I've a class with following structure:
public class BestWayContext
{
public Preference Preference { get; set; }
public DateTime DueDate { get; set; }
public List<ServiceRate> ServiceRate { get; set; }
}
public class ServiceRate
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Carrier { get; set; }
public string Service { get; set; }
public decimal Rate { get; set; }
public DateTime DeliveryDate { get; set; }
}
and I've dynamic linq expression string
"Preference != null && ServiceRate.Any(Carrier == Preference.Carrier)"
and I want to convert above string in Dynamic LINQ as follows:
var expression = System.Linq.Dynamic.DynamicExpression.ParseLambda<BestWayContext, bool>(condition, null).Compile();
But it showing following error:
Please correct me what am I doing wrong?
It looks like you wanted to do something like this:
var bwc = new BestWayContext
{
Preference = new Preference { Carrier = "test" },
DueDate = DateTime.Now,
ServiceRate = new List<ServiceRate>
{
new ServiceRate
{
Carrier = "test",
DeliveryDate = DateTime.Now,
Id = 2,
Rate = 100,
Service = "testService"
}
}
};
string condition = "Preference != null && ServiceRate.Any(Carrier == #0)";
var expression = System.Linq.Dynamic.DynamicExpression.ParseLambda<BestWayContext, bool>(condition, bwc.Preference.Carrier).Compile();
bool res = expression(bwc); // true
bwc.ServiceRate.First().Carrier = "test1"; // just for testing this -> there is only one so I've used first
res = expression(bwc); // false
You want to use Preference which belong to BestWayContext but you didn't tell the compiler about that. If i write your expression on Linq i will do as follows:
[List of BestWayContext].Where(f => f.Preference != null && f.ServiceRate.Where(g => g.Carrier == f.Preference.Carrier)
);
As you see i specified to use Preference of BestWayContext.
Related
Given a list of strings, I'd like to create a list of the following object
class LineInfo
{
public string line { get; set; }
public bool isSearchMatch { get; set; }
public int searchMatchNumber { get; set; }
}
Where I'd like searchMatchNumber to have 1 for the 1st match, 2 for the 2nd, etc. Otherwise it can be zero
I set this up like so
IEnumerable<string> allLines; //pulled in from somewhere
IEnumerable<LineInfo> logInfoLines = allLines.Select((l, i) => new LineInfo
{
line = l,
isSearchMatch = l.IndexOf(search, StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase) >= 0
});
How can I set searchMatchNumber?
LINQ queries should not cause side effects like this. If you'd add an OrderBy you'd get a different result. I wouldn't use LINQ for this, you could provide a method:
class LineInfo
{
public string line { get; set; }
public bool isSearchMatch { get; set; }
public int searchMatchNumber { get; set; }
public static IEnumerable<LineInfo> GetSearchResult(IEnumerable<string> allLines, string search)
{
int matchCounter = 0;
var lineInfoList = new List<LineInfo>();
foreach (string line in allLines)
{
bool isMatch = line.IndexOf(search, StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase) >= 0;
var li = new LineInfo
{
line = line,
isSearchMatch = isMatch,
searchMatchNumber = isMatch ? ++matchCounter : -1 // or whatever
};
lineInfoList.Add(li);
}
return lineInfoList;
}
}
I'm having hard time understanding how to convert an Enum value to it's corresponding name. My model is as follows:
public class CatalogRule
{
public int ID { get; set; }
[Display(Name = "Catalog"), Required]
public int CatalogID { get; set; }
[Display(Name = "Item Rule"), Required]
public ItemType ItemRule { get; set; }
public string Items { get; set; }
[Display(Name = "Price Rule"), Required]
public PriceType PriceRule { get; set; }
[Display(Name = "Value"), Column(TypeName = "MONEY")]
public decimal PriceValue { get; set; }
[Display(Name = "Exclusive?")]
public bool Exclude { get; set; }
}
public enum ItemType
{
Catalog,
Category,
Group,
Item
}
public enum PriceType
{
Catalog,
Price_A,
Price_B,
Price_C
}
A sample result from .net API:
[
{
$id: "1",
$type: "XYZ.CMgr.Models.CatalogRule, XYZ.CMgr",
ID: 1,
CatalogID: 501981,
ItemRule: 0,
Items: "198",
PriceRule: 1,
PriceValue: 0.5,
Exclude: false
},
{
$id: "2",
$type: "XYZ.CMgr.Models.CatalogRule, XYZ.CMgr",
ID: 2,
CatalogID: 501981,
ItemRule: 2,
Items: "9899",
PriceRule: 2,
PriceValue: 10.45,
Exclude: false
}
]
So in this example, I need to get Catalog for results[0].ItemRule & Price A for results[0].PriceRule. How can I accomplish this in BreezeJS??
This is easy to do in ASP.NET Web API, because it is an out-of-box feature in the default JSON serializer (Json.NET).
To see strings instead of enum numbers in JSON, just add an instance of StringEnumConverter to JSON serializer settings during app init:
var jsonFormatter = GlobalConfiguration.Configuration.Formatters.JsonFormatter;
jsonFormatter.SerializerSettings.Converters.Add(new Newtonsoft.Json.Converters.StringEnumConverter());
UPDATE: Yep, you right, this is not help with Breeze.js. Ok, you can anyway do a little magic to make enums work like strings (while new version with fix is not released).
Create a custom ContextProvider which updates all integer enum values in metadata to strings. Here it is:
public class StringEnumEFContextProvider<T> : EFContextProvider<T>
where T : class, new()
{
protected override string BuildJsonMetadata()
{
XDocument xDoc;
if (Context is DbContext)
{
xDoc = GetCsdlFromDbContext(Context);
}
else
{
xDoc = GetCsdlFromObjectContext(Context);
}
var schemaNs = "http://schemas.microsoft.com/ado/2009/11/edm";
foreach (var enumType in xDoc.Descendants(XName.Get("EnumType", schemaNs)))
{
foreach (var member in enumType.Elements(XName.Get("Member", schemaNs)))
{
member.Attribute("Value").Value = member.Attribute("Name").Value;
}
}
return CsdlToJson(xDoc);
}
}
And use it instead of EFContextProvider in your Web API controllers:
private EFContextProvider<BreezeSampleContext> _contextProvider =
new StringEnumEFContextProvider<BreezeSampleContext>();
This works well for me with current Breeze.js version (1.1.3), although I haven't checked other scenarios, like validation...
UPDATE: To fix validation, change data type for enums in breeze.[min|debug].js, manually (DataType.fromEdmDataType function, dt = DataType.String; for enum) or replace default function during app init:
breeze.DataType.fromEdmDataType = function (typeName) {
var dt = null;
var parts = typeName.split(".");
if (parts.length > 1) {
var simpleName = parts[1];
if (simpleName === "image") {
// hack
dt = DataType.Byte;
} else if (parts.length == 2) {
dt = DataType.fromName(simpleName);
if (!dt) {
if (simpleName === "DateTimeOffset") {
dt = DataType.DateTime;
} else {
dt = DataType.Undefined;
}
}
} else {
// enum
dt = DataType.String; // THIS IS A FIX!
}
}
return dt;
};
Dirty, dirty hacks, I know... But that's the solution I found
There will be a new release out in the next few days where we "change" breeze's enum behavior ( i.e. break existing code with regards to enums). In the new release enums are serialized and queried by their .NET names instead of as integers. I will post back here when the new release is out.
Quite new to EF, basically i want to convert this SQL query:
SELECT
PSKU.ProductSKUID,
PSKU.ProductSKUName,
W.WarehouseID,
W.WarehouseName,
SA.SystemAreaName,
COUNT(SLI.ProductSKUID) AS QTY
FROM dbo.StockLineItem AS SLI INNER JOIN
dbo.ProductSKU AS PSKU ON PSKU.ProductSKUID = SLI.ProductSKUID INNER JOIN
dbo.Warehouse AS W ON W.WarehouseID = SLI.WarehouseID INNER JOIN
dbo.SystemArea AS SA ON SA.SystemAreaID = SLI.SystemAreaID
WHERE (SA.SystemAreaID = 1)
AND W.WarehouseID = #WarehouseID
GROUP BY PSKU.ProductSKUID, PSKU.ProductSKUName, W.WarehouseName, SA.SystemAreaName, W.WarehouseID
To an effective EF statement. This is what i Have so far, my Model class and the method:
[Serializable]
public class StockReturnMethod
{
public int ProductSKUID { get; set; }
public int WarehouseID { get; set; }
public int LotID { get; set; }
public string LotName { get; set; }
public int AreaID { get; set; }
public string AreaName { get; set; }
public int BinID { get; set; }
public string BinName { get; set; }
}
public class DALStockMovement
{
scmEntitiesPrimaryCon entities = new scmEntitiesPrimaryCon();
public List<AvailibleStock> AvailibleStockQty(int warehouseID)
{
var rows = (from PLA in entities.ProductLocationAssignments
from W in entities.Warehouses
from SLI in entities.StockLineItems
from SA in entities.SystemAreas
from PSKU in entities.ProductSKUs
where W.WarehouseID == warehouseID
select new AvailibleStock() { WarehouseID = W.WarehouseID, ProductSKUID = PSKU.ProductSKUID, ProductSKUName = PSKU.ProductSKUName, WarehouseName = W.WarehouseName, Status = SA.SystemAreaName, QtyUnassigned = SLI.ProductSKUID }).ToList();
return rows;
}
Any Advice to get this to an Effective EF Statement would be appreciated
I actually used this tool called Linqer, since I had the SQL
I just popped it into that tool and it generated the Linq for me.
Here is what came out:
var SKUStock = (from sli in entities.StockLineItems
where
sli.SystemArea.SystemAreaID == 1 &&
sli.WarehouseID == warehouseID
group new { sli.ProductSKU, sli.Warehouse, sli.SystemArea, sli } by new
{
ProductSKUID = (System.Int32?)sli.ProductSKU.ProductSKUID,
sli.ProductSKU.ProductSKUName,
sli.Warehouse.WarehouseName,
sli.SystemArea.SystemAreaName,
WarehouseID = (System.Int32?)sli.Warehouse.WarehouseID
} into g
select new AvailibleStock()
{
ProductSKUID = (int)(System.Int32?)g.Key.ProductSKUID,
ProductSKUName = g.Key.ProductSKUName,
WarehouseID = (int)(System.Int32?)g.Key.WarehouseID,
WarehouseName = g.Key.WarehouseName,
Status = g.Key.SystemAreaName,
QtyUnassigned = (int)(Int64?)g.Count(p => p.sli.ProductSKUID != null)
}).ToList();
return SKUStock;
It returns exactly what i need :).
I have a LINQ query with more than 2 where conditions, but it doesn't seem to evaluate with more than 2 conditions. Is there a way to add more conditions to the where clause?
var query =
from f in XElement.Load(MapPath("flightdata3.xml")).Elements("flight")
where (string)f.Element("departurelocation") == From &&
(string)f.Element("destinationlocation") == DestCity &&
(string)f.Element("airline") == Airline
// && (string)f.Element("departuredate") == DepartDate &&
// (string)f.Element("departuretime")==DepartTime
//&& (string)f.Element("returndate")==ReturnDate &&
//(string)f.Element("returntime")==ReturnTime
orderby Convert.ToInt32(f.Element("price").Value)
select new
{
FlightNumber = (Int32)f.Element("flightnumber"),
Airline = (string)f.Element("airline"),
Departure = (string)f.Element("departureairportsymbol"),
DepartTime = (string)f.Element("departuretime"),
Destination = (string)f.Element("destinationairportsymbol"),
ArrivalTime = (string)f.Element("arrivaltime"),
Stops = (int)f.Element("numberofstops"),
Duration = (string)f.Element("duration"),
Cabin = (string)f.Element("cabin"),
Price = "$" + (Int32)f.Element("price"),
ImagePath = (string)f.Element("airlineimageurl").Value
};
LINQ absolutely allows more than two WHERE conditions. Have you tried separating the query into more manageable pieces? LINQ uses deferred execution anyway so you won't see a performance penalty in doing so.
You should also consider making a class to hold the information you're stuffing into the result.
public class FlightDetail
{
public Int32 FlightNumber { get; set; }
public String Airline { get; set; }
public String Departure { get; set; }
public String DepartureTime { get; set; }
public String Destination { get; set; }
public String ArrivalTime { get; set; }
public Int32 Stops { get; set; }
public String Duration { get; set; }
public String Cabin { get; set; }
public Int32 Price { get; set; }
public String ImagePath { get; set; }
}
Then something like this which is more readable but should also help you find whatever bug is popping up.
var flights =
from f in XElement.Load(MapPath("flightdata3.xml")).Elements("flight")
select new FlightDetail
{
FlightNumber = (Int32)f.Element("flightnumber"),
Airline = (string)f.Element("airline"),
Departure = (string)f.Element("departureairportsymbol"),
DepartTime = (string)f.Element("departuretime"),
Destination = (string)f.Element("destinationairportsymbol"),
ArrivalTime = (string)f.Element("arrivaltime"),
Stops = (int)f.Element("numberofstops"),
Duration = (string)f.Element("duration"),
Cabin = (string)f.Element("cabin"),
Price = "$" + (Int32)f.Element("price"),
ImagePath = (string)f.Element("airlineimageurl").Value
};
var flightsByLocation =
flights.
where (string)f.Element("departurelocation") == From &&
(string)f.Element("destinationlocation") == DestCity
select new FlightDetail
{
FlightNumber = (Int32)f.Element("flightnumber"),
Airline = (string)f.Element("airline"),
Departure = (string)f.Element("departureairportsymbol"),
DepartTime = (string)f.Element("departuretime"),
Destination = (string)f.Element("destinationairportsymbol"),
ArrivalTime = (string)f.Element("arrivaltime"),
Stops = (int)f.Element("numberofstops"),
Duration = (string)f.Element("duration"),
Cabin = (string)f.Element("cabin"),
Price = "$" + (Int32)f.Element("price"),
ImagePath = (string)f.Element("airlineimageurl").Value
};
There shouldn't be an issue with having more then one condition. For example, you could have something like this from an Order table.
var orderDetails = (from o in context.OrderDetails
where o.OrderID == orderID
where o.OrderName == orderName
select o).ToList();
I am trying to create a t4 template to help speed up my Create Form template.
Is it possible to add extra html depending if a model's property is required?
e.g.
[Required]
[Display(Name = "Contact Email Address:")]
public string ContactEmailAddress { get; set; }
Now in my tt file do something like
foreach (ModelProperty property in GetModelProperties(mvcHost.ViewDataType)) {
if (!property.IsPrimaryKey && !property.IsReadOnly) {
#>
<div>
#Html.LabelFor(model => model.<#= property.Name #>)
#Html.EditorFor(model => model.<#= property.Name #>)
#Html.ValidationMessageFor(model => model.<#= property.Name #>)
if(this.Required==true){<span class="required-field"></span>}
</div>
<#
}
Or is this not possible?
1,Open this file:
C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 12.0\Common7\IDE\Extensions\Microsoft\Web\Mvc\Scaffolding\Templates\MvcViewWithContextScaffolder\ModelPropertyFunctions.include.t4
2, Add some property to ModelProperty
class ModelProperty {
public string Name { get; set; }
public string AssociationName { get; set; }
public string ValueExpression { get; set; }
public string ModelValueExpression { get; set; }
public string ItemValueExpression { get; set; }
public EnvDTE.CodeTypeRef Type { get; set; }
public bool IsPrimaryKey { get; set; }
public bool IsForeignKey { get; set; }//
public bool IsReadOnly { get; set; }//
public bool IsRequired{ get; set;}//Here is your customer Property
public bool Scaffold { get; set; }
}
3, Add an method out under this class
bool IsRequired(EnvDTE.CodeProperty propertyType)
{
foreach (EnvDTE.CodeAttribute attribute in propertyType.Attributes)
{
if (String.Equals(attribute.FullName, "System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations.RequiredAttribute", StringComparison.Ordinal))
{
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
4,Go to the bottom of this file to modify the method GetEligibleProperties:
List<ModelProperty> GetEligibleProperties(EnvDTE.CodeType typeInfo) {
List<ModelProperty> results = new List<ModelProperty>();
if (typeInfo != null) {
foreach (var prop in typeInfo.GetPublicMembers().OfType<EnvDTE.CodeProperty>()) {
if (prop.HasPublicGetter() && !prop.IsIndexerProperty() && IsBindableType(prop.Type)) {
string valueExpression = GetValueExpressionSuffix(prop);
results.Add(new ModelProperty {
Name = prop.Name,
AssociationName = GetAssociationName(prop),
ValueExpression = valueExpression,
ModelValueExpression = "Model." + valueExpression,
ItemValueExpression = "item." + valueExpression,
Type = prop.Type,
IsPrimaryKey = IsPrimaryKey(prop),
IsForeignKey = IsForeignKey(prop),
IsRequired=IsRequired(prop),//Here is your customer property.
IsReadOnly = !prop.HasPublicSetter(),
Scaffold = Scaffold(prop)
});
}
}
}
return results;
}
5, go to the file
C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 12.0\Common7\IDE\Extensions\Microsoft\Web\Mvc\Scaffolding\Templates\MvcViewWithContextScaffolder\Edit.cs.t4
Add the following check before your ValidationMessageFor
#Html.ValidationMessageFor(model => model.<#= property.Name #>):
Codes like this:
<#
if (property.IsRequired) {
#>
*<!--your html code-->
<#
}
#>
This would be possible but would take more work than what you have here. You could add a Required property to ModelProperty and then set it by looking for the required attribute on the property when getting the model properties. You can take a look at the code that determines whether or not a property is a primary key in the .tt templates for an example.
If someone still searching for a solution...
I'm using the MetadataType attibute to define the property attributes like Required or DisplayName in a seperate class.
Sample:
[MetadataType(typeof(personMetaData))]
public partial class Person
{
}
public class personMetaData
{
[DisplayName("Surname")]
[Required]
public object Name { get; set; }
}
If you want to access these attributes in the t4-template you have to extend the ModelProperty class and creator in the template-file.
Put the following code at the bottom of your template (e.g. List.tt). You have to replace the existing code.
<#+
// Describes the information about a property on the model
public class ModelProperty
{
public string Name { get; set; }
public string ValueExpression { get; set; }
public Type UnderlyingType { get; set; }
public bool IsPrimaryKey { get; set; }
public bool IsReadOnly { get; set; }
public string DisplayName { get; set; }
}
// Change this list to include any non-primitive types you think should be eligible for display/edit
private static Type[] bindableNonPrimitiveTypes = new[]
{
typeof (string),
typeof (decimal),
typeof (Guid),
typeof (DateTime),
typeof (DateTimeOffset),
typeof (TimeSpan),
};
// Call this to get the list of properties in the model. Change this to modify or add your
// own default formatting for display values.
public List<ModelProperty> GetModelProperties(Type type)
{
List<ModelProperty> results = GetEligibleProperties(type);
foreach (ModelProperty prop in results)
{
if (prop.UnderlyingType == typeof (double) || prop.UnderlyingType == typeof (decimal))
{
prop.ValueExpression = "String.Format(\"{0:F}\", " + prop.ValueExpression + ")";
}
else if (prop.UnderlyingType == typeof (DateTime))
{
prop.ValueExpression = "String.Format(\"{0:g}\", " + prop.ValueExpression + ")";
}
}
return results;
}
// Call this to determine if the property represents a primary key. Change the
// code to change the definition of primary key.
private bool IsPrimaryKey(PropertyInfo property)
{
if (string.Equals(property.Name, "id", StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase))
{
// EF Code First convention
return true;
}
if (string.Equals(property.Name, property.DeclaringType.Name + "id", StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase))
{
// EF Code First convention
return true;
}
foreach (object attribute in property.GetCustomAttributes(true))
{
if (attribute is KeyAttribute)
{
// WCF RIA Services and EF Code First explicit
return true;
}
var edmScalar = attribute as EdmScalarPropertyAttribute;
if (edmScalar != null && edmScalar.EntityKeyProperty)
{
// EF traditional
return true;
}
/* var column = attribute as ColumnAttribute;
if (column != null && column.IsPrimaryKey)
{
// LINQ to SQL
return true;
}*/
}
return false;
}
// This will return the primary key property name, if and only if there is exactly
// one primary key. Returns null if there is no PK, or the PK is composite.
private string GetPrimaryKeyName(Type type)
{
IEnumerable<string> pkNames = GetPrimaryKeyNames(type);
return pkNames.Count() == 1 ? pkNames.First() : null;
}
// This will return all the primary key names. Will return an empty list if there are none.
private IEnumerable<string> GetPrimaryKeyNames(Type type)
{
return GetEligibleProperties(type).Where(mp => mp.IsPrimaryKey).Select(mp => mp.Name);
}
// Helper
private List<ModelProperty> GetEligibleProperties(Type type)
{
List<ModelProperty> results = new List<ModelProperty>();
foreach (PropertyInfo prop in type.GetProperties(BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.Instance))
{
Type underlyingType = Nullable.GetUnderlyingType(prop.PropertyType) ?? prop.PropertyType;
if (prop.GetGetMethod() != null && prop.GetIndexParameters().Length == 0 &&
IsBindableType(underlyingType))
{
var displayName = prop.Name;
// Search in Metadata
var metadata = type.GetCustomAttributes(typeof(MetadataTypeAttribute), true).OfType<MetadataTypeAttribute>().ToArray().FirstOrDefault();
if (metadata != null)
{
var metaPropery = metadata.MetadataClassType.GetProperty(prop.Name);
if (metaPropery != null)
{
displayName = ((DisplayNameAttribute)metaPropery.GetCustomAttributes(typeof (DisplayNameAttribute), true).First()).DisplayName;
}
}
results.Add(new ModelProperty
{
Name = prop.Name,
ValueExpression = "Model." + prop.Name,
UnderlyingType = underlyingType,
IsPrimaryKey = IsPrimaryKey(prop),
IsReadOnly = prop.GetSetMethod() == null,
DisplayName = displayName
});
}
}
return results;
}
// Helper
private bool IsBindableType(Type type)
{
return type.IsPrimitive || bindableNonPrimitiveTypes.Contains(type);
}
#>
Now you can access these attributes like this:
<#
List<ModelProperty> properties = GetModelProperties(mvcHost.ViewDataType);
foreach (ModelProperty property in properties) {
if (!property.IsPrimaryKey) {
#>
<th>
<#= property.DisplayName #><#= property.AllowEmptyStrings ? "*" : "" #>
</th>
<#
}
}
#>
T4 templates have changed with MVC5. To accomplish this in MVC5, I've written a tutorial here: https://johniekarr.wordpress.com/2015/05/16/mvc-5-t4-templates-and-view-model-property-attributes/