Configure a Spring bean callback on server startup? - spring

I want my server to do some database cleanup on startup. I tried adding a #PostConstruct method to a service to do this, however #Transactional doesn't work there. Any changes I make aren't being persisted. How can I get this done? Can I create a new bean with specific callbacks on it?

You can just call another transactional resource in #PostConstruct which does the work, because injection is done then. So DbPopulator can use UserService and whatsoever in its #PostConstruct and everything is transactional and nicely separated again. Singleton beans are constructed at startup afaik, so no additonal setup required.

Related

Spring - how to debug to find specific use of spring's auto-wiring or a request parameter?

Spring is auto-wiring in a request parameter - let's call it "bob".
I don't know where nor how it is doing this, so I cannot debug it. What spring specific code (using intellij, so I can at lest set a conditional) would be appropriate to find where the auto-wiring of the request parameter is happening, so I can work out what the system is doing?
I think I understood the question, so I will try to answer it as best as I can.
You are facing a dilemma of choosing between managing your instances, or letting Spring manage them. If you let Spring manage dependency injection, you will often face situations where you wish you had more fine control over the beans lifecycle.
By default, Spring beans are "singletons", which means that only one
instance of that object will be created, and every class that demands
a dependency injection of that object will receive the same instance.
The first step on beans lifecycle is its construction. You can setup a breakpoint to catch that moment on any method annotated with #PostConstruct. This article describes the need of running some code on bean initialization, and how it is solved by this annotation. For example:
public class AnyBean {
#PostConstruct
public void init(){
// any code or breakpoints inserted here will
// be run whenever an instance of this bean is created.
// if a singleton bean, only one instance is created and,
// only one #PostConstruct will be called.
// If a bean is a prototype bean, a new instance will be created
// for every dependency injection, and hence one #PostConstruct
// will be called for each.
}
}

How To Execute method before #PostConstruct work??

I am Trying to update DB Schema whenever application version updated.
Some People said It is not a good Function but I wanna try whether I use it or not.
I Succeed Update schema when application booted.
but I have to change the timing that schema updated. and It is between after Bean object DI finished and before #PostConstruct work.
is it impossible, just before #PostConstruct work whether DI is finished or not.
how can I do this?
PS. I have known flyway work similar function compared I am making. but I want to make similar thing by my self.
When spring bean gets initialized, spring guarantees that all the properties will be injected (by means of applying constructor injection, setter injection or field injection)
So First of all spring calls bean's constructor
Then (if the fields are not set yet) it tries to inject fields
And only after that, it calls #PostConstruct
So you should be able to access the database from the post-construct method of the bean.

Spring AMQP ListenerContainer lifecycle management

We are using Spring AMQP to connect to RabbitMQ in our Spring based web application.
When we declare our listener-containers as beans (using rabbit:listener-container) in application context, their lifecycle is managed by Spring.
If we declare a listener-container in a component inside a #PostConstruct method, or we create a bean with class org.springframework.amqp.rabbit.listener.SimpleMessageListenerContainer as a prototype scoped bean, we then have to manage the lifecycle i.e. start and stop the listener-container ourselves.
My question is, if we declare new queues, bindings and listener-containers inside a #PostConstruct method, just calling listener.stop/shutdown/destroy method inside the corresponding #PreDestroy method would be enough for a graceful shutdown? Or else what do I need to do?
Note: I am guessing I don't have to do anything for the new queues and bindings created in the #PostContruct, but I would be very glad if you also confirm this for me.
I would not recommend starting a listener container or declaring queues/bindings in an #PostConstruct method; the context is only half-baked at that time. It might work but it's not recommended to do stuff like that while the context is being initialized.
It's better to implement SmartLifecycle and start/stop them in the start()/stop() methods.
Then, the container lifecycles would be indirectly managed by the spring context.
You can also control exactly when your bean is started/stopped by putting it in a phase.

injecting spring beans into non-singleton classes

is it possible to inject spring beans into a polling filter class (FClass) controlled by a scheduler job?
i don't quite understand how singleton applies here.
i understand spring beans are singleton so in order to inject the spring beans into class FClass. i need to define FClass as a bean and add the DI as property etc..
so how do i know if FClass should be a singleton? i assume only classes that are singletons can be created and beans and have DI done to them.
my problem is :
i need to be able to inject my facade bean xfacade into FClass. x_facacde handles the dao object. it has Y_dao and a Z_hibernate session beans injected as DI.
when i tried to create a spring bean of StatusPollingFilter (FClass) and injected the facade bean - i got a null and the setter is never called for the injection in debug mode.
the problem:
i'm thought it might be something to do with the thread / scheduler nature of StatusPollingFilter, and since spring beans are singletons it might not work due to that.
i'm thinking of creating a factory for the StatusPollingFilter (FClass). but need to know if this is correct thing and i'm on right track before i do too much work and realize even that doesn't work as the problem might be somewhere else. ideally i just want to update a table in the easiest possible way. but i have to use hibernate as the DAO exists but hibernate is configured using
<bean id="sessionFactory" class="org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.LocalSessionFactoryBean">
with /hibernate/TopoObject.hbm.xml
files.
so no matter how i try this i always get null pointer exception on session or injected facade bean.
reading some of the QA's here seems like because StatusPollingFilter is instantiated using the scheduler and not spring it cant be aware of the DI beans. so would the above factory pattern help here.
I may have an additional problem but i'll cross that bridge when i come to it. but just to mention briefly, in case anyone is aware of issues that i might hit ... not sure what / how the scheduler would invoke the factory for an instance as its all controlled by 3rd party api - which invokes a StatusPollingFilter but i'm assuming if i pass in the factory as the class and parameter it would find its way through... but initial part is the main question. please ignore the latter waffle. thanks in advance.
Actually :
i assume only classes that are singletons can be created
is where you are wrong.
A bean is just a class that you let spring instantiate. By default, they are created as singleton but you can specify the scope on your bean using the attribute scope (quite surprisingly). The value you can specify are those specified in the documentation here
So one thing you have to be careful with is the injection of beans scoped as prototype or request into singletons.
having read more - i have come across the ans.
because the StatusPollingFilter object is under control of scheduler (i knew that scheduler had something to do with it) then it is unaware of the spring beans which is why i keep getting null when i try injecting the bean.
i created a class:
ApplicationContextProvider implements ApplicationContextAware
added static access
private static ApplicationContext appContext;
did a setter for it :
public void setApplicationContext(ApplicationContext context)
{
appContext = context;
}
and added
public static Object getBean(String beanName) throws BeansException
{
return appContext.getBean(beanName);
}
used in code as :
EvoTAMDAOFacade evoDao = (EvoTAMDAOFacade) ApplicationContextProvider.getBean("evoDaoFacade");
i now have access to the facade bean and all injected beans into facade.
i still have an issue with hibernate session but thats prob due to some other issue.
pt here is i don't have access to the bean as its not in control of the spring container so i needed to somehow get it , probably could have done it via the factory method but why mess around when there a simpler way.
thanks for help by anyone who may have posted or tried to understand my problem.

Autowired spring bean is not a proxy

I'm working on a very small application connecting to a MySQL database.
I'm trying to create table record but getting 'no transaction in progress'.
I have all the right stuff in place:
a service interface MyService and its implementation MyServiceImpl
I have annotated the service impl with #Service
In the controller I used the interface name for the field #Autowired MyService
I have the correct transaction configuration as it was originally generated by roo
There is a public method MyService.create(...) which MyServiceImpl implements
But,
When I remote debug and inspect the controller's myService field what I see is something like
com.some.package.services.MyService#12345 (and NOT something like $Proxy73) which to me is not right, because what should be autowired is the proxy not he target bean (which is what I think this is). If I'm correct then it makes sense that there is no transaction as the annotation would only kick in when invoking a public method annotated with #Transactional on a proxy.
Please tell me why is spring injecting the target bean in this setup.
Thanks
If you have AspectJ-enabled transaction management (<tx:annotation-driven mode="aspectj" .../>) application of transactions happens in-place in the same class, either during build (compile-time weaving) or on startup (load-time weaving).
No new classes are created (like when using cglib) and no proxies (like with ordinary interface-based AOP in Spring). Instead bytecode of MyServiceImpl was modified directly without you even noticing. Unfortunately the only way to see AOP is to decompile your classes. If you use javap -c MyServiceImpl you'll find plenty of references to Spring transaction layer.
If you are using Spring MVC, make sure to scan specific controller classes alone in servlet context file. Otherwise it will scan 2 times and transaction is not available on the application context.

Resources