i wanted ask if there some algorithm ready, that allowed me to do this: i have a matrix m (col) x n (row) with m x n elements. I want give position to this element starting from center and rotating as a spiral, for example, for a matrix 3x3 i have 9 elements so defined:
5 6 7
4 9 8
3 2 1
or for una matrix 4 x 3 i have 12 elements, do defined:
8 9 10 1
7 12 11 2
6 5 4 3
or again, a matrix 5x2 i have 10 elements so defined:
3 4
7 8
10 9
6 5
2 1
etc.
I have solved basically defining a array of integer of m x n elements and loading manually the value, but in generel to me like that matrix maked from algorithm automatically.
Thanks to who can help me to find something so, thanks very much.
UPDATE
This code, do exactely about i want have, but not is in delphi; just only i need that start from 1 and not from 0. Important for me is that it is valid for any matrics m x n. Who help me to translate it in delphi?
(defun spiral (rows columns)
(do ((N (* rows columns))
(spiral (make-array (list rows columns) :initial-element nil))
(dx 1) (dy 0) (x 0) (y 0)
(i 0 (1+ i)))
((= i N) spiral)
(setf (aref spiral y x) i)
(let ((nx (+ x dx)) (ny (+ y dy)))
(cond
((and (< -1 nx columns)
(< -1 ny rows)
(null (aref spiral ny nx)))
(setf x nx
y ny))
(t (psetf dx (- dy)
dy dx)
(setf x (+ x dx)
y (+ y dy)))))))
> (pprint (spiral 6 6))
#2A ((0 1 2 3 4 5)
(19 20 21 22 23 6)
(18 31 32 33 24 7)
(17 30 35 34 25 8)
(16 29 28 27 26 9)
(15 14 13 12 11 10))
> (pprint (spiral 5 3))
#2A ((0 1 2)
(11 12 3)
(10 13 4)
(9 14 5)
(8 7 6))
Thanks again very much.
Based on the classic spiral algorithm. supporting non-square matrix:
program SpiralMatrix;
{$APPTYPE CONSOLE}
uses
SysUtils;
type
TMatrix = array of array of Integer;
procedure PrintMatrix(const a: TMatrix);
var
i, j: Integer;
begin
for i := 0 to Length(a) - 1 do
begin
for j := 0 to Length(a[0]) - 1 do
Write(Format('%3d', [a[i, j]]));
Writeln;
end;
end;
var
spiral: TMatrix;
i, m, n: Integer;
row, col, dx, dy,
dirChanges, visits, temp: Integer;
begin
m := 3; // columns
n := 3; // rows
SetLength(spiral, n, m);
row := 0;
col := 0;
dx := 1;
dy := 0;
dirChanges := 0;
visits := m;
for i := 0 to n * m - 1 do
begin
spiral[row, col] := i + 1;
Dec(visits);
if visits = 0 then
begin
visits := m * (dirChanges mod 2) + n * ((dirChanges + 1) mod 2) - (dirChanges div 2) - 1;
temp := dx;
dx := -dy;
dy := temp;
Inc(dirChanges);
end;
Inc(col, dx);
Inc(row, dy);
end;
PrintMatrix(spiral);
Readln;
end.
3 x 3:
1 2 3
8 9 4
7 6 5
4 x 3:
1 2 3 4
10 11 12 5
9 8 7 6
2 x 5:
1 2
10 3
9 4
8 5
7 6
There you go!!! After 30some syntax errors...
On ideone.com, I ran it with some tests and it seems to work fine. I think you can see the output there still and run it yourself...
I put some comments in the code. Enough to understand most of it. The main navigation system is a little bit harder to explain. Briefly, doing a spiral is going in first direction 1 time, second 1 time, third 2 times, fourth 2 times, fifth 3 times, 3, 4, 4, 5, 5, and so on. I use what I called a seed and step to get this behavior.
program test;
var
w, h, m, n, v, d : integer; // Matrix size, then position, then value and direction.
spiral : array of array of integer; // Matrix/spiral itself.
seed, step : integer; // Used to travel the spiral.
begin
readln(h);
readln(w);
setlength(spiral, h, w);
v := w * h; // Value to put in spiral.
m := trunc((h - 1) / 2); // Finding center.
n := trunc((w - 1) / 2);
d := 0; // First direction is right.
seed := 2;
step := 1;
// Travel the spiral.
repeat
// If in the sub-spiral, store value.
if ((m >= 0) and (n >= 0) and (m < h) and (n < w)) then
begin
spiral[m, n] := v;
v := v - 1;
end;
// Move!
case d of
0: n := n + 1;
1: m := m - 1;
2: n := n - 1;
3: m := m + 1;
end;
// Plan trajectory.
step := step - 1;
if step = 0 then
begin
d := (d + 1) mod 4;
seed := seed + 1;
step := trunc(seed / 2);
end;
until v = 0;
// Print the spiral.
for m := 0 to (h - 1) do
begin
for n := 0 to (w - 1) do
begin
write(spiral[m, n], ' ');
end;
writeln();
end;
end.
If you really need that to print text spirals I'll let you align the numbers. Just pad them with spaces.
EDIT:
Was forgetting... In order to make it work on ideone, I put the parameters on 2 lines as input. m, then n.
For example:
5
2
yields
3 4
7 8
10 9
6 5
2 1
Here's the commented JavaScript implementation for what you're trying to accomplish.
// return an array representing a matrix of size MxN COLxROW
function spiralMatrix(M, N) {
var result = new Array(M * N);
var counter = M * N;
// start position
var curCol = Math.floor((M - 1) / 2);
var curRow = Math.floor(N / 2);
// set the center
result[(curRow * M) + curCol] = counter--;
// your possible moves RIGHT, UP, LEFT, DOWN * y axis is flipped
var allMoves = [[1,0], [0,-1], [-1,0], [0,1]];
var curMove = 0;
var moves = 1; // how many times to make current Move, 1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4 etc
// spiral
while(true) {
for(var i = 0; i < moves; i++) {
// move in a spiral outward counter clock-wise direction
curCol += allMoves[curMove][0];
curRow += allMoves[curMove][1];
// naively skips locations that are outside of the matrix bounds
if(curCol >= 0 && curCol < M && curRow >= 0 && curRow < N) {
// set the value and decrement the counter
result[(curRow * M) + curCol] = counter--;
// if we reached the end return the result
if(counter == 0) return result;
}
}
// increment the number of times to move if necessary UP->LEFT and DOWN->RIGHT
if(curMove == 1 || curMove == 3) moves++;
// go to the next move in a circular array fashion
curMove = (curMove + 1) % allMoves.length;
}
}
The code isn't the most efficient, because it walks the spiral naively without first checking if the location it's walking on is valid. It only checks the validity of the current location right before it tries to set the value on it.
Even though the question is already answered, this is an alternative solution (arguably simpler).
The solution is in python (using numpy for bidimendional arrays), but can be easily ported.
The basic idea is to use the fact that the number of steps is known (m*n) as end condition,
and to properly compute the next element of the loop at each iteration:
import numpy as np
def spiral(m, n):
"""Return a spiral numpy array of int with shape (m, n)."""
a = np.empty((m, n), int)
i, i0, i1 = 0, 0, m - 1
j, j0, j1 = 0, 0, n - 1
for k in range(m * n):
a[i, j] = k
if i == i0 and j0 <= j < j1: j += 1
elif j == j1 and i0 <= i < i1: i += 1
elif i == i1 and j0 < j <= j1: j -= 1
elif j == j0 and 1 + i0 < i <= i1: i -= 1
else:
i0 += 1
i1 -= 1
j0 += 1
j1 -= 1
i, j = i0, j0
return a
And here some outputs:
>>> spiral(3,3)
array([[0, 1, 2],
[7, 8, 3],
[6, 5, 4]])
>>> spiral(4,4)
array([[ 0, 1, 2, 3],
[11, 12, 13, 4],
[10, 15, 14, 5],
[ 9, 8, 7, 6]])
>>> spiral(5,4)
array([[ 0, 1, 2, 3],
[13, 14, 15, 4],
[12, 19, 16, 5],
[11, 18, 17, 6],
[10, 9, 8, 7]])
>>> spiral(2,5)
array([[0, 1, 2, 3, 4],
[9, 8, 7, 6, 5]])
Related
Each positive integer n has 2^(n−1) distinct compositions. what If I want the number of composition which is only have specific number which is in my list:
for example composition of 4 is
4
3 1
1 3
2 2
2 1 1
1 2 1
1 1 2
1 1 1 1
but if I want the number of composition of 4 which it has only 1 and 2,
How could I calculate the NUMBER of distinct compositions?
2 2
2 1 1
1 2 1
1 1 2
1 1 1 1
Edited:
Here Haskell code which calculate the number, But I think It takes too long even IF I add memorization for Number 70
main :: IO ()
main = do
putStrLn "Enter the integer number"
num' <- getLine
let num = read num' :: Int
putStr ""
let result= composition num
let len=length result
print len
--print result
composition 0 = [[]]
composition n = [x:rest | x <- [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,20,30,40,50,60,70,80,90,100,200,300,400,500,600,700,800,900,1000],x<=n ,rest <- composition (n-x)]
You can use dynamic programming to calculate the number of needed compositions.
Example of recursive relation for your example:
P(4, [1,2]) = P(3, [1,2]) + P(2, [1,2])
here P(N, [list]) is the number of variants to make N from the list
Try to generalize formulas and use top-down memoization or bottom-up table filling DP to quickly find the result.
Delphi example:
var
A: TArray<Integer>;
Mem: TArray<Int64>;
N, i: Integer;
function Calc(N: Integer): Int64;
var
i: Integer;
begin
if Mem[N] >= 0 then
Exit(Mem[N]);
i := 0;
Result := 0;
while A[i] <= N do begin
Result := Result + Calc(N - A[i]);
Inc(i);
end;
Mem[N] := Result;
end;
begin
//should be sorted
//-1 - sentinel value to stop
A := TArray<Integer>.Create(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60,
70, 80, 90, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900, 1000, -1);
for N := 10 to 64 do begin
SetLength(Mem, N + 1);
for i := 1 to N do
Mem[i] := -1; //not initialized yet
Mem[0] := 1;
Memo1.Lines.Add(Format('%d %d', [N, Calc(N)]));
end;
I saw this in an algorithm textbook. I am confused about the middle recursive function. If you can explain it with an example, such as 4/2, that would be great!
function divide(x, y)
Input: Two n-bit integers x and y, where y ≥ 1
Output: The quotient and remainder of x divided by y
if x = 0: return (q, r) = (0, 0)
(q, r) = divide(floor(x/2), y)
q = 2 · q, r = 2 · r
if x is odd: r = r + 1
if r ≥ y: r = r − y, q = q + 1
return (q, r)
You're seeing how many times it's divisible by 2. This is essentially performing bit shifts and operating on the binary digits. A more interesting case would be 13/3 (13 is 1101 in binary).
divide(13, 3) // initial binary value - 1101
divide(6, 3) // shift right - 110
divide(3, 3) // shift right - 11
divide(1, 3) // shift right - 1 (this is the most significant bit)
divide(0, 3) // shift right - 0 (no more significant bits)
return(0, 0) // roll it back up
return(0, 1) // since x is odd (1)
return(1, 0) // r = r * 2 = 2; x is odd (3) so r = 3 and the r > y condition is true
return(2, 0) // q = 2 * 1; r = 2 * 1 - so r >= y and q = 2 + 1
return(4, 1) // q = 2 * 2; x is odd to r = 0 + 1
I am wanting to write a procedure to take a square matrix and have it output a spiral matrix.
for example;
M:=Matrix(3,[[1,2,3],[4,5,6],[7,8,9]]);
would turn into
S:=Matrix(3,[[1,2,3],[8,9,4],[7,6,5]]);
Starting in the top left corner and each row follows around clockwise until you reach the middle.
My first thought was I need to be able to call each element (m_i,j) from a matrix and tell it where to go. I could write a different procedure for each square matrix assigning where the elements in the matrix each should move to. Since I could not get it to work for n.
Here is what i have for a 3x3 matrix
Spiral := proc(a1,a2,a3,b1,b2,b3,c1,c2,c3)
local M,S;
M:=Matrix(3,[[a1,a2,a3],[b1,b2,b3],[c1,c2,c3]]);
S:=Matrix(3,[[a1,a2,a3],[c2,c3,b1],[c1,b3,b2]]);
print(M);
print(S);
end:
Spiral(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9);
It is very difficult for me to find information about Matrices in Maple. Any hint on using Maple would be appreciated. Thank you.
I don't think there is a particularly compact solution to this problem. Here is a solution I came up with. It takes in a square Matrix as input and returns another Matrix which is the spiral of the input Matrix.
spiral:=proc(M::Matrix)
local size, spiralCount, currentRow, currentCol, MIndex, k;
local spiralMatrix;
size := numelems(M[1]);
spiralCount := size;
currentRow := 1;
currentCol := 0;
MIndex := 0;
spiralMatrix := Matrix(size, size);
while spiralCount > 0 do
for k from 1 to spiralCount do
currentCol:=currentCol + 1;
spiralMatrix[currentRow,currentCol] := M[iquo(MIndex,size) + 1,(MIndex mod size) + 1];
MIndex := MIndex + 1;
end do:
for k from 1 to spiralCount-1 do
currentRow:=currentRow + 1;
spiralMatrix[currentRow,currentCol] := M[iquo(MIndex,size) + 1,(MIndex mod size) + 1];
MIndex := MIndex + 1;
end do:
for k from 1 to spiralCount-1 do
currentCol:=currentCol - 1;
spiralMatrix[currentRow,currentCol] := M[iquo(MIndex,size) + 1,(MIndex mod size) + 1];
MIndex := MIndex + 1;
end do:
for k from 1 to spiralCount-2 do
currentRow:=currentRow - 1;
spiralMatrix[currentRow,currentCol] := M[iquo(MIndex,size) + 1,(MIndex mod size) + 1];
MIndex := MIndex + 1;
end do:
spiralCount := spiralCount - 2;
end do:
return spiralMatrix;
end proc:
> m:=Matrix([[1,2,3],[4,5,6],[7,8,9]]);
[1 2 3]
[ ]
m := [4 5 6]
[ ]
[7 8 9]
> spiral(m);
[1 2 3]
[ ]
[8 9 4]
[ ]
[7 6 5]
Feel free to ask me any questions about this implementation and/or about how I to use the Matrix type.
I have came across this very interesting program of printing numbers in pyramid.
If n = 1 then print the following,
1 2
4 3
if n = 2 then print the following,
1 2 3
8 9 4
7 6 5
if n = 3 then print the following,
1 2 3 4
12 13 14 5
11 16 15 6
10 9 8 7
I can print all these using taking quite a few loops and variables but it looks very specific. You might have noticed that all these pyramid filling starts in one direction until it find path filled. As you might have noticed 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12 filed in outer edges till it finds 1 so after it goes in second row after 12 and prints 13,14 and so on. It prints in spiral mode something like snakes game snakes keep on going until it hits itself.
I would like to know is there any algorithms behind this pyramid generation or its just tricky time consuming pyramid generation program.
Thanks in advance. This is a very interesting challenging program so I kindly request no need of pipeline of down vote :)
I made a small recursive algorithm for your problem.
public int Determine(int n, int x, int y)
{
if (y == 0) return x + 1; // Top
if (x == n) return n + y + 1; // Right
if (y == n) return 3 * n - x + 1; // Bottom
if (x == 0) return 4 * n - y + 1; // Left
return 4 * n + Determine(n - 2, x - 1, y - 1);
}
You can call it by using a double for loop. x and y start at 0:
for (int y=0; y<=n; y++)
for (int x=0; x<=n; x++)
result[x,y] = Determine(n,x,y);
Here is some C code implementing the basic algorithm submitted by #C.Zonnerberg my example uses n=6 for a 6x6 array.
I had to make a few changes to get the output the way I expected it to look. I swapped most the the x's and y's and changed several of the n's to n-1 and changed the comparisons in the for loops from <= to <
int main(){
int x,y,n;
int result[6][6];
n=6;
for (x=0; x<n; x++){
for (y=0; y<n; y++) {
result[x][y] = Determine(n,x,y);
if(y==0)
printf("\n[%d,%d] = %2d, ", x,y, result[x][y]);
else
printf("[%d,%d] = %2d, ", x,y, result[x][y]);
}
}
return 0;
}
int Determine(int n, int x, int y)
{
if (x == 0) return y + 1; // Top
if (y == n-1) return n + x; // Right
if (x == n-1) return 3 * (n-1) - y + 1; // Bottom
if (y == 0) return 4 * (n-1) - x + 1; // Left
return 4 * (n-1) + Determine(n - 2, x - 1, y- 1);
}
Output
[0,0] = 1, [0,1] = 2, [0,2] = 3, [0,3] = 4, [0,4] = 5, [0,5] = 6,
[1,0] = 20, [1,1] = 21, [1,2] = 22, [1,3] = 23, [1,4] = 24, [1,5] = 7,
[2,0] = 19, [2,1] = 32, [2,2] = 33, [2,3] = 34, [2,4] = 25, [2,5] = 8,
[3,0] = 18, [3,1] = 31, [3,2] = 36, [3,3] = 35, [3,4] = 26, [3,5] = 9,
[4,0] = 17, [4,1] = 30, [4,2] = 29, [4,3] = 28, [4,4] = 27, [4,5] = 10,
[5,0] = 16, [5,1] = 15, [5,2] = 14, [5,3] = 13, [5,4] = 12, [5,5] = 11,
With an all-zeros array, you could start with [row,col] = [0,0], fill in this space, then add [0,1] to position (one to the right) until it's at the end or runs into a non-zero.
Then go down (add [1,0]), filling in space until it's the end or runs into a non-zero.
Then go left (add [0,-1]), filling in space until it's the end or runs into a non-zero.
Then go up (add [-1,0]), filling in space until it's the end or runs into a non-zero.
and repeat...
I know that there is an algorithm that permits, given a combination of number (no repetitions, no order), calculates the index of the lexicographic order.
It would be very useful for my application to speedup things...
For example:
combination(10, 5)
1 - 1 2 3 4 5
2 - 1 2 3 4 6
3 - 1 2 3 4 7
....
251 - 5 7 8 9 10
252 - 6 7 8 9 10
I need that the algorithm returns the index of the given combination.
es: index( 2, 5, 7, 8, 10 ) --> index
EDIT: actually I'm using a java application that generates all combinations C(53, 5) and inserts them into a TreeMap.
My idea is to create an array that contains all combinations (and related data) that I can index with this algorithm.
Everything is to speedup combination searching.
However I tried some (not all) of your solutions and the algorithms that you proposed are slower that a get() from TreeMap.
If it helps: my needs are for a combination of 5 from 53 starting from 0 to 52.
Thank you again to all :-)
Here is a snippet that will do the work.
#include <iostream>
int main()
{
const int n = 10;
const int k = 5;
int combination[k] = {2, 5, 7, 8, 10};
int index = 0;
int j = 0;
for (int i = 0; i != k; ++i)
{
for (++j; j != combination[i]; ++j)
{
index += c(n - j, k - i - 1);
}
}
std::cout << index + 1 << std::endl;
return 0;
}
It assumes you have a function
int c(int n, int k);
that will return the number of combinations of choosing k elements out of n elements.
The loop calculates the number of combinations preceding the given combination.
By adding one at the end we get the actual index.
For the given combination there are
c(9, 4) = 126 combinations containing 1 and hence preceding it in lexicographic order.
Of the combinations containing 2 as the smallest number there are
c(7, 3) = 35 combinations having 3 as the second smallest number
c(6, 3) = 20 combinations having 4 as the second smallest number
All of these are preceding the given combination.
Of the combinations containing 2 and 5 as the two smallest numbers there are
c(4, 2) = 6 combinations having 6 as the third smallest number.
All of these are preceding the given combination.
Etc.
If you put a print statement in the inner loop you will get the numbers
126, 35, 20, 6, 1.
Hope that explains the code.
Convert your number selections to a factorial base number. This number will be the index you want. Technically this calculates the lexicographical index of all permutations, but if you only give it combinations, the indexes will still be well ordered, just with some large gaps for all the permutations that come in between each combination.
Edit: pseudocode removed, it was incorrect, but the method above should work. Too tired to come up with correct pseudocode at the moment.
Edit 2: Here's an example. Say we were choosing a combination of 5 elements from a set of 10 elements, like in your example above. If the combination was 2 3 4 6 8, you would get the related factorial base number like so:
Take the unselected elements and count how many you have to pass by to get to the one you are selecting.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2 -> 1
1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
3 -> 1
1 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4 -> 1
1 5 6 7 8 9 10
6 -> 2
1 5 7 8 9 10
8 -> 3
So the index in factorial base is 1112300000
In decimal base, it's
1*9! + 1*8! + 1*7! + 2*6! + 3*5! = 410040
This is Algorithm 2.7 kSubsetLexRank on page 44 of Combinatorial Algorithms by Kreher and Stinson.
r = 0
t[0] = 0
for i from 1 to k
if t[i - 1] + 1 <= t[i] - 1
for j from t[i - 1] to t[i] - 1
r = r + choose(n - j, k - i)
return r
The array t holds your values, for example [5 7 8 9 10]. The function choose(n, k) calculates the number "n choose k". The result value r will be the index, 251 for the example. Other inputs are n and k, for the example they would be 10 and 5.
zero-base,
# v: array of length k consisting of numbers between 0 and n-1 (ascending)
def index_of_combination(n,k,v):
idx = 0
for p in range(k-1):
if p == 0: arrg = range(1,v[p]+1)
else: arrg = range(v[p-1]+2, v[p]+1)
for a in arrg:
idx += combi[n-a, k-1-p]
idx += v[k-1] - v[k-2] - 1
return idx
Null Set has the right approach. The index corresponds to the factorial-base number of the sequence. You build a factorial-base number just like any other base number, except that the base decreases for each digit.
Now, the value of each digit in the factorial-base number is the number of elements less than it that have not yet been used. So, for combination(10, 5):
(1 2 3 4 5) == 0*9!/5! + 0*8!/5! + 0*7!/5! + 0*6!/5! + 0*5!/5!
== 0*3024 + 0*336 + 0*42 + 0*6 + 0*1
== 0
(10 9 8 7 6) == 9*3024 + 8*336 + 7*42 + 6*6 + 5*1
== 30239
It should be pretty easy to calculate the index incrementally.
If you have a set of positive integers 0<=x_1 < x_2< ... < x_k , then you could use something called the squashed order:
I = sum(j=1..k) Choose(x_j,j)
The beauty of the squashed order is that it works independent of the largest value in the parent set.
The squashed order is not the order you are looking for, but it is related.
To use the squashed order to get the lexicographic order in the set of k-subsets of {1,...,n) is by taking
1 <= x1 < ... < x_k <=n
compute
0 <= n-x_k < n-x_(k-1) ... < n-x_1
Then compute the squashed order index of (n-x_k,...,n-k_1)
Then subtract the squashed order index from Choose(n,k) to get your result, which is the lexicographic index.
If you have relatively small values of n and k, you can cache all the values Choose(a,b) with a
See Anderson, Combinatorics on Finite Sets, pp 112-119
I needed also the same for a project of mine and the fastest solution I found was (Python):
import math
def nCr(n,r):
f = math.factorial
return f(n) / f(r) / f(n-r)
def index(comb,n,k):
r=nCr(n,k)
for i in range(k):
if n-comb[i]<k-i:continue
r=r-nCr(n-comb[i],k-i)
return r
My input "comb" contained elements in increasing order You can test the code with for example:
import itertools
k=3
t=[1,2,3,4,5]
for x in itertools.combinations(t, k):
print x,index(x,len(t),k)
It is not hard to prove that if comb=(a1,a2,a3...,ak) (in increasing order) then:
index=[nCk-(n-a1+1)Ck] + [(n-a1)C(k-1)-(n-a2+1)C(k-1)] + ... =
nCk -(n-a1)Ck -(n-a2)C(k-1) - .... -(n-ak)C1
There's another way to do all this. You could generate all possible combinations and write them into a binary file where each comb is represented by it's index starting from zero. Then, when you need to find an index, and the combination is given, you apply a binary search on the file. Here's the function. It's written in VB.NET 2010 for my lotto program, it works with Israel lottery system so there's a bonus (7th) number; just ignore it.
Public Function Comb2Index( _
ByVal gAr() As Byte) As UInt32
Dim mxPntr As UInt32 = WHL.AMT.WHL_SYS_00 '(16.273.488)
Dim mdPntr As UInt32 = mxPntr \ 2
Dim eqCntr As Byte
Dim rdAr() As Byte
modBinary.OpenFile(WHL.WHL_SYS_00, _
FileMode.Open, FileAccess.Read)
Do
modBinary.ReadBlock(mdPntr, rdAr)
RP: If eqCntr = 7 Then GoTo EX
If gAr(eqCntr) = rdAr(eqCntr) Then
eqCntr += 1
GoTo RP
ElseIf gAr(eqCntr) < rdAr(eqCntr) Then
If eqCntr > 0 Then eqCntr = 0
mxPntr = mdPntr
mdPntr \= 2
ElseIf gAr(eqCntr) > rdAr(eqCntr) Then
If eqCntr > 0 Then eqCntr = 0
mdPntr += (mxPntr - mdPntr) \ 2
End If
Loop Until eqCntr = 7
EX: modBinary.CloseFile()
Return mdPntr
End Function
P.S. It takes 5 to 10 mins to generate 16 million combs on a Core 2 Duo. To find the index using binary search on file takes 397 milliseconds on a SATA drive.
Assuming the maximum setSize is not too large, you can simply generate a lookup table, where the inputs are encoded this way:
int index(a,b,c,...)
{
int key = 0;
key |= 1<<a;
key |= 1<<b;
key |= 1<<c;
//repeat for all arguments
return Lookup[key];
}
To generate the lookup table, look at this "banker's order" algorithm. Generate all the combinations, and also store the base index for each nItems. (For the example on p6, this would be [0,1,5,11,15]). Note that by you storing the answers in the opposite order from the example (LSBs set first) you will only need one table, sized for the largest possible set.
Populate the lookup table by walking through the combinations doing Lookup[combination[i]]=i-baseIdx[nItems]
EDIT: Never mind. This is completely wrong.
Let your combination be (a1, a2, ..., ak-1, ak) where a1 < a2 < ... < ak. Let choose(a,b) = a!/(b!*(a-b)!) if a >= b and 0 otherwise. Then, the index you are looking for is
choose(ak-1, k) + choose(ak-1-1, k-1) + choose(ak-2-1, k-2) + ... + choose (a2-1, 2) + choose (a1-1, 1) + 1
The first term counts the number of k-element combinations such that the largest element is less than ak. The second term counts the number of (k-1)-element combinations such that the largest element is less than ak-1. And, so on.
Notice that the size of the universe of elements to be chosen from (10 in your example) does not play a role in the computation of the index. Can you see why?
Sample solution:
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
// The input
var n = 5;
var t = new[] { 2, 4, 5 };
// Helping transformations
ComputeDistances(t);
CorrectDistances(t);
// The algorithm
var r = CalculateRank(t, n);
Console.WriteLine("n = 5");
Console.WriteLine("t = {2, 4, 5}");
Console.WriteLine("r = {0}", r);
Console.ReadKey();
}
static void ComputeDistances(int[] t)
{
var k = t.Length;
while (--k >= 0)
t[k] -= (k + 1);
}
static void CorrectDistances(int[] t)
{
var k = t.Length;
while (--k > 0)
t[k] -= t[k - 1];
}
static int CalculateRank(int[] t, int n)
{
int k = t.Length - 1, r = 0;
for (var i = 0; i < t.Length; i++)
{
if (t[i] == 0)
{
n--;
k--;
continue;
}
for (var j = 0; j < t[i]; j++)
{
n--;
r += CalculateBinomialCoefficient(n, k);
}
n--;
k--;
}
return r;
}
static int CalculateBinomialCoefficient(int n, int k)
{
int i, l = 1, m, x, y;
if (n - k < k)
{
x = k;
y = n - k;
}
else
{
x = n - k;
y = k;
}
for (i = x + 1; i <= n; i++)
l *= i;
m = CalculateFactorial(y);
return l/m;
}
static int CalculateFactorial(int n)
{
int i, w = 1;
for (i = 1; i <= n; i++)
w *= i;
return w;
}
}
The idea behind the scenes is to associate a k-subset with an operation of drawing k-elements from the n-size set. It is a combination, so the overall count of possible items will be (n k). It is a clue that we could seek the solution in Pascal Triangle. After a while of comparing manually written examples with the appropriate numbers from the Pascal Triangle, we will find the pattern and hence the algorithm.
I used user515430's answer and converted to python3. Also this supports non-continuous values so you could pass in [1,3,5,7,9] as your pool instead of range(1,11)
from itertools import combinations
from scipy.special import comb
from pandas import Index
debugcombinations = False
class IndexedCombination:
def __init__(self, _setsize, _poolvalues):
self.setsize = _setsize
self.poolvals = Index(_poolvalues)
self.poolsize = len(self.poolvals)
self.totalcombinations = 1
fast_k = min(self.setsize, self.poolsize - self.setsize)
for i in range(1, fast_k + 1):
self.totalcombinations = self.totalcombinations * (self.poolsize - fast_k + i) // i
#fill the nCr cache
self.choose_cache = {}
n = self.poolsize
k = self.setsize
for i in range(k + 1):
for j in range(n + 1):
if n - j >= k - i:
self.choose_cache[n - j,k - i] = comb(n - j,k - i, exact=True)
if debugcombinations:
print('testnth = ' + str(self.testnth()))
def get_nth_combination(self,index):
n = self.poolsize
r = self.setsize
c = self.totalcombinations
#if index < 0 or index >= c:
# raise IndexError
result = []
while r:
c, n, r = c*r//n, n-1, r-1
while index >= c:
index -= c
c, n = c*(n-r)//n, n-1
result.append(self.poolvals[-1 - n])
return tuple(result)
def get_n_from_combination(self,someset):
n = self.poolsize
k = self.setsize
index = 0
j = 0
for i in range(k):
setidx = self.poolvals.get_loc(someset[i])
for j in range(j + 1, setidx + 1):
index += self.choose_cache[n - j, k - i - 1]
j += 1
return index
#just used to test whether nth_combination from the internet actually works
def testnth(self):
n = 0
_setsize = self.setsize
mainset = self.poolvals
for someset in combinations(mainset, _setsize):
nthset = self.get_nth_combination(n)
n2 = self.get_n_from_combination(nthset)
if debugcombinations:
print(str(n) + ': ' + str(someset) + ' vs ' + str(n2) + ': ' + str(nthset))
if n != n2:
return False
for x in range(_setsize):
if someset[x] != nthset[x]:
return False
n += 1
return True
setcombination = IndexedCombination(5, list(range(1,10+1)))
print( str(setcombination.get_n_from_combination([2,5,7,8,10])))
returns 188