Today while doing the release of our project, the release:perform command failed in between as our nexus was having intermittent issues. The release command only able to upload one pom file to nexus.
Now, the nexus issue is resolved and I am trying to do the release, it fails as the pom file already exists and its not the snapshot version and we don't have access to nexus so that I can delete that file and start over again.
Is there any way I can pass an argument so that release:perform should continue if the file is already there and ignore this but continue with uploading the rest.
I have looked for options of such type but didn't find anything.
My last resource would be to start the release again, which will bump the version number, but would like to understand if there is any other approach where in I don't need to bump the version.
I am using maven 2.2.1
Here's how I have handled this in the past. The release:perform command does a checkout of the tag from your SCM provider (e.g. SVN). This is done in the target/checkout directory of that project - whatever is there should be an exact copy of the released tag, so it will have the right version number in the pom files etc.
If you move to that directory (target/checkout in the directory where you started the release), you can simply do a mvn deploy there and it should compile and package that version, and then upload it to your Nexus instance.
If you don't have the target/checkout directory, you can check out the Tag created as part of the release:prepare phase from your SCM system to a fresh directory and run mvn deploy there.
Since the tag in your SCM has already been created, the only thing that's left is really compiling, packaging and deploying the release, which is exactly what mvn deploy should do.
If you have provided additional parameters (e.g. for activating profiles) for the build during the call to mvn release:perform, you will have to provide these as well when you run mvn deploy.
Using this approach, your version number will not have to change, it can stay the same, since you're just uploading what has already been tagged as part of mvn release:prepare.
My advice would be for you to request from the admins that the old artifact be removed. You can either re-deploy the code from the tag by checking it out and simply doing
mvn deploy
Or rolling back your release:
mvn release:rollback
And re-doing it as usual.
It is essential to remove the old artifact from the remote repository, if the sizes do not match. Release repositories do not allow the redeployment of artifacts, unless this has been explicitly switched on on the server side.
Furthermore, #nwinkler's answer is also quite good.
Related
I have created pipelines which will clean, compile, test, & deploy the code every time we update it. But in case of a technical issue/or error I want to add a step which allows me to revert/rollback the "build" or deployment.
Is there a maven command that can be used to revert/rollback builds/deployments?
No.
If you just run clean package, then another clean will erase the results of package, but if you have run install or deploy the artifact is send to the local repository or remote repository. This cannot be "rolled back" by Maven.
The Maven Release Plugin has a rollback goal that rolls back the changes that it made to version control:
version changes in POMs are reverted
created tag is deleted
created branch is deleted
However, this rollback does not delete files that were uploaded to the remote repository! If the remote repository does not allow artifacts with final versions to get deleted or modified, then you would end up with a problem, because your next attempt would fail to re-upload.
The Maven Release Plugin internally uses the Maven Deploy Plugin to upload files, and the latter has an experimental deployAtEnd feature. Unfortunately, I did not manage to get it to work for my build (using the suggestion from this SO comment) - I still had a build in which the Maven Release Plugin uploaded files before exiting with a failure.
I got a maven project (myApp) depending on another maven project in snapshot version.
like:
<dependency>
<groupId>org.group.dep</groupId>
<artifactId>arty</artifactId>
<version>12.1.4-SNAPSHOT</version>
</dependency>
But I got a problem with this after the "arty" got an update without changing the version (I know that would be the cleanest solution).
I build the myApp local and got still the old version of the "arty" dependency.
I verified tow option working for me (and a college):
1) Manual cleaning of the local repository: navigating to my .m2/repo/org/group/dep/arty and deleted all folders inside. After rebuilding the myApp local it was working fine - arty was downloaded form the artifactory.company.com again with the updated content.
2) Local building of the arty package so it got updated in the local repository. After rebuilding the myApp local it was working fine.
But I got similar problem on the Jenkins:
I got a Jenkins job just building org.group.myApp without building before org.group.dep.arty. It failed for the missing changes form "arty".
What can I do now to solve my problem there?
I can not rely on first building org.group.dep.arty as I can not be sure for Jenkins to run both jobs on the same host using same local repository (I don't want to change that).
Somehow the myApp-Jobs was failing after I manually cleared on that Jenkins node the org.group.dep.arty in the repository and running than the myApp-job (was somehow not downloading the package).
I finally found the mvn -u but as I tried this I was as well disappointed.
I tried different maven versions on that jenkins and got the same result.
Is there no way to force the update of the snapshot versions?
Is this "another project" is a part of the same multi-module project?
If so you can build your project with --also-make options so that maven will effectively rebuild your module and all of its dependencies
If its an entirely different project, use mvn -U to forcefully download all the snapshot dependencies of your project.
If there is a particular issue with one concrete dependency consider using mvn dependency:get. This get goal of maven-dependency-plugin downloads one specific artifact from the remote repository
Here is a link to the plugin documentation
The simplest solution to redownload -SNAPSHOT is by using the command line option: -U or as long option --update-snapshots
Furthermore your project sounds like the need for a multi module build which prevents such issues. Or you might need to define those Jobs depending on each other (There is an option to build if a SNAPSHOT has been updated in Jenkins).
I recently upgraded from hudson to jenkins. Since they are practically the same I thought it would be just plug and play. I noticed that when I build my projects my war files are being appended with the SNAPSHOT version instead of just .war. I didn't have this problem in hudson.
Is there a way to globally tell jenkins to use the release war, the one in my target directory, as it's artifact build file or have jenkins, I'm assuming the maven plugin, to not append the SNAPSHOT to the file?
SNAPSHOT is added on purpose. Don't mess with it. Either use bleeding-edge or perform mvn release:prepare release:perform in batch mode from Jenkins.
We use Maven with Subversion internally. We also use Maven's Release plugin. We noticed the issue described below when running through the following (correct, I presume) steps.
1. We run release:prepare:
Maven updates the trunk version to 1.0.0.
Maven runs svn copy trunk/myproject tags/myproject-1.0.0, thus creating tag myproject-1.0.0.
Maven updates the trunk version to 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT.
2. We run release:rollback:
Maven resets the trunk version to 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT.
Maven does not remove the tag, because Maven doesn't do this kind of stuff.
3. We commit more changes to trunk, obviously against version 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT.
4. We run release:prepare again:
Maven updates the trunk version to 1.0.0.
Maven runs svn copy trunk/myproject tags/myproject-1.0.0, thinking it created tag myproject-1.0.0 out of the latest trunk. But, alas, Subversion (1.6 and 1.7 alike) will instead create tags/myproject-1.0.0/myproject on Maven's behalf.
5. We run release:perform:
Maven checks out the contents of tag myproject-1.0.0.
Maven builds the contents and deploys the result to Nexus.
The problem is obvious: the change in step 3 did not make it into the tag. We are now releasing 1.0.0 without the change in it.
The questions are: How can we fix this? Is Maven's release rollback feature inherently broken?
In fairness, rollback should reset the project and SCM to a state that allows a second prepare to occur. This includes removing the tag. The answer is now apparent (Googling "maven release rollback remove tag"):
http://maven.apache.org/maven-release/maven-release-plugin/examples/rollback-release.html:
The created branch/tag in SCM for the release is removed. Note: This
is not yet implemented so you will need to manually remove the
branch/tag from your SCM. For more info see MRELEASE-229.
The resolution would then be to force release:rollback to include a command to delete the SCM tag using something like org.codehaus.mojo:exec-maven-plugin. Short of this, wrap rollback inside a script that does that externally.
As you've discovered, release:rollback doesn't have a whole lot of utility when it doesn't clean up SCM. What our shop has done is setup our Jenkins automation to run "mvn release:prepare release:perform" in combination with the Jenkins M2 Release Plugin.
If it fails we need to delete the tag in Subversion but, then again, we would have to do this anyway with rollback.
We have three artifacts:
common.jar : with common classes.
public.war : depending on the common.jar, contains only public site resources.
internal.war : depends on both common.jar and public.war, adding authentication
information and security context resource files. Also contains
few administration site classes.
Currently I have structured these in such way, that internal.war overlays itself with public.war.
Building the project locally, installing the artifacts to local repo, works perfectly.
Problems start when trying to get the Hudson builds working with following sequence:
Build all projects in dependency order.
Modify common.jar (say, add a new class method)
Modify internal.war classes in such way that they are compile-time dependent on changes done in 2. step.
Commit both changes, triggering the Hudson builds.
Internal.war build fails because it can not find the symbols added in step 2.
Somehow the build in step 5. is using an old version of the common.jar, and failing because of it.
The common.jar version number does not change, let's say it's 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT for the purposes of this example.
If I DO change the common.jar version number, the build works. (Supposedly because there is only one release by a release version number).
Now, what could cause this using of old artifacts in Hudson builds?
We are running maven builds on Hudson with command "clean package -e -X -U"
"Deploy artifacts to maven repository" has been checked.
It's hard to definitively answer this without access to the real poms, but here is what I would do:
1) Make sure Hudson is using the exact same version of Maven as you are on your local machine
2) Examine the effective pom.xml of internal.war on the Hudson machine in a terminal via mvn help:effective-pom making sure you are running the same mvn executable as your Hudson job does. You need to verify the version of the common.jar in the effective pom.xml of internal.war. It could be different than what you expect due to profiles or settings.xml differences.
3) Check the settings.xml file for your Hudson install of Maven. In particular you need to verify all is well in your distributionManagement, servers, and repositories stanzas. Another good way to check this is to go to your internal.war project and run mvn help:effective-settings and see if what is there matches what is on your local machine.
Something is awry and it won't take long to find with the right analysis.