Trying to debug ESP32-S3 with PlatformIO on VSCode with macOS on M1.
Installed ftdi drivers from their website. (installed the VCP drivers, not the D3XX ones as I couldn't find a way to compile and install them).
As ESP32-S3 has an internal debugger, I just created a USB that connects D-/D+ pins to the board gpio 19 and 20 (and grd). BTW, when I connect it to the macbook, I dont see any additional port under /dev/*
Getting the following error, regardless of my platform.ini configuration.
http://openocd.org/doc/doxygen/bugs.html
adapter speed: 20000 kHz
adapter speed: 5000 kHz
Info : tcl server disabled
Info : telnet server disabled
Error: no device found
Error: unable to open ftdi device with vid 0403, pid 6010, description '*', serial '*' at bus location '*'
Error: no device found
Error: unable to open ftdi device with vid 0403, pid 6014, description '*', serial '*' at bus location '*'
.pioinit:11: Error in sourced command file:
Remote connection closed
My platformio.ini:
[env:esp32-s3-devkitc-1]
platform = espressif32
board = esp32-s3-devkitc-1
framework = arduino
upload_port = /dev/cu.wchusbserial553C0085431
monitor_speed=115200
build_type = debug
debug_init_break = tbreak setup
;debug_tool = esp-builtin
debug_tool = esp-prog
Removed and installed the ftdi drivers.
Got a similar error when trying with ESP-IDF.
Any thoughts?
If you are connecting the USB conector directly on esp32s3 module, you should try to change the board parameter from esp32-s3-devkitc-1 to esp32s3-builtin. This way you specify that you are using the built-in debugger.
I'm trying to make a RPI3 buildroot image with CAN interface.
So far I don't see any device in /sys/bus/spi/devices
Please help
What I did are below
At the buildroot terminal "make raspberrypi3_defconfig" then enabled those below via "make xconfig" and "make linux-xconfig"
BR2_ROOTFS_DEVICE_CREATION_DYNAMIC_EUDEV
BR2_PACKAGE_IPROUTE2
NET
CAN
CAN_DEV
SPI
CAN_MCP251X
After that I flashed sdcard.img to an SD card then I add those two lines below to config.txt
dtparam=spi=on
dtoverlay=mcp2515-can0,oscillator=12000000,interrupt=25
I expected to see spi0.0 but I don't see any device in /sys/bus/spi/devices
Can you please help?
Thank you
My Linux kernel version is 3.10.14 and I am using libusb-1.0.21 . I cross compiled it for mipsel-linux on my router for usb modem. when I try to run usb_modeswitch I got the following error :
Error: Failed to initialize libusb. LIBUSB_ERROR_OTHER (-99)
I found there is no entry /proc/bus for the attached usb modem.
Can anybody tell me what to do resolve this issue.
I will be very thankful to you.
I am trying to setup OVS2.6 with DPDK16.07. I am following INSTALL.DPDK.md instructions that came under openvswitch-2.6.0.tar.gz. Getting following warning message in ovs-vswitchd.log:
00034|netdev|WARN|could not create netdev dpdk1 of unknown type dpdk
00035|bridge|WARN|could not open network device dpdk1 (Address family not supported by protocol)
Googling little bit shows this issue is faced by earlier ovs version as well, but I didn't find any satisfactory solution.
Any idea what could be rootcause, and how to fix it?
Thanks!
All ports that are to be used by Open vSwitch must be bound to the uio_pci_generic, igb_uio or vfio-pci module before the application is run. Any network ports under Linux control will be ignored by OvS or any DPDK application.
Please check the output of $DPDK_DIR/tools/dpdk-devbind.py scripts with -s parameter. You must see some ports in "Network devices using DPDK-compatible driver" section like below;
$/dpdk-stable-16.07.2/tools$ ./dpdk-devbind.py -s
Network devices using DPDK-compatible driver
============================================
0000:05:00.0 '82571EB Gigabit Ethernet Controller (Copper)' drv=igb_uio unused=e1000e
0000:05:00.1 '82571EB Gigabit Ethernet Controller (Copper)' drv=igb_uio unused=e1000e
I have the same issue as well, and by checking the code I found that before starting ovs-vswitchd, we should use the command below, to initialize dpdk.
ovs-vsctl --no-wait set Open_vSwitch . other_config:dpdk-init=true
I'm compiling a custom kernel under Ubuntu and I'm running into the problem that my kernel doesn't seem to know where to look for firmware. Under Ubuntu 8.04, firmware is tied to kernel version the same way driver modules are. For example, kernel 2.6.24-24-generic stores its kernel modules in:
/lib/modules/2.6.24-24-generic
and its firmware in:
/lib/firmware/2.6.24-24-generic
When I compile the 2.6.24-24-generic Ubuntu kernel according the "Alternate Build Method: The Old-Fashioned Debian Way" I get the appropriate modules directory and all my devices work except those requiring firmware such as my Intel wireless card (ipw2200 module).
The kernel log shows for example that when ipw2200 tries to load the firmware the kernel subsystem controlling the loading of firmware is unable to locate it:
ipw2200: Detected Intel PRO/Wireless 2200BG Network Connection
ipw2200: ipw2200-bss.fw request_firmware failed: Reason -2
errno-base.h defines this as:
#define ENOENT 2 /* No such file or directory */
(The function returning ENOENT puts a minus in front of it.)
I tried creating a symlink in /lib/firmware where my kernel's name pointed to the 2.6.24-24-generic directory, however this resulted in the same error. This firmware is non-GPL, provided by Intel and packed by Ubuntu. I don't believe it has any actual tie to a particular kernel version. cmp shows that the versions in the various directories are identical.
So how does the kernel know where to look for firmware?
Update
I found this solution to the exact problem I'm having, however it no longer works as Ubuntu has eliminated /etc/hotplug.d and no longer stores its firmware in /usr/lib/hotplug/firmware.
Update2
Some more research turned up some more answers. Up until version 92 of udev, the program firmware_helper was the way firmware got loaded. Starting with udev 93 this program was replaced with a script named firmware.sh providing identical functionality as far as I can tell. Both of these hardcode the firmware path to /lib/firmware. Ubuntu still seems to be using the /lib/udev/firmware_helper binary.
The name of the firmware file is passed to firmware_helper in the environment variable $FIRMWARE which is concatenated to the path /lib/firmware and used to load the firmware.
The actual request to load the firmware is made by the driver (ipw2200 in my case) via the system call:
request_firmware(..., "ipw2200-bss.fw", ...);
Now somewhere in between the driver calling request_firmware and firmware_helper looking at the $FIRMWARE environment variable, the kernel package name is getting prepended to the firmware name.
So who's doing it?
From the kernel's perspective, see /usr/src/linux/Documentation/firmware_class/README:
kernel(driver): calls request_firmware(&fw_entry, $FIRMWARE, device)
userspace:
- /sys/class/firmware/xxx/{loading,data} appear.
- hotplug gets called with a firmware identifier in $FIRMWARE
and the usual hotplug environment.
- hotplug: echo 1 > /sys/class/firmware/xxx/loading
kernel: Discard any previous partial load.
userspace:
- hotplug: cat appropriate_firmware_image > \
/sys/class/firmware/xxx/data
kernel: grows a buffer in PAGE_SIZE increments to hold the image as it
comes in.
userspace:
- hotplug: echo 0 > /sys/class/firmware/xxx/loading
kernel: request_firmware() returns and the driver has the firmware
image in fw_entry->{data,size}. If something went wrong
request_firmware() returns non-zero and fw_entry is set to
NULL.
kernel(driver): Driver code calls release_firmware(fw_entry) releasing
the firmware image and any related resource.
The kernel doesn't actually load any firmware at all. It simply informs userspace, "I want a firmware by the name of xxx", and waits for userspace to pipe the firmware image back to the kernel.
Now, on Ubuntu 8.04,
$ grep firmware /etc/udev/rules.d/80-program.rules
# Load firmware on demand
SUBSYSTEM=="firmware", ACTION=="add", RUN+="firmware_helper"
so as you've discovered, udev is configured to run firmware_helper when the kernel asks for firmware.
$ apt-get source udev
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Need to get 312kB of source archives.
Get:1 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com hardy-security/main udev 117-8ubuntu0.2 (dsc) [716B]
Get:2 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com hardy-security/main udev 117-8ubuntu0.2 (tar) [245kB]
Get:3 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com hardy-security/main udev 117-8ubuntu0.2 (diff) [65.7kB]
Fetched 312kB in 1s (223kB/s)
gpg: Signature made Tue 14 Apr 2009 05:31:34 PM EDT using DSA key ID 17063E6D
gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
dpkg-source: extracting udev in udev-117
dpkg-source: unpacking udev_117.orig.tar.gz
dpkg-source: applying ./udev_117-8ubuntu0.2.diff.gz
$ cd udev-117/
$ cat debian/patches/80-extras-firmware.patch
If you read the source, you'll find that Ubuntu wrote a firmware_helper which is hard-coded to first look for /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/$FIRMWARE, then /lib/modules/$FIRMWARE, and no other locations. Translating it to sh, it does approximately this:
echo -n 1 > /sys/$DEVPATH/loading
cat /lib/firmware/$(uname -r)/$FIRMWARE > /sys/$DEVPATH/data \
|| cat /lib/firmware/$FIRMWARE > /sys/$DEVPATH/data
if [ $? = 0 ]; then
echo -n 1 > /sys/$DEVPATH/loading
echo -n -1 > /sys/$DEVPATH/loading
fi
which is exactly the format the kernel expects.
To make a long story short: Ubuntu's udev package has customizations that always look in /lib/firmware/$(uname -r) first. This policy is being handled in userspace.
Wow this is very useful information and it led me to the solution for my problem when making a custom USB kernel module for a device requiring firmware.
Basically, every Ubuntu brings a new rehash of hal,sysfs,devfs,udev,and so on...and things just change. In fact I read they stopped using hal.
So let's reverse engineer this yet again so it's pertinent to the latest [Ubuntu] systems.
On Ubuntu Lucid (the latest at time of writing), /lib/udev/rules.d/50-firmware.rules is used. This file calls the binary /lib/udev/firmware, where magic happens.
Listing: /lib/udev/rules.d/50-firmware.rules
# firmware-class requests, copies files into the kernel
SUBSYSTEM=="firmware", ACTION=="add", RUN+="firmware --firmware=$env{FIRMWARE} --devpath=$env{DEVPATH}"
The magic should be something along these lines (source: Linux Device Drivers, 3rd Ed., Ch. 14: The Linux Device Model):
echo 1 to loading
copy firmware to data
on failure, echo -1 to loading and halt firmware loading process
echo 0 to loading (signal the kernel)
then, a specific kernel module receives the data and pushes it to the device
If you look at Lucid's source page for udev, in udev-151/extras/firmware/firmware.c, the source for that firmware /lib/udev/firmware binary, that's exactly what goes on.
Excerpt: Lucid source, udev-151/extras/firmware/firmware.c
util_strscpyl(datapath, sizeof(datapath), udev_get_sys_path(udev), devpath, "/data", NULL);
if (!copy_firmware(udev, fwpath, datapath, statbuf.st_size)) {
err(udev, "error sending firmware '%s' to device\n", firmware);
set_loading(udev, loadpath, "-1");
rc = 4;
goto exit;
};
set_loading(udev, loadpath, "0");
Additionally, many devices use an Intel HEX format (textish files containing checksum and other stuff) (wiki it i have no reputation and no ability to link). The kernel program ihex2fw (called from Makefile in kernel_source/lib/firmware on .HEX files) converts these HEX files to an arbitrary-designed binary format that the Linux kernel then picks up with request_ihex_firmware, because they thought reading text files in the kernel was silly (it would slow things down).
On current Linux systems, this is handled via udev and the firmware.agent.
Linux 3.5.7 Gentoo, I have the same issue.
SOLVED:
emerge ipw2200-firmware
Then go to /usr/src/linux
make menucofig
on device driver, remove all wirless drivers don't needed, set Intell 2200 as module and recompile.
make
make modules_install
cp arch/x86/boot/bzImage /boot/kernel-yourdefault