Locked. This question and its answers are locked because the question is off-topic but has historical significance. It is not currently accepting new answers or interactions.
I've used a number of different *nix-based systems of the years, and it seems like every flavor of Bash I use has a different algorithm for deciding which startup scripts to run. For the purposes of tasks like setting up environment variables and aliases and printing startup messages (e.g. MOTDs), which startup script is the appropriate place to do these?
What's the difference between putting things in .bashrc, .bash_profile, and .environment? I've also seen other files such as .login, .bash_login, and .profile; are these ever relevant? What are the differences in which ones get run when logging in physically, logging in remotely via ssh, and opening a new terminal window? Are there any significant differences across platforms (including Mac OS X (and its Terminal.app) and Cygwin Bash)?
The main difference with shell config files is that some are only read by "login" shells (eg. when you login from another host, or login at the text console of a local unix machine). these are the ones called, say, .login or .profile or .zlogin (depending on which shell you're using).
Then you have config files that are read by "interactive" shells (as in, ones connected to a terminal (or pseudo-terminal in the case of, say, a terminal emulator running under a windowing system). these are the ones with names like .bashrc, .tcshrc, .zshrc, etc.
bash complicates this in that .bashrc is only read by a shell that's both interactive and non-login, so you'll find most people end up telling their .bash_profile to also read .bashrc with something like
[[ -r ~/.bashrc ]] && . ~/.bashrc
Other shells behave differently - eg with zsh, .zshrc is always read for an interactive shell, whether it's a login one or not.
The manual page for bash explains the circumstances under which each file is read. Yes, behaviour is generally consistent between machines.
.profile is simply the login script filename originally used by /bin/sh. bash, being generally backwards-compatible with /bin/sh, will read .profile if one exists.
That's simple. It's explained in man bash:
/bin/bash
The bash executable
/etc/profile
The systemwide initialization file, executed for login shells
~/.bash_profile
The personal initialization file, executed for login shells
~/.bashrc
The individual per-interactive-shell startup file
~/.bash_logout
The individual login shell cleanup file, executed when a login shell exits
~/.inputrc
Individual readline initialization file
Login shells are the ones that are read one you login (so, they are not executed when merely starting up xterm, for example). There are other ways to login. For example using an X display manager. Those have other ways to read and export environment variables at login time.
Also read the INVOCATION chapter in the manual. It says "The following paragraphs describe how bash executes its startup files.", i think that's a spot-on :) It explains what an "interactive" shell is too.
Bash does not know about .environment. I suspect that's a file of your distribution, to set environment variables independent of the shell that you drive.
Classically, ~/.profile is used by Bourne Shell, and is probably supported by Bash as a legacy measure. Again, ~/.login and ~/.cshrc were used by C Shell - I'm not sure that Bash uses them at all.
The ~/.bash_profile would be used once, at login. The ~/.bashrc script is read every time a shell is started. This is analogous to /.cshrc for C Shell.
One consequence is that stuff in ~/.bashrc should be as lightweight (minimal) as possible to reduce the overhead when starting a non-login shell.
I believe the ~/.environment file is a compatibility file for Korn Shell.
I found information about .bashrc and .bash_profile here to sum it up:
.bash_profile is executed when you
login. Stuff you put in there might be
your PATH and other important
environment variables.
.bashrc is used for non login shells.
I'm not sure what that means. I know
that RedHat
executes it everytime you start
another shell (su to this user or
simply calling bash again) You might
want to put aliases in there but again
I am not sure what that means. I
simply ignore it myself.
.profile is the equivalent of
.bash_profile for the root. I think
the name is changed to let other
shells (csh, sh, tcsh) use it as well.
(you don't need one as a user)
There is also .bash_logout wich
executes at, yeah good guess...logout.
You might want to stop deamons or even
make a little housekeeping . You can
also add "clear" there if you want to
clear the screen when you log out.
Also there is a complete follow up on each of the configurations files here
These are probably even distro.-dependant, not all distros choose to have each configuraton with them and some have even more. But when they have the same name, they usualy include the same content.
According to Josh Staiger, Mac OS X's Terminal.app actually runs a login shell rather than a non-login shell by default for each new terminal window, calling .bash_profile instead of .bashrc.
He recommends:
Most of the time you don’t want to maintain two separate config files
for login and non-login shells — when you set a PATH, you want it to
apply to both. You can fix this by sourcing .bashrc from your
.bash_profile file, then putting PATH and common settings in .bashrc.
To do this, add the following lines to .bash_profile:
if [ -f ~/.bashrc ]; then
source ~/.bashrc
fi
Now when you login to your
machine from a console .bashrc will be called.
A good place to look at is the man page of bash. Here's an online version. Look for "INVOCATION" section.
I have used Debian-family distros which appear to execute .profile, but not .bash_profile,
whereas RHEL derivatives execute .bash_profile before .profile.
It seems to be a mess when you have to set up environment variables to work in any Linux OS.
Related
Can I have certain settings that are universal for all my users?
As well as /etc/profile which others have mentioned, some Linux systems now use a directory /etc/profile.d/; any .sh files in there will be sourced by /etc/profile. It's slightly neater to keep your custom environment stuff in these files than to just edit /etc/profile.
If your LinuxOS has this file:
/etc/environment
You can use it to permanently set environmental variables for all users.
Extracted from: http://www.sysadmit.com/2016/04/linux-variables-de-entorno-permanentes.html
man 8 pam_env
man 5 pam_env.conf
If all login services use PAM, and all login services have session required pam_env.so in their respective /etc/pam.d/* configuration files, then all login sessions will have some environment variables set as specified in pam_env's configuration file.
On most modern Linux distributions, this is all there by default -- just add your desired global environment variables to /etc/security/pam_env.conf.
This works regardless of the user's shell, and works for graphical logins too (if xdm/kdm/gdm/entrance/… is set up like this).
Amazingly, Unix and Linux do not actually have a place to set global environment variables. The best you can do is arrange for any specific shell to have a site-specific initialization.
If you put it in /etc/profile, that will take care of things for most posix-compatible shell users. This is probably "good enough" for non-critical purposes.
But anyone with a csh or tcsh shell won't see it, and I don't believe csh has a global initialization file.
Some interesting excerpts from the bash manpage:
When bash is invoked as an interactive
login shell, or as a non-interactive
shell with the --login option, it
first reads and executes commands from
the file /etc/profile, if that file
exists. After reading that file, it
looks for ~/.bash_profile,
~/.bash_login, and ~/.profile, in that
order, and reads and executes commands
from the first one that exists and is
readable. The --noprofile option may
be used when the shell is started to
inhibit this behavior.
...
When an
interactive shell that is not a login
shell is started, bash reads and
executes commands from
/etc/bash.bashrc and ~/.bashrc, if
these files exist. This may be
inhibited by using the --norc option.
The --rcfile file option will force
bash to read and execute commands from
file instead of /etc/bash.bashrc and
~/.bashrc.
So have a look at /etc/profile or /etc/bash.bashrc, these files are the right places for global settings. Put something like this in them to set up an environement variable:
export MY_VAR=xxx
Every process running under the Linux kernel receives its own, unique environment that it inherits from its parent. In this case, the parent will be either a shell itself (spawning a sub shell), or the 'login' program (on a typical system).
As each process' environment is protected, there is no way to 'inject' an environmental variable to every running process, so even if you modify the default shell .rc / profile, it won't go into effect until each process exits and reloads its start up settings.
Look in /etc/ to modify the default start up variables for any particular shell. Just realize that users can (and often do) change them in their individual settings.
Unix is designed to obey the user, within limits.
NB: Bash is not the only shell on your system. Pay careful attention to what the /bin/sh symbolic link actually points to. On many systems, this could actually be dash which is (by default, with no special invocation) POSIXLY correct. Therefore, you should take care to modify both defaults, or scripts that start with /bin/sh will not inherit your global defaults. Similarly, take care to avoid syntax that only bash understands when editing both, aka avoiding bashisms.
Using PAM is execellent.
# modify the display PAM
$ cat /etc/security/pam_env.conf
# BEFORE: $ export DISPLAY=:0.0 && python /var/tmp/myproject/click.py &
# AFTER : $ python $abc/click.py &
DISPLAY DEFAULT=${REMOTEHOST}:0.0 OVERRIDE=${DISPLAY}
abc DEFAULT=/var/tmp/myproject
I've got a makefile for installing my personal repo of config files, part of which is compiling my emacs scripts:
compile:
emacs -batch --eval "(progn (load \"~/.emacs\") (byte-recompile-directory \"~/.emacs.d\" 0))"
The problem is, on OSX, I have an alias called "emacs" that points to the Emacs.app binary for use in a terminal, this is defined in my ~/.bash_profile.
Now, no matter what I do, I can't seem to get the shell that Make is calling to read a startup file to load that alias, so that compilation step always fails.
Does anyone know how to do this?
.bash_profile is only read by interactive login shells. Exported environment variables set in it are inherited through the process environment, which means that these settings are generally available to all programs the user starts (if bash is indeed the login shell, of course).
No such inheritance happens for aliases, though. Bash supports exported functions, but that's an obscure feature which can easily break other programs (for example, those which assume that environment variable values do not contain newlines). If you go that route, you may have to use .bashrc instead, to make sure that these functions are exported by interactive bash shells which are not login shells.
I expected the easiest solution is to put a directory like $HOME/bin on the PATH (in .bash_profile or .bashrc, whatever works best) and put an emacs wrapper script into that directory which invokes the actual binary using exec /path/to/Emacs.app "$#" (or maybe just a symbolic link would do).
That is very strange. Aliases are not exported to sub-shells, and the .bash_profile script is only run by interactive shells: make doesn't invoke an interactive shell (by default). So, it's hard to understand how the shell make invokes would see that alias based on the information you've provided.
Maybe you set the BASH_ENV shell variable somewhere? You should never do that, unless you really know what you're doing.
Maybe you reset make's .SHELLFLAGS variable to force a login shell? You shouldn't to that either.
Anyway, you can try using command which avoids aliases etc. Unfortunately make doesn't know this is a shell-built in, so you have to convince it to run a shell. This will be fixed in the next release of GNU make but Apple will never ship that.
compile:
command emacs -batch --eval "(progn (load \"~/.emacs\") (byte-recompile-directory \"~/.emacs.d\" 0))" && true
I love zsh, but I am not sure where to place my $PATH and other variable assertions? I find that they are scattered between the files .zshrc .zprofile .bashrc .bash_profile, and sometimes doubled.
I realize that having anything inside the bash files doesn't make much sense seeing as I'm using zsh, but where exactly should I be placing my rvm, python, node etc additions to my $PATH?
Is there a specific file I should be using (i.e. .zshenv which does not currently exist in my installation), one of the ones I am currently using, or does it even matter?
tl;dr version: use ~/.zshrc
And read the man page to understand the differences between:
~/.zshrc, ~/.zshenv and ~/.zprofile.
Regarding my comment
In my comment attached to the answer kev gave, I said:
This seems to be incorrect - /etc/profile isn't listed in any zsh documentation I can find.
This turns out to be partially incorrect: /etc/profile may be sourced by zsh. However, this only occurs if zsh is "invoked as sh or ksh"; in these compatibility modes:
The usual zsh startup/shutdown scripts are not executed. Login shells source /etc/profile followed by $HOME/.profile. If the ENV environment variable is set on invocation, $ENV is sourced after the profile scripts. The value of ENV is subjected to parameter expansion, command substitution, and arithmetic expansion before being interpreted as a pathname. [man zshall, "Compatibility"].
The ArchWiki ZSH link says:
At login, Zsh sources the following files in this order:
/etc/profile
This file is sourced by all Bourne-compatible shells upon login
This implys that /etc/profile is always read by zsh at login - I haven't got any experience with the Arch Linux project; the wiki may be correct for that distribution, but it is not generally correct. The information is incorrect compared to the zsh manual pages, and doesn't seem to apply to zsh on OS X (paths in $PATH set in /etc/profile do not make it to my zsh sessions).
To address the question:
where exactly should I be placing my rvm, python, node etc additions to my $PATH?
Generally, I would export my $PATH from ~/.zshrc, but it's worth having a read of the zshall man page, specifically the "STARTUP/SHUTDOWN FILES" section - ~/.zshrc is read for interactive shells, which may or may not suit your needs - if you want the $PATH for every zsh shell invoked by you (both interactive and not, both login and not, etc), then ~/.zshenv is a better option.
Is there a specific file I should be using (i.e. .zshenv which does not currently exist in my installation), one of the ones I am currently using, or does it even matter?
There's a bunch of files read on startup (check the linked man pages), and there's a reason for that - each file has it's particular place (settings for every user, settings for user-specific, settings for login shells, settings for every shell, etc).
Don't worry about ~/.zshenv not existing - if you need it, make it, and it will be read.
.bashrc and .bash_profile are not read by zsh, unless you explicitly source them from ~/.zshrc or similar; the syntax between bash and zsh is not always compatible. Both .bashrc and .bash_profile are designed for bash settings, not zsh settings.
Here is the docs from the zsh man pages under STARTUP/SHUTDOWN FILES section.
Commands are first read from /etc/zshenv this cannot be overridden.
Subsequent behaviour is modified by the RCS and GLOBAL_RCS options; the
former affects all startup files, while the second only affects global
startup files (those shown here with an path starting with a /). If
one of the options is unset at any point, any subsequent startup
file(s) of the corresponding type will not be read. It is also possi-
ble for a file in $ZDOTDIR to re-enable GLOBAL_RCS. Both RCS and
GLOBAL_RCS are set by default.
Commands are then read from $ZDOTDIR/.zshenv. If the shell is a login
shell, commands are read from /etc/zprofile and then $ZDOTDIR/.zpro-
file. Then, if the shell is interactive, commands are read from
/etc/zshrc and then $ZDOTDIR/.zshrc. Finally, if the shell is a login
shell, /etc/zlogin and $ZDOTDIR/.zlogin are read.
From this we can see the order files are read is:
/etc/zshenv # Read for every shell
~/.zshenv # Read for every shell except ones started with -f
/etc/zprofile # Global config for login shells, read before zshrc
~/.zprofile # User config for login shells
/etc/zshrc # Global config for interactive shells
~/.zshrc # User config for interactive shells
/etc/zlogin # Global config for login shells, read after zshrc
~/.zlogin # User config for login shells
~/.zlogout # User config for login shells, read upon logout
/etc/zlogout # Global config for login shells, read after user logout file
You can get more information here.
I had similar problem (in bash terminal command was working correctly but zsh showed command not found error)
Solution:
just paste whatever you were earlier pasting in ~/.bashrc to:
~/.zshrc
This question already has answers here:
Closed 11 years ago.
Possible Duplicate:
What's the difference between .bashrc, .bash_profile, and .environment?
It seems that if I use
alias ls='ls -F'
inside of .bashrc on Mac OS X, then the newly created shell will not have that alias. I need to type bash again and that alias will be in effect.
And if I log into Linux on the hosting company, the .bashrc file has a comment line that says:
For non-login shell
and the .bash_profile file has a comment that says
for login shell
So where should aliases be written in? How come we separate the login shell and non-login shell?
Some webpage say use .bash_aliases, but it doesn't work on Mac OS X, it seems.
The reason you separate the login and non-login shell is because the .bashrc file is reloaded every time you start a new copy of Bash. The .profile file is loaded only when you either log in or use the appropriate flag to tell Bash to act as a login shell.
Personally,
I put my PATH setup into a .profile file (because I sometimes use other shells);
I put my Bash aliases and functions into my .bashrc file;
I put this
#!/bin/bash
#
# CRM .bash_profile Time-stamp: "2008-12-07 19:42"
#
# echo "Loading ${HOME}/.bash_profile"
source ~/.profile # get my PATH setup
source ~/.bashrc # get my Bash aliases
in my .bash_profile file.
Oh, and the reason you need to type bash again to get the new alias is that Bash loads your .bashrc file when it starts but it doesn't reload it unless you tell it to. You can reload the .bashrc file (and not need a second shell) by typing
source ~/.bashrc
which loads the .bashrc file as if you had typed the commands directly to Bash.
Check out http://mywiki.wooledge.org/DotFiles for an excellent resource on the topic aside from man bash.
Summary:
You only log in once, and that's when ~/.bash_profile or ~/.profile is read and executed. Since everything you run from your login shell inherits the login shell's environment, you should put all your environment variables in there. Like LESS, PATH, MANPATH, LC_*, ... For an example, see: My .profile
Once you log in, you can run several more shells. Imagine logging in, running X, and in X starting a few terminals with bash shells. That means your login shell started X, which inherited your login shell's environment variables, which started your terminals, which started your non-login bash shells. Your environment variables were passed along in the whole chain, so your non-login shells don't need to load them anymore. Non-login shells only execute ~/.bashrc, not /.profile or ~/.bash_profile, for this exact reason, so in there define everything that only applies to bash. That's functions, aliases, bash-only variables like HISTSIZE (this is not an environment variable, don't export it!), shell options with set and shopt, etc. For an example, see: My .bashrc
Now, as part of UNIX peculiarity, a login-shell does NOT execute ~/.bashrc but only ~/.profile or ~/.bash_profile, so you should source that one manually from the latter. You'll see me do that in my ~/.profile too: source ~/.bashrc.
From the bash manpage:
When bash is invoked as an
interactive login shell, or as a
non-interactive shell with the
--login option, it first reads and executes commands from the file
/etc/profile, if that file exists.
After reading that file, it looks for
~/.bash_profile, ~/.bash_login, and
~/.profile, in that order, and reads
and executes commands from the first
one that exists and is readable. The
--noprofile option may be used when the shell is started to inhibit this
behavior.
When a login shell exits, bash
reads and executes commands from the
file ~/.bash_logout, if it exists.
When an interactive shell that is not a login shell is started, bash
reads and executes commands from ~/.bashrc, if that file exists. This
may be inhibited by using the --norc option. The --rcfile file option
will force bash to read and execute commands from file instead of
~/.bashrc.
Thus, if you want to get the same behavior for both login shells and interactive non-login shells, you should put all of your commands in either .bashrc or .bash_profile, and then have the other file source the first one.
.bash_profile is loaded for a "login shell". I am not sure what that would be on OS X, but on Linux that is either X11 or a virtual terminal.
.bashrc is loaded every time you run Bash. That is where you should put stuff you want loaded whenever you open a new Terminal.app window.
I personally put everything in .bashrc so that I don't have to restart the application for changes to take effect.
Locked. This question and its answers are locked because the question is off-topic but has historical significance. It is not currently accepting new answers or interactions.
I've used a number of different *nix-based systems of the years, and it seems like every flavor of Bash I use has a different algorithm for deciding which startup scripts to run. For the purposes of tasks like setting up environment variables and aliases and printing startup messages (e.g. MOTDs), which startup script is the appropriate place to do these?
What's the difference between putting things in .bashrc, .bash_profile, and .environment? I've also seen other files such as .login, .bash_login, and .profile; are these ever relevant? What are the differences in which ones get run when logging in physically, logging in remotely via ssh, and opening a new terminal window? Are there any significant differences across platforms (including Mac OS X (and its Terminal.app) and Cygwin Bash)?
The main difference with shell config files is that some are only read by "login" shells (eg. when you login from another host, or login at the text console of a local unix machine). these are the ones called, say, .login or .profile or .zlogin (depending on which shell you're using).
Then you have config files that are read by "interactive" shells (as in, ones connected to a terminal (or pseudo-terminal in the case of, say, a terminal emulator running under a windowing system). these are the ones with names like .bashrc, .tcshrc, .zshrc, etc.
bash complicates this in that .bashrc is only read by a shell that's both interactive and non-login, so you'll find most people end up telling their .bash_profile to also read .bashrc with something like
[[ -r ~/.bashrc ]] && . ~/.bashrc
Other shells behave differently - eg with zsh, .zshrc is always read for an interactive shell, whether it's a login one or not.
The manual page for bash explains the circumstances under which each file is read. Yes, behaviour is generally consistent between machines.
.profile is simply the login script filename originally used by /bin/sh. bash, being generally backwards-compatible with /bin/sh, will read .profile if one exists.
That's simple. It's explained in man bash:
/bin/bash
The bash executable
/etc/profile
The systemwide initialization file, executed for login shells
~/.bash_profile
The personal initialization file, executed for login shells
~/.bashrc
The individual per-interactive-shell startup file
~/.bash_logout
The individual login shell cleanup file, executed when a login shell exits
~/.inputrc
Individual readline initialization file
Login shells are the ones that are read one you login (so, they are not executed when merely starting up xterm, for example). There are other ways to login. For example using an X display manager. Those have other ways to read and export environment variables at login time.
Also read the INVOCATION chapter in the manual. It says "The following paragraphs describe how bash executes its startup files.", i think that's a spot-on :) It explains what an "interactive" shell is too.
Bash does not know about .environment. I suspect that's a file of your distribution, to set environment variables independent of the shell that you drive.
Classically, ~/.profile is used by Bourne Shell, and is probably supported by Bash as a legacy measure. Again, ~/.login and ~/.cshrc were used by C Shell - I'm not sure that Bash uses them at all.
The ~/.bash_profile would be used once, at login. The ~/.bashrc script is read every time a shell is started. This is analogous to /.cshrc for C Shell.
One consequence is that stuff in ~/.bashrc should be as lightweight (minimal) as possible to reduce the overhead when starting a non-login shell.
I believe the ~/.environment file is a compatibility file for Korn Shell.
I found information about .bashrc and .bash_profile here to sum it up:
.bash_profile is executed when you
login. Stuff you put in there might be
your PATH and other important
environment variables.
.bashrc is used for non login shells.
I'm not sure what that means. I know
that RedHat
executes it everytime you start
another shell (su to this user or
simply calling bash again) You might
want to put aliases in there but again
I am not sure what that means. I
simply ignore it myself.
.profile is the equivalent of
.bash_profile for the root. I think
the name is changed to let other
shells (csh, sh, tcsh) use it as well.
(you don't need one as a user)
There is also .bash_logout wich
executes at, yeah good guess...logout.
You might want to stop deamons or even
make a little housekeeping . You can
also add "clear" there if you want to
clear the screen when you log out.
Also there is a complete follow up on each of the configurations files here
These are probably even distro.-dependant, not all distros choose to have each configuraton with them and some have even more. But when they have the same name, they usualy include the same content.
According to Josh Staiger, Mac OS X's Terminal.app actually runs a login shell rather than a non-login shell by default for each new terminal window, calling .bash_profile instead of .bashrc.
He recommends:
Most of the time you don’t want to maintain two separate config files
for login and non-login shells — when you set a PATH, you want it to
apply to both. You can fix this by sourcing .bashrc from your
.bash_profile file, then putting PATH and common settings in .bashrc.
To do this, add the following lines to .bash_profile:
if [ -f ~/.bashrc ]; then
source ~/.bashrc
fi
Now when you login to your
machine from a console .bashrc will be called.
A good place to look at is the man page of bash. Here's an online version. Look for "INVOCATION" section.
I have used Debian-family distros which appear to execute .profile, but not .bash_profile,
whereas RHEL derivatives execute .bash_profile before .profile.
It seems to be a mess when you have to set up environment variables to work in any Linux OS.