on some desktop apps. Until now I never had any performance related issues but today as we completed a mobile application for the iPad, I'm facing a challenge, the application is incredibly slow on the iPad.
http://i.stack.imgur.com/qkbWn.png
Slow, means that when I press a button in the menu to change the splitview I must wait something like 5s. Then scrolling is really slow two, with less than one fps and my TextInput starts to bug (the text is not in his box anymore).
I started to read a lot of blog post and presentation about optimisation for the mobile platform and then I rewrite some of the components I use. I removed the SkinnableContainer for instance and replaced it by a VGroup including some actionScript based drawing.
Now what you see is a VGroup (the dark grey one) containing some others VGroup (the group with title here) and then each widget is an HGroup with a label and a Widget. I only use Label and TextInput for the text.
Creation time is slow even (several seconds to create the view) for another page where there is only 4 text widget on it, or another one with only a list with a custom item renderer where each row is a set of 4 labels.
The whole things is cabled with RobotLegs, with nothing fancy, one models is injected in the view and at the beginning I set a member variable on the view with this object to bind my variables.
Frankly my thinking right now is : it smells fishy because if I've done everything right it is impossible to have such low performance and thinks that flex is competitive on the mobile platform. So right now I'm trying to disable the application piece by piece to try to locate what could slow it like that. I've got a couple suspects to check, for instance I've got some binding warning to check, and then see if robotlegs has got its share of the problem.
So my main question here is what do you think, and could you have some ideas about "is there a problem" and "how do we solve it".
Thanks
Run profiler for startup and separatelly for each operation that takes longed that it needs. Then prioritize the problems and try to solve them with basic optimization techniques.
Some problems you will not be able to solve fast - e.g. time for creating big components. The only option there is to rewrite those components with AS3 without MXML, styles and anything. I'm sure that flash.text.TextField is created many times faster than mx.controls.Label. The same for other components.
When component is created, it can be reused at a very low price. In your app there must be a lot of places where you recreate while you can reuse old components. It will save you memory and time.
Layouts tend to redraw even when it's not needed. If you have a lot of nested layouts, find the most critical places and replace a series of layouts with one custom layout or even component.
This all is very developer time consuming. At the end you will not get a smooth app anyway, but I believe that it can become usable.
Usually, when a View requires a lot of bindings, or some UI Elements like a Bing Map, it takes a "while" to load (like between half a second and a second).
I don't want a delay between a "tap" action (like tapping an element on a ListBox) and the navigation action (displaying a new page).
I don't mind displaying the page progressively. For example, for a Bing Map, I don't mind displaying a black page with only a title, and a second later, having the Map appear.
What are the best practices ? It could post a sample if i'm not clear enough
edit: I'll keep the question open for a while, so other can answer. Thanks Matt and Mick for awesome answers. I'm already working on some improvements. The major one being binding my controls after the page loaded.
It's expected on resource constrained devices that non trivial actions will take at least a little time to execute.
The most commonly recommended best practice for dealing with this is to use animations to give the user the impression of perceived performance. This has been a recurring recommendation throughout the CTP and Beta phases by the product team and in presentations at Mix 10 and Tech Ed 2010.
Page transitions are a common approach to this.
Discussed here by Kevin Marshall, prior to inclusion in the November toolkit.
WP7 – Page Transitions Sample
And here, referencing the control in the toolkit.
Transitions for Windows Phone 7
There are also a number of very basic optimisations you can do that will give you some bang for a little effort.
don't name controls that you don't reference in code
use background worker to load any data to avoid impact the UI thread (already busy loading your page) and fire this off after the page is loaded (disable any controls not usable in leui of this) (Phạm Tiểu Giao - Threads in WP7)
use httpwebrequest over webclient for the same reason (WebClient, HttpWebRequest and the UI Thread on Windows Phone 7)
I would also reiterate Matt's suggestion for not loading controls that aren't used initially.
If you decide to go the extra mile, there is more you can do to optimise page loading. These two posts are worth absorbing in that regard.
Creating High Performing Silverlight Applications for Windows Phone
WP7 Development Tips Part 1 - Kevin Marshall's Epic Work Blog for Awesome People
If using Listboxes, also familiarise with Oren Nachman and David Anson's
WP7 Silverlight Perf Demo 1: VirtualizingStackPanel vs. StackPanel as a ListBox ItemsPanel
Keep a low profile LowProfileImageLoader helps the Windows Phone 7 UI thread stay responsive by loading images in the background
Never do today what you can put off till tomorrow DeferredLoadListBox (and StackPanel) help Windows Phone 7 lists scroll smoothly and consistently
and be sure image sizes are optimised for their display size.
My suggestions/recommendations:
Create and navigate to the new page as quickly as possible.
Display the page with placeholder content while it loads (if appropriate).
Give an indication that something is happening while the page loads. An indeterminate progress bar (use this one) is the convention on the platform.
If it's not possible to use the page until all controls are loaded, then prevent access to the page. A semi-transparent object displayed over the entire page is a common technique to not only prevent touching of controls but also to indicate that they can't yet be touched.
If possible/practical set the size of the items in xaml/code to prevent relayout due to resizing once an item is loaded.
Try delay loading of items which aren't on the screen initially to get the perceived total load time down.
and finally:
Optimize everything to get the load time down and the application as responsive as possible.
I am designing an installer interface for a already written program. It is my first windows.form. I see three approaches to solving my "problem" of needing multiple "screens". I can add all the labels/buttons/interface, and then hide/show them at events. Or I can close and open a new windows? Or do I somehow load my next form into the window frame (sortv like an iFrame approach)? Can somehow help explain how to do this?
Thanks!
Though there is nothing stopping you from using any of the approaches that you mentioned,
using separate windows and opening/closing them would be cleaner. If the code for individual windows gets complicated it would be clearer if they were separate.
Since you said you are doing installer's particulary take a look at Wix. It was meant to be used for creating installer's. It has it's own approach of building UI from XML's.
I would design my "screens" as unique frames with each frame having the controls it needed. Then I would just swap them in and out of the main window.
Its sort of like an IFrame (visually at least).
I agree that WiX is worth a look. An alternative to WiX that some people like more (it's just different, some people like one approach, some like the other) is NSIS.
When I have a requirement that calls for swapping out the controls in a single window, I tend to create a user control for each "page".
Have you considered using The Panel control? You can group certain controls together and have them placed inside one or more Panels.
You could Hide/Show each panel when required.