I just got to know about the global temporary tables(I use oracle as db) and understood them but not able to know the exact use of these.
As the name suggests they are used to keep temporary data/session and on closing session the data vanishes for that session.
What can be the examples, business use cases where we need to use them.
A possible use case would be a user that has only rights to create reports. These reports use a lot of aggregated data and these information is reused in more than one of the reports. So it would be a good idea to cache the information for this session and this can be done by using temporary tables.
Another use case would be that you have a reporting framework and want to have an easy way to query information. So you would just call a PLSQL package that puts together the information in a temporary table and after the package has finished you can just do a SELECT * FROM temporary_table.
Related
I'm trying to make a database table for every single username. I see that for every username, I can add more columns in it's row, but I want to attribute a full table for each one. How can I do that?
Thanks,
Eli
First let me say, what you are trying to do sounds like really, really bad database design and you should rethink your idea of creating a table per user. To get help for this you should add way more detail about the reasoning to your question to get a good answer. As far as I know there is also a maximum number of classes you can create on Parse so sooner or later you will run into problems, either performance wise or due to technical limitations of the platform.
That being said, you can use the Schema API to programmatically create/delete/update tables of your Parse app. It always requires the master key, so doing this from the client side is not recommended for security reasons. You could put this into a Cloud Code function for example and call this one from your app/admin tool to create a new table for a user on the fly or delete a table of a user.
Again, better don't do it and think about a better way to design your database, it would be out of scope here to discuss it.
My task is to make a trigger which will fire when our programmers create, alter, replace or delete triggers in database. It must log their changes to 2 datatables which I made similar to SYS.trigger$ table and added some extra info about user who made changes to them. I copied the principles of logging from already existing audit capability in ERP-system named Galaktika or Galaxy to be simple. However, I encountered a well-famous problem ORA-04089: no one can create triggers on system tables and stuck with it.
Now I'm looking for a way to gently modify my trigger according to database rules. Here is the original code:
CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER MRK_AlTrigger$
BEFORE DELETE OR INSERT OR UPDATE
ON SYS.TRIGGER$
REFERENCING NEW AS New OLD AS Old
FOR EACH ROW
DECLARE
Log_Rec MRK_TRIGGERS_LOG_HEADER.NREC%TYPE;
BEGIN
INSERT INTO MRK_TRIGGERS_LOG_HEADER (DATEOFCHANGE,
USERCODE,
OPERATION,
OBJ#)
VALUES (
SYSDATE,
UID,
CASE
WHEN INSERTING THEN 0
WHEN UPDATING THEN 1
WHEN DELETING THEN 2
END,
CASE
WHEN INSERTING OR UPDATING THEN :new.OBJ#
ELSE :old.OBJ#
END)
RETURNING NRec
INTO Log_Rec;
IF INSERTING OR UPDATING
THEN
INSERT INTO MRK_TRIGGERS_LOG_SPECIF (LOGLINK,
OBJ#,
TYPE#,
UPDATE$,
INSERT$,
DELETE$,
BASEOBJECT,
REFOLDNAME,
REFNEWNAME,
DEFINITION,
WHENCLAUSE,
ACTION#,
ACTIONSIZE,
ENABLED,
PROPERTY,
SYS_EVTS,
NTTRIGCOL,
NTTRIGATT,
REFPRTNAME,
ACTIONLINENO)
VALUES (Log_Rec,
:new.OBJ#,
:new.TYPE#,
:new.UPDATE$,
:new.INSERT$,
:new.DELETE$,
:new.BASEOBJECT,
:new.REFOLDNAME,
:new.REFNEWNAME,
:new.DEFINITION,
:new.WHENCLAUSE,
:new.ACTION#,
:new.ACTIONSIZE,
:new.ENABLED,
:new.PROPERTY,
:new.SYS_EVTS,
:new.NTTRIGCOL,
:new.NTTRIGATT,
:new.REFPRTNAME,
:new.ACTIONLINENO);
END IF;
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS
THEN
-- Consider logging the error and then re-raise
RAISE;
END MRK_AlTrigger$;
/
I can also provide MRK_TRIGGERS_LOG_HEADER and MRK_TRIGGERS_LOG_SPECIF DDL, but think it is not necessary. So to make summary, here are the questions I have:
How do I modify the above source to the syntax CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER ON DATABASE?
Am I inventing a wheel doing this? Is there any common way to do such things? (I noticed that some tables have logging option, but consider it is for debugging purposes)
Any help will be appreciated!
UPD: I came to decision (thanks to APC) that it is better to hold different versions of code in source control and record only revision number in DB, but dream about doing this automatically.
"We despaired to appeal to our programmers' neatness so my boss
requires that there must be strong and automatic way to log changes.
And to revert them quickly if we need."
In other words, you want a technical fix for what is a political problem. This does not work. However, if you have your boss's support you can sort it out. But it will get messy.
I have been on both sides of this fence, having worked as developer and development DBA. I know from bitter experience how bad it can be if the development database - schemas, configuration parameters, reference data, etc - are not kept under control. Your developers will feel like they are flying right now, but I guarantee you they are not tracking all the changes they make in script form . So their changes are not reversible or repeatable, and when the project reaches UAT the deployment will most likely be a fiasco (buy me a beer and I'll tell you some stories).
So what to do?
Privileged access
Revoke access to SYSDBA accounts and application schema accounts from developers. Apart from anything else you may find parts of the application start to rely on privileged accesses and/or hard-coded passwords, and those are Bad Things; you don't want to include those breaches in Production.
As your developers have got accustomed to having such access this will be highly unpopular. Which is why you need your boss's support. You also must have a replacement approach in place, so leave this action until last. But make no mistake, this is the endgame.
Source control
Database schemas are software too. They are built out of programs, just like the rest of the application, only the source code is DDL and DML scripts not C# or Java. These scripts can be controlled in SVN as with any other source code.
How to organise it in source control? That can be tricky. So recognise that you have three categories of scripts:
Schema scripts which deploy objects
Configuration scripts which insert reference data, manage system parameters, etc
Build scripts which call the other scripts in the right order
Managing the schema scripts is the hardest thing to get right. I suggest you use separate scripts for each object. Also, have separate scripts for table, indexes and constraints. This means you can build all the tables without needing to arrange them in dependency order.
Handling change
The temptation will be to just control a CREATE TABLE statement (or whatever). This is a mistake. In actuality changes to the schema are just as likely to add, drop or modify columns as to introduce totally new objects. Store a CREATE TABLE statement as a baseline, then manage subsequent changes as ALTER TABLE statements.
One file for CREATE TABLE and subsequent ALTER TABLE commands, or separate ones? I'm comfortable having one script: I don't mind if a CREATE TABLE statement fails when I'm expecting the table to already be there. But this can be confusing if others will be running the scripts in say Production. So have a baseline script then separate scripts for applying changes. One alter script per object per time-box is a good compromise.
Changes from developers consist of
alter table script(s) to apply the change
a mirrored alter table script(s) to reverse the change
other scripts, e.g. DML
change reference number (which they will use in SVN)
Because you're introducing this late in the day, you'll need to be diplomatic. So make the change process light and easy to use. Also make sure you check and run the scripts as soon as possible. If you're responsive and do things quickly enough the developers won't chafe under the restricted access.
Getting to there
First of all you need to establish a baseline. Something like DBMS_METADATA will give you CREATE statements for all current objects. You need to organise them in SVN and write the build scripts. Create a toy database and get this right.
This may take some time, so remember to refresh the DDL scripts so they reflect the latest statement. If you have access to a schema comparison tool that would be very handy right now.
Next, sort out the configuration. Hopefully you already know tables contain reference data, otherwise ask the developers.
In your toy database practice zapping the database and building it from scratch. You can use something like Ant or Hudson to automate this if you're feeling adventurous, but at the very least you need some shell scripts to get a build out of SVN.
Making the transition
This is the big one. Announce the new regime to the developers. Get your boss to attend the meeting. Remind the developers to inform you of any changes they make to the database.
That night:
Take a full export with Data Pump
Drop all the application schemas.
Build the application from SVN
Reload the data - but not the data structures - with Data Pump
Hopefully you won't have any structural issues; but if the developer has made changes without telling you you'll know - and they won't have any data in the table.
Make sure you revoke the SYSDBA access as soon as possible.
The developers will need access to a set of schemas so they can write the ALTER scripts. In the developers don't have local personal databases or private schemas to test things I suggest you let them have access to that toy database to test change scripts. Alternatively you can let them keep the application owner access, because you'll be repeating the Trash'n'Rebuild exercise on a regular basis. Once they get used to the idea that they will lose any changes they don't tell you about they will knuckle down and start Doing The Right Thing.
Last word
Obviously this is a lot of vague windbaggery, lacking in solid detail. But that's politics for you.
Postscript
I was at a UKOUG event yesterday, and attended a session by a couple of smart chaps from Regdate. They have a product Source Control for Oracle which provides an interface between (say) SVN and the database. It takes a rather different approach from what I outlined above. But their approach is a sound one. Their tool automates a lot of things, and I think it might help you a lot in your current situation. I must stress that I haven't actually used this product but I think you should check it out - there's a 28 day free trial. Of course, if you don't have any money to spend then this won't help you.
you can find the desierd infos in the following trigger attributes
dictionary_obj_name
dictionary_obj_owner
ora_sysevent
here is the simple ON DATABASE trigger
CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER trigger_name
AFTER CREATE OR DROP ON DATABASE
BEGIN
IF dictionary_obj_type = 'TRIGGER'
THEN
INSERT INTO log_table ( trg_name, trg_owner, trg_action) VALUES (dictionary_obj_name,dictionary_obj_owner, ora_sysevent);
END IF;
END;
/
I have a to develop a PL/SQL procedure that dumps the content of a table when an error occurs during an application transaction, the content of the dump must match the content of the table before the ROLLBACK of the transaction.
I thought about using external table as the dump format of the table (TYPE ORACLE_DATAPUMP). After going through the Oracle documentation, I found that the only way to that is by executing:
CREATE TABLE tabtest_test (
F1 NUMBER,
F2 CHAR(10))
ORGANIZATION EXTERNAL (
TYPE ORACLE_DATAPUMP
DEFAULT DIRECTORY USER_DUMP_DEST
LOCATION ('tabtest.dmp’));
The problem is that by executing the “CREATE TABLE”, Oracle performs an implicit commit within our failed transaction which needs to be rolled back after the dump of the table.
I thought about using the “PRAGMA AUTONOMOUS_TRANSACTION;” to execute the “CREATE TABLE”, but it doesn’t really fit our need as it dumps the content of the table outside our application transaction.
My question: is there a way to get the 'tabtest.dmp’ without doing a “CREATE TABLE” ? for example by accessing directly the Oracle API responsible for this.
Regards.
How about creating the external table once, as part of your application setup process?
Failing that, you could create it at the beginning of the transaction that might need it. If there is an error, populate it; if the transaction finishes successfully, drop it.
If (and it's a big IF) you can use AUTONOMOUS_TRANSACTIONS to create the table in a separate transaction, I think this is what you need to do. If you manage to create the table within the scope of your current transaction, and write your data to that newly-created table, that data should, by all rights, disappear as soon as you do your ROLLBACK.
The problems you're experiencing here are a subset of the large class of issues known as "Problems Which Occur When Trying To Treat A Relational Database As A Flat File". Relational databases are great when used AS DATABASES, but are really bad at being flat files. It's kind of like animals on the farm - sheep are great AS SHEEP, but make lousy cows. Cows make lousy goats. Goats - great animals - intelligent, affectionate (yep), low-maintenance, won't hear a word spoken against 'em - but NOT what you want in a draft animal - use a horse, ox, or mule for that. Basically, you should pick horses for courses (pardon the expression). A database makes a crappy flat file, and vice versa. Use what's appropriate.
IMO you'd be better off writing your data to a flat file, and perhaps this file could be mapped in as an external table. You might want to write the file in something like CSV format that lots of other tools can process. YMMV.
Share and enjoy.
Why do you need to use external tables? You could just read the file using UTL_FILE.
OK, the question title probably isn't the best, but I'm looking for a good way to implement an extensible set of parameters for Oracle database applications that "stay with" the host/instance. By "stay with", I mean that I'd like to rule out just having an Oracle table of name/value pairs that would have to modified if I create a test/QA instance by cloning the production instance. (For example, imagine a parameter called email_error_address that should be set to prod_support#abc.com in production and qa_support#abc.com in testing).
These parameters need to be accessed from both PL/SQL code running in the database as well as client-side code. I started out doing this by overloading the plsql_cc_flags init parameter (not a solution I'm proud of), but this is getting messy to maintain and parse.
[Edit]
Ideally, the implementation would allow changes to the list without restarting the instance, similar to the dynamically-modifiable init parameters.
You want to have a separate set of values for each environment. You want these values to be independent of the data, so that they don't get overridden if you import data from another instance.
The solution is to use an external table (providing you are on 9i or higher). Because external tables hold the data in an OS file they are independent of the database. To apply changed values all you need to do is overwrite the OS file.
All you need to do is ensure that the files for each environment are kept separate, This is easy enough if Test, QA, Production, etc are on their own servers. If they are on the same server then you will need to distinguish them by file name or directory path; in either case you may need to issue a bit of DDL to correct the location in the event of a database refresh.
The drawback to using external tables is that they can be a bit of a performance overhead - they are really intended for bulk loading. If this is likely to be a problem you could use caching, with a user-defined namespace or CONTEXT. Load the values into memory using DBMS_SESSION.SET_CONTEXT() either on demand on with an ON LOGON trigger. Retrieve the values by wrapper calls to SYS_CONTEXT(). Because the namespace is in session memory retrieval is quite fast. René Nyffenegger has a simple example of working with CONTEXT: check it out.
While I've been writing this up I see you have added a requirement to change things on the fly. As I have said already this is easy with an OS file, but the use of caching makes things sightly more difficult. The solution would be to use a globally accessible CONTEXT. Have a routine which loads all the values at startup which you can also call whenever you refresh the OS file.
You could use environment variables that you can set per oracle user (the account that starts up the Oracle database) or per server. The environment variables can be read with the DBMS_SYSTEM.GET_ENV procedure.
I tend to use a system_parameters table. If your concerned with it being overwritten put it in it's own schema and make a public synonym.
#APC's answer is clever.
You could solve the performance overhead by adding a materialized view on top of the external table(s). You would refresh it after RMAN-cloning, and after each update of the config files.
I want to load data into text file that is generated after executing "views" in Oracle?How can I achieve this in oracle using UNIX.for example-
I want the same in Oracle on unix box.Please help me out as it alredy cosume lots of time.
your early response is highly appreciated!!
As Thomas asked, we need to know what you are doing with the "flat file". For example, if you're loading it into spreadsheet or doing some other processing that expects a defined format, then you need to use SQL*Plus and spool to a file. If you're looking to save a table (data + table definition) for moving it to another Oracle database then EXP/IMP is the tool to use.
We generally describe the data retrieval process as "selecting" from a table/view, not "executing" a table/view.
If you have access to directories on the database server, and authority to create "Directory" objects in Oracle, then you have lots of options.
For example, you can use the UTL_FILE package (part of the PL/SQL built-ins) to read or write files at the operating system level.
Or use the "external table" functionality to define objects that look like single tables to Oracle but are actually flat files at the OS level. Well documented in the Oracle docs.
Also, for one-time tasks, most of the tools for working SQL and PL/SQL provide facilities for moving data to and from the database. In the Windows environment, Toad's good at that. So is Oracle's free SQLDeveloper, which runs on many platforms. You wouldn't want to use those for a process that runs every day, but they're fine for single moves. I've generally found these easier to use than SQLPlus spooling, but that's a primitive version of the same functionality.
As stated by others, we need to know a bit more about what you're trying to do.