I have bash script within which some function are declared and I like to source it automatically when a new shell created so that I can use the functions immediately. Add a source ~/setsetup.sh in the ~/.bashrc seems do not work.
EDIT:
Both ~/.profile and ~/.bashrc works. I just have a stupid typo when source the script. Thanks!
If the new shell you create is a login shell, it will execute one of .bash_login, .bash_profile, or .profile (whichever it finds first) instead of .bashrc. Typically, you source .bashrc from one of the two bash specific ones if you use them. You should not put any bash-specific commands in .profile, as that file may be read by other non-bash shells. For example, if you decide to source your script from .profile, you should use the . setsetup.sh form, and make sure that nothing bash specific is in that script.
There are several files. The relevant one is likely ~/.profile for your case. It is often used to source .bashrc.
Check man .profile for details. When bash is started as login shell .profile is relevant, otherwise .bashrc.
What you are looking for is ~/.profile which should execute every time you create a new bash shell.
Related
I have a bash script where I make a few changes to the .bashrc. I then want to run the bashrc from my script so I've been running
source ~/.bashrc
to avoid having to reload my shell. The problem I've been seeing is that it's only being set in the subshell bash is running in.
Can I do anything from my script so that the source command is run in the parent shell?
What you could do, if you really wanted to: Provide a shell function which checks whether .bashrc has been modified, and if it is the case, sources this file. Let#s call this function check_reload. Then define your PS1 as
PS1='$(check_reload) .....'
With this setup, your .bashrc will be reloaded before you get a new command line.
While this should solve your problem, I personally would not do it: I consider the information in .bashrc fairly static, and I would not use a script to modify it, but do it manually with a text editor. But of course everyone can do this as he likes....
Locked. This question and its answers are locked because the question is off-topic but has historical significance. It is not currently accepting new answers or interactions.
I've used a number of different *nix-based systems of the years, and it seems like every flavor of Bash I use has a different algorithm for deciding which startup scripts to run. For the purposes of tasks like setting up environment variables and aliases and printing startup messages (e.g. MOTDs), which startup script is the appropriate place to do these?
What's the difference between putting things in .bashrc, .bash_profile, and .environment? I've also seen other files such as .login, .bash_login, and .profile; are these ever relevant? What are the differences in which ones get run when logging in physically, logging in remotely via ssh, and opening a new terminal window? Are there any significant differences across platforms (including Mac OS X (and its Terminal.app) and Cygwin Bash)?
The main difference with shell config files is that some are only read by "login" shells (eg. when you login from another host, or login at the text console of a local unix machine). these are the ones called, say, .login or .profile or .zlogin (depending on which shell you're using).
Then you have config files that are read by "interactive" shells (as in, ones connected to a terminal (or pseudo-terminal in the case of, say, a terminal emulator running under a windowing system). these are the ones with names like .bashrc, .tcshrc, .zshrc, etc.
bash complicates this in that .bashrc is only read by a shell that's both interactive and non-login, so you'll find most people end up telling their .bash_profile to also read .bashrc with something like
[[ -r ~/.bashrc ]] && . ~/.bashrc
Other shells behave differently - eg with zsh, .zshrc is always read for an interactive shell, whether it's a login one or not.
The manual page for bash explains the circumstances under which each file is read. Yes, behaviour is generally consistent between machines.
.profile is simply the login script filename originally used by /bin/sh. bash, being generally backwards-compatible with /bin/sh, will read .profile if one exists.
That's simple. It's explained in man bash:
/bin/bash
The bash executable
/etc/profile
The systemwide initialization file, executed for login shells
~/.bash_profile
The personal initialization file, executed for login shells
~/.bashrc
The individual per-interactive-shell startup file
~/.bash_logout
The individual login shell cleanup file, executed when a login shell exits
~/.inputrc
Individual readline initialization file
Login shells are the ones that are read one you login (so, they are not executed when merely starting up xterm, for example). There are other ways to login. For example using an X display manager. Those have other ways to read and export environment variables at login time.
Also read the INVOCATION chapter in the manual. It says "The following paragraphs describe how bash executes its startup files.", i think that's a spot-on :) It explains what an "interactive" shell is too.
Bash does not know about .environment. I suspect that's a file of your distribution, to set environment variables independent of the shell that you drive.
Classically, ~/.profile is used by Bourne Shell, and is probably supported by Bash as a legacy measure. Again, ~/.login and ~/.cshrc were used by C Shell - I'm not sure that Bash uses them at all.
The ~/.bash_profile would be used once, at login. The ~/.bashrc script is read every time a shell is started. This is analogous to /.cshrc for C Shell.
One consequence is that stuff in ~/.bashrc should be as lightweight (minimal) as possible to reduce the overhead when starting a non-login shell.
I believe the ~/.environment file is a compatibility file for Korn Shell.
I found information about .bashrc and .bash_profile here to sum it up:
.bash_profile is executed when you
login. Stuff you put in there might be
your PATH and other important
environment variables.
.bashrc is used for non login shells.
I'm not sure what that means. I know
that RedHat
executes it everytime you start
another shell (su to this user or
simply calling bash again) You might
want to put aliases in there but again
I am not sure what that means. I
simply ignore it myself.
.profile is the equivalent of
.bash_profile for the root. I think
the name is changed to let other
shells (csh, sh, tcsh) use it as well.
(you don't need one as a user)
There is also .bash_logout wich
executes at, yeah good guess...logout.
You might want to stop deamons or even
make a little housekeeping . You can
also add "clear" there if you want to
clear the screen when you log out.
Also there is a complete follow up on each of the configurations files here
These are probably even distro.-dependant, not all distros choose to have each configuraton with them and some have even more. But when they have the same name, they usualy include the same content.
According to Josh Staiger, Mac OS X's Terminal.app actually runs a login shell rather than a non-login shell by default for each new terminal window, calling .bash_profile instead of .bashrc.
He recommends:
Most of the time you don’t want to maintain two separate config files
for login and non-login shells — when you set a PATH, you want it to
apply to both. You can fix this by sourcing .bashrc from your
.bash_profile file, then putting PATH and common settings in .bashrc.
To do this, add the following lines to .bash_profile:
if [ -f ~/.bashrc ]; then
source ~/.bashrc
fi
Now when you login to your
machine from a console .bashrc will be called.
A good place to look at is the man page of bash. Here's an online version. Look for "INVOCATION" section.
I have used Debian-family distros which appear to execute .profile, but not .bash_profile,
whereas RHEL derivatives execute .bash_profile before .profile.
It seems to be a mess when you have to set up environment variables to work in any Linux OS.
to use lilypond from the command line, you are supposed to make a script, chmod it, and put its location on the PATH (see right-hand column here). you are supposed to use .profile for the PATH change, but that didn't work for me, so i used .bash_profile.
that worked (why didn't .profile work? and should i prefer .bashrc?), but which lilypond doesn't see the script, and i assume the reason is the same reason i can't see it with findExecutable in haskell's System.Directory.
is this so, and how do i fix it?
Bash doesn't expand ~ inside double quotes. Use export PATH=~/bin:"$PATH" instead.
If both ~/.bash_profile and ~/.profile exist, Bash only reads ~/.bash_profile when invoked as an interactive login shell. Terminal and iTerm 2 open new shells as login shells, so Bash reads ~/.bash_profile but not ~/.bashrc. See http://www.gnu.org/software/bash/manual/html_node/Bash-Startup-Files.html.
This question already has answers here:
Closed 11 years ago.
Possible Duplicate:
What's the difference between .bashrc, .bash_profile, and .environment?
It seems that if I use
alias ls='ls -F'
inside of .bashrc on Mac OS X, then the newly created shell will not have that alias. I need to type bash again and that alias will be in effect.
And if I log into Linux on the hosting company, the .bashrc file has a comment line that says:
For non-login shell
and the .bash_profile file has a comment that says
for login shell
So where should aliases be written in? How come we separate the login shell and non-login shell?
Some webpage say use .bash_aliases, but it doesn't work on Mac OS X, it seems.
The reason you separate the login and non-login shell is because the .bashrc file is reloaded every time you start a new copy of Bash. The .profile file is loaded only when you either log in or use the appropriate flag to tell Bash to act as a login shell.
Personally,
I put my PATH setup into a .profile file (because I sometimes use other shells);
I put my Bash aliases and functions into my .bashrc file;
I put this
#!/bin/bash
#
# CRM .bash_profile Time-stamp: "2008-12-07 19:42"
#
# echo "Loading ${HOME}/.bash_profile"
source ~/.profile # get my PATH setup
source ~/.bashrc # get my Bash aliases
in my .bash_profile file.
Oh, and the reason you need to type bash again to get the new alias is that Bash loads your .bashrc file when it starts but it doesn't reload it unless you tell it to. You can reload the .bashrc file (and not need a second shell) by typing
source ~/.bashrc
which loads the .bashrc file as if you had typed the commands directly to Bash.
Check out http://mywiki.wooledge.org/DotFiles for an excellent resource on the topic aside from man bash.
Summary:
You only log in once, and that's when ~/.bash_profile or ~/.profile is read and executed. Since everything you run from your login shell inherits the login shell's environment, you should put all your environment variables in there. Like LESS, PATH, MANPATH, LC_*, ... For an example, see: My .profile
Once you log in, you can run several more shells. Imagine logging in, running X, and in X starting a few terminals with bash shells. That means your login shell started X, which inherited your login shell's environment variables, which started your terminals, which started your non-login bash shells. Your environment variables were passed along in the whole chain, so your non-login shells don't need to load them anymore. Non-login shells only execute ~/.bashrc, not /.profile or ~/.bash_profile, for this exact reason, so in there define everything that only applies to bash. That's functions, aliases, bash-only variables like HISTSIZE (this is not an environment variable, don't export it!), shell options with set and shopt, etc. For an example, see: My .bashrc
Now, as part of UNIX peculiarity, a login-shell does NOT execute ~/.bashrc but only ~/.profile or ~/.bash_profile, so you should source that one manually from the latter. You'll see me do that in my ~/.profile too: source ~/.bashrc.
From the bash manpage:
When bash is invoked as an
interactive login shell, or as a
non-interactive shell with the
--login option, it first reads and executes commands from the file
/etc/profile, if that file exists.
After reading that file, it looks for
~/.bash_profile, ~/.bash_login, and
~/.profile, in that order, and reads
and executes commands from the first
one that exists and is readable. The
--noprofile option may be used when the shell is started to inhibit this
behavior.
When a login shell exits, bash
reads and executes commands from the
file ~/.bash_logout, if it exists.
When an interactive shell that is not a login shell is started, bash
reads and executes commands from ~/.bashrc, if that file exists. This
may be inhibited by using the --norc option. The --rcfile file option
will force bash to read and execute commands from file instead of
~/.bashrc.
Thus, if you want to get the same behavior for both login shells and interactive non-login shells, you should put all of your commands in either .bashrc or .bash_profile, and then have the other file source the first one.
.bash_profile is loaded for a "login shell". I am not sure what that would be on OS X, but on Linux that is either X11 or a virtual terminal.
.bashrc is loaded every time you run Bash. That is where you should put stuff you want loaded whenever you open a new Terminal.app window.
I personally put everything in .bashrc so that I don't have to restart the application for changes to take effect.
Locked. This question and its answers are locked because the question is off-topic but has historical significance. It is not currently accepting new answers or interactions.
I've used a number of different *nix-based systems of the years, and it seems like every flavor of Bash I use has a different algorithm for deciding which startup scripts to run. For the purposes of tasks like setting up environment variables and aliases and printing startup messages (e.g. MOTDs), which startup script is the appropriate place to do these?
What's the difference between putting things in .bashrc, .bash_profile, and .environment? I've also seen other files such as .login, .bash_login, and .profile; are these ever relevant? What are the differences in which ones get run when logging in physically, logging in remotely via ssh, and opening a new terminal window? Are there any significant differences across platforms (including Mac OS X (and its Terminal.app) and Cygwin Bash)?
The main difference with shell config files is that some are only read by "login" shells (eg. when you login from another host, or login at the text console of a local unix machine). these are the ones called, say, .login or .profile or .zlogin (depending on which shell you're using).
Then you have config files that are read by "interactive" shells (as in, ones connected to a terminal (or pseudo-terminal in the case of, say, a terminal emulator running under a windowing system). these are the ones with names like .bashrc, .tcshrc, .zshrc, etc.
bash complicates this in that .bashrc is only read by a shell that's both interactive and non-login, so you'll find most people end up telling their .bash_profile to also read .bashrc with something like
[[ -r ~/.bashrc ]] && . ~/.bashrc
Other shells behave differently - eg with zsh, .zshrc is always read for an interactive shell, whether it's a login one or not.
The manual page for bash explains the circumstances under which each file is read. Yes, behaviour is generally consistent between machines.
.profile is simply the login script filename originally used by /bin/sh. bash, being generally backwards-compatible with /bin/sh, will read .profile if one exists.
That's simple. It's explained in man bash:
/bin/bash
The bash executable
/etc/profile
The systemwide initialization file, executed for login shells
~/.bash_profile
The personal initialization file, executed for login shells
~/.bashrc
The individual per-interactive-shell startup file
~/.bash_logout
The individual login shell cleanup file, executed when a login shell exits
~/.inputrc
Individual readline initialization file
Login shells are the ones that are read one you login (so, they are not executed when merely starting up xterm, for example). There are other ways to login. For example using an X display manager. Those have other ways to read and export environment variables at login time.
Also read the INVOCATION chapter in the manual. It says "The following paragraphs describe how bash executes its startup files.", i think that's a spot-on :) It explains what an "interactive" shell is too.
Bash does not know about .environment. I suspect that's a file of your distribution, to set environment variables independent of the shell that you drive.
Classically, ~/.profile is used by Bourne Shell, and is probably supported by Bash as a legacy measure. Again, ~/.login and ~/.cshrc were used by C Shell - I'm not sure that Bash uses them at all.
The ~/.bash_profile would be used once, at login. The ~/.bashrc script is read every time a shell is started. This is analogous to /.cshrc for C Shell.
One consequence is that stuff in ~/.bashrc should be as lightweight (minimal) as possible to reduce the overhead when starting a non-login shell.
I believe the ~/.environment file is a compatibility file for Korn Shell.
I found information about .bashrc and .bash_profile here to sum it up:
.bash_profile is executed when you
login. Stuff you put in there might be
your PATH and other important
environment variables.
.bashrc is used for non login shells.
I'm not sure what that means. I know
that RedHat
executes it everytime you start
another shell (su to this user or
simply calling bash again) You might
want to put aliases in there but again
I am not sure what that means. I
simply ignore it myself.
.profile is the equivalent of
.bash_profile for the root. I think
the name is changed to let other
shells (csh, sh, tcsh) use it as well.
(you don't need one as a user)
There is also .bash_logout wich
executes at, yeah good guess...logout.
You might want to stop deamons or even
make a little housekeeping . You can
also add "clear" there if you want to
clear the screen when you log out.
Also there is a complete follow up on each of the configurations files here
These are probably even distro.-dependant, not all distros choose to have each configuraton with them and some have even more. But when they have the same name, they usualy include the same content.
According to Josh Staiger, Mac OS X's Terminal.app actually runs a login shell rather than a non-login shell by default for each new terminal window, calling .bash_profile instead of .bashrc.
He recommends:
Most of the time you don’t want to maintain two separate config files
for login and non-login shells — when you set a PATH, you want it to
apply to both. You can fix this by sourcing .bashrc from your
.bash_profile file, then putting PATH and common settings in .bashrc.
To do this, add the following lines to .bash_profile:
if [ -f ~/.bashrc ]; then
source ~/.bashrc
fi
Now when you login to your
machine from a console .bashrc will be called.
A good place to look at is the man page of bash. Here's an online version. Look for "INVOCATION" section.
I have used Debian-family distros which appear to execute .profile, but not .bash_profile,
whereas RHEL derivatives execute .bash_profile before .profile.
It seems to be a mess when you have to set up environment variables to work in any Linux OS.