MVC3 - Validating inputs - Difference between create() and edit() - asp.net-mvc-3

I'm again struggling at validating inputs.
Let's say I edit a customer and the field "name" is required via
[Required(ErrorMessage = Constants.ErrorMsgNameMissing)]
public string NAME { get; set; }
inside the model.
The edit method does
[HttpPost]
edit(ViewModel vm)
{
// some code here
try
{
UpdateModel(vm);
// some code there
}
catch (Exception e)
{
return View(vm);
}
}
While doing UpdateModel(vm), an exception is thrown if the name is empty. Then my view shows the Html.ValidationSummary(). So far, so good.
Now, if I create a customer via
[HttpPost]
create(ViewModel vm)
{
if (ModelState.IsValid) { ... }
}
I don't have the method UpdateModel() since there's nothing to update. And ModelState.IsValid seems to return true every time. Even if the ViewModel is null. So I run into trouble then.
How do I validate this? And what do I return in case of errors?
Update: I think it was too late yesterday. In fact, it DOES work. But I was hoping for an exception and forgot the else { ... }...

Try this:
[HttpPost, ValidateInput(true)]
create(ViewModel vm)
{
if (ModelState.IsValid) { ... }
}

Related

TextBoxFor on a boolean field renders the same value even if it was modified on controller side

I have a simple form with a textbox (and a model editor I want to render in specific cases)
#using (Html.BeginForm("Import", "Flow"))
{
#Html.TextBoxFor(model => model.IsConfirmed)
#if (Model.IsConfirmed)
{
#Html.EditorFor(m => m.Preview)
}
}
The model used in this view is the following
public class ImportViewModel
{
public Boolean IsConfirmed { get; set; }
public PreviewViewModel Preview { get; set; }
public ImportViewModel()
{
this.IsConfirmed = false;
}
}
The form posts on the following controller
public class FlowController
{
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult Import(ImportViewModel model)
{
try
{
if (ModelState.IsValid)
{
if (model.IsConfirmed)
{
// do something else
}
else
{
model.Preview = Preview(model.strCA, model.SelectedAccount);
model.IsConfirmed = true;
return View(model);
}
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
throw new Exception("arf", ex);
}
return RedirectToAction("Index", "Home");
}
}
On first load, the textbox contains "false"
When posted, the property IsConfirmed of the model is set to "true" and this model is passed to the same view.
I expect the textbox to be "true" but it is still "false"... moreover the Preview property is correctly rendered, so it means Model.IsConfirmed is indeed true...
Am I missing something ?
Thanks
Make sure you remove the value from the ModelState if you intend to modify it:
ModelState.Remove("IsConfirmed");
model.IsConfirmed = true;
The reason you need to do that is because, by design, all Html helpers (such as TextBoxFor) will first look for a value in the ModelState when binding and only not found they will use the value on your model. And since there's a value with the same name in the ModelState (coming from the POST request), that's what's being used.

Using the Trim function in ASP.net MVC 3

Hi everyone new to MVC and I need to trim some %20's off of my data so it will display correctly. At the moment my CRUD displays the index correctly and it is able to edit user created records but when I try to edit a record that was from the legacy database it doesn't work and throws an error that the resource cannot be found. I looked closer at the URL for the legacy database records and saw that following most of the database records was %20%20%20%20%20. This told me that the database records were being followed by extra white space since that is what %20 meaning is. I did some research and found that the Trim function could get rid of the extraneous characters for me. I just don't understand how to use the trim function in my specific situation.
I think that I need to use the function in my Controller under my Edit ActionResult but when I tried it in a few different spots I had no luck. I thought that I understood how this function works but with no change in result for the better I am stuck. I hope that this explains the problem well enough, below I have posted the code for my controller with my CRUD methods in it but if you need me to post any other classes let me know.
You may notice that I have left a trim method in my edit method, this was my attempt at solving the problem and can easily be removed if I am completely wrong, and since it didn't work I believe I am! Thanks for your help if you need my edit class just ask I will be checking back often! And for anyone reading this to help them solve the same problem I will be sure and post the solution once it has been solved!
PaController
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Web;
using System.Web.Mvc;
using DBFirstMVC.Models;
using System.Data;
namespace DBFirstMVC.Controllers
{
public class PaController : Controller
{
PaEntities db = new PaEntities();
//
// GET: /Pa/
public ActionResult Index()
{
using (var db = new PaEntities())
{
return View(db.iamp_mapping.ToList());
}
}
//
// GET: /Pa/Details/5
public ActionResult Details(int id)
{
return View();
}
//
// GET: /Pa/Create
public ActionResult Create()
{
return View();
}
//
// POST: /Pa/Create
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult Create(iamp_mapping IAMP)
{
try
{
using (var db = new PaEntities())
{
db.iamp_mapping.Add(IAMP);
db.SaveChanges();
}
return RedirectToAction("Index");
}
catch
{
return View();
}
}
//
// GET: /Pa/Edit/5
public ActionResult Edit(string id)
{
using (var db = new PaEntities())
{
string trimmedID = id.Trim();
return View(db.iamp_mapping.Find(trimmedID));
}
}
//
// POST: /Pa/Edit/5
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult Edit(string id, iamp_mapping IAMP)
{
try
{
using (var db = new PaEntities())
{
db.Entry(IAMP).State = EntityState.Modified;
db.SaveChanges();
return RedirectToAction("");
}
}
catch
{
return View();
}
}
//
// GET: /Pa/Delete/5
public ActionResult Delete(string id)
{
using (var db = new PaEntities())
{
return View(db.iamp_mapping.Find(id));
}
}
//
// POST: /Pa/Delete/5
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult Delete(string id, iamp_mapping IAMP)
{
try
{
using (var db = new PaEntities())
{
db.Entry(IAMP).State = EntityState.Deleted;
db.SaveChanges();
return RedirectToAction("");
}
}
catch
{
return View();
}
}
}
}
You're using the trim function correctly so it seems your problem is elsewhere. That said, I would advise you do the trimming before you display the index page, otherwise you will have to trim the id in any actions which take the id as a parameter (edit, delete, etc).
Sounds like you want HttpUtility.HtmlDecode:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/7c5fyk1k.aspx

Is this the correct way to save form values in MVC3?

Here's my code:
[HttpGet]
public ActionResult Register()
{
RegisterViewModel model = new RegisterViewModel();
using (CityRepository city = new CityRepository())
{
model.SelectCityList = new SelectList(city.FindAllCities().ToList(), "CityID", "CityName");
}
using (CountryRepository country = new CountryRepository())
{
model.SelectCountryList = new SelectList(country.FindAllCountries().ToList(), "CountryID", "CountryName");
}
return View(model);
}
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult Register(RegisterViewModel model)
{
if (ModelState.IsValid)
{
//Actually register the user here.
RedirectToAction("Index", "Home");
}
//Something went wrong, redisplay the form for correction.
return View(model);
}
Is this the best approach or is there another better tested way? Keep in mind that my database tables/field names are nothing like what I declared in my models. I have to scrape the values from the ViewModel and put them into an entity framework generated class to persist the information.
Anything here that screams out at you as wrong?
I use that pattern and another pattern which looks like this (important part is the AutoMapper part):
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult Register(RegisterViewModel model)
{
if (!ModelState.IsValid)
{
// repopulate any input or other items set in GET
// prefer to do at top due to ^^^ is easy to overlook
return View(model);
}
// if it's an edit, pull to new instance
// from the database and use automapper to
// map over the submitted values from model to instance
// then update instance in database
//
// VALUE: useful if form only shows
// some of the properties/fields of model
// (otherwise, those not shown would be null/default)
// if it's new, insert
RedirectToAction("Index", "Home");
}
That's the pattern I generally use.
I prefer this pattern:
Controller:
[HttpGet]
public ActionResult Index()
{
var cities= (from m in db.cities select m);
ViewBag.Cities= cities;
var states = (from m in db.States select m);
ViewBag.States = states;
return View();
}
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult Index(RegisterViewModel model)
{
if (ModelState.IsValid)
{
// Saving the data
return View("ActionName", model);
}
return View();
}
View:
#Html.DropDownList("DDLCities",new SelectList(ViewBag.Cities, "CityId" , "CityName" ), new { #class = "className" })
#Html.DropDownList("DDLStates",new SelectList(ViewBag.States, "StateId" , "StateName" ), new { #class = "className" })
Advised changes to [HttpGet]:
[HttpGet]
public ActionResult Register()
{
// Get
var cities = new List<City>();
var countries = new List<Country>();
using (CityRepository city = new CityRepository())
{
cities = city.FindAllCities().ToList();
}
using (CountryRepository country = new CountryRepository())
{
counties = country.FindAllCountries().ToList();
}
// Map.
var aggregatedObjects = new SomePOCO(cities, countries);
var model = Mapper.Map<SomePOCO,RegisterViewModel>(aggregatedObjects );
// Return
return View(model);
}
Summary of changes:
Layout your logic in such a way the controller's job makes sense. Get - Map - Return. Exactly the tasks (in order) for which a Controller is designed for.
Use AutoMapper to do the heavy lifting of ViewModel creation for you.
Advised changes to your [HttpPost]:
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult Register(RegisterViewModel model)
{
if (!ModelState.IsValid)
return View(model);
try
{
var dbObj = Mapper.Map<RegisterViewModel,SomeDomainObj>(model);
_repository.Save(dbObj);
return RedirectToAction("Index");
}
catch (Exception exc)
{
if (exc is BusinessError)
ModelState.AddModelError("SomeKey", ((BusinessError)exc).FriendlyError);
else
ModelState.AddModelError("SomeKey", Resources.Global.GenericErrorMessage);
}
return View(model);
}
Summary of changes:
Try/catch. Always need to capture exceptions, whether they are domain exceptions or lower-level (database ones)
Check ModelState validity first. As #Cymen says - do it first so you don't forget later
Add exceptions to ModelState. Use custom exception classes for business errors with descriptive, resource-based messages. If the error is too low-level for the user (foreign key constraint, etc), show a generic message

Model.IsValid is always false when I insert a datetime

I have the following class:
public class Post
{
[DataType(DataType.Date, ErrorMessage="Please fill in a valid date.")]
[RegularExpression(#"^\d{1,2}\/\d{1,2}\/\d{4}$", ErrorMessage="Fill in a valid date.")]
public DateTime? PublishDate { get; set; }
}
and in my Edit action I have it like this
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult Edit(Post post)
{
if (ModelState.IsValid)
{
return RedirectToAction("Index");
}
else
{
return View(post);
}
}
But my ModelState is always invalid. How come? How can I solve this?
I also posted here: http://forums.asp.net/t/1663783.aspx/1?MVC3+how+to+check+datetime+on+model+with+unobtrusive+javascript+.
Update: I found that there is indeed an error via:
ModelState.Values.Select(x => x.Errors);
But how can I find out how it gets there? And more important, how can I solve it?
Your regular expression does not work with the date that you enter. I would simply remove it since the DateTime struct will not be assigned if the date can't be parsed by the model binder.

ASP MVC 3 testing controller calling ModelState.IsValid always returns true

I have an ASP MVC 3 application and in my Model I have implemented IValidatableObject.
When my controller posts for a create or edit, I obviously only want to save the model if it is valid.
I see many blogs and posts and answers that say something like
if(!ModelState.IsValid)
{
return View();
}
My question. Why is it that ModelState.IsValid is always true in a unit test on the Controller?
Example:
[Test]
public void InValidModelsAreNotAdded()
{
var invalidModel = new MyModel() { SomeField = "some data", SomeOtherField = "" };
var result = _controller.Submit(invalidModel);
_repository.AssertWasNotCalled(r => r.Add(Arg.Is.Anything));
}
Model code:
public class MyModel : IValidatableObject
{
public string SomeField { get; set; }
public string SomeOtherField { get; set; }
public IEnumerable Validate(ValidationContext validationContext)
{
if(string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(SomeOtherField))
{
yield return
new ValidationResult("Oops invalid.", new[] {"SomeOtherField"});
}
}
}
The AssertWasNotCalled always fails this test.
I stepped through the test and noticed that the ModelState.IsValid is true for this test. It is as if the IValidatableObject.Validate is not being invoked. It seems to work when I run the project, but thats not much of a way to test drive an application.
Also, I realize I could use the [Required] attribute for my example, but my real code has much more complex validation to it.
Thoughts?
It's true because you haven't called anything which sets it false.
This normally happens during binding, but since you just pass the model directly in the test you skip that altogether.
If you're trying to test validation, do that directly. If you're trying to test the error path in your controller, your test's arrange can call _controller.ModelState.AddModelError( //...
Well, insted of simulate the model binding behavior you can do that:
public class YourController : Controller
{
//some code
public ViewResult someAction(Model model)
{
try
{
ValidateModel(model);
}
catch
{
// deal with errors
}
}
//some code
}
ValidateModel with "try catch" blocks are much more readable for me. But you can still use "if" blocks with the method TryValidateModel
Hope that helps!!

Resources