I have the findbugs plugin working fine in my maven setup. I've setup findbugs to execute during the compile phase. I noticed however that it runs during the test phase as well because the test phase also calls compile. Because I have an automated build pipeline that runs all my targets, I don't need findbugs to run during the test phase. I've tried to exclude findbugs from the test phase with the following but no luck yet.
<plugin>
<groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
<artifactId>findbugs-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.4.0</version>
<inherited>true</inherited>
<configuration>
<failOnError>${findbugs.failOnError}</failOnError>
<skip>${findbugs.skip}</skip>
<trace>${findbugs.trace}</trace>
</configuration>
<executions>
<execution>
<phase>compile</phase>
<goals>
<goal>check</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>findbugs-test-compile</id>
<phase>test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>check</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<skip>true</skip>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
It will not be called based on the running through the life-cylcle via compile it simply is running cause you configured to have two executions one in test and one in compile phase. Findbugs should usually run in the reporting area(site).
Just make a single execution:
<executions>
<execution>
<id>findbugs-test-compile</id>
<phase>test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>check</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<skip>true</skip>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
The one you like to have. But i recommend to read the documentation cause it should run in reporting area (via site) only.
UPDATE:
If you like to run findbugs only during the site generation than just remove it from the usual build area and put into the reporting area instead.
Related
I have integrated FindBugs plugin to fail the build in case of bugs.
Then using that brilliant answer I configured FindBugs to generate html reports (xml version is barely readable).
The problem is that I have failOnError property set to true, which means that the build would fail in case of bug.
.....
<configuration>
.....
<failOnError>true</failOnError>
</configuration>
And then no html report would be generated.
I read about Maven build lifecycle and there is no such thing as "Execute on fail" (like finally block in Java). So, are there any possible workarounds?
And shouldn't it be out-of the box Maven feature?
Special thanks to #SpaceTrucker for workaround suggestion.
Here is the configuration I ended up with:
<plugin>
<groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
<artifactId>findbugs-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>3.0.4</version>
<configuration>
<effort>Max</effort>
<threshold>Low</threshold>
<findbugsXmlOutputDirectory>${project.build.directory}/findbugs</findbugsXmlOutputDirectory>
</configuration>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>noFailOnError</id>
<phase>verify</phase>
<goals>
<goal>check</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<failOnError>false</failOnError>
</configuration>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>failOnError</id>
<phase>install</phase>
<goals>
<goal>check</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<failOnError>true</failOnError>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
The solution is to use different configurations in verify and install phases.
Note, that according to that answer transformation (to html) is executed in verifyphase.
Issue was submitted for html report generation.
Results are also can be seen by simply run mvn findbugs:gui
Please consider this pom excerpt taken from jacoco example ( http://www.eclemma.org/jacoco/trunk/doc/examples/build/pom-it.xml)
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.jacoco</groupId>
<artifactId>jacoco-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>0.7.5-SNAPSHOT</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>default-prepare-agent</id>
<goals>
<goal>prepare-agent</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>default-prepare-agent-integration</id>
<goals>
<goal>prepare-agent-integration</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>default-report</id>
<goals>
<goal>report</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>default-report-integration</id>
<goals>
<goal>report-integration</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>default-check</id>
<goals>
<goal>check</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<rules>
<!-- implmentation is needed only for Maven 2 -->
<rule implementation="org.jacoco.maven.RuleConfiguration">
<element>BUNDLE</element>
<limits>
<!-- implmentation is needed only for Maven 2 -->
<limit implementation="org.jacoco.report.check.Limit">
<counter>COMPLEXITY</counter>
<value>COVEREDRATIO</value>
<minimum>0.60</minimum>
</limit>
</limits>
</rule>
</rules>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.16</version>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-failsafe-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.16</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>default-integration-test</id>
<goals>
<goal>integration-test</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
</plugins>
Now I know that you can bind a plugin's goal to a maven phase, that is run that goal when maven executes a specific phase.
What is the point of just listing the integration-test goal for the maven failsafe plugin without binding it to something?
The same as for jacoco report and others goal? I don't think you can force the plugin to execute just those listed goals right?
Many thanks
The point is that a plugin can define default life cycle phases where the appropriate goal is bound to (many plugins do this). In this cases you don't need to specify the life cycle phase within the pom file explicitly.
For example the maven-failsafe-plugin has a goal integration-test. This goal has a default binding to the integration-test life cycle phase. Here an excerpt from the documentation:
Description:
Run integration tests using Surefire. Attributes:
Requires a Maven project to be executed.
Requires dependency resolution of artifacts in scope: test.
The goal is thread-safe and supports parallel builds.
Binds by default to the lifecycle phase: integration-test.
That's the reason why you don't need to give a life cylce phase in the configuration like this:
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-failsafe-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.18.1</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>default-integration-test</id>
<goals>
<goal>integration-test</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
The same is meant for the jacoco maven plugin.
If I understand correctly, M2E will execute the plugin goal during workspace full or incremental builds.
The following article may shed some light:
http://eclipse.org/m2e/documentation/m2e-execution-not-covered.html
You are correct that, on command line, you would not be able to specify the goal, since it is a plugin goal and not tied to a phase. This could be an oddball usage specifically for M2E integration.
I have the following configuration for the maven failsafe plugin to run my integration tests (based on the documentation at Failsafe Usage Documentation:
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-failsafe-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.16</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>integration-test</id>
<goals>
<goal>integration-test</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>verify</id>
<goals>
<goal>verify</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
When I try to run an individual test using:
mvn -Dit.test=MyLovelyTest failsafe:integration-test
It does not run my test. It dies with the message: No tests were executed
If I remove the execution definition for verify, then it executes the test as expected. Since I copied the plugin def from the official usage documentation, I'm wondering if there's a bug in the plugin, or is it something I'm doing wrong?
TL;DR: Using maven, I want to run a plugin goal at the beginning of the test phase, before tests actually run. What would be a clean way to do it?
I want to print a message just before the tests actually run. Hence I want to use the echo goal of the echo plugin at the beginning of the test phase (to tell the user that if every tests fail, he'd better have a look at the README since there's a test environment he should set up first)
Attempt n°1
A simple approach could be to run this plugin in the previous phase, process-test-classes.
It works, but it doesn't seem semantically correct to bind this task to this phase...
Attempt n°2
According to Maven documentation, When multiple executions are given that match a particular phase, they are executed in the order specified in the POM, with inherited executions running first., so I tried to set explicitly the surefire plugin:
...
<plugin>
<groupId>com.soebes.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-echo-plugin</artifactId>
<version>0.1</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<phase>test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>echo</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
<configuration>
<echos>
<echo>*** If most tests fail, make sure you've installed the fake wiki. See README for more info ***</echo>
</echos>
</configuration>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.16</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<phase>test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>test</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
...
But tests run before my message is printed.
So, to put it in a nutshell: is there a way to reach my goal, or should I stick to the "process-test-classes solution" even though it seems a bit "hacky"?
Thanks!
As #khmarbaise said, your solution is still hacky, because whole test looks like Integration Test and should be processed by Failsafe Plugin. Failsafe has nice phase pre-integration-test for testing fake wiki etc :)
Based on Guide to Configuring Default Mojo Executions this works for me:
<plugin>
<groupId>com.soebes.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-echo-plugin</artifactId>
<version>0.1</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>1-test</id>
<phase>test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>echo</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
<configuration>
<echos>
<echo>*** If most tests fail, make sure you've installed the fake wiki. See README for more info ***</echo>
</echos>
</configuration>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.16</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>default-test</id>
<configuration>
<skip>true</skip>
</configuration>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>2-test</id>
<phase>test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>test</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
This is very odd for me ;)
I have two plugins with executions bound to generate-sources, one listed first in the list of about 6 plugins and the other listed last. However, the one listed last (which depends on the one listed first) always executes first.
How can I execute several maven plugins within a single phase and set their respective execution order?
AFAIK, the maven failsafe plugin fails safe because it has separate goals for running the tests and failing the build based on the tests. These are designed to be bound to the integration-test and verify goals respectively. This allows post-integration-test bound goals to run (shutting down the build) before the build fails.
My question is, how do I do this with the maven-soapui-plugin? I thought I could simply specify <testFailIgnore>true</testFailIgnore> in my soapui plugin config and then call the failsafe plugin verify goal, but that isn't working. I don't think I'm not sure if I'm getting a summary file out of the soapui plugin or not. I keep getting Expected root element 'failsafe-summary' but found 'testsuite' Here is a snippet of the POM:
<plugin>
<groupId>eviware</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-soapui-plugin</artifactId>
<version>4.0.0</version>
<configuration>
<junitReport>true</junitReport>
<exportAll>true</exportAll>
<outputFolder>${project.build.directory}/surefire-reports</outputFolder>
<testFailIgnore>true</testFailIgnore>
<printReport>true</printReport>
</configuration>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>FailingTest</id>
<phase>integration-test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>test</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<projectFile>${basedir}/testData/soapui-integration-tests.xml</projectFile>
<host>localhost</host>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-failsafe-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.9</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<phase>verify</phase>
<id>verify</id>
<goals>
<goal>verify</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<summaryFiles>
<summaryFile>${project.build.directory}/surefire-reports/TEST-TestSuite_1.xml</summaryFile>
</summaryFiles>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
Is there something wrong with my POM or is this a bad approach? Are there any better approaches?
There is an open source extension of the soapui plugin which has a separate test-verify goal for exactly this purpose.
https://github.com/redfish4ktc/maven-soapui-extension-plugin
The following example shows the required configuration:
https://github.com/redfish4ktc/maven-soapui-extension-plugin/blob/master/src/it/test-verify_goal/one_failing_project/pom.xml
AFAIK maven-failsafe-plugin can only verify success status of tests run by maven-failsafe-plugin and not by maven-soapui-plugin. It does that by reading test summary report file (failsafe-summary.xml) which has specific format.
maven-soapui-plugin could be adjusted to separate running tests from verifying test success status, to support running post-integration-test tasks (stop server, undeploy artifacts, etc.) before verification. Create a support ticket for this to soapUI guys.
Maybe even maven-failsafe-plugin, it's verify mojo, could be extended to allow specifying different test report format (JUnit style reports are supported by soapUI) or even an xpath expression which would be used by maven-failsafe-plugin to determine if there were failed tests or not. Create a support ticket for this on maven-failsafe-plugin issue tracker.
Until those extensions are supported, and you need to do tasks on post-integration-test phase you can use soapUI JUnit integration and have maven-failsafe-plugin run those soapUI JUnit tests.
I am trying this solution, and it doesn't work.
But I have found one.
To obtain de tests report of SOAPUI tests in Jenkins, I using the failsafe plugin with this configuration in the pom.xml of my Soap tests folder :
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>eviware</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-soapui-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.6.1</version>
<configuration>
<projectFile>${basedir}/soap_project_tests.xml</projectFile>
<outputFolder>${filePath.reports.soap}</outputFolder>
<testFailIgnore>true</testFailIgnore>
<junitReport>true</junitReport>
<exportwAll>true</exportwAll>
<printReport>true</printReport>
</configuration>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>run-soap-integration-test</id>
<phase>integration-test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>test</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-failsafe-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.11</version>
<configuration>
<reportsDirectory>${filePath.reports.soap}</reportsDirectory>
<printSummary>true</printSummary>
<argLine>-Xmx512m</argLine>
</configuration>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>soap-integration-test-verify</id>
<phase>post-integration-test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>integration-test</goal>
<goal>verify</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
The tests cases status are up to Jenkins.