I'm building the following query. For some reason, it doesn't bring to me all the fields. I've checked the spelling and when I assign values to those field, I even switched the name, leading to an exception. So I know for sure that they exist and are used. I'm adding a pre-image to the update-step with all data, just to be sure.
QueryExpression request = new QueryExpression
{
EntityName = "myLogicalName",
ColumnSet = new ColumnSet { AllColumns = true },
Criteria =
{
Filters =
{
new FilterExpression
{
FilterOperator = LogicalOperator.Or,
Conditions =
{
new ConditionExpression("someField", ConditionOperator.NotEqual, someValue),
new ConditionExpression("someField", ConditionOperator.Equal, somValue)
}
}
}
}
};
EntityCollection result = Service.RetrieveMultiple(request);
What can I be possibly missing?!
Its probably because; the field does not have a value or field level security is being applied.
As a side generally you should avoid using AllColumns = true
Setting the AllColumns property to true is essentially the same as doing a Select * in sql. The columns won't be adding to the ColumnSet, but they will be returned in the results of your query expression.
Related
I've got the following container class:
public class AssetAndItsDepositsContainer
{
public jp_asset Asset { get; set; }
public jp_deposit Deposit { get; set; }
}
Is there a way to take the following LINQ query:
from a in serviceContext.jp_assetSet
join d in serviceContext.jp_depositsSet on a.Id equals d.jp_assetid.Id
where a.statecode == jp_assetState.Active &&
a.jp_isonhold = true
select new AssetAndItsDepositsContainer()
{
Asset = a,
Deposit = d
})
.ToList();
And "translate" it by using QueryExpression?
This is what I came up with so far, but I don't know how to mimic the select new expression:
QueryExpression query = new QueryExpression(jp_asset.EntityLogicalName);
query.ColumnSet = new ColumnSet(true);
query.Criteria.AddCondition("statecode", ConditionOperator.Equal, (int)jp_assetState.Active);
query.Criteria.AddCondition("jp_isonhold", ConditionOperator.Equal, true);
LinkEntity link = query.AddLink(jp_deposit.EntityLogicalName, "Id", "jp_assetid", JoinOperator.Inner);
// Now what?
var res = service.RetrieveMultiple(query).Entities; // gets only jp_assets
You can't access an entire LinkEntity, you can only access its attributes as AliasedValue properties on the main Entity itself.
I would simply retrieve the Id of the second record you're looking for as part of an EntityReference and then execute a Retrieve.
You can actually construct valid Entity objects from linked entities. The only requirement is that the primary key of the linked entity must be available in the result set.
So, your code snippet could be extended like this:
var query = new QueryExpression(jp_asset.EntityLogicalName);
query.ColumnSet.AllColumns = true;
query.Criteria.AddCondition("statecode", ConditionOperator.Equal, (int)jp_assetState.Active);
query.Criteria.AddCondition("jp_isonhold", ConditionOperator.Equal, true);
LinkEntity link = query.AddLink(jp_deposit.EntityLogicalName, "Id", "jp_assetid", JoinOperator.Inner);
link.EntityAlias = "d";
link.Columns.AddColumns("jp_depositid", "jp_name");
IEnumerable<Entity> deposits = Service.RetrieveMultiple(query).Entities
.Select(e => new Entity("jp_deposit")
{
Id = (Guid)e.GetAttributeValue<AliasedValue>("d.jp_depositid").Value,
["jp_name"] = e.GetAttributeValue<AliasedValue>("d.jp_name")?.Value
});
Note
The example above will only work reliable for inner joins. In the result set the primary key (ID) for the linked entity will always be available. Therefore it is safe to get its value using the .Value syntax. All other attribute values can be retrieved using ?.Value.
For left joins you would need to filter the result set first before performing the Select.
How can I find (preferably using CRM Linq) parent entities that have 0 children. For example how can I find all accounts that have 0 contacts.
If you are going to use the query expression route, which I would recommend then the following code will be useful
var entityAlias = "con";
var query = new QueryExpression
{
EntityName = "account",
ColumnSet = new ColumnSet(true),
Criteria =
{
FilterOperator = LogicalOperator.And,
Conditions =
{
new ConditionExpression(entityAlias, "contactid",ConditionOperator.Null)
}
}
LinkEntities =
{
new LinkEntity
{
EntityAlias = entityAlias,
LinkFromEntityName = "account",
LinkFromAttributeName = "accountid",
LinkToEntityName = "contact",
LinkToAttributeName = "parentcustomerid",
Columns = new ColumnSet("parentcustomerid", "contactid"),
JoinOperator = JoinOperator.LeftOuter,
}
},
};
var response = service.RetrieveMultiple(query);
var accounts = response.Entities;
In this code I have not limited the columns, this will reduce performance and you should only return the columns needed.
If there is the case for more than 5000 records are going to be returned then you will need to use paging and loop the query to find all the entities,
This can be found here:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg327917.aspx
However if you are certain you want to use LINQ then you can use the following code:
public static IEnumerable<Account> FindAccountsWithNoContacts()
{
var contactRelationship = new Relationship("contact_customer_accounts");
foreach(var account in XrmContext.AccountSet)
{
XrmContext.LoadProperty(contactRelationship);
if(!account.RelatedEntities.ContainsKey(contactRelationship)
yield return account;
}
}
My problem with the LINQ code is that all the enities, both the account and contact entities, will be loaded into memory. With large entity sets this can cause OutOfMemoryException, whereas the query expression route will pass the query to the Dynamics server to execute; which should make the execution of the code faster.
The thing you are looking for is left outer join. Which is unfortunately not possible in CRM using LINQ. However you can do it using query expression or FetchXML.
Here is a link that can help you:
https://community.dynamics.com/crm/b/gonzaloruiz/archive/2014/02/23/all-about-outer-join-queries-in-crm-2011-and-crm-2013
I have an IEnumerable collection.
Using LINQ, I am populating the collection from a web service response.
Below is the sample I am using.
lookupData = from data in content["data"].Children()
select new LookupData
{
LookupKey = (data["data"]["key"]).ToString(),
LookupValue = (string)data["data"]["name"]
};
I will be using the same code for a lot of similar responses which will return a key and value.
Now, I got a scenario when I needed an additional field from the service response for few of the responses(not for all). So, I created an "Optional" property in "LookUpData" class and used as below:
lookupData = from data in content["data"].Children()
select new LookupData
{
LookupKey = (data["data"]["key"]).ToString(),
LookupValue = (string)data["data"]["name"],
Optional = referenceConfig.Optional != null
? (data["data"]["optional"]).ToString()
: String.Empty
};
The null check here is a performance issue. I do not want to use the below since I have other conditions and all together it will become a very big if else loop.
if(referenceConfig.Optional != null){
lookupData = from data in content["data"].Children()
select new LookupData
{
LookupKey = (data["data"]["key"]).ToString(),
LookupValue = (string)data["data"]["name"],
Optional = (data["data"]["optional"]).ToString()
};
}
else{
lookupData = from data in content["data"].Children()
select new LookupData
{
LookupKey = (data["data"]["key"]).ToString(),
LookupValue = (string)data["data"]["name"]
};
}
But I have at least 10 web server response with lots of data in each.
If the value of referenceConfig.Optional is available at compile time you can do
#if OPTIONAL
...
#else
...
If not - you can implement the Null Object Pattern i.e. have all of your ["data"][...] properties always return a value(for instance string.Empty if the type is string) so you won't have check explicitly in the code.
I'm breaking my head with this and decided to share my problem with you
I want to create an anonymous select from several tables, some of them may contain more than one result. i want to concatenate these results into one string
i did something like this:
var resultTable = from item in dc.table
select new
{
id= item.id,
name= CreateString((from name in item.Ref_Items_Names
select name.Name).ToList()),
};
and the CreateString() is:
private string CreateString(List<string> list)
{
StringBuilder stringedData = new StringBuilder();
for (int i = 0; i < list.Count; i++)
{
stringedData.Append(list[i] + ", ");
}
return stringedData.ToString();
}
my intentions were to convert the "name" query to list and then sent it to CreateString() to convert it to one long concatenated string.
I tried using .Aggregate((current,next) => current + "," + next);
but when i try to convert my query to DataTable like below:
public DataTable ToDataTable(Object query)
{
DataTable dt = new DataTable();
IDbCommand cmd = dc.GetCommand(query as IQueryable);
SqlDataAdapter adapter = new SqlDataAdapter();
adapter.SelectCommand = (SqlCommand)cmd;
cmd.Connection.Open();
adapter.Fill(dt);
cmd.Connection.Close();
return dt;
}
I'm getting exception that "dc.GetCommand()" can't understand query with Aggregate method
later I tried to even use this simple query:
var resultTable = from itemin dc.table
select new
{
name = CreateString()
};
When CreateString() returns "success", nothing was inserted to "name"
why there is no way of using methods in select clause?
Thank you
Yotam
There is difference between LINQ to objects and LINQ to some-db-provider. Generally speaking, when using IQueryable, you can't use any methods, except the ones your provider understands.
What you can do is to retrieve the data from the database and then do the formatting using LINQ to objects:
var data = from item in dc.table
where /* some condition */
select item;
var result = from item in data.AsEnumerable()
select new
{
name = SomeFunction(item)
}
The AsEnumerable() extension method forces processing using LINQ to objects.
Forgive me if I've miss interpreted your question. It seems that what you are trying to do is abstract your select method for reuse. If this is the case, you may consider projection using a lambda expression. For example:
internal static class MyProjectors
{
internal static Expression<Func<Object1, ReturnObject>> StringDataProjector
{
get
{
return d => new Object1()
{
//assignment here
}
}
}
}
Now you can select your datasets as such:
dc.Table.Select(MyProjectors.StringDataProjector)
As for the concatenation logic, what about selecting to some base class with an IEnumerable<string> property and a read-only property to handle the concatenation of the string?
I am having some trouble with a linq query I am trying to write.
I am trying to use the repository pattern without to much luck. Basically I have a list of transactions and a 2nd list which contains the description field that maps against a field in my case StoreItemID
public static IList<TransactionViewModel> All()
{
var result = (IList<TransactionViewModel>)HttpContext.Current.Session["Transactions"];
if (result == null)
{
var rewardTypes = BusinessItemRepository.GetItemTypes(StoreID);
HttpContext.Current.Session["Transactions"] =
result =
(from item in new MyEntities().TransactionEntries
select new TransactionViewModel()
{
ItemDescription = itemTypes.FirstOrDefault(r=>r.StoreItemID==item.StoreItemID).ItemDescription,
TransactionDate = item.PurchaseDate.Value,
TransactionAmount = item.TransactionAmount.Value,
}).ToList();
}
return result;
}
public static List<BusinessItemViewModel>GetItemTypes(int storeID)
{
var result = (List<BusinessItemViewModel>)HttpContext.Current.Session["ItemTypes"];
if (result == null)
{
HttpContext.Current.Session["ItemTypes"] = result =
(from items in new MyEntities().StoreItems
where items.IsDeleted == false && items.StoreID == storeID
select new BusinessItemViewModel()
{
ItemDescription = items.Description,
StoreID = items.StoreID,
StoreItemID = items.StoreItemID
}).ToList();
}
return result;
However I get this error
Unable to create a constant value of type 'MyMVC.ViewModels.BusinessItemViewModel'. Only primitive types ('such as Int32, String, and Guid') are supported in this context.
I know its this line of code as if I comment it out it works ok
ItemDescription = itemTypes.FirstOrDefault(r=>r.StoreItemID==item.StoreItemID).ItemDescription,
How can I map ItemDescription against my list of itemTypes?
Any help would be great :)
This line has a problem:
ItemDescription = itemTypes.FirstOrDefault(r=>r.StoreItemID==item.StoreItemID)
.ItemDescription,
Since you are using FirstOrDefault you will get null as default value for a reference type if there is no item that satifies the condition, then you'd get an exception when trying to access ItemDescription - either use First() if there always will be at least one match or check and define a default property value for ItemDescription to use if there is none:
ItemDescription = itemTypes.Any(r=>r.StoreItemID==item.StoreItemID)
? itemTypes.First(r=>r.StoreItemID==item.StoreItemID)
.ItemDescription
: "My Default",
If itemTypes is IEnumerable then it can't be used in your query (which is what the error message is telling you), because the query provider doesn't know what to do with it. So assuming the that itemTypes is based on a table in the same db as TransactionEntities, then you can use a join to achieve the same goal:
using (var entities = new MyEntities())
{
HttpContext.Current.Session["Transactions"] = result =
(from item in new entities.TransactionEntries
join itemType in entities.ItemTypes on item.StoreItemID equals itemType.StoreItemID
select new TransactionViewModel()
{
ItemDescription = itemType.ItemDescription,
TransactionDate = item.PurchaseDate.Value,
TransactionAmount = item.TransactionAmount.Value,
CustomerName = rewards.CardID//TODO: Get customer name
}).ToList();
}
I don't know the structure of your database, but hopefully you get the idea.
I had this error due a nullable integer in my LINQ query.
Adding a check within my query it solved my problem.
query with problem:
var x = entities.MyObjects.FirstOrDefault(s => s.Obj_Id.Equals(y.OBJ_ID));
query with problem solved:
var x = entities.MyObjects.FirstOrDefault(s => s.Obj_Id.HasValue && s.Obj_Id.Value.Equals(y.OBJ_ID));