Please let me know how can I can use orderby in linq only when a particular column is not null using lambda expression:
var list= // result returned from sql stored proc
list.orderby(s=>s.empid!=null).select(p=>p) //something like this
Is it possible to include a condition to perform orderby on the list?
var list = _context.Products
.Where(p => p.EmpId != null)
.OrderBy(p => p.EmpId)
.Select(p => p)
Related
trying to convert a query which has 2 levels of where in clauses to linq and getting some errors. Can anybody help me on this?
Original Query:
select id
from student
where suId
in (select suId
from subjects
where cid
in (select id
from chapters
where chapter='C203'))
LINQ query:
var query = (from s in dc.students
let subs = (from su in dc.subjects
where su.cid == Convert.ToInt32(from c in dc.Chapters
where c.chapter == 'Ç203'
select c.id) //Single chapter id will be returned
select su.suid)
where subs.Contains(s.sid)
select s.id).ToArray();
Am getting below 2 errors while compiling app
'System.Linq.IQueryable' does not contain a definition for 'Contains' and the best extension method overload 'System.Linq.ParallelEnumerable.Contains(System.Linq.ParallelQuery, TSource)' has some invalid arguments
Instance argument: cannot convert from 'System.Linq.IQueryable' to 'System.Linq.ParallelQuery'
Since Linq is lazy-loading everything you don't need to cram everything into a single statement; you can do something like this:
var chapterIds = dc.Chapters
.Where(c => c.Chapter == "C023")
.Select(c => c.Id);
var subjectIds = dc.Subjects
.Where(s => chapterIds.Contains(s.Cid))
.Select(s => s.Suid);
var students = dc.Students
.Where(s => subjectIds.Contains(s.Suid))
.Select(s => s.Sid)
.ToArray();
This way you can debug each subquery by looking at what it returns.
However, looking at your original select you can rewrite the whole thing as a Join and get rid of the bugging issue:
var students = dc.Chapters.Where(c => c.Chapter == "C023")
.Join(dc.Subjects,
c => c.Id,
s => s.Cid,
(chapter, subject) => subject)
.Join(dc.Students,
subj => subj.Suid,
student => student.Suid,
(subj, st) => st.Sid)
.ToArray();
I would like to select only the records that have the field "1" from the string eventTriggers (that looks something like this : "00100010" )
I've tried and succesfully done so with more than 1 calls .. but i doubt its efficient. Basically I would want something like this ... but apprently LINQ does not support this.
(LINQ to Entities does not recognize the method 'Char get_Chars(Int32)' method, and this method cannot be translated into a store expression.)
using (var service = new dB.Business.Service.BaseBusinessService<memo>())
{
List<memo> result = service.Repository.GetQuery().Where(p => p.ID == ID && p.eventTriggers[index] == '1').ToList();
}
Any hints towards the correct solution ? Thank you !
I Had the same problem and solved It with substring.
ervice.Repository.GetQuery().Where(p => p.ID == ID && p.eventTriggers.Substring(index,1) == "1").ToList();
EF can't convert the char array operation into a valid query. How about
IEnumerable<Memo> memos
using (var service = new dB.Business.Service.BaseBusinessService<Memo>())
{
memos = service.Repository.GetQuery()
.Where(p => p.ID == ID).AsEnumerable();
}
var result = memos.Where(m => m.eventTriggers[index] == '1').ToList();
This gets all the memos with a matching ID locally then filters on the eventTriggers array.
Alternatively you could convert eventTriggers into a numeric value and use a bit mask, this would probably be a much faster query.
Linq looking like this,
using (var service = new dB.Business.Service.BaseBusinessService<Memo>())
{
result = service.Repository.GetQuery()
.Where(p =>
p.ID == ID
&&
m.eventTriggers & mask != 0).ToList();
}
more exapmles here
Solved:
using (var service = new dB.Business.Service.BaseBusinessService<memo>())
{
List<memo> result = service.Repository.GetQuery().Where(p => p.ID == ID && p.eventTriggers.Contains('1')).ToList();
}
I want to know how to make Linq expression that has the same effect as these SQL query
SELECT item.*, priceforitem.*
FROM
item
LEFT JOIN priceforitem
ON priceforitem.ItemID = item.ItemID
AND priceforitem.PriceID = ?PriceID
I already make it using the Method query but I don't know if it will produce the same result
db.Items
.GroupJoin(
db.PriceForItems.Where(pi => pi.PriceID == id),
i => i.ItemID,
pi => pi.ItemID,
(i, pi) => new { Item = b, Prices = pi })
.SelectMany(
a => a.Prices.DefaultIfEmpty(),
(i, pi) => new
{
ItemID = i.Item.ItemID,
Code = i.Item.Code,
Name = i.Item.Name,
PriceForItemID = pi.PriceForItemID,
Price = pi.Price
})
and then after thinking for awhile i shorten it like this
db.Items
.SelectMany(
i => db.PriceForItems.Where(
pi => pi.PriceID == id
&& pi.ItemID = i.ItemID).DefaultIfEmpty(),
(i, pi) => new
{
ItemID = i.Item.ItemID,
Code = i.Item.Code,
Name = i.Item.Name,
PriceForItemID = pi.PriceForItemID,
Price = pi.Price
})
I am new to Linq, and I don't know which is better and how to convert it to Linq query statement.
First of all your sql query. It is effectively and inner join because the where condition will filter out all rows where data from priceforitem is null. If you do want to convert same query to linq you can do it like
from i in db.Items
join p in db.PriceforItems on
i.ItemId equals p.ItemId into tempvals
from t in tempvals.DefaultIfEmpty()
where t.PriceId == id
select new{i.ItemId, ..., t.PriceId, t...., t....}
I mostly write linq queries instead of expressions where they are more readable to me. If you still want to get an expression, you can write a valid linq query and paste it into Linqpad and it will give the result as well as lambda expression of your query.
I have a LINQ query where I want to select and read the p.Api value.
var api = DataAccessNew.Instance.dcServers.Where(p => p.Ip == IpAddress).Select(p => p.Api);
How do I read the p.Api value?
I have tried api.ToString() but I get SQL instead of actual column value.
You are getting an IEnumerable<> back (and your ToString call is showing you the value of that expression).
If you are expecting a single value, do this:
var api = DataAccessNew.Instance.dcServers
.Where(p => p.Ip == IpAddress)
.Select(p => p.Api)
.Single();
You might be interested to read about the other methods like Single(): SingleOrDefault, First, FirstOrDefault. Which one you used depends on whether you are expecting a single or multiple values returned (Single vs. First) and what you want to happen if there are no values (the *Default methods will return the type default instead of throwing an exception).
Or if you want to look at all the returned values:
var api = DataAccessNew.Instance.dcServers
.Where(p => p.Ip == IpAddress)
.Select(p => p.Api);
foreach (var apiValue in api)
{
// apiValue will have the value you're looking for.
}
Try this snippet of code:
string apiValue = api.FirstOrDefault().ToString();
your syntex seems ok..
By the way try this
string api =DataAccessNew.Instance.dcServers.Where(p => p.Ip == IpAddress).Select(p => p.Api).FirstOrDefault();
if p.Ip is a unique key in your table you could try to add .FirstOrDefault() after your Linq query.
public string getselectedvalue(ListBox l)
{
string vtext="",vval="";
var selectedQueryText = l.Items.Cast<ListItem>().Where(item => item.Selected);
var selectedQueryVal = l.Items.Cast<ListItem>().Where(item => item.Selected).Select(item => item.Value);
vtext= String.Join("','", selectedQueryText ).TrimEnd();
vval= String.Join("','", selectedQueryVal ).TrimEnd();
return v;
}
I have IQueryable list of objects of type T which I want to transform into objects of type K
List<K> tranformedList = originalList.Select(x => transform(x)).ToList();
the transform function returns null if it cannot tranform the objects.If I want to filter out null elements can I call
List<K> tranformedList = originalList.Select(x => transform(x))
.Where(y => y != default(K))
.ToList();
or is there any other way of filtering out null elements when calling Select in LINQ ?
Can't you just do something like this:
List<K> tranformedList = originalList.Select(x => tranform(x))
.Where(y => y != null) //Check for nulls
.ToList();
What about
List<K> tranformedList = originalList
.Select(transform)
.OfType<K>()
.ToList()
Takes care of unboxing an getting rid of nulls at the same time (especially when K is a struct)
David B I dont believe you that your code .Where(y => y != null) works when K is an int! There is NO WAY you will get that code to compile if K is an int!
List<K> tranformedList = originalList.Select(x => transform(x))
.Where(y => !string.IsNullOrEmpty(y))
.ToList();
After your Select linq query, filter null values with !string.IsNullOrEmpty("string") or string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace("string") in your Where query.
Use Where Instead of Select (Linq).
Where returns the list without null values directly
List tranformedList = originalList.Where(x => x != null).ToList();
You could try a for loop and add the non nulls to the new transformed list.
foreach (var original in originalList)
{
K transformed = tranform(orignal);
if (transformed != null)
{
tranformedList.Add(transformed);
}
}
or you could try
List<K> tranformedList = (from t in
(from o in originalList
select tranform(o))
where t != null
select t).ToList();
I think Nathan's works as well but is less verbose