Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
It can this is a silly question, but is it possible to handle files on Windows (XP, Vista or 7) like on the Mac?
I clarify: on the Mac you can rename or move a file even if it is currently used by an application, on Windows you simply cannot! There is a way to change this behavior with some black magic on the Registry?
If you are interested You can read about File locking and specific implementations in Windows and Mac here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_locking
I use unlocker to get around this problem in Windows. It's quite handy
http://www.emptyloop.com/unlocker/
No, there is no builtin solution to your problem and I haven't heard of any tool accomplishing that.
It's not possible because the file handling is done in a different way, which is also strongly influenced by the features of the different filesystems.
Related
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
What is the equivalent of the POSIX compliant sh shell language or bash extensions in the Windows world ?
What is the optimal choice when writing a script that is supposed to run on as many different versions of Windows as possible ?
I need a solution that is supposed to be already present/installed on the client side, so I tend to exclude the only scripting solution that I know of, Powershell, and I'm considering Windows XP as the oldest target.
I know you do not want to read this: If you need a solution to be present on the client side from XP to 8.1 try to do your scripts with Windows cmd.exe.
Closed. This question needs details or clarity. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Add details and clarify the problem by editing this post.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
Hi I was working on some Ruby stuffs and I need to use Linux terminal or Cygwin. Which is the best choice? Is there any slowness issue in Cygwin
The question is pretty subjective to what it is you are really wanting to do. If you need access to the Windows environment, then Cygwin is going to be your choice of the two. mingw32 is often used rather than Cygwin.
I have used Cygwin-X and Cygwin tools for more than a decade. But I think Linux is better if you can do so.
I use Cygwin occasionally when I am traveling and I have not encountered any lag
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 11 years ago.
Improve this question
On the Windows operating system, the shell/terminal we have by default is the Command Prompt (CMD).
Now, when I use Linux (or even Mac) systems, I find that the terminal is generally a lot more full featured. The one I used made it easy to change settings and properties, was easily resizable, some even had line numbering and multiple tabs.
Since I've started programming, I've realized the importance of the command line, and I was wondering if there were any alternatives to the default Command Prompt? And, if there aren't many good alternatives, how would I go about writing my own? What would I have to take into consideration?
Yes, the Windows command prompt sucks. It is truly pathetic for 2011.
I use Cygwin+mintty instead.
If you miss Tilda/Guake/Yakuake (for Linux) or TotalTerminal (née Visor) (for OS X) try mintty-quake-console.
Edit
Just came across another potential alternative, though I haven't tried it out yet: Gow (Gnu on Windows).
If you want a truly manly command line for Windows, use PowerShell.
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
I am working on a project that uses a filesystem and I'm having some problems integrating with Windows.
I need help understanding how the Windows file system works.
Which Windows? The file system used by DOS and Windows up to Win98 (if I am not mistaken) is FAT. It is still widely used e.g. by memory cards, digital cameras etc. Windows NT and later Windows versions however use NTFS.
You may start reading about FAT and NTFS on Wikipedia.
You probably mean NTFS. Then the best reference is http://www.ntfs.com/
A friend of mine started implementing a defragmenter based on that information and it appears to work properly. That means the info from that site seems reliable.
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
I was wondering it for a long time since Apple released iTunes for Windows. What did they use to write iTunes for Windows? It seems completely with its own UI components and everything is contained inside it. It even uses QuickTime resources files. Can we assume that they've Cocoa working with windows. Anyway, my main question is, is there any known (public or private) tool/language/framework used in developing iTunes for Windows?
Not a direct answer, but if the reason you're asking is that you want to port a cocoa application to Windows, you might be interested in this:
http://code.google.com/p/cocotron/
bit more info here:
http://cocoawithlove.com/2010/04/design-of-multi-platform-app-using.html
http://cocoawithlove.com/2010/04/porting-mac-program-to-windows-using.html
Haven't used it myself, but I gather they've got enough done to make a useable cross-platform Cocoa app.
itunes for both mac and windows are written in c++ as it is easier to port between operating systems with much or the same codebase