MailAddress Sender = new MailAddress("SomeOne#yahoo.com", "SomeOne", Encoding.UTF8);
SmtpClient Client = new SmtpClient("smtp.mail.yahoo.com",465);
Client.Credentials = new System.Net.NetworkCredential(Sender.Address,"Password",Domain??? );
just out of curiosity what is the third overload of NetworkCredential
I mean what we need to pass argument for Domain property . I searched on net but but no one used it(domain property) .I tried "Yahoo.com","#Yahoo.com","Yahoo" bot no every time same authentication error .It can be done without Domain property but where can we use it or what we can pass it .
The Domain property is used for NTLM authentication with Active Directory domains.
It is not used for normal login scenarios.
Related
While trying to READ the email addressee of an email coming from Outlook:
message.getRecipients(Message.RecipientType.TO)
I am getting following exception:
Caused by: javax.mail.internet.AddressException: Domain contains illegal character in string ``'xxxxx#yyyyyy.com'''
at javax.mail.internet.InternetAddress.checkAddress(InternetAddress.java:1269)
at javax.mail.internet.InternetAddress.parse(InternetAddress.java:1091)
at javax.mail.internet.InternetAddress.parseHeader(InternetAddress.java:658)
at javax.mail.internet.MimeMessage.getAddressHeader(MimeMessage.java:701)
at javax.mail.internet.MimeMessage.getRecipients(MimeMessage.java:534)
The problem is given by this character " ' " at the beginning and at the end of the email address. The problem is that for the outlook server this is a valid address but not for a MimeMessage, so when I am trying to retrieve it and all the checks are applied I am getting the exception.
Please note that I am not creating the message, I am just reading whatever is in the outlook inbox folder through:
Folder inbox = store.getFolder(.......);
messages = inbox.getMessages();
Any idea how to solve/workaround this?
Thank you very much
Sam
I suspect you are using java mail version higher than 1.4 which by defaults enables strict RFC822 syntax
You could able to read email with quotes by disabling "strict" policy on InternetAddress something like this.
Properties props = new Properties();
props.setProperty("mail.mime.address.strict", "false");
Session session = Session.getDefaultInstance(props, ....);
Or simply
new InternetAddress("...", false);
In my globals.asax.cs, I am creating a dictionary object that I want to use in my APIs to add and get data from in the life of the application.
I do the following:
Application["MyDictionary"] = myDictionary;
In my ApiController I get a handle of it, in this way:
MyDictionary myDictionary= (MyDictionary)HttpContext.Current.Application["MyDictionary"];
So far so good, the issue is that I need to do the same in the unit test, I need to add this dictionary into my Application as well, so when I call my controller, I will be able to retrieve it, how do I do that ?
doing this:
HttpContext.Current.Application.Add("MyDictionary", myDictionary);
enter code here
doesn't work, I get an exception:
An exception of type 'System.NullReferenceException' occurred in RESTServices.Tests.dll but was not handled in user code
My HttpContext.Current is null.
Any ideas how to work around this ?
The HttpContext.Current is created when a request is received, so you need to set the Current property, before using it.
See the example below:
var myDictionary = new Dictionary<string, string>();
HttpContext.Current = new HttpContext(new HttpRequest("default.aspx", "http://localhost", string.Empty), new HttpResponse(new StringWriter(CultureInfo.InvariantCulture)));
HttpContext.Current.Application.Add("MyDictionary", myDictionary);
We are using the TropoSharp to send SMS message to my phone. The weird part is that I didn't get any SMS message, rather I get a phone call and it is very short and I could not figure out what the person is talking over the phone.
By looking at the code, we could not figure out what's wrong:
string voiceToken = "xxx";
string messagingToken = "xxx";
IDictionary<string, string> parameters = new Dictionary<String, String>();
parameters.Add("sendToNumber", "xxx");
parameters.Add("sendFromNumber", "+1 201-xxx-04xx");
string channel = Channel.Text;
parameters.Add("channel", channel);
string network = Network.SMS;
parameters.Add("network", network);
parameters.Add("msg", HttpUtility.UrlEncode("This is a test message from C#."));
Tropo tropo = new Tropo();
XmlDocument doc = new XmlDocument();
string token = channel == Channel.Text ? messagingToken : voiceToken;
doc.Load(tropo.CreateSession(token, parameters));
Console.WriteLine("Result: " + doc.SelectSingleNode("session/success").InnerText.ToUpper());
Console.WriteLine("Token: " + doc.SelectSingleNode("session/token").InnerText);
Console.ReadKey();
Here is the http request (removed some sensitive information)
GET http://api.tropo.com/1.0/sessions?action=create&token=xxxxx&sendToNumber=xxx&sendFromNumber=+1%20201-xxx-xxxx&channel=TEXT&network=SMS&msg=This+is+a+test+message+from+C%23.& HTTP/1.1
Host: api.tropo.com
Connection: Keep-Alive
here is the response (I guess it only means that request is submitted successful):
<session><success>true</success><token>xxxx</token><id>5c994e73ab85ff47fd1af4ffd4002e00
Any idea where we did wrong here? Thanks
You're using the scripting approach, not WebAPI, right? Can you post the script that your application is using? It's my understanding that when you create a session, you're just passing variables up to your script. Your script might be completely ignoring those variables, and just making a voice call.
I agree about your last point. That response just tells you that it succeeded in creating the session. It doesn't return any additional information about other steps of the process.
There are two tokens for your application, one for voice and one for messaging. Are you using the one for messaging? Also, outbound messaging is not turned on be default for your application. You have to contact Tropo support to turn it on for development. They may require you to put some money in your account to do this, but they will not charge you unless you start abusing this feature during development.
I'm trying to send a message to a queue using a Message object and am getting the error
The specified format name does not support the requested operation. For example, a direct queue format name cannot be deleted.
Here is the code.
Order ord = new Order(new Guid(), "Smith & Smith");
Message orderMessage = new Message(ord);
orderMessage.UseEncryption = true;
orderMessage.EncryptionAlgorithm = EncryptionAlgorithm.Rc2;
orderMessage.Recoverable = true;
orderMessage.Priority = MessagePriority.VeryHigh;
orderMessage.TimeToBeReceived = TimeSpan.FromHours(1);
orderMessage.UseJournalQueue = true;
orderMessage.Body = "Test Encryption";
queue.Send(orderMessage, "Encrypted Order");
Any help with this is appreciated.
Tom
Did you ever solve this? I came across this problem myself and found out I needed to use (just like the error says) a different format name.
The strange thing was that if I set UseAuthentication property using the MQ certificate, then it worked. But if I also wanted to set UseEncryption, then it did not work.
You do not specify your queue/server setup/formats, but I suspect you're trying to send from one machine to another machine's public queue within the same domain, using DIRECT formatname? As the MQ Manager will use the domain AD to lookup the certificate and queue details, it raises an exception as the format name is invalid (not the same as specified in the AD). So instead of using the direct format, use the queue ID to define the formatname. I switched this:
"FormatName:Direct=TCP:111.222.1.22\your_public_queue"
with this:
"FormatName:PUBLIC=7EB2A53C-7593-462C-A568-5A0EFA26D91D"
Now it worked. You can find your queue ID by right-clicking your queue on the receiver machine and then go to Properties->General and see the value specified in field "ID".
I have found that getting the FormatName correct whether public or private in nature will save hours of work. It's incredibly important to understand the setup of each (Public requiring AD and private does not when access remotely). This is a great summary of FormatName.
https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/johnbreakwell/2009/02/26/difference-between-path-name-and-format-name-when-accessing-msmq-queues/
One note on this issue, if your queue format name starts this way: "FormatName:Direct=" then you will receive the error "The specified format name does not support the requested operation. For example, a direct queue format name cannot be deleted" if you try to access the queue's QueueName property. Use the queue's FormatName property instead.
After reading the MSDN article (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/2009.01.genevests.aspx) on implementing a Custom STS using the Microsoft Geneva Framework I am a bit puzzled about one of the scenarios covered there. This scenario is shown in figure 13 of the above referenced article.
My questions are around how does the RP initiate the call to the RP-STS in order to pass on the already obtained claims from the IP-STS? How does the desired method DeleteOrder() get turned into a Claim Request for the Action claim from the RP-STS which responds with the Action claim with a value Delete which authorizes the call? I also think the figure is slightly incorrect in that the interaction between the RP-STS and the Policy Engine should have the Claims and arrows the other way around.
I can see the structure but it's not clear what is provided by Geneva/WCF and what has to be done in code inside the RP, which would seem a bit odd since we could not protect the DeleteOrder method with a PrincipalPermission demand for the Delete "permission" but would have to demand a Role first then obtain the fine-grained claim of the Delete Action after that point.
If I have missed the point (since I cannot find this case covered easily on the Web), then apologies!
Thanks in advance.
I asked the same question on the Geneva Forum at
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en/Geneva/thread/d10c556c-1ec5-409d-8c25-bee2933e85ea?prof=required
and got this reply:
Hi Dokie,
I wondered this same thing when I read that article. As I've pondered how such a scenario would be implemented, I've come up w/ two ideas:
The RP is actually configured to require claims from the RP-STS; the RP-STS requires a security token from the IP-STS. As a result, when the subject requests a resource of the RP, it bounces him to the RP-STS who bounces him to the IP-STS. After authenticating there, he is bounced back to the RP-STS, the identity-centric claims are transformed into those necessary to make an authorization decision and returned to the RP.
The RP is configured to have an interceptor (e.g., an AuthorizationPolicy if it's a WCF service) that grabs the call, sees the identity-centric claims, creates an RST (using the WSTrustClient), passes it to the RP-STS, that service expands the claims into new one that are returned to the RP, and the RP makes an authorization decision.
I've never implemented this, but, if I were going to, I would explore those two ideas further.
HTH!
Regards,
Travis Spencer
So I will try option 2 first and see if that works out then formulate an answer here.
I've got situation one working fine.
In my case AD FS is the Identity Service and a custom STS the Resource STS.
All webapp's use the same Resource STS, but after a user visits an other application the Identity releated claims are not addad again by the AD FS since the user is already authenticated. How can I force or request the basic claims from the AD FS again?
I've created a call to the AD FS with ActAs, now it returns my identification claims.
Remember to enable a Delegation allowed rule for the credentials used to call the AD FS.
string stsEndpoint = "https://<ADFS>/adfs/services/trust/2005/usernamemixed";
var trustChannelFactory = new WSTrustChannelFactory(new UserNameWSTrustBinding(SecurityMode.TransportWithMessageCredential), stsEndpoint);
trustChannelFactory.Credentials.UserName.UserName = #"DELEGATE";
trustChannelFactory.Credentials.UserName.Password = #"PASSWORD";
trustChannelFactory.TrustVersion = TrustVersion.WSTrustFeb2005;
//// Prepare the RST.
//var trustChannelFactory = new WSTrustChannelFactory(tokenParameters.IssuerBinding, tokenParameters.IssuerAddress);
var trustChannel = (WSTrustChannel)trustChannelFactory.CreateChannel();
var rst = new RequestSecurityToken(RequestTypes.Issue);
rst.AppliesTo = new EndpointAddress(#"https:<RPADDRESS>");
// If you're doing delegation, set the ActAs value.
var principal = Thread.CurrentPrincipal as IClaimsPrincipal;
var bootstrapToken = principal.Identities[0].BootstrapToken;
// The bootstraptoken is the token received from the AD FS after succesfull authentication, this can be reused to call the AD FS the the users credentials
if (bootstrapToken == null)
{
throw new Exception("Bootstraptoken is empty, make sure SaveBootstrapTokens = true at the RP");
}
rst.ActAs = new SecurityTokenElement(bootstrapToken);
// Beware, this mode make's sure that there is no certficiate needed for the RP -> AD FS communication
rst.KeyType = KeyTypes.Bearer;
// Disable the need for AD FS to crypt the data to R-STS
Scope.SymmetricKeyEncryptionRequired = false;
// Here's where you can look up claims requirements dynamically.
rst.Claims.Add(new RequestClaim(ClaimTypes.Name));
rst.Claims.Add(new RequestClaim(ClaimTypes.PrimarySid));
// Get the token and attach it to the channel before making a request.
RequestSecurityTokenResponse rstr = null;
var issuedToken = trustChannel.Issue(rst, out rstr);
var claims = GetClaimsFromToken((GenericXmlSecurityToken)issuedToken);
private static ClaimCollection GetClaimsFromToken(GenericXmlSecurityToken genericToken)
{
var handlers = FederatedAuthentication.ServiceConfiguration.SecurityTokenHandlers;
var token = handlers.ReadToken(new XmlTextReader(new StringReader(genericToken.TokenXml.OuterXml)));
return handlers.ValidateToken(token).First().Claims;
}