I use Poedit in a project for localization. Whenever I change an entry with poedit, it reorders all elements. I think it reorders the elements according to their line number and file but since I´m working with many coders on this project, poedit must not reorder all elements to avoid unneccessary line changes in the repository. Does anyone know how to achieve that?
Poedit never, under any circumstances, reorders content of the file when you “change an entry”. Files are always saved in the order they had when loaded, and it’s been like this since the very first version.
I have two explanations:
Either you’re confusing content of the file with the view presented in Poedit (where you can select your preferred display order in the View menu), in which case just change the display to whatever you like. But this seems unlikely.
Or you’re talking about not “changing an entry” in the file, but updating the PO file from source code. If that’s the case, it’s possible that you or some of your coworkers are using some very old version of Poedit. The fix would be to update to the current version, because the scan order was fixed to be stable across platforms in v1.6.5 1.3 years ago.
If it’s neither, you need to describe the issue reproducibly.
Related
I have an issue, I wouldn't say it's a problem at the moment, but I can see how it could turn into one in the future.
I'm following some tutorials from Ruby, so I have a folder with a bunch of different files. In one of them, I was studying Hashes, and they showed that I could name its keys like :key. No problem so far.
The issue came when I was studying Classes and I had to declare the class attributes, IntelliSense (I guess, maybe it is another extension) would recommend code completion with the keys I declared in that Hashes ruby file.
So I tested some stuff and:
It wasn't unique to that file (of course).
It's not just in hashes, it will recommend any type of :attribute I create. Whether it is classes or hashes (which is what I have tried so far), it doesn't matter.
It isn't unique to that folder. If I have the files in different folders, with different depths let's say, it will still appear.
The only way I found to get rid of that was to erase the file, and that's no solution at all.
I guess my precise question is: How can I disable that code completion characteristic?
You can ignore file or folder in code completion by adding it to files.watcherExclude setting.
Files must be closed in editor: if ignored file is open, it will still be used for autocomplete.
With gettext, the original (usually English) text of messages serves as
the message key ("msgid") for the translations. This means that every time the
original text changes, the msgid must be updated in all the .po files.
For real changes of the text, this is obviously unavoidable, as the
translator must update the translation.
However, if the change of the original does not change its meaning,
re-translation is superflous (e.g. change in punctation, whitespace
changes, or correction of a spelling mistake).
Is there a way to update the .po files automatically in that case?
I tried to use xgettext & msgmerge (with fuzzy matching turned on), but
fuzzy matching sometimes fails, plus this produces lots of ugly
"#,fuzzy" flags.
Note: There is a similar question:
How to efficiently work with gettext PO files when making small edits to large text values
However, it's about large strings, thus about a more specific problem.
One way to avoid the problem is to leave the msgids alone, have a .po file for the original language and make the fix inside that.
It always strikes me as being more of a work around than a proper fix though. For the next iteration (where there will definitely be more msgid changes) the msgid is changed and either the translators translate it in their usual update or each language is updated by hand when the msgid is changed.
I've had exactly this issue when doing minor changes to a django project. What I do is the following:
Change message in code.
Run find and replace on all translation files ("django.po"), replacing the old message (msgid) with the new one.
Run django-admin makemessages.
If I have done things right, the last step is superflous (i.e, you have done the change for gettext). django uses the gettext utilities, so it shouldn't matter how you make your message files.
I find and replace like so:
find . -name "*.po" -print | xargs sed -i 's/oldmessageid/newmessageid/g' Courtesy of http://rushi.vishavadia.com/blog/find-replace-across-multiple-files-in-linux
Looking for tips and/or tools on how to efficiently work with gettext PO files when making small edits to large msgid values.
Example: We have lots of multi-sentence/multi-paragraph messages that are stored in our PO message catalog files. If we make a very minor change to a message, perhaps editing a single sentence or even correcting punctuation, we lose our original translation when we run the msgmerge utility.
Rather than re-translate long messages (that have already gone through an editorial approval process) from scratch, our translators return to backup copies of their PO files and manually search for the text of the last msgid/msgstr translation pair which they then diff against the current msgid values to see what has changed, followed by a copy and paste of the last translation which they then edit to reflect the updated msgid value.
That's a lot of work! Certainly there must be a better way of handling this type of workflow?
Is there a best practice way to archive and find previous translations that are no longer in a PO file? One idea that comes to mind is to store a unique msg id in the text of our messages or in the comments that precede our message and use this id to retrieve previous msgid/msgstr translation pairs for review. Or are there PO editors or online services that make this process more efficient?
Thank you,
Malcolm
I've been looking for a way to make minor changes to msgids without disturbing existing translations - for instance, typo fixes in the source text. Here's a recipe I've just worked out that doesn't involve websites:
Use msgen from GNU gettext to generate an English-to-English po file:
msgen project.pot >corrections.po
Manually edit the msgstrs in "corrections.po" to reflect the typo fixes made in the source text, so we have a mapping from uncorrected to corrected strings. (I haven't thought about how to automate this bit.)
For each "real" translation (for example ca.po): abuse poswap from the Translate Toolkit (translate-toolkit in Ubuntu) to change the msgids:
poswap -i corrections.po -t ca.po -o ca.new.po
This does seem to lose header comments and obsolete strings from GNU gettext po files, but manually fixing those up is much less work than manually tweaking msgids in each translation (and could probably easily be scripted).
(Obviously, this should only be used in exceptional circumstances, where you're absolutely sure that none of the translators need the opportunity to re-review their translations.)
Virtaal's translation memory support can probably help with this. If your original units are in the translation memory, it will be shown (with differences) within a certain margin of change (based on Levenshtein distance). It will still contain the original (unmodified) translation, but at least the original text is more easily accessible and the differences highlighted.
I'm not 100% sure, but Pootle might also offer a web based solution. If you need any help, ask in #pootle on FreeNode.
The more general improvement is, of course, to separate/segment the units as far as possible.
Sadly, a project that I have been working on lately has a large amount of copy-and-paste code, even within single files. Are there any tools or techniques that can detect duplication or near-duplication within a single file? I have Beyond Compare 3 and it works well for comparing separate files, but I am at a loss for comparing single files.
Thanks in advance.
Edit:
Thanks for all the great tools! I'll definitely check them out.
This project is an ASP.NET/C# project, but I work with a variety of languages including Java; I'm interested in what tools are best (for any language) to remove duplication.
Check out Atomiq. It finds code that is duplicate that is prime for extracting to one location.
http://www.getatomiq.com/
If you're using Eclipse, you can use the copy paste detector (CPD) https://olex.openlogic.com/packages/cpd.
You don't say what language you are using, which is going to affect what tools you can use.
For Python there is CloneDigger. It also supports Java but I have not tried that. It can find code duplication both with a single file and between files, and gives you the result as a diff-like report in HTML.
See SD CloneDR, a tool for detecting copy-paste-edit code within and across multiple files. It detects exact copyies, copies that have been reformatted, and near-miss copies with different identifiers, literals, and even different seqeunces of statements.
The CloneDR handles many languages, including Java (1.4,1.5,1.6) and C# especially up to C#4.0. You can see sample clone detection reports at the website, also including one for C#.
Resharper does this automagically - it suggests when it thinks code should be extracted into a method, and will do the extraction for you
Check out PMD , once you have configured it (which is tad simple) you can run its copy paste detector to find duplicate code.
One with some Office skills can do following sequence in 1 minute:
use ordinary formatter to unify the code style, preferably without line wrapping
feed the code text into Microsoft Excel as a single column
search and replace all dual spaces with single one and do other replacements
sort column
At this point the keywords for duplicates will be already well detected. But to go further
add comparator formula to 2nd column and counter to 3rd
copy and paste values again, sort and see the most repetitive lines
There is an analysis tool, called Simian, which I haven't yet tried. Supposedly it can be run on any kind of text and point out duplicated items. It can be used via a command line interface.
Another option similar to those above, but with a different tool chain: https://www.npmjs.com/package/jscpd
I'm working in XCode and I've also written an external editor tool that generates resources for use in the project. In the best case scenario, the tool would edit the project.pbxproj file so that it includes the generated resources in the project. I've read through the file in an attempt to understand it, and it's mostly discernible but there is still one major question I have.
If I wanted to generate a new Group from outside XCode (or a new anything, for that matter), how do I know what ID code to use? For example: 19C28FACFE9D520D11CA2CBB is one of them from my project. How am I supposed to know what to use if I make my own? Do they just need to be unique? Would it be legal to just make one up: 000000000000000000000001 and 000000000000000000000002 and 000000000000000000000003 etc. ?
Any help on this would be wonderful. Thanks.
Yes, you can make your own. The best way would be to use a hash function such as MD5 or SHA1 to generate it then you can truncate it at the desired length. I would hash the name of the file/group along with a time stamp appended this way you get a more unique result.