The aim is to remove only the last row at any time and only by the last remove button.
There is a user interface which building up as a multiplication of the same row. The number of rows are controlled by 'Add' & 'Remove' buttons which are also elements of the row. The problem is that the hidden widgets - that are applied for each row to distinguish the instances by storing their row numbers - are storing the very same number which is the last one. Except the first (0) hidden widget which stores the proper number (0). Where am I missing the point? How should this be resolved?
As per the remove buttons have two different purposes (not detailed here), we use a cacheService to distinguish the last row from all the others. Only the last row should be removed at any time.
var cache = CacheService.getPrivateCache();
we clear the cache and create the first instance
function doGet() {
var app = UiApp.createApplication();
app.add(app.createVerticalPanel().setId('mainContainer'));
cache.removeAll([]);
ui(0);
cache.put('numberOfInstances',0);
return app; }
each instance is held by a horizontal panel which contains the mentioned hidden widget, a label which informs about the instance number, and the Add & Remove buttons.
function ui(instance) {
var app = UiApp.getActiveApplication();
var eventContainer = app.createHorizontalPanel()
.setId('eventContainer' + instance);
var instanceContainer = app.createHidden('instanceContainer',instance);
var showInstance = app.createLabel(instance)
.setId('showInstance' + instance);
var addButton = app.createButton('Add')
.setId('add' + instance)
.addClickHandler(app.createClientHandler()
.forEventSource().setEnabled(false)) //avoiding multiple click during server response
.addClickHandler(app.createServerHandler('add')
.addCallbackElement(instanceContainer));
var removeButton = app.createButton('X')
.addClickHandler(app.createServerHandler('remove')
.addCallbackElement(instanceContainer));
app.getElementById('mainContainer')
.add(eventContainer
.add(instanceContainer)
.add(showInstance)
.add(addButton)
.add(removeButton));
return app; }
and the event handling...
function add(inst) {
var app = UiApp.getActiveApplication();
var instance = Number(inst.parameter.instanceContainer);
ui(instance+1);
cache.put('numberOfInstances',instance+1);
return app; }
function remove(inst) {
var app = UiApp.getActiveApplication();
var instance = Number(inst.parameter.instanceContainer);
var numberOfInstances = cache.get('numberOfInstances')
if( (instance != 0) && (instance = numberOfInstances) ) {
app.getElementById('mainContainer').remove(app.getElementById('eventContainer' + instance));
cache.put('numberOfInstances',instance-1);
app.getElementById('add' + (instance-1)).setEnabled(true); } //avoiding multiple click during server response
return app; }
The aim is to remove only the last row at any time and only by the last remove button.
Many Thanks.
Why don't you simply use a clientHandler just as you did on the 'add' button? You could target the preceding 'remove' button and disable it each time you create a new one and change /update each time you remove one row.
EDIT : I can suggest you something, feel free to have a look, I changed a bit the approach but it is working and I hope you'll find it at least interesting ;-)
Link to the online test
function doGet() {
var app = UiApp.createApplication();
var counter = app.createHidden().setName('counter').setId('counter').setValue('1');
var mainContainer = app.createVerticalPanel().setId('mainContainer')
app.add(mainContainer.add(counter));
var event1Container = app.createHorizontalPanel()
var showInstance = app.createLabel('1')
var addButton = app.createButton('Add')
.setId('add1')
.addClickHandler(app.createClientHandler()
.forEventSource().setEnabled(false)) //avoiding multiple click during server response
.addClickHandler(app.createServerHandler('add')
.addCallbackElement(mainContainer));
var removeButton = app.createButton('X')
.setId('remove1')
.addClickHandler(app.createServerHandler('remove')
.addCallbackElement(mainContainer));
mainContainer.add(event1Container
.add(showInstance)
.add(addButton)
.add(removeButton));
return app; }
function add(inst) {
var app = UiApp.getActiveApplication();
var hiddenVal =inst.parameter.counter;
var counterVal = Number(hiddenVal);
var mainContainer = app.getElementById('mainContainer')
var counter = app.getElementById('counter')
++ counterVal
counter.setValue(counterVal.toString())
var eventContainer = app.createHorizontalPanel().setId('eventContainer'+counterVal)
var showInstance = app.createLabel(counterVal.toString())
var addButton = app.createButton('Add')
.setId('add'+counterVal)
.addClickHandler(app.createClientHandler()
.forEventSource().setEnabled(false)) //avoiding multiple click during server response
.addClickHandler(app.createServerHandler('add')
.addCallbackElement(mainContainer));
var removeButton = app.createButton('X')
.setId('remove'+counterVal)
.addClickHandler(app.createServerHandler('remove')
.addCallbackElement(mainContainer));
app.add(eventContainer
.add(showInstance)
.add(addButton)
.add(removeButton));
if(counterVal>1){app.getElementById('remove'+(counterVal-1)).setEnabled(false)}
return app; }
function remove(inst) {
var app = UiApp.getActiveApplication();
var counterVal = Number(inst.parameter.counter);
var counter = app.getElementById('counter')
if(counterVal ==1) {return app}
var maincontainer = app.getElementById('mainContainer')
app.getElementById('eventContainer' + counterVal).setVisible(false)
--counterVal
counter.setValue(counterVal.toString())
app.getElementById('add'+counterVal).setEnabled(true)
app.getElementById('remove'+counterVal).setEnabled(true)
return app;
}
NOTE : I didn't make use of .remove(widget) since this is a fairly new method and I don't know exactly how it works... I'll test it later. Until then I used setVisible(false) instead, sorry about that :-)
Note 2 : I didn't use the cache since the hidden widget is sufficient to keep track of what is going on... if you needed it for something else then you could always add it back .
Related
I wanted the scene load 5 different movie clips (named B1-B5). Each movie clip is placed on a specific x and y. Each movie clip grows/shrinks on roll over/roll out....
I got the code working by typing everything out and duplicating each section per time but it's messy and I'd like to clean up the code by getting a loop to do it (if it's possible?).
This is the code that works but I'd have to duplicate it per movie clip (changing the obvious bits)...
var scene1:MovieClip = new B1();
addChild(scene1);
scene1.x = 170.30;
scene1.y = 231.15;
scene1.addEventListener(MouseEvent.MOUSE_OVER, onRollOverEvent1);
scene1.addEventListener(MouseEvent.MOUSE_OUT, onRollOutEvent1);
function onRollOverEvent1(e:MouseEvent) {
scene1.width=25.9;
scene1.height=25;
}
function onRollOutEvent1(e:MouseEvent) {
scene1.width = 20.9;
scene1.height = 20;
}
Below is what I've tried out but have been stuck for a good while...
for (var i:int=1; i<5; i++){
var scene[i]:MovieClip = new "B"+i();
addChild("scene"+i);
//var scene[i]:MovieClip = new B[i]();
scene[i].addEventListener(MouseEvent.MOUSE_OVER, onRollOverEvent);
scene[i].addEventListener(MouseEvent.MOUSE_OUT, onRollOutEvent)
function onRollOverEvent(e:MouseEvent) {
scene[i].width=25.9;
scene[i].height=25;
}
function onRollOutEvent(e:MouseEvent) {
scene[i].width = 20.9;
scene[i].height = 20;
}
}
scene1.x = 170.30;
scene1.y = 231.15;
scene2.x = 284.30;
scene2.y = 250.75;
scene3.x = 377.30;
scene3.y = 280.15;
scene4.x = 444.30;
scene4.y = 321.15;
scene5.x = 196.30;
scene5.y = 172.15;
First, lets go through your mistakes.
new "B"+i();
At the very best that translates to calling a number i as function and adding the result to "B" as a String. But even new "B1"() is not the same as new B1(). There is, in fact, a method getDefinitionByName(..) that allows to address a class via its name, but I don't recommend to use it because it is advanced topic.
var scene[i]:MovieClip
You just cannot define variables scene1, scene2, etc this way. The closest thing you can actually devise is the square bracket notation: this["scene" + i] = ....
addChild("scene"+i);
The argument must be a DisplayObject instance, not a String.
for (...)
{
...
function onRollOverEvent(e:MouseEvent)
...
}
Do not define functions inside other functions or loops.
scene[i].width = 20.9;
scene[i].height = 20;
By the end of your loop i will be equal to 5, so, what do you think such a record will address?
Then, the solution.
When you come to scaling your working solution to multiple instances, you are to go algorithmic. Loops and Arrays are your friends.
// Lets devise a list of classes and (x,y) coordinates.
var Designs:Array = [
null, // the 0-th element
{id:B1, x:170, y:230},
{id:B2, x:285, y:250},
];
for (var i:int = 1; i < Design.length; i++)
{
// Retrieve a record for the future object.
var aDesign:Object = Designs[i];
// Get a reference to the object's class.
var aClass:Class = aDesign.id;
// Create the object. Yes, you CAN omit () with
// the "new" operator if there are no mandatory arguments.
var aThing:Movieclip = new aClass;
// Set coordinates from the design record.
aThing.x = aDesign.x;
aThing.y = aDesign.y;
// Add to the display list.
addChild(aThing);
// Subscribe the event handlers.
aThing.addEventListener(MouseEvent.MOUSE_OVER, onOver);
aThing.addEventListener(MouseEvent.MOUSE_OUT, onOut);
// Save the object's reference for the later use.
// If you'd need to address, say, 3rd object,
// you do it as following:
// Designs[3].instance
aDesign.instance = aThing;
}
function onOver(e:MouseEvent):void
{
// You subscribed all of the objects to this one event handler.
// This is the correct way to learn, which one of the objects
// is under the mouse and is dispatching the said event.
var aThing:MovieClip = e.currentTarget as MovieClip;
// Change the object's size.
aThing.width = 26;
aThing.height = 25;
}
function onOut(e:MouseEvent):void
{
// Get the source of the dispatched event.
var aThing:MovieClip = e.currentTarget as MovieClip;
// Change the object's size.
aThing.width = 21;
aThing.height = 20;
}
I'm trying to insert images into Google Docs (other GSuite apps later) from an Add-On. I've succeeded in fetching the image and inserting it when getCursor() returns a valid Position. When there is a selection (instead of a Cursor), I can succeed if it's text that's selected by walking up to the Parent of the selected text and inserting the image at the start of the paragraph (not perfect, but OK).
UPDATE: It seems that I was using a deprecated method (getSelectedElements()), but that didn't fix the issue. It seems the issue is only with wrapped images as well (I didn't realize that the type of the object changed when you changed it to a wrapped text).
However, when an wrapped-text Image (presumably a PositionedImage) is highlighted (with the rotate and resize handles visible in blue), both getSelection() and getCursor() return null. This is a problem as I would like to be able to get that image and replace it with the one I'm inserting.
Here's my code... any help would be great.
var response = UrlFetchApp.fetch(imageTokenURL);
var selection = DocumentApp.getActiveDocument().getSelection();
if (selection)
{
Logger.log("Got Selection");
var replaced = false;
var elements = selection.getRangeElements();
if (elements.length === 1
&& elements[0].getElement().getType() === DocumentApp.ElementType.INLINE_IMAGE)
{
//replace the URL -- this never happens
}
//otherwise, we take the first element and work from there:
var firstElem = elements[0].getElement();
Logger.log("First Element Type = " + firstElem.getType());
if (firstElem.getType() == DocumentApp.ElementType.PARAGRAPH)
{
var newImage = firstElem.asParagraph().insertInlineImage(0, response);
newImage.setHeight(200);
newImage.setWidth(200);
}
else if (firstElem.getType() == DocumentApp.ElementType.TEXT)
{
var p = firstElem.getParent();
if (p.getType() == DocumentApp.ElementType.PARAGRAPH)
{
var index = p.asParagraph().getChildIndex(firstElem);
var newImage = p.asParagraph().insertInlineImage(index, response);
newImage.setHeight(200);
newImage.setWidth(200);
}
}
} else {
Logger.log("Checking Cursor");
var cursor = DocumentApp.getActiveDocument().getCursor();
if (cursor)
{
Logger.log("Got Cursor: " + cursor);
var newImage = cursor.insertInlineImage(response);
var p = cursor.getElement();
var size=200;
newImage.setHeight(size);
newImage.setWidth(size);
}
}
You are using the deprecated 'getSelectedElements()' method of the Range class. You may notice it's crossed out in the autocomplete selection box.
Instead, use the 'getRangeElements()' method. After selecting the image in the doc, the code below worked for me:
var range = doc.getSelection();
var element = range.getRangeElements()[0].getElement();
Logger.log(element.getType() == DocumentApp.ElementType.INLINE_IMAGE); //logs 'true'
When a button is pressed, I would like the id and the name of the button saved locally.
I am not quite sure the best way to approach this problem. Should I use appcelerator properties (http://docs.appcelerator.com/titanium/3.0/#!/api/Titanium.App.Properties) or write to a file to storage? At the moment I am using the Ti.App.Properties.setList.
Example code:
searchStorageName = "searchHistory";
searchResultsArray = [];
var currentEntries = (Ti.App.Properties.getList(searchStorageName));
// Create search entry object.
var localSearchObject = {
company_name: resultNodeCompany,
company_id: resultNodeCompanyID,
variation_id: resultNodeCompanyVariationID
};
// Check if existing entries, if so push current search
// and previous searches to array.
if(currentEntries === null || currentEntries === undefined){
searchResultsArray.push(localSearchObject);
Ti.App.Properties.setList(searchStorageName, searchResultsArray);
// searchResultsArray.push(localSearchObject, currentEntries);
}
else {
searchResultsArray.push(localSearchObject, currentEntries);
Ti.App.Properties.setList(searchStorageName, searchResultsArray);
}
I am stuck at the moment as it is inserting duplicate searches into the array. When I loop over the values to create a list in the UI it shows duplicates.
var currentEntries = (Ti.App.Properties.getList(searchStorageName));
var currentEntriesLength = currentEntries.length;
var getPreviousHistorySearchesArray = [];
currentEntries.forEach(function(entry, index) {
var company_name = entry.company_name;
var company_id = entry.company_id;
var variation_id = entry.variation_id;
// Create View Entry.
createSearchHistoryViewEntry(index, company_name, company_id, variation_id);
}
Use SQLite_Database Better than local properties http://docs.appcelerator.com/titanium/3.0/#!/guide/Working_with_a_SQLite_Database
I have two slickgrid and one delete button,
When i click on delete,i want focused grid so that i will delete items.
How to get focused grid ?
This is what i have done so far....
function deleteRow(e, args){
//code to delete items from "grid"
var selectedrows = grid.getSelectedRows();
var len = selectedrows.length;
var itemNo = "";
for(var i=0;i<len;i++)
{
var data = grid.getData().getItem(selectedrows[i]);
dataView.deleteItem(data.id);
itemNo =data.id;
var url = "delete_Item_Master?itemNo="+itemNo;
$.get(url, {itemNo : itemNo},function(data) {
location.reload(true);
});
}
//code to delete items from "metalGrid"
var metalSelectedrows = metalGrid.getSelectedRows();
var mlen = metalSelectedrows.length;
var itemNo = "";
for(var i=0;i<mlen;i++)
{
var mData = metalGrid.getData().getItem(metalSelectedrows[i]);
meyalDataView.deleteItem(mData.id);
itemNo =mData.id;
var url = "delete_subItem?itemNo="+itemNo;
$.get(url, {itemNo : itemNo},function(data) {
location.reload(true);
});
}
}
But this code delete items from both grid..
I think that the correct way to do this is to write your own selection model. It should be a Singleton, and two grids should interact with it. It should know which grid was last active.
But you need to ask yourself is that behaviour is good. What if user will delete an item from another grid - because there's only one button. IMHO every grid should have it's own button. And I work for an ERP company where we got that dillemas everyday ;)
I have an interface that calls a script for spreadsheet creation using data taken from other spreadsheet. I want the interface to update its labels at runtime in order to give visual feedback to the user and let him know the script is running and it's not stuck. When I try to update the label I put in the interface, it doesn't update the first time, but updates correctly after myFunction() reaches its end. Which means I can see the message "Creation Completed", but the message "Creating file..." is never shown. Also, the button buttonCompile is never disabled so it seems that the instructions before myFunction() are not executed at all. How can I get the labels updated and the button disabled before myFunction() starts executing? (I already double-checked variable references)
function doGet() {
var app = UiApp.createApplication();
app.add(app.loadComponent("File creation"));
var buttonCreate = app.getElementById('createBtn');
var handlerCrea = app.createServerHandler('createClickHandler');
buttonCreate.addClickHandler(handlerCreate);
return app;
}
function createClickHandler(e) {
var app = UiApp.getActiveApplication();
var label = app.getElementById('createLbl');
label.setText("Creating file...");
var buttonCompile = app.getElementById('compileBtn');
buttonCompile.setEnabled(false);
myFunction();
label.setText("Creation completed.");
buttonCompile.setEnabled(true);
app.close();
return app;
}
The cause of this behavior is that the GUI is updated only after leaving a handler. A workaround is to use two handlers. The 1st one sets the label text to Creating file... and disables the button, the 2nd one executes the myFunction function, changes the text to Creation completed, and eanbles the button. Here is an example. It disables/enables the button and the worker handler simply waits 5 seconds.
function doGet(e) {
var app = UiApp.createApplication();
var container = app.createHorizontalPanel().setId('container');
var btnPerformance = app.createButton("Performance Demo").setId('btnPerformance');
var handlerPerformance = app.createServerHandler('onBtnPerformanceClick');
var handlerWait = app.createServerHandler('onWait');
btnPerformance.addClickHandler(handlerPerformance);
btnPerformance.addClickHandler(handlerWait);
container.add(btnPerformance);
app.add(container);
return app;
}
function enableControls(enable) {
var lstControls = [ 'btnPerformance' ];
var app = UiApp.getActiveApplication();
for (var i = 0; i < lstControls.length; i++) {
var ctl = app.getElementById(lstControls[i]);
ctl.setEnabled(enable);
}
}
function onWait(e) {
enableControls(false);
return UiApp.getActiveApplication();
}
function onBtnPerformanceClick(e) {
Utilities.sleep(5000);
enableControls(true);
return UiApp.getActiveApplication();
}