Windows analog of _NET_WM_USER_TIME - winapi

Is there an analog of _NET_WM_USER_TIME property in Win32 or other way to get list of windows sorted by last used time?

There's the EnumWindows call, which lists all of the windows on-screen at any given time:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms633497(v=vs.85).aspx
Secondly, GetActiveWindow will give you the top-level window currently active, and GetFocus the window with input focus:
How can I tell if a Window has focus? (Win32 API)
There's no way to get a list of focus history from the Win32 API - it's a pretty niche bit of information! - but you can run a process on a background thread which periodically iterates through the results of EnumWindows, compares the handle to GetActiveWindow and stores a log over time of windows and focus statuses. That way, you'll be able to interrogate your very own log whenever you want without additional overhead.
I used to do much the same thing from Visual Basic back in the pre .NET days, but the same should be perfectly possible from any other environment which can get to the Win32 API.

Related

How to improve CGWindowListCopyWindowInfo performance

The documentation for CGWindowListCopyWindowInfo says
Generating the dictionaries for system windows is a relatively expensive operation. As always, you should profile your code and adjust your usage of this function appropriately for your needs.
My question is how can I "adjust" my use of this function? For a code automation process I frequently need to check what window is frontmost among those of document or modal level. That is, I call CGWindowListCopyWindowInfo, ignore the windows that belong to other processes or have levels that I don't care about, and identify the first window that remains.
If there were a way to ask for information about just the windows owned by my process, say, that would be nice, but I see no way to do that. Or if there were a way to be notified when my windows change. I could watch for Carbon Events when windows are hidden or shown, but of course that is a deprecated technology.
You can use [NSWindow windowNumbersWithOptions:0] to get the window numbers of just the current application's windows (on the active space) in z-order.

How does Spy++ construct its process list?

TL;DR - How does the Spy++ tool really construct its process list?
Stage
We have an MFC desktop application (running on Windows XP) that is hanging in that it doesn't react to any user input anymore. It is redrawn when switching to it via alt-tab however. (It does receive WM_SETFOCUS, WM_ACTIVATE, etc. It apparently does not receive any mouse or keyboard messages.)
Since the app is hanging in some limbo, we pulled a few process dumps, but these were of little help so far. Enter:
Spy++
We used Spy++ to find the information I gave above about the window messages this application seems to be processing. We did this by Opening the Windows View and selecting our application Window and in the Messages properties selected Windows of same process and Messages to View : Select All.
However we first tried to view all messages of this process by opening the Processes View of Spy++ and our application is not shown in this process list. Cross checking on another PC where the app is running normally, the process is also normally shown in the processes list of Spy++.
Can anything about the misbehaving app be inferred from the fact that the process is not shown in Spy++'s Process View, but the main window of the app is shown in the Windows View. Why would a process with a main window that is visible not be shown in Spy++'s Processes View?
The process is listed in Task Manager and in the Attach Process Window of Visual Studio 2005. So these tools apparently use a different method to list processes than Spy++ ... ?
The system where the app is currently hanging is a Windows XP SP2 system and we've used the Spy++ Utility that comes with Visual Studio 2005.
The behavior does recur occasionally, but only after the App has been running for several days!
Running Vista or later? Your process is probably elevated and Spy++ is not. Newer versions of Spy++ require elevation. So, try elevating Spy++ explicitly and see if that helps.
Yes, of course things can be inferred from this. Don't take anything I say too seriously in this context, I'd have to go look at the code. But I believe that Spy goes off and looks at the EnumProcesses API. (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms682629.aspx)
So, if your process isn't showing up there... hrm.
But, what is different between the system where it's working and the one where it's not?
Spy++ requires the following two values in the registry to be disabled (0) to display the processes/threads list AT ALL:
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Perflib
HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\PerfProc\Performance
Disable Performance Counters -> either 0 or not present
Was going insane trying to find out why it refused to display them. It's some kind of bad joke - this debugger requires itself a debugger to get it working! Not that WinDBG would display any meaningful info, MS doesn't even provide a symbol file on their symbol server, pfft.
Anyway, maybe it doesn't display processes that have their performance counters disabled, because I think, this can be set on individual basis, at least for services, like:
HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\.NET CLR Networking\Performance
Disable Performance Counters
So it's basically always a value of the "Performance" subkey. All this stuff is undocumented, it makes use of advapi32.dll functions like "PerfRegQueryValue" and "PerfRegQueryInfoKey"... don't ask me.

Win32 - Can one Enumerate the windows belonging to the calling thread?

From MSDN on GetActiveWindow
"Retrieves the window handle to the active window attached to the calling thread's message queue."
I'm writing SketchUp plugins using its Ruby API. Currently trying to make some tweaks to some windows via the Win32. From the Ruby API I have very limited info about SU's window and thread. GetActiveWindow works fine as long as the SketchUp window has focus - but fails otherwise.
So I am looking for a safe way to get hold of the handle to the SketchUp window regardless of whether it has focus or not.
Seeing how GetActiveWindow is able to get the active window for the calling process I was wondering if it was possible to enumerate the windows that belong to the calling process instead. Then I can scan through the results and find my window.
Alternatively, getting the process id for the calling thread, so I can enumerate ALL windows and pick out the one that belong to the thread my script runs in.
Any ideas?
You can use EnumWindows to find all top-level windows. In Ruby, win32-api supports passing in appropriate callbacks.
Edit: You can then use GetWindowThreadProcessId to determine what process each window belongs to.
Edit: To determine the process id of the process running your script, use GetCurrentProcessId.

How do I provide the "Find Window's Process" feature in Process Explorer (sysinternals)

I'm developing an application for debugging purposes. I want the user to be able to select the process to be debugged using the mouse. Process Explorer does a great job of this with the "Find Window's Process" feature. What I can't figure out is how it does this? Does anyone know the Window's API that provides this functionality?
Thanks, Grant
I haven't tried this, but it should work: Use WindowFromPoint to get the window handle, then use GetWindowThreadProcessId to get the ID of the process that created the window.
Alternatively, you could use EnumWindows to enumerate all top-level windows on the screen, filter them by some criteria (e.g. position) and then use GetWindowThreadProcessId to get the process IDs.
If I understand you correctly you are looking to enumerate all Windows and perform some action when the target Window in question is found. You can do this by enumerating all current windows and then performing some action when the user is over the window in question. You will have to associate that window handle with a process.
This is not a simple task as it requires going through a lot of hoops but it is possible, just have to put all the pieces together.

Window title for a console application

In Visual Studio's Attach to Process dialog, one of the columns in the Available Processes list is "Title", which lists the title of the topmost window owned by each process.
We spawn multiple instances of several server processes in order to compartmentalize the work. For these console processes, the Title field is blank, so currently we have to look up the process id in our management tool in order to find the correct process.
In order to streamline the debugging process, I would love to be able to use the Title field to directly determine which process I want.
SetConsoleTitle does not do the trick, nor SetWindowText with a NULL hWnd. To the best of my knowledge, a console application does not intrinsically own any window handles that we could pass to SetWindowText. We don't want to create any visible windows for these server processes.
Any suggestions for a reasonable way to trick Visual Studio into displaying some useful information here?
I think you might be out of luck. The console window does not belong to the console process, but instead belongs to a system process (conhost.exe on win7 and maybe vista, csrss.exe before that) so if Visual Studio is just looking for a processes top level windows it won't find the console window. Probing consoles out of proc is not supported as far as I know, so there is probably no sensible way for visual studio to see the title of the console windows you have.
One possible solution might be to create a top level window in your console process as a debugging aid. You might want to conditionally compile it, so it is only available when you're debugging though. Just create an additional thread which pumps messages, and create a top level window. If you set the right styles the window will be invisible. You might not want to ship with the window in the code because in long running server code, windows always increase your attack surface, even if only a little bit.
This is probably not very helpful, but it is worth mentioning that on windows the preferred way of portioning up work would be to use threads rather than multiple processes. A process is an expensive object, and threads are much cheaper in terms of system resources as well as being easier to debug.

Resources