I need to create insert and update triggers for view. I also need that sql%rowcount after executing insert/update on one row return 1. In SQL Server I can set nocount to on, then make some operations and then set nocount to off and select one row. How can I do something similar in Oracle.
I need this for mapping that view in NHibernate which expect Affected rows equal 1.
One way to ensure that an update will only affect one row is to create a primary key or a unique constraint on the table. Then use the columns that make up the constraint in the where clause of your update statement.
Related
I have a trigger that is fire on inserting a new record in table in that i want to insert new record in the same table.
My trigger is :
create or replace trigger inst_table
after insert on test_table referencing new as new old as old
for each row
declare
df_name varchar2(500);
df_desc varchar2(2000);
begin
df_name := :new.name;
df_desc := :new.description;
if inserting then
FOR item IN (SELECT pid FROM tbl2 where pid not in(1))
LOOP
insert into test_table (name,description,pid) values(df_name,df_desc,item.pid);
END LOOP;
end if;
end;
its give a error like
ORA-04091: table TEST_TABLE is mutating, trigger/function may not see it
i think it is preventing me to insert into same table.
so how can i insert this new record in to same table.
Note :- I am using Oracle as database
Mutation happens any time you have a row-level trigger that modifies the table that you're triggering on. The problem, is that Oracle can't know how to behave. You insert a row, the trigger itself inserts a row into the same table, and Oracle gets confused, cause, those inserts into the table due to the trigger, are they subject to the trigger action too?
The solution is a three-step process.
1.) Statement level before trigger that instantiates a package that will keep track of the rows being inserted.
2.) Row-level before or after trigger that saves that row info into the package variables that were instantiated in the previous step.
3.) Statement level after trigger that inserts into the table, all the rows that are saved in the package variable.
An example of this can be found here:
http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/ASKTOM.download_file?p_file=6551198119097816936
Hope that helps.
I'd say that you should look at any way OTHER than triggers to achieve this. As mentioned in the answer from Mark Bobak, the trigger is inserting a row and then for each row inserted by the trigger, that then needs to call the trigger to insert more rows.
I'd look at either writing a stored procedure to create the insert or just insert via a sub-query rather than by values.
Triggers can be used to solve simple problems but when solving more complicated problems they will just cause headaches.
It would be worth reading through the answers to this duplicate question posted by APC and also these this article from Tom Kyte. BTW, the article is also referenced in the duplicate question but the link is now out of date.
Although after complaining about how bad triggers are, here is another solution.
Maybe you need to look at having two tables. Insert the data into the test_table table as you currently do. But instead of having the trigger insert additional rows into the test_table table, have a detail table with the data. The trigger can then insert all the required rows into the detail table.
You may again encounter the mutating trigger error if you have a delete cascade foreign key relationship between the two tables so it might be best to avoid that.
I have a database with tables that are chained together with foreign keys, and the last one in the chain also has a foreign key to itself. I want to delete them with cascade on, exapt for the last one in the chain. That one should be set null, unless it's parent record has a certain value. I figured i would do that with a trigger: whenever the last table updated, if the foreign key to itself had been set to null, check the field in the parent record, and if it is the value "default", delete the record in the last table.
However, I haven't found any help online indicting that comparing a parent record in another table.
Is this possible?
In general, a row-level trigger on table A cannot query table A. Doing so would generally raise a mutating table exception (ORA-04091). So a trigger is generally not the right solution.
Presumably, you have some sort of API (i.e. a stored procedure) to delete records from the parent table. That API should query this last table before issuing the DELETE against the parent table. It should take care of updating the last table in the chain as well as deleting the data from the parent table.
If you really wanted a trigger-based solution, life would get substantially more complicated. You could work around the mutating table exception by
Creating a package with a collection of primary keys from the parent table
Creating a before statement trigger that initializes this collection
Creating a row-level trigger that populates the collection with the primary keys that were modified by the SQL statement
Creating an after statement trigger that iterates over the collection and issues whatever DML is necessary (unlike row-level triggers, statement-level triggers on table A can query or modify table A).
If you're using 11g, you can simplify this a bit with a compound trigger with before statement, after row, and after statement sections. But you've still got a number of moving pieces to try to coordinate.
AFAIK you won't be able to really delete the record in the last table (mutating table problem), but you could update a status field indicating the record has been logically deleted (untested):
create or replace trigger last_table_trig
before update on last_table
for each row
declare
l_parentField varchar2(100);
begin
if :new.self_ref_fk is null then
select p.parent_field into l_parentField from parent_table p
where p.pk = :new.parent_fk;
if l_parentField = 'default' then
:new.status := 'DELETED';
end if;
end if;
end;
I have a TABLE1. On this table I created a trigger : AFTER INSERT OR UPDATE OR DELETE
Now, if I do an insert which doesn't insert anything, the trigger will still be fired :
insert into TABLE1 select * from TABLE1 where 1=0;
This query will insert NO ROWS but yet the trigger is still fired.
Is there a way to avoid this ? Is this normal behavior?
Yes, it is normal behaviour. It can be avoided, though doing so requires having 3 triggers:
A BEFORE trigger to set a package boolean variable to FALSE
A FOR EACH ROW trigger to set the variable to TRUE when a row is inserted
The AFTER trigger you have, where you can now check the value of the variable before carrying out its action.
Sounds like overkill? Maybe it is: what are to trying to achieve with your trigger?
This is the normal behaviour, Oracle is expecting to insert row so it fires both BEFORE INSERT and AFTER INSERT triggers, even if no row is inserted. One of the purpose of the AFTER triggers is to do some action after a statement succeeds. This statement succeeded :)
You could count the number of rows affected with a package variable:
set the mypackage.table1_nb_ins variable to 0 in a BEFORE INSERT trigger
increment the counter in a AFTER INESRT FOR EACH ROW trigger
and then perform your AFTER INSERT logic if your counter is greater than 0
Row Triggers
A row trigger is fired each time the table is affected by the triggering statement. For example, if an UPDATE statement updates multiple rows of a table, a row trigger is fired once for each row affected by the UPDATE statement. If a triggering statement affects no rows, a row trigger is not run.
https://docs.oracle.com/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14220/triggers.htm
Hi I have a database with loads of columns and I want to insert couple of records for testing, now in order to insert something into that database I'd have to write large query .. is it possible to do something like this
INSERT INTO table (SELECT FROM table WHERE id='5') .. I try to insert the row with ID 5 but I think this will create a problem because it will try to duplicate a record, is it possible to change this ID 5 to let say 1000 then I'd be able to insert data without writing complex query and while doing so avoiding replication of data .. tnx
In PL/SQL you can do something like this:
declare
l_rec table%rowtype;
begin
select * into l_rec from table where id='5';
l_rec.id := 1000;
insert into table values l_rec;
end;
If you have a trigger on the table to handle the primary key from a sequence (:NEW.id = seq_sequence.NEXTVAL) then you should be able to do:
INSERT INTO table
(SELECT columns_needed FROM table WHERE whatever)
This will allow you to add in many rows at one (the number being limited by the WHERE clause). You'll need to select the columns that are required by the table to be not null or not having default values. Beware of any unique constraints as well.
Otherwise you'll be looking at PL/SQL or some other form of script to insert multiple rows.
For each column that has no default value or you want to insert the values other than default, you will need to provide the explicit name and value.
You only can use an implicit list (*) if you want to select all columns and insert them as they are.
Since you are changing the PRIMARY KEY, you need to enumerate.
However, you can create a before update trigger and change the value of the PRIMARY KEY in this trigger.
Note that the trigger cannot reference the table itself, so you will need to provide some other way to get the unique number (like a sequence):
CREATE TRIGGER trg_mytable_bi BEFORE INSERT ON mytable FOR EACH ROW
BEGIN
:NEW.id := s_mytable.nextval;
END;
This way you can use the asterisk but it will always replace the value of the PRIMARY KEY.
Is it possible to 'hide' a column in an Oracle 10g database, or prevent data from being inserted altogether? We'd prefer to have existing INSERT statements still function, but have the information NOT insert for a particular column. Also, column masking or any type of encryption is not preferred.
Not sure if it's possible, but thanks in advance.
If all you need to do is stop data from being inserted, you could create a BEFORE INSERT FOR EACH ROW trigger that wipes out any value inserted into the column before the row is saved.
There are various other things you can do with security (also views) to prevent inserts/selects from particular users in particular circumstances, but these will probably not let existing inserts continue to work.
With Oracle feature virtual private database (VPD) you can define which users can change and which users can select a column. Virtual private database is also called fine-grained access control (FGAC).
I know how to hide the column.
You use the
SET UNUSED
option to mark one or more columns as unused.
You use the DROP
UNUSED COLUMNS
option to remove the columns that are marked as unused.
ALTER TABLE emp
SET UNUSED (last_name);
and
ALTER TABLE emp
DROP UNUSED COLUMNS;
Rename original table, create view with original table name but only selecting the columns you want to show.
Recompile code referring to existing table.
what about just setting your grants to each item you allow to update or insert
grant select on emp to scott;
grant update (column1, column2), insert (column1) on emp to scott