I'm stuck over the config spec for a dynamic view.
I try to get the latest version of a folder of a UCM stream from the Dev-stream into another (Base) dynamic view.
My idea would have been to do a
element PathToFolder/... .../DEV-STREAM-NAME/LATEST
but that won't give me anything in the view.
The config spec that is automatically generated by UCM does not help me as it specifies a specific baseline and creates a branch once you check out a file (which I of course do not want, I only need read-access to the version).
Is it possible to access the latest version from the Dev-stream, or do I have to skip the folder altogether in the config spec and just copy it using the operating system (which would be possible but takes quite long as the folder might be quite large)?
Thanks for any answers and Best Regards
You need to make sure the parent folders are selected as well:
element vob/... .../DEV-STREAM-NAME/LATEST
element vob/path/... .../DEV-STREAM-NAME/LATEST
element vob/path/to/... .../DEV-STREAM-NAME/LATEST
element vob/path/to/folder/... .../DEV-STREAM-NAME/LATEST
element * /main/LATEST
If one of the parent folder has no version in DEV-STREAM-NAME, but a version in the parent stream (like INT-STREAM-NAME), you would need to select that as well.
element vob/path/to/... .../INT-STREAM-NAME/LATEST
Related
I use Poedit in a project for localization. Whenever I change an entry with poedit, it reorders all elements. I think it reorders the elements according to their line number and file but since I´m working with many coders on this project, poedit must not reorder all elements to avoid unneccessary line changes in the repository. Does anyone know how to achieve that?
Poedit never, under any circumstances, reorders content of the file when you “change an entry”. Files are always saved in the order they had when loaded, and it’s been like this since the very first version.
I have two explanations:
Either you’re confusing content of the file with the view presented in Poedit (where you can select your preferred display order in the View menu), in which case just change the display to whatever you like. But this seems unlikely.
Or you’re talking about not “changing an entry” in the file, but updating the PO file from source code. If that’s the case, it’s possible that you or some of your coworkers are using some very old version of Poedit. The fix would be to update to the current version, because the scan order was fixed to be stable across platforms in v1.6.5 1.3 years ago.
If it’s neither, you need to describe the issue reproducibly.
I have a SharePoint 2010 solution in Visual Studio 2013. Every time I close and reopen Visual Studio, a new feature is added to the solution with one list inside it. The list was removed from another feature that it should be in. It is always the same list. As soon as I open the solution this pops up in the Output window before I do anything...
A new feature Feature2 has been added to the project Solution
C:\Code\Solution\Package\Package.package (0,0): Added Feature2 to Package
What is causing this?
I have tried the following:
Recreated the solution and copied all files over - No change
Checked the package and project manifest. - Everything looks okay.
Loaded the project every different way, including unload and reload command. - No change
Recreated the list it likes to isolate into its own feature - No change
Recreated the feature the list should be in but it keeps moving to this new feature - No change
Added a new list and put it after the problem list in the feature - VS then created 3 new features! It took 3 lists out of my feature and put one in each of its own features. I guess I made it angry.
If the lists in the same feature have the same Type ID, the tooling will move the lists into a newly created feature, because the Type must be unique within a feature. You can check the documentation on the ListTemplate element for more information.
It is because features cannot contain list templates that have identical values for Type. This is explained here: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/office/ms462947.aspx
Type
Optional Integer.
Provides a unique identifier for the template. This identifier must be unique within the feature, but need not be unique across all feature definitions or site definitions. For a list of the default list template types, see SPListTemplateType.
You will probably find that your Elements.xml file for your list templates contains the same value for Type.
To fix this, you will need to edit the Elements.xml files of the list template and the list instance.
Change the Type of the ListTemplate xml element to a unique integer.
Change the TemplateType of the ListInstance xml element to the same integer
I have started to choose numbers over 1000 to avoid conflicts (Although 1100, 1200, 1220 and 1221 are system types)
this is kind of a follow up to this question: ClearCase UCM: Get latest version from Dev-stream
I need a dynamic view to have the LATEST (or CHECKED_OUT) version of certain components of a UCM VOB and at the same time specific baselines for other components.
For components where I want to include a specific baseline I can just include them with
element component_1/... BASELINEwhere BASELINE is just a name of a baseline (without the need to specify a stream or anything).
The folder of the component is later included by a element * /main/LATEST-directive (at least to my knowledge).
As mentioned in the above mentioned link I can also add a line likeelement component_2/... /main/INT-STREAM/DEV-STREAM/LATEST which should give me the latest version of DEV-STREAM.
Now I found out that sometimes (when the DEV-STREAM was 'branched' from version /main/0 I need a element component_2/... /main/DEV-STREAM/LATESTto get the latest version of this component. And in other cases there is no DEV-STREAM (because the file was obviously never changed and therefore the DEV-STREAM is not created), so I need a third lineelement component_2/... /main/INT-STREAM/LATEST.
And the same applies to version CHECKED_OUT.
As I want to create the config spec by script I would either need to find out where the component_2 is located (in the INT-STREAM or the DEV-STREAM) and where the DEV-STREAM was branched off or I would have to include 6 lines (one of them should match) for each component - in comparison to the one line for the baseline. Obviously I wouldn't want to include each file (there are VERY many) but would like to be able to simply specify the component with all its subfolders, just like for the baseline.
Thanks for reading - and obviously for any answers
You can avoid all those multiple rules with:
element component_2/... .../DEV-STREAM/LATEST
element component_2/... .../INT-STREAM/LATEST -mkbranch DEV-STREAM
The order is important, and the '...' allows you to select a branch without knowing of its exact parent branch.
I want to create a fragment file that will only contain a CustomTable in the file. This is easy enough, but I do not know how to link/include it back into the main product.wxs file.
The fragment file is in the same project as the product file, and I have also tried adding an include tag for the file without success, and even putting the custom table into a WiX include file.
Is there a way to do this? Or is it going to have to live in the product file?
The WiX toolset compiles and links in a similar manner to the C/C++ compiler. The linker starts at the "main" entry point (Product element, in your case) then follows the references from there, which in turn follows references from there until all are resolved.
Part of your question is missing but based on the title I'm going to guess that you want a CustomTable element. Typically that CustomTable is processed by a CustomAction. There are a couple good ways to reference a CustomAction.
I would not use an include file.
You could try using EnsureTable if you'd like to make sure the table is created whether or not there is data in it. If you'd like to separate the custom table's schema definition from the data I believe you can just define them in separate fragments and reference the schema definition from the data definition fragment by opening with <CustomTable Id="your table name"> and defining the rows of data within it.
In general Wix won't pull fragments into the main authoring unless they contain elements that are referred to somewhere and since there is currently no such thing as CustomTableRef you may opt to use other elements such as an empty PayloadGroup or ComponentGroup that you can refer to (using a PayloadGroupRef or ComponentGroupRef respectively) from your main Bundle, Product or Module element as the case may be.
When I run phpinfo() and look by the Configuration category under PHP Core, I see a directive titled include_path, with a local value and a master value.
In this case, my local value is set to
.:
./include:
../include:
/usr/share/php:
/usr/share/php/smarty:
/usr/share/pear
and my master value is set to
.:
/usr/share/php:
/usr/share/pear:
/usr/share/php/pear:
/usr/share/php/smarty
The reason I am trying to learn how this works is because there is a file in the system I am working on titled Smarty.class.php, which I'm sure sounds very familiar to anyone who uses Smarty Templating Engine.
One of the PHP files has the following includes:
require_once("Smarty.class.php");
require_once("user_info_class.inc");
The file user_info_class.inc is in the same directory as the file making the include, which makes perfect sense to me, and is the way that I've always referenced files. I decided that I wanted to open up the Smarty.class.php file and had assumed it would be in the same directory, but it was not.
After doing a bit of digging, I discovered those php_ini variables, and was finally able to locate the file in the directory usr/share/php/smarty/.
So it would seem that when making an include, it follows some sort of order between the Local and Master values for the include_path.
Assuming that my deductions were correct thus far, can someone explain the order in which PHP searches for the files to be included?
The global value is basically what's set in php.ini. The local value is what's currently being used. The local value completely overwrites the master value.
According to the manual, PHP checks the paths in the order that they are specified in the include_path setting: http://php.net/manual/en/ini.core.php#ini.include-path