I am working with flex for the last two years on some desktop apps. Until now I never had any performance related issues but today as we completed a mobile application for the iPad, I'm facing a challenge, the application is incredibly slow on the iPad.
http://i.stack.imgur.com/qkbWn.png
Slow, means that when I press a button in the menu to change the splitview I must wait something like 5s. Then scrolling is really slow two, with less than one fps and my TextInput starts to bug (the text is not in his box anymore).
I started to read a lot of blog post and presentation about optimisation for the mobile platform and then I rewrite some of the components I use. I removed the SkinnableContainer for instance and replaced it by a VGroup including some actionScript based drawing.
Now what you see is a VGroup (the dark grey one) containing some others VGroup (the group with title here) and then each widget is an HGroup with a label and a Widget. I only use Label and TextInput for the text.
Creation time is slow even (several seconds to create the view) for another page where there is only 4 text widget on it, or another one with only a list with a custom item renderer where each row is a set of 4 labels.
The whole things is cabled with RobotLegs, with nothing fancy, one models is injected in the view and at the beginning I set a member variable on the view with this object to bind my variables.
Frankly my thinking right now is : it smells fishy because if I've done everything right it is impossible to have such low performance and thinks that flex is competitive on the mobile platform. So right now I'm trying to disable the application piece by piece to try to locate what could slow it like that. I've got a couple suspects to check, for instance I've got some binding warning to check, and then see if robotlegs has got its share of the problem.
So my main question here is what do you think, and could you have some ideas about "is there a problem" and "how do we solve it".
Thanks
Run profiler for startup and separatelly for each operation that takes longed that it needs. Then prioritize the problems and try to solve them with basic optimization techniques.
Some problems you will not be able to solve fast - e.g. time for creating big components. The only option there is to rewrite those components with AS3 without MXML, styles and anything. I'm sure that flash.text.TextField is created many times faster than mx.controls.Label. The same for other components.
When component is created, it can be reused at a very low price. In your app there must be a lot of places where you recreate while you can reuse old components. It will save you memory and time.
Layouts tend to redraw even when it's not needed. If you have a lot of nested layouts, find the most critical places and replace a series of layouts with one custom layout or even component.
This all is very developer time consuming. At the end you will not get a smooth app anyway, but I believe that it can become usable.
Related
In a project I am working with in Swift, I have a huge form that needs to be filled out. I found the best way to present the form was by combining many table views in a Modal Popover that takes over 75%ish of the screen. Using animation and a custom build Array of ViewControllers, I created something very similar to a Navigation Stack that never kept any views in it if they were data intensive by keeping them at the top or second to the top of the stack. It would push them onto the left or right side of the modal, all being done with a simple one liner outside of the Container Controller. Is this implementation bad to use for any reason? I feel like I might have bypassed a natural way of making this work without realizing it was an option.
My skills in Swift have been skyrocketing since I left my college in December, but I don't work directly with anyone more knowledgeable than me in Swift. This makes some of the more complex questions hard to answer without intense amounts of research. (which I am not opposed to if I can find an answer) I am expected to provide a quality working product in the end though, so I need to be assured that I am not making any mistakes that are at the backbone of my project.
I've inherited a project that uses ~100 Xcode storyboard scenes. Trying to add to this project has been a nightmare for the following reasons:
My machine (late 2011 Macbook Pro 13inch with non-SSD drive 16GB running 10.8 + XCode 4.4) crawls to a halt on storyboards. In some cases I'll move a scene and it will take 10 seconds to update its position.
When I modify a scene (create a segue between two scenes, etc) in some cases all the scenes disappear. I have to do a "select all" on the sidebar to get them back.
Navigating a specific storyboard scene is absolutely frustrating. There's no apparent way to sort the storyboard scenes by name.
The filter feature below the scenes sidebar kind of lets me find the scene I'm looking for, but has the frustrating side effect of filtering out the attributes (segues, views, etc) of the specific scene I'm looking for. So if I need to modify the "add_new_guy" segue for "Person View Controller", and I type "Person" in the filter, I get the Person View Controller sans the add_new_guy segue. If I delete the text in the filter to make the segue appear, I'm taken back to the top of the scene list and (most likely) away from the Person View Controller at the other end of it. I end up scrolling all the way down the scene list manually looking for the specific scene I want to change.
I've spent hours googling solutions and nothing useful has appeared. Any suggestions on how to improve the storyboards situation or pointers to things in XCode I've stupidly overlooked?
Disclaimers:
a) I am well aware that moving to nibs would solve the problem and 100 storyboard scenes is nuts, but I've inherited the code and I'm expected to do storyboards for at least the next year.
b) I'm aware that it's possible to split out the project into several storyboards. I might look into this if I have time.
c) I've heard that some problems may be caused by having two storyboards open at once, which I've tried to avoid as much as possible.
d) Filing a bug with Apple's regarding storyboards is already on my to-do list.
First, work on splitting your storyboard up into smaller storyboards. I would recommend a maximum of 4-5 view controllers per storyboard. It will be a giant headache at first, just work on it over time. Take a look at RBStoryboardLink, which allows you to connect them "by allowing 'pseudo-segues' between UIStoryboards. These segues can be built without leaving Interface Builder and without writing any extra code". This will give you:
The ability to make abstract super classes in storyboards for very similar view controllers
Smaller, more manageable files that don't bring your computer to a halt
Fewer merge conflicts when working as part of a team (assuming your project is under version control)
Second, tell your boss to immediately purchase you a new, way better development computer. They'll make back the $3-$4k in more efficient development time in a matter of days. (Or, if this is contract work… buy a new one yourself.)
And, please indulge my slightly off-topic comment.
Regarding this statement:
I'm expected to do storyboards for at least the next year
Work expectations are always negotiable. Your boss likely thinks "switching from storyboards to code will cost more time than it will save." If this isn't true, say so.
I'm experimenting with creating a metro style app with Visual Studio 2012, I am not the most experienced designer but one thing with my applications is confusing me.
I have been working with 'basic pages' instead of blank ones for the different pages in my application for design consistency, however it seems that these 'basic pages' have a strange behaviour. Every item I place on the page (buttons, text boxes, etc) will all slide in one by one when the page opens. For example if I run the application and navigate to a page with 10 buttons, it will do a brief animation where each button will slide in from the right side to the left side. When dealing with a large number of items on one page this can take a lot of time as each item slides in seperatley.
Looking at the properties for each item I have been able to change the direction it slides in while loading the page by changing the flow direction. Also with a bit of research I am thinking it could potentially be due to either the metro style 'enterPage' or 'enterContent' animations, though I can not be certain.
I have tried to experiment and figure this out, and search to find out what causes this so I can modify it (Ideally I would like to just group items together to slide in with each other) however it's kind of a difficult thing to search with vague words, so I'm asking here.
What is causing this and how might I go about modifying it?
EnterPage shouldn't be sequencing the animations. They do offset some of the animations of a number of elements, but it shouldn't be each one sequentially.
Are you using WinJS navigation?
Well after a bit of experimentation I figured out that putting all my page content inside a grid made them all come in at once like I wanted. I probably should have tried that earlier but everything was already inside an outer grid for the page, so I thought that woulda handled it.
I don't quite understand it fully, but that works for now.
I'm new to developing on the Mac and am looking to implement an interface similar to Spotlight's - the main part which seems to be an expanding table/grid view.
I was wondering if there is a component Apple provides for creating something like this or is available open source else where.
Of course if not I'll just try and work something out myself but it's always worth checking!
Thanks for your help in advance.
New Answer (December, 2015)
These days I'd go with a vertical stack view ( NSStackView ).
You can use its hiding priorities to guarantee the number of results you show will fit (it'll hide those it can't). Note, it doesn't reuse views like a table view reuses cell views, so it's only appropriate for a limited number of "results" in your case, especially since it doesn't make sense to add a bunch of subviews that'll never appear. I'd go so far as to say outright you shouldn't use it for lists of things you intend to scroll (in this case, go with a table view).
The priority setting can be used to make sure your assumption of what should be "enough" results doesn't cause ugly layout issues by letting the stack view "sacrifice" the last few.
You can even emulate Spotlight's "Spotlight Preferences" entry (or a "show all" option) by adding it last and setting its priority to required (1000) so it always stays put even if result entries above it are hidden due to lack of space.
Lately all my UI designs for 10.11 (and beyond) have been making heavy use of them. I keep finding new ways to simplify my layouts with them. Given how lightweight they are, they should be your go-to solution first unless you need something more complex (Apple engineers stated in WWDC videos they're intended to be used in this way).
Old 2011 Answer
This is private Apple API. I don't know of any open-source initiatives that mimic it off-hand.
Were I trying to do it, I might use an NSTableView with no enclosing scroll view, no headers, two columns, right-justified lighter-colored text in the left column, the easily-googled image/text cell in the right column, with vertical grid lines turned on. The container view would observe the table view for frame changes and resize/reposition accordingly.
Adding: It might be a good idea also to see if the right/left justified text (or even the position of the columns) is different in languages with different sweep paths. Example: Arabic and Hebrew are read right-to-left. Better to adapt than to say "who cares" (he says flippantly while knowing full well his own apps have problems with this sort of thing :-)). You can test this by making sure such languages are installed on your computer, then switching between them and testing out Spotlight. Changing languages shouldn't pose an issue since the language switching UI doesn't rely on reading a foreign language. :-)
Usually, when a View requires a lot of bindings, or some UI Elements like a Bing Map, it takes a "while" to load (like between half a second and a second).
I don't want a delay between a "tap" action (like tapping an element on a ListBox) and the navigation action (displaying a new page).
I don't mind displaying the page progressively. For example, for a Bing Map, I don't mind displaying a black page with only a title, and a second later, having the Map appear.
What are the best practices ? It could post a sample if i'm not clear enough
edit: I'll keep the question open for a while, so other can answer. Thanks Matt and Mick for awesome answers. I'm already working on some improvements. The major one being binding my controls after the page loaded.
It's expected on resource constrained devices that non trivial actions will take at least a little time to execute.
The most commonly recommended best practice for dealing with this is to use animations to give the user the impression of perceived performance. This has been a recurring recommendation throughout the CTP and Beta phases by the product team and in presentations at Mix 10 and Tech Ed 2010.
Page transitions are a common approach to this.
Discussed here by Kevin Marshall, prior to inclusion in the November toolkit.
WP7 – Page Transitions Sample
And here, referencing the control in the toolkit.
Transitions for Windows Phone 7
There are also a number of very basic optimisations you can do that will give you some bang for a little effort.
don't name controls that you don't reference in code
use background worker to load any data to avoid impact the UI thread (already busy loading your page) and fire this off after the page is loaded (disable any controls not usable in leui of this) (Phạm Tiểu Giao - Threads in WP7)
use httpwebrequest over webclient for the same reason (WebClient, HttpWebRequest and the UI Thread on Windows Phone 7)
I would also reiterate Matt's suggestion for not loading controls that aren't used initially.
If you decide to go the extra mile, there is more you can do to optimise page loading. These two posts are worth absorbing in that regard.
Creating High Performing Silverlight Applications for Windows Phone
WP7 Development Tips Part 1 - Kevin Marshall's Epic Work Blog for Awesome People
If using Listboxes, also familiarise with Oren Nachman and David Anson's
WP7 Silverlight Perf Demo 1: VirtualizingStackPanel vs. StackPanel as a ListBox ItemsPanel
Keep a low profile LowProfileImageLoader helps the Windows Phone 7 UI thread stay responsive by loading images in the background
Never do today what you can put off till tomorrow DeferredLoadListBox (and StackPanel) help Windows Phone 7 lists scroll smoothly and consistently
and be sure image sizes are optimised for their display size.
My suggestions/recommendations:
Create and navigate to the new page as quickly as possible.
Display the page with placeholder content while it loads (if appropriate).
Give an indication that something is happening while the page loads. An indeterminate progress bar (use this one) is the convention on the platform.
If it's not possible to use the page until all controls are loaded, then prevent access to the page. A semi-transparent object displayed over the entire page is a common technique to not only prevent touching of controls but also to indicate that they can't yet be touched.
If possible/practical set the size of the items in xaml/code to prevent relayout due to resizing once an item is loaded.
Try delay loading of items which aren't on the screen initially to get the perceived total load time down.
and finally:
Optimize everything to get the load time down and the application as responsive as possible.