I'm trying to write a procedure that "encapsulates" (i.e. puts in a list) elements of a list between a "separator" element.
(my-proc '(1 + 2))
=> ((1) (2))
(my-proc '(x * y + z ^ 2 + 1 + 5))
=> ((x * y) (z ^ 2) (1) (5))
(my-proc '((x + 1) * y + 5))
=> (((x + 1) * y) (5))
In this case the procedure can be hard-coded to define the + symbol as the separator.
Assume that foldr (fold right operation) is defined, I'd prefer that it'd be in terms of it.
I'm not giving a full solution since this looks really homework-y.
(define (split-expr expr)
(foldr (lambda (e es)
(if (eq? e '+)
<???> ; do split
(cons (cons e (car es))
(cdr es))))
<???> ; what should start be?
es))
Just for fun, here's a version in continuation-passing style (no foldr, probably not suitable as a homework answer):
(define split/cps
(λ (sep ls)
(let loop ([ls ls] [k (λ (item acc)
(if item (cons item acc) acc))])
(cond
[(null? ls)
(k #f '())]
[(eq? sep (car ls))
(loop (cdr ls)
(λ (item acc)
(k #f (if item (cons item acc) acc))))]
[else
(loop (cdr ls)
(λ (item acc)
(k (if item
(cons (car ls) item)
(list (car ls)))
acc)))]))))
Here's another way to do it, also without foldr:
(define split/values
(λ (sep ls)
(let loop ([ls ls])
(cond
[(null? ls)
'()]
[else
(let-values ([(a d) (car-to-sep sep ls)])
(if (null? a)
(loop d)
(cons a (loop d))))]))))
(define car-to-sep
(λ (sep ls)
(let loop ([ls ls] [a '()])
(cond
[(null? ls)
(values '() '())]
[(eq? sep (car ls))
(values '() (cdr ls))]
[else
(let-values ([(a d) (loop (cdr ls) a)])
(values (cons (car ls) a) d))]))))
Related
I have to write a scheme function which does the following:
Define a SCHEME function, named (rev p), which takes a pair as an argument and evaluates to
another pair with the first and second elements in the pair p in reverse order. For instance,
( rev ( cons 1 2))
> (2 . 1)
Here is my code:
(define (rev p)
(cond ((null? p) '())
(not (pair? (car p)) p)
(else (append (rev (cdr p)) (list (rev (car p))))
However, my code returns (1 . 2) when I test it when it should be returning (2 . 1).
(define rev
(lambda (l acc)
(if (null? l)
acc
(rev (cdr l)(cons (car l) acc)))))
(rev '(1 2 3) '())
And here is an apparently obfuscate version, but the ideas may be useful.
(define rev
(lambda (l k)
(if (null? l)
(k (lambda (x) x))
(rev (cdr l)
(lambda (k0)
(k (lambda (r) (k0 (cons (car l) r)))))))))
((rev '(1 2 3) (lambda (x) x)) '())
--
As suggested by Will, here is other variant, non-tail recursive, hence not completely cps'd, it's a combination of classic recursion and cps.
(define rev
(lambda (l k)
(if (null? l)
(k '())
(rev (cdr l)
(lambda (r)
(cons (car l)
(k r)))))))
If it's just a pair that you want to reverse, it's pretty simple, you don't even need to do recursion! And remember to use cons, not append:
(define (rev p)
(cond ((not (pair? p)) p)
(else (cons (cdr p) (car p)))))
For example:
(rev '())
=> '()
(rev 5)
=> 5
(rev (cons 1 2))
=> '(2 . 1)
Or the same expressed as:
(define (rev p)
(if (pair? p)
(cons (cdr p) (car p))
p))
All you need to do for this function is use the car and cdr function for your pair p.
(define (rev p)
(cons (cdr p) (car p))
)
I need to write a scheme function that returns as a function which then takes another argument, eg a list and in turn return the desired result. In this example (c?r "arg") would return -- (car(cdr -- which then subsequently takes the list argument to return 2
> ((c?r "ar") '(1 2 3 4))
2
> ((c?r "ara") '((1 2) 3 4))
2
The problem I have is how can I return a function that accepts another arg in petite?
Here's how you might write such a function:
(define (c?r cmds)
(lambda (lst)
(let recur ((cmds (string->list cmds)))
(if (null? cmds)
lst
(case (car cmds)
((#\a) (car (recur (cdr cmds))))
((#\d) (cdr (recur (cdr cmds))))
(else (recur (cdr cmds))))))))
Note that I'm using d to signify cdr, not r (which makes no sense, to me). You can also write this more succinctly using string-fold-right (requires SRFI 13):
(define (c?r cmds)
(lambda (lst)
(string-fold-right (lambda (cmd x)
(case cmd
((#\a) (car x))
((#\d) (cdr x))
(else x)))
lst cmds)))
Just wanted to add my playing with this. Uses SRFI-1.
(import (rnrs)
(only (srfi :1) fold)) ;; require fold from SRFI-1
(define (c?r str)
(define ops (reverse (string->list str)))
(lambda (lst)
(fold (lambda (x acc)
((if (eq? x #\a) car cdr) ; choose car or cdr for application
acc))
lst
ops)))
Its very similar to Chris' version (more the previous fold-right) but I do the reverseso i can use fold in the returned procedure. I choose which of car or cdr to call by looking at the character.
EDIT
Here is an alternative version with much more preprocessing. It uses tail-ref and list-tail as shortcuts when there are runs of #\d's.
(define (c?r str)
(let loop ((druns 0) (ops (string->list str)) (funs '()))
(cond ((null? ops)
(let ((funs (reverse
(if (zero? druns)
funs
(cons (lambda (x)
(list-tail x druns))
funs)))))
(lambda (lst)
(fold (lambda (fun lst)
(fun lst))
lst
funs))))
((eq? (car ops) #\d) (loop (+ druns 1) (cdr ops) funs))
((= druns 0) (loop 0 (cdr ops) (cons car funs)))
(else (loop 0 (cdr ops) (cons (lambda (x)
(list-ref x druns))
funs))))))
This can be made even simpler in #!racket. we skip the reverse and just do (apply compose1 funs).
(define (c?r str)
(let loop ((druns 0) (ops (string->list str)) (funs '()))
(cond ((null? ops)
(let ((funs (if (zero? druns)
funs
(cons (lambda (x)
(list-tail x druns))
funs))))
(apply compose1 funs)))
((eq? (car ops) #\d) (loop (+ druns 1) (cdr ops) funs))
((= druns 0) (loop 0 (cdr ops) (cons car funs)))
(else (loop 0 (cdr ops) (cons (lambda (x)
(list-ref x druns))
funs))))))
Assuming a compose procedure:
(define (compose funs . args)
(if (null? funs)
(apply values args)
(compose (cdr funs) (apply (car funs) args))))
(compose (list cdr car) '(1 2 3 4))
=> 2
c?r can be defined in terms of compose like so:
(define (c?r funs)
(lambda (e)
(compose
(map
(lambda (f) (if (char=? f #\a) car cdr))
(reverse (string->list funs)))
e)))
then
((c?r "ar") '(1 2 3 4))
=> 2
((c?r "ara") '((1 2) 3 4))
=> 2
I am getting "Error: Invalid lambda: (lambda (insert-all))."
(define permutations
(lambda (L)
(let
((insert-all
(lambda (e Ls)
(let
((insert-one
(lambda (L)
(letrec
((helper
(lambda(L R)
(if (null? R)
(list (append L(list e)R))
(helper (append L (list (car R) ) ) (cdr R) )
))))
(helper '() L)))))
(apply append(map insert-one Ls)))))))
(cond ((null? L) '() )
((null?(cdr L)) (list L))
(else (insert-all (car L) (permutations ((cdr L))))))))
It is supposed to return all permutations of a given list.
The form that you have provided in not valid scheme. Specifically, your highest-level let form does not have a body. You might be thinking that the cond clause is the body but owing to your parenthesis it is not part of the let. Honestly, this is the fault of your formatting. Here is a 'properly' formatted Scheme form:
(define (permutations L)
(let ((insert-all
(lambda (e Ls)
(let ((insert-one
(lambda (L)
(let helper ((L '()) (R L))
(if (null? R)
(list (append L (list e) R))
(helper (append L (list (car R)))
(cdr R)))))))
(apply append (map insert-one Ls))))))
(cond ((null? L) '())
((null? (cdr L)) (list L))
(else (insert-all (car L)
(permutations (cdr L)))))))
At least it compiles and runs, although it doesn't produce the right answer (although I don't know what the proper input it):
> (permutations '(a b c))
((c b a))
> (permutations '((a b) (1 2)))
(((1 2) (a b)))
Here is an implementation that works:
(define (permutations L)
(define (insert-all e Ls)
(apply append
(map (lambda (e)
(map (lambda (x) (cons e x)) Ls))
e)))
(cond ((null? L) '())
((null? (cdr L)) (map list (car L)))
(else (insert-all (car L)
(permutations (cdr L))))))
> (permutations '((a b) (1 2) (x y)))
((a 1 x) (a 1 y) (a 2 x) (a 2 y) (b 1 x) (b 1 y) (b 2 x) (b 2 y))
The basic structure of your code was fine; just the implementation of your insert-one and helper were lacking.
What is the most transparent and elegant string to decimal number procedure you can create in Scheme?
It should produce correct results with "+42", "-6", "-.28", and "496.8128", among others.
This is inspired by the previously posted list to integer problem: how to convert a list to num in scheme?
I scragged my first attempt since it went ugly fast and realized others might like to play with it as well.
Much shorter, also makes the result inexact with a decimal point, and deal with any +- prefix. The regexp thing is only used to assume a valid syntax later on.
#lang racket/base
(require racket/match)
(define (str->num s)
;; makes it possible to assume a correct format later
(unless (regexp-match? #rx"^[+-]*[0-9]*([.][0-9]*)?$" s)
(error 'str->num "bad input ~e" s))
(define (num l a)
(match l
['() a]
[(cons #\. l) (+ a (/ (num l 0.0) (expt 10 (length l))))]
[(cons c l) (num l (+ (* 10 a) (- (char->integer c) 48)))]))
(define (sign l)
(match l
[(cons #\- l) (- (sign l))]
[(cons #\+ l) (sign l)]
[_ (num l 0)]))
(sign (string->list s)))
Here is a first shot. Not ugly, not beautiful, just longer than I'd like. Tuning another day. I will gladly pass the solution to someone's better creation.
((define (string->number S)
(define (split L c)
(let f ((left '()) (right L))
(cond ((or (not (list? L)) (empty? right)) (values L #f))
((eq? c (car right)) (values (reverse left) (cdr right)))
(else (f (cons (car right) left) (cdr right))))))
(define (mkint L)
(let f ((sum 0) (L (map (lambda (c) (- (char->integer c) (char->integer #\0))) L)))
(if (empty? L) sum (f (+ (car L) (* 10 sum)) (cdr L)))))
(define list->num
(case-lambda
((L) (cond ((empty? L) 0)
((eq? (car L) #\+) (list->num 1 (cdr L)))
((eq? (car L) #\-) (list->num -1 (cdr L)))
(else (list->num 1 L))))
((S L) (let*-values (((num E) (split L #\E)) ((W F) (split num #\.)))
(cond (E (* (list->num S num) (expt 10 (list->num E))))
(F (* S (+ (mkint W) (/ (mkint F) (expt 10 (length F))))))
(else (* S (mkint W))))))))
(list->num (string->list S)))
(define *graph* (read (open-input-file "test.sxml")))
(define get
(lambda (l)
(cond ((null? l) '())
((equal? 'opm:artifacts (car l)) l)
(else (get (cdr l))))))
(get *graph*)
I have this recursive function that goes through the list and returns the rest of a list that starts with "opm:artifacts".
It works on other lists.
For example, it works for the list (1 2 3 4); when I call the function,
(get 2) returns (2 3 4).
test.sxml is a list. I checked it with list?.
(define (get l)
(match l
[(? null?) '()]
[(list 'opm:artifacts _ ...) l]
[(list _ rs ...) (get rs)]))
(define (get mat ls*)
(define (get* ls)
(cond ((null? ls) '())
((and (list? (car ls)) (not (null? (car ls))))
(if (equal? mat (caar ls))
(car ls)
(let ((sub-result (get* (car ls))))
(if (null? sub-result)
(get* (cdr ls))
sub-result))))
(else (get* (cdr ls)))))
(let ((result (get* ls*)))
(if (null? result)
'()
(cdr result))))
(get 'b '(a (b c d) e)) ;-> '(c d)
(get 'b '((a (b c d) e))) ;-> '(c d)
(get '() '( 4 6 () (2 ()) (() () ()))) ;-> '(() ())
I've also generalized it so you can hand in what you want it to match against.