I'm trying to implement a JSON-RPC middleware using Wt. I can read raw request body using WResource, no problem. But I need WebSockets and my Wt server using WResource ( I'm calling server.addResource ) don't answer properly to WebSockets clients. Maybe this is normal?
Second way, I made addEntryPoint to a customized WApplication, that work well for WebSocket, thanks Wt!, but I can't imagine how to read the JSON sent in POST requests.
Help please.
Unfortunately WResource doesn't support websockets. In a WApplication, all communication is done by Wt's rendering engine, so you can't interfere by that mechanism.
Related
I am hoping someone can point me in the right direction. I have a CF2021 Server which uses a Node.js websocket server and CF pages (via javascript) as a client. Messages from user to user work as expected, so no issue there.
This CF Server also has a custom API built using CFML that handles and routes inbound SMS messages. My question is; what would be the best way to send the SMS message (by now its json) to the Node.js websocket to it can send it to the user(s).
I tried using the same javascript that the browser client uses, but it appears that the CFML API script is "browser-less", so that doesn't work, or should it?
I thought something like Apache Groovy may be the solution, but I am having difficulties with any websocket example I have found.
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
thanks in advance
Flow matters.
If you want to handle an incoming message by delivering it to all currently logged in users who are subscribed to messages of the current sort: set up your message handler to deliver using lucee/adobe-coldfusion websockets. Be forewarned, Lucee takes some setup time, but once running, it is a great solution.
If you don't need immediate delivery, or you need a super simple solution: I actually have had some success with "Long Polling" you just have to remember to use "flush" early in the request, before any pause/sleep, then loop your message lookup requests for new data, with a 1-5 second delay between each loop. Once new data is found, I like to return the request to the client, close that polling request and start a new polling request using the client side. I typically won't poll for more than 60 seconds. Even if the returned json object is empty.
I read documents online. They say that
A GET-Ajax request is used for getting data from the server.
A POST-Ajax request is used for change data on the server.
But why is it?
A Get-Ajax request can change the data on the server TOO, right?
Why should only the POST-Ajax request change the data?
Is it because of a security reason or something? Please explain to me
GET and POST are different methods for web requests that provide different features/describe different intentions for programmers and APIs. You are correct that, technically speaking, if you want to do some other CRUD operation on the server when using a GET request, you can. Most would probably argue that this is not a good idea, in part for security/performance features that either method provides. Example: GET requests can be cached, POST cannot.
More on that here: https://www.w3schools.com/tags/ref_httpmethods.asp
I am trying to connect to an API that uses websockets. I need to do the following:
Connect to the websocket using a given URI
Send a login request
Send a request for the required data stream(s)
Store the returned streamed data in an array for immediate processing (the array will be continually updated while data is streamed)
When finished collecting data, send a logout request
I have a general understanding of websockets, but have never tried to connect to a websocket. I have read through the “documentation” for packages HTTP (which I have used before), WebSockets, and DandelionWebSockets. Each has left me scratching my head trying to understand how to implement the above tasks.
Would someone please help by showing me, line-by-line, how to set up the above tasks and also explain why each line or function is used? (Assume I have the correct URI, login, data, and logout request formats.)
We have a existing server which receives POST data and respond with json. The server is using Django. I am developing an webpage game using the json data. However I figured out I may need to use jsonp because the game is hosted on another domain. I want to know if the server need to know I am using jsonp (i.e. does the server need to change the code) or it is completely transparent to the server side? I cannot reach the server developer so I hope I can get advise here. Thank you very much!
Yes, server must respond differently - JSNOP requires that JSON response is wrapped in some sort of function call.
wrapperFunc({"Name": "Foo", "Id": 1234, "Rank": 7});
Note that securing JSONP against Cross-site request forgery is harder than using proper CORS which you may be able to use if you don't need to target old versions of IE.
We have a need to consume an external REST Api and dynamically update content on our website and have ran into the age old problem of cross site scripting and Ajax.
I've read up on JSONP however I don't want to go down that route in a million years as it seems like really a rather dirty hack.
As a solution to this issue is it "right" and "proper" to have a local service that acts as a proxy for any requests to an external Api? So on the client there would be an Ajax call to ../RestProxy/MakeRequest passing it the details of the request it needs to make to the external api, it performs the request and returns anything passed back.
Any thoughts would be appreciated.
There are three ways to do this:
1. JSONP
This is accepted by many popular APIs and frameworks. JQuery makes it easy. I would recommend this.
2. Proxy
Works pretty much as you described. Adds an extra step and server code and server load for you. However, it does allow you to filter or otherwise manipulate the results before sending them to the client.
3. Rely Access-Control-Allow-Origin
This is a header that the server can set to allow you to read json directly from their server even though you aren't on the same domain. This eliminates the need for the jsonp hack, but it requires the the server be setup to support it and it requires a web browser that supports it.
Access-Control-Allow-Origin is supported in:
IE8+
Firefox 3.6+
Safari 4.0+
Chrome 6+
iOS Safari 3.2+
Android browser 2.1+
If you need to support IE7, then this option isn't for you.