As far as i understand, there are two possible ways of setting up a selenium server (just a node) on windows:
As a windows service
Using the task scheduler to start the server running within a local user account
However, using the service way (where no desktop is available) the Internet Explorer can not be used.
Therefore, i created a local user account and a scheduled task to start the selenium server at startup connected to the user account (using the selenium-standalone package, selenium-standalone start --drivers.ie.arch=ia32).
Unfortunately, i ran into the "Session 0" problem, which requires a real login for the local user account. Otherwise, i would receive a timeout error for
Chrome and black screenshots for IE and have the max resolution of 1024x768...
However, with a active user session, i still get the timeout error for IE (Chrome works). The browser makes the initial GET request (retrieving the login page) but keeps stuck after this (next step would be to fill the form with credentials using protractor).
I read about the Headless Selenium for Windows that gives me some connecting layer between the driver and the GUI. Though, i do not know if this would help and how to integrate this into the selenium-standalone package.
So, my question is, what is the missing puzzle in the setup?
I would suggest you to move away from Session 0, as Chrome is trying to move away from Session 0 too in the near future.
You can find further references of this here (comment 21 in the link below, but actually the whole thread is a good read in respect to this subject): https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=615396#c21
You could try using this setup for Chrome for now, however there is no guarantee that it will still work while Chrome is started Session 0.
var chromeOptions = new ChromeOptions();
chromeOptions.AddArguments("test-type");
chromeOptions.AddArguments("--disable-extensions");
chromeOptions.AddArguments("no-sandbox");
var driver = new ChromeDriver(chromeOptions);
I had the same issues with using Microsoft's Test Agent, and moving the agent from a windows service to a process, solved all the issues and headaches that I had.
As stated above, there are two ways to accomplish the setup. However, only with using a scheduled task i was able to workaround the session 0 issue (as #Cosmin stated). Using NSSM and FireDeamon Pro was a dead end.
I reconfigured the server, to automatically login the local user account and changed the scheduled task, to run if and only if this user is logged in (starting Selenium). So, after the server starts, the user gets logged in, which triggers the task scheduler (at this point a simple startup script should work, too) to start Selenium.
And for the screen resolution problem: The VM setup uses Hyper-V, where the default resolution is 1024x768. This could easily be changed (to the max resolution the screen adapter is providing) to 1600x1200.
PS: The Headless Selenium for Windows did not work either (can not be used with Protractor). However, even this is no longer necessary. IE works this way.
Short Version:
Are the event sources "Application" and "Application Error" always included in the Application Event Log? Are they available on new installations of Windows XP, Vista and Windows 7? Would it be really bad to use them instead of creating my own source (an impossibility for me)?
Long Version:
I have a ClickOnce application that is used by users without administrative privileges on their machines.
When I try to write to the Appliction Event Log, I get a security exception. (The Windows event logging infrastructure is trying to create me a new event source, and gets a security violation.)
So I would like to try reusing an existing event source. I have found a only two"generic-sounding" sources in the Application Event Log. Are these always part of a Windows installation, and would make a reasonable choice?
Application
Application Error
I am sure this is frowned upon, as I should distinguish my application using its own event source. But this is for infrequent fatal errors, which should be getting logged elsewhere by my code. I just want a really easy place to find them on a client machine in case it all goes wrong...
When I try to write to the Appliction Event Log, I get a security exception. (The Windows event logging infrastructure is trying to create me a new event source, and gets a security violation.)
I have just answered this here: Using EventLog in ClickOnce application
So I would like to try reusing an existing event source. I have found a only two"generic-sounding" sources in the Application Event Log. Are these always part of a Windows installation, and would make a reasonable choice?
It's really not wise to do this. Existing event sources will be used by either Windows applications, or by third party applications. If any of those are removed, or changed by something like a service pack or patch, your program will crash unless you have implemented exception handling to handle the exception gracefully, but then you wont have any event logging.
Also consider the work you may have to do to port your app to the next version of Windows. I suggest you will be making a rod for your own back.
In the answer I linked to, I suggested the best way to handle the problem, is to install your application using admin privs with the installer creating the source, or by creating a simple app that effectively does the same using the admin role.
The only thing else I can suggest is to always run your application in admin mode.
I'm trying to setup CI environment for QA department. They use SeleniumRC to run UI tests in IE and FF browsers to test some web application. I had a success configuring it to run as a windows service as described here. However when i run the test it hangs. I can see iexplore.exe process spawned by Selenium service in the process list but nothing more happens. No browser window appears, no entries in the windows event log. I did a lot of googling and as fas as i understand the problem is interaction with desktop. I tried to run the service under SYSTEM account with "Allow service to interact with desktop" check-box set as well as under a regular user account with local admin permissions. So my question is if it's possible at all?
In our organization we have a continuous integration server (Cruise Control) running the build including Selenium RC tests. The CI server is run as a Windows service (on MS Windows 2003 Server) and Selenium tests are just part of the test suite.
That is quite a straightforward setup and frankly I see no reasons for giving up with it. Currently in our setup the Selenium server (and client) is started directly from the tests (however we used to have Selenium as a separate service).
In Java code (actually in the super class of all web tests) we do something like:
// to start the server
RemoteControlConfiguration config = new RemoteControlConfiguration();
config.set(...) // set the serverHost and port
...
SeleniumServer server = new SeleniumServer(config);
server.start();
// and then to start the client
Selenium selenium = new DefaultSelenium(serverHost, port, "*firefox", "http://www.google.com");
selenium.start();
selenium.open("http://www.google.com");
// now the browser should be visible for you (if you run it locally, not as a service)
So I would suggest you trying the following (whatever language you are using):
Try to run the Selenium server and client from just a standalone application. The browser should show up as a window. Adjust the settings to your needs (browser type, etc.).
Try to incorporate the code within your test framework (xUnit or whatever). Run them manually. The result should be the same.
Then you can try to have the tests run from the continuous-integration. Run the CI server as a service and let it build your project. The browser wouldn't be visible, but that's not required for the tests to be run, isn't it?
NOTE:
if you wanted to peep what Selenium is doing, I believe it would be easier on UNIX machine. You could point the tests to use the X-server DISPLAY of your choice - a fake one or a true one connected to some monitor.
I'm skeptical about running anything as a windows service that is supposed to interact with a desktop application. Windows services run in their own sandbox; they're not supposed to interact with a user's desktop or its applications. To do so requires special efforts to communicate with the service, so if it is possible at all, I would think there would be some kind of desktop client running as well, acting as a liaison between the browser and the windows service.
I can't tell you it won't work, though, because it is obviously possible if people are blogging about it.
Why does it need to run as a Windows service, by the way? Is that how Selenium has set up their automation, or can you do it without the Windows service? Because I think that would be the shortest distance between two points.
My recommendation would be to have a dedicated machine (or virtual machine) for running Selenium RC. In my experience it's best to let Selenium run interactively rather than in a headless mode.
I have recently inherited a couple of applications that run as windows services, and I am having problems providing a gui (accessible from a context menu in system tray) with both of them.
The reason why we need a gui for a windows service is in order to be able to re-configure the behaviour of the windows service(s) without resorting to stopping/re-starting.
My code works fine in debug mode, and I get the context menu come up, and everything behaves correctly etc.
When I install the service via "installutil" using a named account (i.e., not Local System Account), the service runs fine, but doesn't display the icon in the system tray (I know this is normal behavior because I don't have the "interact with desktop" option).
Here is the problem though - when I choose the "LocalSystemAccount" option, and check the "interact with desktop" option, the service takes AGES to start up for no obvious reason, and I just keep getting
Could not start the ... service on Local Computer.
Error 1053: the service did not respond to the start or control request in a timely fashion.
Incidentally, I increased the windows service timeout from the default 30 seconds to 2 minutes via a registry hack (see http://support.microsoft.com/kb/824344, search for TimeoutPeriod in section 3), however the service start up still times out.
My first question is - why might the "Local System Account" login takes SOOOOO MUCH LONGER than when the service logs in with the non-LocalSystemAccount, causing the windows service time-out? what's could the difference be between these two to cause such different behavior at start up?
Secondly - taking a step back, all I'm trying to achieve, is simply a windows service that provides a gui for configuration - I'd be quite happy to run using the non-Local System Account (with named user/pwd), if I could get the service to interact with the desktop (that is, have a context menu available from the system tray). Is this possible, and if so how?
Any pointers to the above questions would be appreciated!
After fighting this message for days, a friend told me that you MUST use the Release build. When I InstallUtil the Debug build, it gives this message. The Release build Starts fine.
If you continue down the road of trying to make your service interact with the user's desktop directly, you'll lose: even under the best of circumstances (i.e. "before Vista"), this is extremely tricky.
Windows internally manages several window stations, each with their own desktop. The window station assigned to services running under a given account is completely different from the window station of the logged-on interactive user. Cross-window station access has always been frowned upon, as it's a security risk, but whereas previous Windows versions allowed some exceptions, these have been mostly eliminated in Vista and later operating systems.
The most likely reason your service is hanging on startup, is because it's trying to interact with a nonexistent desktop (or assumes Explorer is running inside the system user session, which also isn't the case), or waiting for input from an invisible desktop.
The only reliable fix for these issues is to eliminate all UI code from your service, and move it to a separate executable that runs inside the interactive user session (the executable can be started using the global Startup group, for example).
Communication between your UI code and your service can be implemented using any RPC mechanism: Named Pipes work particularly well for this purpose. If your communications needs are minimal, using application-defined Service Control Manager commands might also do the trick.
It will take some effort to achieve this separation between UI and service code: however, it's the only way to make things work reliably, and will serve you well in the future.
ADDENDUM, April 2010: Since this question remains pretty popular, here's a way to fix another common scenario that causes "service did not respond..." errors, involving .NET services that don't attempt any funny stuff like interacting with the desktop, but do use Authenticode signed assemblies: disable the verification of the Authenticode signature at load time in order to create Publisher evidence, by adding the following elements to your .exe.config file:
<configuration>
<runtime>
<generatePublisherEvidence enabled="false"/>
</runtime>
</configuration>
Publisher evidence is a little-used Code Access Security (CAS) feature: only in the unlikely event that your service actually relies on the PublisherMembershipCondition will disabling it cause issues. In all other cases, it will make the permanent or intermittent startup failures go away, by no longer requiring the runtime to do expensive certificate checks (including revocation list lookups).
I faced this problem because of a missing framework on the box running my service. The box had .NET 4.0 and the service was written on top of .NET 4.5.
I installed the following download on the box, restarted, and the service started up fine:
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=30653
To debug the startup of your service, add the following to the top of the OnStart() method of your service:
while(!System.Diagnostics.Debugger.IsAttached) Thread.Sleep(100);
This will stall the service until you manually attach the Visual Studio Debugger using Debug -> Attach to Process...
Note: In general, if you need a user to interact with your service, it is better to split the GUI components into a separate Windows application that runs when the user logs in. You then use something like named pipes or some other form of IPC to establish communication between the GUI app and your service. This is in fact the only way that this is possible in Windows Vista.
In service class within OnStart method don't do huge operation, OS expect short amount of time to run service, run your method using thread start:
protected override void OnStart(string[] args)
{
Thread t = new Thead(new ThreadStart(MethodName)); // e.g.
t.Start();
}
I'm shooting blind here, but I've very often found that long delays in service startups are directly or indirectly caused by network function timeouts, often when attemting to contact a domain controller when looking up account SIDs - which happens very often indirectly via GetMachineAccountSid() whether you realize it or not, since that function is called by the RPC subsystem.
For an example on how to debug in such situations, see The Case of the Process Startup Delays on Mark Russinovich's blog.
If you are using Debug code as below in your service the problem may arise.
#if(!DEBUG)
ServiceBase[] ServicesToRun;
ServicesToRun = new ServiceBase[]
{
new EmailService()
};
ServiceBase.Run(ServicesToRun);
#else
//direct call function what you need to run
#endif
To fix this, while you build your windows service remove #if condition because it didn't work as it is.
Please use argument for debug mode instead as below.
if (args != null && args.Length > 0)
{
_isDebug = args[0].ToLower().Contains("debug");
}
In my case the problem was missing version of .net framework.
My service used
<startup>
<supportedRuntime version="v4.0" sku=".NETFramework,Version=v4.5" />
</startup>
But .net Framework version of server was 4, so by changing 4.5 to 4 the problem fixed:
<startup>
<supportedRuntime version="v4.0" sku=".NETFramework,Version=v4.0" />
</startup>
Copy the release DLL or get the dll from release mode rather than Debug mode and paste it to installation folder,,it should work
I was running into a similar problem with a Service I was writing. It worked fine then one day I started getting the timeout on Start errors. It happened in one &/or both Release and Debug depending on what was going on. I had instantiated an EventLogger from System.Diagnostics, but whatever error I was seeing must have been happening before the Logger was able to write...
If you are not aware of where to look up the EventLogs, in VS you can go to your machine under the Server Explorer. I started poking around in some of the other EventLogs besides those for my Service. Under Application - .NETRuntime I found the Error logs pertinent to the error on startup. Basically, there were some exceptions in my service's constructor (one turned out to be an exception in the EventLog instance setup - which explained why I could not see any logs in my Service EventLog). On a previous build apparently there had been other errors (which had caused me to make the changes leading to the error in the EventLog set up).
Long story short - the reason for the timeout may be due to various exceptions/errors, but using the Runtime EventLogs may just help you figure out what is going on (especially in the instances where one build works but another doesn't).
Hope this helps!
Install the debug build of the service and attach the debugger to the service to see what's happening.
I want to echo mdb's comments here. Don't go this path. Your service is not supposed to have a UI... "No user interaction" is like the definining feature of a service.
If you need to configure your service, write another application that edits the same configuration that the service reads on startup. But make it a distinct tool -- when you want to start the service, you start the service. When you want to configure it, you run the configuration tool.
Now, if you need realtime monitoring of the service, then that's a little trickier (and certainly something I've wished for with services). Now you're talking about having to use interprocess communications and other headaches.
Worst of all, if you need user interaction, then you have a real disconnect here, because services don't interact with the user.
In your shoes I would step back and ask why does this need to be a service? And why does it need user interaction?
These two requirements are pretty incompatible, and that should raise alarms.
I had this problem and it drove me nuts for two days…
If your problem similar to mine:
I have settings “User settings” in my windows service, so the service can do self-maintenance, without stopping and starting the service. Well, the problem is with the “user settings”, where the config file for these settings is saved in a folder under the user-profile of the user who is running the windows service under the service-exe file version.
This folder for some reason was corrupted. I deleted the folder and service start working back again happily as usual…
I had this problem, it took about a day to fix. For me the problem was that my code skipped the "main content" and effectively ran a couple of lines then finished. And this caused the error for me. It is a C# console application which installs a Windows Service, as soon as it tried to run it with the ServiceController (sc.Run() ) then it would give this error for me.
After I fixed the code to go to the main content, it would run the intended code:
ServiceBase.Run(new ServiceHost());
Then it stopped showing up.
As lots of people have already said, the error could be anything, and the solutions people provide may or may not solve it. If they don't solve it (like the Release instead of Debug, adding generatePublisherEvidence=false into your config, etc), then chances are that the problem is with your own code.
Try and get your code to run without using sc.Run() (i.e. make the code run that sc.Run() would have executed).
This problem usually occurs when there is some reference missing on your assembly and usually the binding fails at the run time.
to debug put Thread.Sleep(1000) in the main(). and put a break point in the next line of execution.
Then start the process and attach the debugger to the process while it is starting. Press f5 after it hit the break point. It will throw the exception of missing assembly or reference.
Hopefully this will resolve this error.
Once try to run your exe file. I had the same problem, but when I ran it direct by double click on the exe file, I got a message about .Net framework version, because I was released the service project with a framework which it wasn't installed on target machine.
Took me hours, should have seen the event viewer get_AppSettings().
A change in the app config, caused the problem.
Adding 127.0.0.1 crl.microsoft.com to the "Hosts" file solved our issue.
My issue was due to target framework mentioned in windows service config was
<startup>
<supportedRuntime version="v4.0" sku=".NETFramework,Version=v4.6"/>
</startup>
and my server in which I tried to install windows service was not supported for this .Net version.
Changing which , I could able to resolve the issue.
I had a similar issue, steps I followed:
Put a Debugger.Launch() in the windows service constructor
Followed step by step to see where it got stuck
My issue wasn't due to any error.
I had a BlockingCollection.GetConsumingEnumerable() in the way that caused the windows service to wait.
I had this problem too. I made it to work by changing Log On account to Local System Account. In my project I had it setup to run as Local Service account. So when I installed it, by default it was using Local Service. I'm using .net 2.0 and VS 2005. So installing .net 1.1 SP1 wouldn't have helped.
Both Local System Account and Local Service would not work for me, i then set it to Network Service and this worked fine.
In my case, I had this trouble due to a genuine error. Before the service constructor is called, one static constructor of member variable was failing:
private static OracleCommand cmd;
static SchedTasks()
{
try
{
cmd = new OracleCommand("select * from change_notification");
}
catch (Exception e)
{
Log(e.Message);
// "The provider is not compatible with the version of Oracle client"
}
}
By adding try-catch block I found the exception was occuring because of wrong oracle version. Installing correct database solved the problem.
I also faced similar problem and found that there was issue loading assembly. I was receiving this error immediately when trying to start the service.
To quickly debug the issue, try to run service executable via command prompt using ProcDump http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/dd996900. It shall provide sufficient hint about exact error.
http://bytes.com/topic/net/answers/637227-1053-error-trying-start-my-net-windows-service helped me quite a bit.
This worked for me. Basically make sure the Log on user is set to the right one. However it depends how the account infrastructure is set. In my example it's using AD account user credentials.
In start up menu search box search for 'Services'
-In Services find the required service
-right click on and select the Log On tab
-Select 'This account' and enter the required content/credentials
-Ok it and start the service as usual
In case you have a windows form used for testing, ensure that the startup object is still the service and not the windows form
We have Log4Net configured to log to a database table. The table had grown so large that the service was timing out trying to log messages.
open the services window as administrator,Then try to start the service.That worked for me.
Build project in Release Mode.
Copy all Release folder files to source path.
Execute Window service using command prompt window in administrative access.
Never delete files from source path.
At lease this works for me.
Release build did not work for me, however, I looked through my event viewer and Application log and saw that the Windows Service was throwing a security exception when it was trying to create an event log. I fixed this by adding the event source manually with administration access.
I followed this guide from Microsoft:
open registry editor, run --> regedit
Locate the following registry subkey:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Eventlog\Application
Right-click the Application subkey, point to New, and then click Key.
Type event source name used in your windows service for the key name.
Close Registry Editor.