I'm having hard time understanding how to convert an Enum value to it's corresponding name. My model is as follows:
public class CatalogRule
{
public int ID { get; set; }
[Display(Name = "Catalog"), Required]
public int CatalogID { get; set; }
[Display(Name = "Item Rule"), Required]
public ItemType ItemRule { get; set; }
public string Items { get; set; }
[Display(Name = "Price Rule"), Required]
public PriceType PriceRule { get; set; }
[Display(Name = "Value"), Column(TypeName = "MONEY")]
public decimal PriceValue { get; set; }
[Display(Name = "Exclusive?")]
public bool Exclude { get; set; }
}
public enum ItemType
{
Catalog,
Category,
Group,
Item
}
public enum PriceType
{
Catalog,
Price_A,
Price_B,
Price_C
}
A sample result from .net API:
[
{
$id: "1",
$type: "XYZ.CMgr.Models.CatalogRule, XYZ.CMgr",
ID: 1,
CatalogID: 501981,
ItemRule: 0,
Items: "198",
PriceRule: 1,
PriceValue: 0.5,
Exclude: false
},
{
$id: "2",
$type: "XYZ.CMgr.Models.CatalogRule, XYZ.CMgr",
ID: 2,
CatalogID: 501981,
ItemRule: 2,
Items: "9899",
PriceRule: 2,
PriceValue: 10.45,
Exclude: false
}
]
So in this example, I need to get Catalog for results[0].ItemRule & Price A for results[0].PriceRule. How can I accomplish this in BreezeJS??
This is easy to do in ASP.NET Web API, because it is an out-of-box feature in the default JSON serializer (Json.NET).
To see strings instead of enum numbers in JSON, just add an instance of StringEnumConverter to JSON serializer settings during app init:
var jsonFormatter = GlobalConfiguration.Configuration.Formatters.JsonFormatter;
jsonFormatter.SerializerSettings.Converters.Add(new Newtonsoft.Json.Converters.StringEnumConverter());
UPDATE: Yep, you right, this is not help with Breeze.js. Ok, you can anyway do a little magic to make enums work like strings (while new version with fix is not released).
Create a custom ContextProvider which updates all integer enum values in metadata to strings. Here it is:
public class StringEnumEFContextProvider<T> : EFContextProvider<T>
where T : class, new()
{
protected override string BuildJsonMetadata()
{
XDocument xDoc;
if (Context is DbContext)
{
xDoc = GetCsdlFromDbContext(Context);
}
else
{
xDoc = GetCsdlFromObjectContext(Context);
}
var schemaNs = "http://schemas.microsoft.com/ado/2009/11/edm";
foreach (var enumType in xDoc.Descendants(XName.Get("EnumType", schemaNs)))
{
foreach (var member in enumType.Elements(XName.Get("Member", schemaNs)))
{
member.Attribute("Value").Value = member.Attribute("Name").Value;
}
}
return CsdlToJson(xDoc);
}
}
And use it instead of EFContextProvider in your Web API controllers:
private EFContextProvider<BreezeSampleContext> _contextProvider =
new StringEnumEFContextProvider<BreezeSampleContext>();
This works well for me with current Breeze.js version (1.1.3), although I haven't checked other scenarios, like validation...
UPDATE: To fix validation, change data type for enums in breeze.[min|debug].js, manually (DataType.fromEdmDataType function, dt = DataType.String; for enum) or replace default function during app init:
breeze.DataType.fromEdmDataType = function (typeName) {
var dt = null;
var parts = typeName.split(".");
if (parts.length > 1) {
var simpleName = parts[1];
if (simpleName === "image") {
// hack
dt = DataType.Byte;
} else if (parts.length == 2) {
dt = DataType.fromName(simpleName);
if (!dt) {
if (simpleName === "DateTimeOffset") {
dt = DataType.DateTime;
} else {
dt = DataType.Undefined;
}
}
} else {
// enum
dt = DataType.String; // THIS IS A FIX!
}
}
return dt;
};
Dirty, dirty hacks, I know... But that's the solution I found
There will be a new release out in the next few days where we "change" breeze's enum behavior ( i.e. break existing code with regards to enums). In the new release enums are serialized and queried by their .NET names instead of as integers. I will post back here when the new release is out.
Related
If I specify as enum then it doesn't get displayed in the dialog. Can anyone help to point out if am missing some thing?
[LuisActionBinding("CollPay", FriendlyName = "Reminder")]
public class CollPayAction : BaseLuisAction
{
public enum PaymentAmtOptions
{
[Terms(new string[] { "Full Payment", "Entire Amount", "Full Due Amount" })]
FullPayment = 1,
[Terms(new string[] { "Clubbed Payment", "Combined Payment" })]
CombinedPayment
};
[Required(ErrorMessage = "Are you planning to make a separate payment or combined one?")]
[LuisActionBindingParam(CustomType = "BOPYMTOPTION", Order = 2)]
[Template(TemplateUsage.EnumSelectOne, "Are you planning to make a separate payment or combined one? {||}",
"How would you like to make the payment - separate for each Invoice(or) clubbed with other pending dues? {||}")]
public PaymentAmtOptions PaymentAmount { get; set; }
public override Task<object> FulfillAsync()
{
var result = string.Format("Hello! You have reached the CollPay intent");
return Task.FromResult((object)result);
}
}
Thanks for reporting this, it was certainly an issue. The good news is that a PR with a patch was already created.
Once the PR is approved, you will have to update your code:
-To use the updated library
-To validate the enum value. Below you will find how the code could look like:
[LuisActionBinding("CollPay", FriendlyName = "Reminder")]
public class CollPayAction : BaseLuisAction
{
public enum PaymentAmtOptions
{
None = 0, // default - no option selected
FullPayment = 1,
CombinedPayment = 2
};
// custom validator for my enum value
public class ValidPaymentAttribute : ValidationAttribute
{
public override bool IsValid(object value)
{
return value is PaymentAmtOptions && ((PaymentAmtOptions)value) != PaymentAmtOptions.None;
}
}
[ValidPayment(ErrorMessage = "Are you planning to make a separate payment [FullPayment] or combined one [CombinedPayment]?")]
[LuisActionBindingParam(CustomType = "BOPYMTOPTION", Order = 2)]
public PaymentAmtOptions PaymentAmount { get; set; }
public override Task<object> FulfillAsync()
{
var result = string.Format("Hello! You have reached the CollPay intent");
return Task.FromResult((object)result);
}
}
I've a class with following structure:
public class BestWayContext
{
public Preference Preference { get; set; }
public DateTime DueDate { get; set; }
public List<ServiceRate> ServiceRate { get; set; }
}
public class ServiceRate
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Carrier { get; set; }
public string Service { get; set; }
public decimal Rate { get; set; }
public DateTime DeliveryDate { get; set; }
}
and I've dynamic linq expression string
"Preference != null && ServiceRate.Any(Carrier == Preference.Carrier)"
and I want to convert above string in Dynamic LINQ as follows:
var expression = System.Linq.Dynamic.DynamicExpression.ParseLambda<BestWayContext, bool>(condition, null).Compile();
But it showing following error:
Please correct me what am I doing wrong?
It looks like you wanted to do something like this:
var bwc = new BestWayContext
{
Preference = new Preference { Carrier = "test" },
DueDate = DateTime.Now,
ServiceRate = new List<ServiceRate>
{
new ServiceRate
{
Carrier = "test",
DeliveryDate = DateTime.Now,
Id = 2,
Rate = 100,
Service = "testService"
}
}
};
string condition = "Preference != null && ServiceRate.Any(Carrier == #0)";
var expression = System.Linq.Dynamic.DynamicExpression.ParseLambda<BestWayContext, bool>(condition, bwc.Preference.Carrier).Compile();
bool res = expression(bwc); // true
bwc.ServiceRate.First().Carrier = "test1"; // just for testing this -> there is only one so I've used first
res = expression(bwc); // false
You want to use Preference which belong to BestWayContext but you didn't tell the compiler about that. If i write your expression on Linq i will do as follows:
[List of BestWayContext].Where(f => f.Preference != null && f.ServiceRate.Where(g => g.Carrier == f.Preference.Carrier)
);
As you see i specified to use Preference of BestWayContext.
I'm going through a short Web Api + OData tutorial from asp.net: http://www.asp.net/web-api/overview/odata-support-in-aspnet-web-api/getting-started-with-odata-in-web-api/create-a-read-only-odata-endpoint.
I downloaded the example project, and it works. But then I started playing around with the Product model that they use in the example. I added a new property to act as a key of type string instead of an integer key.
The new Product.cs:
public class Product
{
public string stringKey { get; set; }
public int ID { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public decimal Price { get; set; }
public string Category { get; set; }
}
The modified controller:
public class ProductsController : EntitySetController<Product, string>
{
static List<Product> products = new List<Product>()
{
new Product() { stringKey = "one", ID = 1, Name = "Hat", Price = 15, Category = "Apparel" },
new Product() { stringKey = "two", ID = 2, Name = "Socks", Price = 5, Category = "Apparel" },
new Product() { stringKey = "three", ID = 3, Name = "Scarf", Price = 12, Category = "Apparel" },
new Product() { stringKey = "four", ID = 4, Name = "Yo-yo", Price = 4.95M, Category = "Toys" },
new Product() { stringKey = "five", ID = 5, Name = "Puzzle", Price = 8, Category = "Toys" },
};
[Queryable]
public override IQueryable<Product> Get()
{
return products.AsQueryable();
}
protected override Product GetEntityByKey(string key)
{
return products.FirstOrDefault(p => p.stringKey == key);
}
}
The trouble is that when I go to /odata/Products(one) the string "one" is not bound to the key argument in the GetEntityByKey(string key) action. However, when I browse to odata/Products(1) then "1" does get bound to the key argument.
How can I get a string with text values to bind correctly, instead of just binding strings with numerical values?
Update
I forgot to include the WebApiConfig:
public static class WebApiConfig
{
public static void Register(HttpConfiguration config)
{
ODataModelBuilder modelBuilder = new ODataConventionModelBuilder();
modelBuilder.EntitySet<Product>("Products");
Microsoft.Data.Edm.IEdmModel model = modelBuilder.GetEdmModel();
config.Routes.MapODataRoute("ODataRoute", "odata", model);
}
}
I noticed that the path /odata/Products(0011-1100) would only bind "0011" as the string key.
After some playing around with it, I've found that the following path works as I had hoped:
/odata/Products('one')
It appears the single quotes are required to read the entire string within the parentheses.
I am trying to create a t4 template to help speed up my Create Form template.
Is it possible to add extra html depending if a model's property is required?
e.g.
[Required]
[Display(Name = "Contact Email Address:")]
public string ContactEmailAddress { get; set; }
Now in my tt file do something like
foreach (ModelProperty property in GetModelProperties(mvcHost.ViewDataType)) {
if (!property.IsPrimaryKey && !property.IsReadOnly) {
#>
<div>
#Html.LabelFor(model => model.<#= property.Name #>)
#Html.EditorFor(model => model.<#= property.Name #>)
#Html.ValidationMessageFor(model => model.<#= property.Name #>)
if(this.Required==true){<span class="required-field"></span>}
</div>
<#
}
Or is this not possible?
1,Open this file:
C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 12.0\Common7\IDE\Extensions\Microsoft\Web\Mvc\Scaffolding\Templates\MvcViewWithContextScaffolder\ModelPropertyFunctions.include.t4
2, Add some property to ModelProperty
class ModelProperty {
public string Name { get; set; }
public string AssociationName { get; set; }
public string ValueExpression { get; set; }
public string ModelValueExpression { get; set; }
public string ItemValueExpression { get; set; }
public EnvDTE.CodeTypeRef Type { get; set; }
public bool IsPrimaryKey { get; set; }
public bool IsForeignKey { get; set; }//
public bool IsReadOnly { get; set; }//
public bool IsRequired{ get; set;}//Here is your customer Property
public bool Scaffold { get; set; }
}
3, Add an method out under this class
bool IsRequired(EnvDTE.CodeProperty propertyType)
{
foreach (EnvDTE.CodeAttribute attribute in propertyType.Attributes)
{
if (String.Equals(attribute.FullName, "System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations.RequiredAttribute", StringComparison.Ordinal))
{
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
4,Go to the bottom of this file to modify the method GetEligibleProperties:
List<ModelProperty> GetEligibleProperties(EnvDTE.CodeType typeInfo) {
List<ModelProperty> results = new List<ModelProperty>();
if (typeInfo != null) {
foreach (var prop in typeInfo.GetPublicMembers().OfType<EnvDTE.CodeProperty>()) {
if (prop.HasPublicGetter() && !prop.IsIndexerProperty() && IsBindableType(prop.Type)) {
string valueExpression = GetValueExpressionSuffix(prop);
results.Add(new ModelProperty {
Name = prop.Name,
AssociationName = GetAssociationName(prop),
ValueExpression = valueExpression,
ModelValueExpression = "Model." + valueExpression,
ItemValueExpression = "item." + valueExpression,
Type = prop.Type,
IsPrimaryKey = IsPrimaryKey(prop),
IsForeignKey = IsForeignKey(prop),
IsRequired=IsRequired(prop),//Here is your customer property.
IsReadOnly = !prop.HasPublicSetter(),
Scaffold = Scaffold(prop)
});
}
}
}
return results;
}
5, go to the file
C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 12.0\Common7\IDE\Extensions\Microsoft\Web\Mvc\Scaffolding\Templates\MvcViewWithContextScaffolder\Edit.cs.t4
Add the following check before your ValidationMessageFor
#Html.ValidationMessageFor(model => model.<#= property.Name #>):
Codes like this:
<#
if (property.IsRequired) {
#>
*<!--your html code-->
<#
}
#>
This would be possible but would take more work than what you have here. You could add a Required property to ModelProperty and then set it by looking for the required attribute on the property when getting the model properties. You can take a look at the code that determines whether or not a property is a primary key in the .tt templates for an example.
If someone still searching for a solution...
I'm using the MetadataType attibute to define the property attributes like Required or DisplayName in a seperate class.
Sample:
[MetadataType(typeof(personMetaData))]
public partial class Person
{
}
public class personMetaData
{
[DisplayName("Surname")]
[Required]
public object Name { get; set; }
}
If you want to access these attributes in the t4-template you have to extend the ModelProperty class and creator in the template-file.
Put the following code at the bottom of your template (e.g. List.tt). You have to replace the existing code.
<#+
// Describes the information about a property on the model
public class ModelProperty
{
public string Name { get; set; }
public string ValueExpression { get; set; }
public Type UnderlyingType { get; set; }
public bool IsPrimaryKey { get; set; }
public bool IsReadOnly { get; set; }
public string DisplayName { get; set; }
}
// Change this list to include any non-primitive types you think should be eligible for display/edit
private static Type[] bindableNonPrimitiveTypes = new[]
{
typeof (string),
typeof (decimal),
typeof (Guid),
typeof (DateTime),
typeof (DateTimeOffset),
typeof (TimeSpan),
};
// Call this to get the list of properties in the model. Change this to modify or add your
// own default formatting for display values.
public List<ModelProperty> GetModelProperties(Type type)
{
List<ModelProperty> results = GetEligibleProperties(type);
foreach (ModelProperty prop in results)
{
if (prop.UnderlyingType == typeof (double) || prop.UnderlyingType == typeof (decimal))
{
prop.ValueExpression = "String.Format(\"{0:F}\", " + prop.ValueExpression + ")";
}
else if (prop.UnderlyingType == typeof (DateTime))
{
prop.ValueExpression = "String.Format(\"{0:g}\", " + prop.ValueExpression + ")";
}
}
return results;
}
// Call this to determine if the property represents a primary key. Change the
// code to change the definition of primary key.
private bool IsPrimaryKey(PropertyInfo property)
{
if (string.Equals(property.Name, "id", StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase))
{
// EF Code First convention
return true;
}
if (string.Equals(property.Name, property.DeclaringType.Name + "id", StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase))
{
// EF Code First convention
return true;
}
foreach (object attribute in property.GetCustomAttributes(true))
{
if (attribute is KeyAttribute)
{
// WCF RIA Services and EF Code First explicit
return true;
}
var edmScalar = attribute as EdmScalarPropertyAttribute;
if (edmScalar != null && edmScalar.EntityKeyProperty)
{
// EF traditional
return true;
}
/* var column = attribute as ColumnAttribute;
if (column != null && column.IsPrimaryKey)
{
// LINQ to SQL
return true;
}*/
}
return false;
}
// This will return the primary key property name, if and only if there is exactly
// one primary key. Returns null if there is no PK, or the PK is composite.
private string GetPrimaryKeyName(Type type)
{
IEnumerable<string> pkNames = GetPrimaryKeyNames(type);
return pkNames.Count() == 1 ? pkNames.First() : null;
}
// This will return all the primary key names. Will return an empty list if there are none.
private IEnumerable<string> GetPrimaryKeyNames(Type type)
{
return GetEligibleProperties(type).Where(mp => mp.IsPrimaryKey).Select(mp => mp.Name);
}
// Helper
private List<ModelProperty> GetEligibleProperties(Type type)
{
List<ModelProperty> results = new List<ModelProperty>();
foreach (PropertyInfo prop in type.GetProperties(BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.Instance))
{
Type underlyingType = Nullable.GetUnderlyingType(prop.PropertyType) ?? prop.PropertyType;
if (prop.GetGetMethod() != null && prop.GetIndexParameters().Length == 0 &&
IsBindableType(underlyingType))
{
var displayName = prop.Name;
// Search in Metadata
var metadata = type.GetCustomAttributes(typeof(MetadataTypeAttribute), true).OfType<MetadataTypeAttribute>().ToArray().FirstOrDefault();
if (metadata != null)
{
var metaPropery = metadata.MetadataClassType.GetProperty(prop.Name);
if (metaPropery != null)
{
displayName = ((DisplayNameAttribute)metaPropery.GetCustomAttributes(typeof (DisplayNameAttribute), true).First()).DisplayName;
}
}
results.Add(new ModelProperty
{
Name = prop.Name,
ValueExpression = "Model." + prop.Name,
UnderlyingType = underlyingType,
IsPrimaryKey = IsPrimaryKey(prop),
IsReadOnly = prop.GetSetMethod() == null,
DisplayName = displayName
});
}
}
return results;
}
// Helper
private bool IsBindableType(Type type)
{
return type.IsPrimitive || bindableNonPrimitiveTypes.Contains(type);
}
#>
Now you can access these attributes like this:
<#
List<ModelProperty> properties = GetModelProperties(mvcHost.ViewDataType);
foreach (ModelProperty property in properties) {
if (!property.IsPrimaryKey) {
#>
<th>
<#= property.DisplayName #><#= property.AllowEmptyStrings ? "*" : "" #>
</th>
<#
}
}
#>
T4 templates have changed with MVC5. To accomplish this in MVC5, I've written a tutorial here: https://johniekarr.wordpress.com/2015/05/16/mvc-5-t4-templates-and-view-model-property-attributes/
I have a List<MyClass> and I want to sort it by DateTime CreateDate attribute of MyClass.
Is that possible with LINQ ?
Thanks
To sort the existing list:
list.Sort((x,y) => x.CreateDate.CompareTo(y.CreateDate));
It is also possible to write a Sort extension method, allowing:
list.Sort(x => x.CreateDate);
for example:
public static class ListExt {
public static void Sort<TSource, TValue>(
this List<TSource> list,
Func<TSource, TValue> selector) {
if (list == null) throw new ArgumentNullException("list");
if (selector == null) throw new ArgumentNullException("selector");
var comparer = Comparer<TValue>.Default;
list.Sort((x,y) => comparer.Compare(selector(x), selector(y)));
}
}
You can enumerate it in sorted order:
IEnumerable<MyClass> result = list.OrderBy(element => element.CreateDate);
You can also use ToList() to convert to a new list and reassign to the original variable:
list = list.OrderBy(element => element.CreateDate).ToList();
This isn't quite the same as sorting the original list because if anyone still has a reference to the old list they won't see the new ordering. If you actually want to sort the original list then you need to use the List<T>.Sort method.
Here is a sample:
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
namespace Demo
{
public class Test
{
public void SortTest()
{
var myList = new List<Item> { new Item { Name = "Test", Id = 1, CreateDate = DateTime.Now.AddYears(-1) }, new Item { Name = "Other", Id = 1, CreateDate = DateTime.Now.AddYears(-2) } };
var result = myList.OrderBy(x => x.CreateDate);
}
}
public class Item
{
public string Name { get; set; }
public int Id { get; set; }
public DateTime CreateDate { get; set; }
}
}
Sure the other answers with .OrderBy() work, but wouldn't you rather make your source item inherit from IComparable and just call .Sort()?
class T {
public DateTime CreatedDate { get; set; }
}
to use:
List<T> ts = new List<T>();
ts.Add(new T { CreatedDate = DateTime.Now });
ts.Add(new T { CreatedDate = DateTime.Now });
ts.Sort((x,y) => DateTime.Compare(x.CreatedDate, y.CreatedDate));