Related
I have a hash of key values and I want to downcase all of the Keys.
However I don't want to have to create an local variable, I would rather functionally do it.
NOT:
x = downcase_keys(params_hash)
BUT THIS:
params_hash.downcase_keys
How would do this in ruby?
I do not understand why you tagged this question as functional-programming it seems you are looking for a method to call on a Hash object.
Be aware that you may encounter problems doing so because duplicated keys are going to be overwritten.
h = {"a" => 1, "B" => 2}
# Singleton method on the object
def h.downcase_keys
temp = map {|k,v| [k.downcase, v]}.to_h
clear
merge! temp
end
h.downcase_keys()
p h # {"a"=>1, "b"=>2}
# Method available on all Hash objects
class Hash
def downcase_keys
temp = map {|k,v| [k.downcase, v]}.to_h
clear
merge! temp
end
end
h = {"a" => 1, "B" => 2}
h.downcase_keys()
p h # {"a"=>1, "b"=>2}
def downcase_keys(hash)
hash.downcase_keys
end
h = {"C" => 1, "B" => 2, "D" => 3}
downcase_keys(h)
p h # {"c"=>1, "b"=>2, "d"=>3}
This question already has answers here:
Flattening nested hash to a single hash with Ruby/Rails
(6 answers)
Closed 8 years ago.
I fetch a JSON document and need to programmatically "flatten" the keys for another third-party service.
What this means is, if my JSON doc comes back with the following:
{'first_name' => "Joe", 'hoffman' => {'patterns' => ['negativity', 'self-sabotage'], 'right_road' => 'happy family'}, 'mbti' => 'INTJ'}
I need to be able to know to create a "flat" key-value pair for a third-party service like this:
first_name = "Joe"
hoffman.patterns = "negativity, self-sabotage"
hoffman.right_road = "happy family"
mbti = "INTJ"
Once I know there's a sub-document, the parsing I think I have figured out just appending the sub-keys with key + '.' + "{subkey}" but right now, don't know which ones are straight key-value and which one's have sub-documents.
Question:
a) How can I parse the JSON to know which keys have sub-documents (additional key-values)?
b) Suggestions on ways to create a string from an array
You could also monkey patch Hash to do this on it's own like so:
class Hash
def flatten_keys(prefix=nil)
each_pair.map do |k,v|
key = [prefix,k].compact.join(".")
v.is_a?(Hash) ? v.flatten_keys(key) : [key,v.is_a?(Array) ? v.join(", ") : v]
end.flatten.each_slice(2).to_a
end
def to_flat_hash
Hash[flatten_keys]
end
end
Then it would be
require 'json'
h = JSON.parse(YOUR_JSON_RESPONSE)
#=> {'first_name' => "Joe", 'hoffman' => {'patterns' => ['negativity', 'self-sabotage'], 'right_road' => 'happy family'}, 'mbti' => 'INTJ'}
h.to_flat_hash
#=> {"first_name"=>"Joe", "hoffman.patterns"=>"negativity, self-sabotage", "hoffman.right_road"=>"happy family", "mbti"=>"INTJ"}
Will work with additional nesting too
h = {"first_name"=>"Joe", "hoffman"=>{"patterns"=>["negativity", "self-sabotage"], "right_road"=>"happy family", "wrong_road"=>{"bad_choices"=>["alcohol", "heroin"]}}, "mbti"=>"INTJ"}
h.to_flat_hash
#=> {"first_name"=>"Joe", "hoffman.patterns"=>"negativity, self-sabotage", "hoffman.right_road"=>"happy family", "hoffman.wrong_road.bad_choices"=>"alcohol, heroin", "mbti"=>"INTJ"}
Quick and dirty recursive proc:
# assuming you've already `JSON.parse` the incoming json into this hash:
a = {'first_name' => "Joe", 'hoffman' => {'patterns' => ['negativity', 'self-sabotage'], 'right_road' => 'happy family'}, 'mbti' => 'INTJ'}
# define a recursive proc:
flatten_keys = -> (h, prefix = "") do
#flattened_keys ||= {}
h.each do |key, value|
# Here we check if there's "sub documents" by asking if the value is a Hash
# we also pass in the name of the current prefix and key and append a . to it
if value.is_a? Hash
flatten_keys.call value, "#{prefix}#{key}."
else
# if not we concatenate the key and the prefix and add it to the #flattened_keys hash
#flattened_keys["#{prefix}#{key}"] = value
end
end
#flattened_keys
end
flattened = flatten_keys.call a
# => "first_name"=>"Joe", "hoffman.patterns"=>["negativity", "self-sabotage"], "hoffman.right_road"=>"happy family", "mbti"=>"INTJ"}
And then, to turn the arrays into strings just join them:
flattened.inject({}) do |hash, (key, value)|
value = value.join(', ') if value.is_a? Array
hash.merge! key => value
end
# => {"first_name"=>"Joe", "hoffman.patterns"=>"negativity, self-sabotage", "hoffman.right_road"=>"happy family", "mbti"=>"INTJ"}
Another way, inspired by this post:
def flat_hash(h,f=[],g={})
return g.update({ f=>h }) unless h.is_a? Hash
h.each { |k,r| flat_hash(r,f+[k],g) }
g
end
h = { :a => { :b => { :c => 1,
:d => 2 },
:e => 3 },
:f => 4 }
result = {}
flat_hash(h) #=> {[:a, :b, :c]=>1, [:a, :b, :d]=>2, [:a, :e]=>3, [:f]=>4}
.each{ |k, v| result[k.join('.')] = v } #=> {"a.b.c"=>1, "a.b.d"=>2, "a.e"=>3, "f"=>4}
I have hash (#post) of hashes where I want to keep the order of the hash's keys in the array (#post_csv_order) and also want to keep the relationship key => value in the array.
I don't know the final number of both #post hashes and key => value elements in the array.
I don't know how to assign the hash in a loop for all elements in the array. One by one #post_csv_order[0][0] => #post_csv_order[0][1] works nicely.
# require 'rubygems'
require 'pp'
#post = {}
forum_id = 123 #only sample values.... to make this sample script work
post_title = "Test post"
#post_csv_order = [
["ForumID" , forum_id],
["Post title", post_title]
]
if #post[forum_id] == nil
#post[forum_id] = {
#post_csv_order[0][0] => #post_csv_order[0][1],
#post_csv_order[1][0] => #post_csv_order[1][1]
##post_csv_order.map {|element| element[0] => element[1]}
##post_csv_order.each_index {|index| #post_csv_order[index][0] => #post_csv_order[index][1] }
}
end
pp #post
desired hash assignment should be like that
{123=>{"Post title"=>"Test post", "ForumID"=>123}}
The best way is to use to_h:
[ [:foo,1],[:bar,2],[:baz,3] ].to_h #=> {:foo => 1, :bar => 2, :baz => 3}
Note: This was introduced in Ruby 2.1.0. For older Ruby, you can use my backports gem and require 'backports/2.1.0/array/to_h', or else use Hash[]:
array = [[:foo,1],[:bar,2],[:baz,3]]
# then
Hash[ array ] #= > {:foo => 1, :bar => 2, :baz => 3}
This is available in Ruby 1.8.7 and later. If you are still using Ruby 1.8.6 you could require "backports/1.8.7/hash/constructor", but you might as well use the to_h backport.
I am not sure I fully understand your question but I guess you want to convert a 2d array in a hash.
So suppose you have an array such as:
array = [[:foo,1],[:bar,2],[:baz,3]]
You can build an hash with:
hash = array.inject({}) {|h,e| h[e[0]] = e[1]; h}
# => {:foo=>1, :bar=>2, :baz=>3}
And you can retrieve the keys in correct order with:
keys = array.inject([]) {|a,e| a << e[0] }
=> [:foo, :bar, :baz]
Is it what you were looking for ?
Answers summary
working code #1
#post[forum_id] = #post_csv_order.inject({}) {|h,e| h[e[0]] = e[1]; h}
working code #2
#post[forum_id] = Hash[*#post_csv_order.flatten]
working code #3
#post[forum_id] ||= Hash[ #post_csv_order ] #requires 'require "backports"'
I need a ruby hash H with keys :a, :b, :c so that H[:b] = H[:a] + 1; H[:c] = H[:b] + 2 etc.
How can I define such a hash in a one line declaration, like H = {:a=>1, :b => H[:a] + 1, :c => H[:b] +2, ... } ?
I need something similar to DataMapper properties declaration:
property :path, FilePath
property :md5sum, String, :default => lambda { |r, p| Digest::MD5.hexdigest(r.path.read)}
where :md5sum default value is referencing the :path property
This is the best I can do:
arr = [[:a,1], [:b,1], [:c,2]]; H = {:temp => 0}
arr.inject(:temp) { |last, kv| H[kv[0]] = H[last] + kv[1]; kv[0] }
H.delete :temp
Pretty ugly, and it isn't so obvious what it does. I suggest you just do it the straightforward way, unless it's really that much of a problem.
It's not clear what you are trying to accomplish.
Note that hashes can have a default proc. Ex:
require 'digest/md5'
h = Hash.new do |hash, key|
hash[:md5sum] = Digest::MD5.hexdigest(hash[:path]) if key == :md5sum
end
h[:path] = "/starway/to/heaven"
h[:md5sum] # ==> "0e4faf226dac83569bde4fcf5bcd7ad6"
h[:md5sum] = "xyz"
h[:md5sum] # ==> "xyz"
It sounds like you may want lazy declarations: http://moonbase.rydia.net/software/lazy.rb/
Consider a "person" stored in a hash. Two examples are:
fred = {:person => {:name => "Fred", :spouse => "Wilma", :children => {:child => {:name => "Pebbles"}}}}
slate = {:person => {:name => "Mr. Slate", :spouse => "Mrs. Slate"}}
If the "person" doesn't have any children, the "children" element is not present. So, for Mr. Slate, we can check whether he has parents:
slate_has_children = !slate[:person][:children].nil?
So, what if we don't know that "slate" is a "person" hash? Consider:
dino = {:pet => {:name => "Dino"}}
We can't easily check for children any longer:
dino_has_children = !dino[:person][:children].nil?
NoMethodError: undefined method `[]' for nil:NilClass
So, how would you check the structure of a hash, especially if it is nested deeply (even deeper than the examples provided here)? Maybe a better question is: What's the "Ruby way" to do this?
The most obvious way to do this is to simply check each step of the way:
has_children = slate[:person] && slate[:person][:children]
Use of .nil? is really only required when you use false as a placeholder value, and in practice this is rare. Generally you can simply test it exists.
Update: If you're using Ruby 2.3 or later there's a built-in dig method that does what's described in this answer.
If not, you can also define your own Hash "dig" method which can simplify this substantially:
class Hash
def dig(*path)
path.inject(self) do |location, key|
location.respond_to?(:keys) ? location[key] : nil
end
end
end
This method will check each step of the way and avoid tripping up on calls to nil. For shallow structures the utility is somewhat limited, but for deeply nested structures I find it's invaluable:
has_children = slate.dig(:person, :children)
You might also make this more robust, for example, testing if the :children entry is actually populated:
children = slate.dig(:person, :children)
has_children = children && !children.empty?
With Ruby 2.3 we'll have support for the safe navigation operator:
https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2015/11/11/ruby-2-3-0-preview1-released/
has_children now could be written as:
has_children = slate[:person]&.[](:children)
dig is being added as well:
has_children = slate.dig(:person, :children)
Another alternative:
dino.fetch(:person, {})[:children]
You can use the andand gem:
require 'andand'
fred[:person].andand[:children].nil? #=> false
dino[:person].andand[:children].nil? #=> true
You can find further explanations at http://andand.rubyforge.org/.
One could use hash with default value of {} - empty hash. For example,
dino = Hash.new({})
dino[:pet] = {:name => "Dino"}
dino_has_children = !dino[:person][:children].nil? #=> false
That works with already created Hash as well:
dino = {:pet=>{:name=>"Dino"}}
dino.default = {}
dino_has_children = !dino[:person][:children].nil? #=> false
Or you can define [] method for nil class
class NilClass
def [](* args)
nil
end
end
nil[:a] #=> nil
Traditionally, you really had to do something like this:
structure[:a] && structure[:a][:b]
However, Ruby 2.3 added a feature that makes this way more graceful:
structure.dig :a, :b # nil if it misses anywhere along the way
There is a gem called ruby_dig that will back-patch this for you.
def flatten_hash(hash)
hash.each_with_object({}) do |(k, v), h|
if v.is_a? Hash
flatten_hash(v).map do |h_k, h_v|
h["#{k}_#{h_k}"] = h_v
end
else
h[k] = v
end
end
end
irb(main):012:0> fred = {:person => {:name => "Fred", :spouse => "Wilma", :children => {:child => {:name => "Pebbles"}}}}
=> {:person=>{:name=>"Fred", :spouse=>"Wilma", :children=>{:child=>{:name=>"Pebbles"}}}}
irb(main):013:0> slate = {:person => {:name => "Mr. Slate", :spouse => "Mrs. Slate"}}
=> {:person=>{:name=>"Mr. Slate", :spouse=>"Mrs. Slate"}}
irb(main):014:0> flatten_hash(fred).keys.any? { |k| k.include?("children") }
=> true
irb(main):015:0> flatten_hash(slate).keys.any? { |k| k.include?("children") }
=> false
This will flatten all the hashes into one and then any? returns true if any key matching the substring "children" exist.
This might also help.
dino_has_children = !dino.fetch(person, {})[:children].nil?
Note that in rails you can also do:
dino_has_children = !dino[person].try(:[], :children).nil? #
Here is a way you can do a deep check for any falsy values in the hash and any nested hashes without monkey patching the Ruby Hash class (PLEASE don't monkey patch on the Ruby classes, such is something you should not do, EVER).
(Assuming Rails, although you could easily modify this to work outside of Rails)
def deep_all_present?(hash)
fail ArgumentError, 'deep_all_present? only accepts Hashes' unless hash.is_a? Hash
hash.each do |key, value|
return false if key.blank? || value.blank?
return deep_all_present?(value) if value.is_a? Hash
end
true
end
Simplifying the above answers here:
Create a Recursive Hash method whose value cannot be nil, like as follows.
def recursive_hash
Hash.new {|key, value| key[value] = recursive_hash}
end
> slate = recursive_hash
> slate[:person][:name] = "Mr. Slate"
> slate[:person][:spouse] = "Mrs. Slate"
> slate
=> {:person=>{:name=>"Mr. Slate", :spouse=>"Mrs. Slate"}}
slate[:person][:state][:city]
=> {}
If you don't mind creating empty hashes if the value does not exists for the key :)
You can try to play with
dino.default = {}
Or for example:
empty_hash = {}
empty_hash.default = empty_hash
dino.default = empty_hash
That way you can call
empty_hash[:a][:b][:c][:d][:e] # and so on...
dino[:person][:children] # at worst it returns {}
Given
x = {:a => {:b => 'c'}}
y = {}
you could check x and y like this:
(x[:a] || {})[:b] # 'c'
(y[:a] || {})[:b] # nil
Thks #tadman for the answer.
For those who want perfs (and are stuck with ruby < 2.3), this method is 2.5x faster:
unless Hash.method_defined? :dig
class Hash
def dig(*path)
val, index, len = self, 0, path.length
index += 1 while(index < len && val = val[path[index]])
val
end
end
end
and if you use RubyInline, this method is 16x faster:
unless Hash.method_defined? :dig
require 'inline'
class Hash
inline do |builder|
builder.c_raw '
VALUE dig(int argc, VALUE *argv, VALUE self) {
rb_check_arity(argc, 1, UNLIMITED_ARGUMENTS);
self = rb_hash_aref(self, *argv);
if (NIL_P(self) || !--argc) return self;
++argv;
return dig(argc, argv, self);
}'
end
end
end
You can also define a module to alias the brackets methods and use the Ruby syntax to read/write nested elements.
UPDATE: Instead of overriding the bracket accessors, request Hash instance to extend the module.
module Nesty
def []=(*keys,value)
key = keys.pop
if keys.empty?
super(key, value)
else
if self[*keys].is_a? Hash
self[*keys][key] = value
else
self[*keys] = { key => value}
end
end
end
def [](*keys)
self.dig(*keys)
end
end
class Hash
def nesty
self.extend Nesty
self
end
end
Then you can do:
irb> a = {}.nesty
=> {}
irb> a[:a, :b, :c] = "value"
=> "value"
irb> a
=> {:a=>{:b=>{:c=>"value"}}}
irb> a[:a,:b,:c]
=> "value"
irb> a[:a,:b]
=> {:c=>"value"}
irb> a[:a,:d] = "another value"
=> "another value"
irb> a
=> {:a=>{:b=>{:c=>"value"}, :d=>"another value"}}
I don't know how "Ruby" it is(!), but the KeyDial gem which I wrote lets you do this basically without changing your original syntax:
has_kids = !dino[:person][:children].nil?
becomes:
has_kids = !dino.dial[:person][:children].call.nil?
This uses some trickery to intermediate the key access calls. At call, it will try to dig the previous keys on dino, and if it hits an error (as it will), returns nil. nil? then of course returns true.
You can use a combination of & and key? it is O(1) compared to dig which is O(n) and this will make sure person is accessed without NoMethodError: undefined method `[]' for nil:NilClass
fred[:person]&.key?(:children) //=>true
slate[:person]&.key?(:children)