I'm compiling a custom kernel under Ubuntu and I'm running into the problem that my kernel doesn't seem to know where to look for firmware. Under Ubuntu 8.04, firmware is tied to kernel version the same way driver modules are. For example, kernel 2.6.24-24-generic stores its kernel modules in:
/lib/modules/2.6.24-24-generic
and its firmware in:
/lib/firmware/2.6.24-24-generic
When I compile the 2.6.24-24-generic Ubuntu kernel according the "Alternate Build Method: The Old-Fashioned Debian Way" I get the appropriate modules directory and all my devices work except those requiring firmware such as my Intel wireless card (ipw2200 module).
The kernel log shows for example that when ipw2200 tries to load the firmware the kernel subsystem controlling the loading of firmware is unable to locate it:
ipw2200: Detected Intel PRO/Wireless 2200BG Network Connection
ipw2200: ipw2200-bss.fw request_firmware failed: Reason -2
errno-base.h defines this as:
#define ENOENT 2 /* No such file or directory */
(The function returning ENOENT puts a minus in front of it.)
I tried creating a symlink in /lib/firmware where my kernel's name pointed to the 2.6.24-24-generic directory, however this resulted in the same error. This firmware is non-GPL, provided by Intel and packed by Ubuntu. I don't believe it has any actual tie to a particular kernel version. cmp shows that the versions in the various directories are identical.
So how does the kernel know where to look for firmware?
Update
I found this solution to the exact problem I'm having, however it no longer works as Ubuntu has eliminated /etc/hotplug.d and no longer stores its firmware in /usr/lib/hotplug/firmware.
Update2
Some more research turned up some more answers. Up until version 92 of udev, the program firmware_helper was the way firmware got loaded. Starting with udev 93 this program was replaced with a script named firmware.sh providing identical functionality as far as I can tell. Both of these hardcode the firmware path to /lib/firmware. Ubuntu still seems to be using the /lib/udev/firmware_helper binary.
The name of the firmware file is passed to firmware_helper in the environment variable $FIRMWARE which is concatenated to the path /lib/firmware and used to load the firmware.
The actual request to load the firmware is made by the driver (ipw2200 in my case) via the system call:
request_firmware(..., "ipw2200-bss.fw", ...);
Now somewhere in between the driver calling request_firmware and firmware_helper looking at the $FIRMWARE environment variable, the kernel package name is getting prepended to the firmware name.
So who's doing it?
From the kernel's perspective, see /usr/src/linux/Documentation/firmware_class/README:
kernel(driver): calls request_firmware(&fw_entry, $FIRMWARE, device)
userspace:
- /sys/class/firmware/xxx/{loading,data} appear.
- hotplug gets called with a firmware identifier in $FIRMWARE
and the usual hotplug environment.
- hotplug: echo 1 > /sys/class/firmware/xxx/loading
kernel: Discard any previous partial load.
userspace:
- hotplug: cat appropriate_firmware_image > \
/sys/class/firmware/xxx/data
kernel: grows a buffer in PAGE_SIZE increments to hold the image as it
comes in.
userspace:
- hotplug: echo 0 > /sys/class/firmware/xxx/loading
kernel: request_firmware() returns and the driver has the firmware
image in fw_entry->{data,size}. If something went wrong
request_firmware() returns non-zero and fw_entry is set to
NULL.
kernel(driver): Driver code calls release_firmware(fw_entry) releasing
the firmware image and any related resource.
The kernel doesn't actually load any firmware at all. It simply informs userspace, "I want a firmware by the name of xxx", and waits for userspace to pipe the firmware image back to the kernel.
Now, on Ubuntu 8.04,
$ grep firmware /etc/udev/rules.d/80-program.rules
# Load firmware on demand
SUBSYSTEM=="firmware", ACTION=="add", RUN+="firmware_helper"
so as you've discovered, udev is configured to run firmware_helper when the kernel asks for firmware.
$ apt-get source udev
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Need to get 312kB of source archives.
Get:1 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com hardy-security/main udev 117-8ubuntu0.2 (dsc) [716B]
Get:2 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com hardy-security/main udev 117-8ubuntu0.2 (tar) [245kB]
Get:3 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com hardy-security/main udev 117-8ubuntu0.2 (diff) [65.7kB]
Fetched 312kB in 1s (223kB/s)
gpg: Signature made Tue 14 Apr 2009 05:31:34 PM EDT using DSA key ID 17063E6D
gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
dpkg-source: extracting udev in udev-117
dpkg-source: unpacking udev_117.orig.tar.gz
dpkg-source: applying ./udev_117-8ubuntu0.2.diff.gz
$ cd udev-117/
$ cat debian/patches/80-extras-firmware.patch
If you read the source, you'll find that Ubuntu wrote a firmware_helper which is hard-coded to first look for /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/$FIRMWARE, then /lib/modules/$FIRMWARE, and no other locations. Translating it to sh, it does approximately this:
echo -n 1 > /sys/$DEVPATH/loading
cat /lib/firmware/$(uname -r)/$FIRMWARE > /sys/$DEVPATH/data \
|| cat /lib/firmware/$FIRMWARE > /sys/$DEVPATH/data
if [ $? = 0 ]; then
echo -n 1 > /sys/$DEVPATH/loading
echo -n -1 > /sys/$DEVPATH/loading
fi
which is exactly the format the kernel expects.
To make a long story short: Ubuntu's udev package has customizations that always look in /lib/firmware/$(uname -r) first. This policy is being handled in userspace.
Wow this is very useful information and it led me to the solution for my problem when making a custom USB kernel module for a device requiring firmware.
Basically, every Ubuntu brings a new rehash of hal,sysfs,devfs,udev,and so on...and things just change. In fact I read they stopped using hal.
So let's reverse engineer this yet again so it's pertinent to the latest [Ubuntu] systems.
On Ubuntu Lucid (the latest at time of writing), /lib/udev/rules.d/50-firmware.rules is used. This file calls the binary /lib/udev/firmware, where magic happens.
Listing: /lib/udev/rules.d/50-firmware.rules
# firmware-class requests, copies files into the kernel
SUBSYSTEM=="firmware", ACTION=="add", RUN+="firmware --firmware=$env{FIRMWARE} --devpath=$env{DEVPATH}"
The magic should be something along these lines (source: Linux Device Drivers, 3rd Ed., Ch. 14: The Linux Device Model):
echo 1 to loading
copy firmware to data
on failure, echo -1 to loading and halt firmware loading process
echo 0 to loading (signal the kernel)
then, a specific kernel module receives the data and pushes it to the device
If you look at Lucid's source page for udev, in udev-151/extras/firmware/firmware.c, the source for that firmware /lib/udev/firmware binary, that's exactly what goes on.
Excerpt: Lucid source, udev-151/extras/firmware/firmware.c
util_strscpyl(datapath, sizeof(datapath), udev_get_sys_path(udev), devpath, "/data", NULL);
if (!copy_firmware(udev, fwpath, datapath, statbuf.st_size)) {
err(udev, "error sending firmware '%s' to device\n", firmware);
set_loading(udev, loadpath, "-1");
rc = 4;
goto exit;
};
set_loading(udev, loadpath, "0");
Additionally, many devices use an Intel HEX format (textish files containing checksum and other stuff) (wiki it i have no reputation and no ability to link). The kernel program ihex2fw (called from Makefile in kernel_source/lib/firmware on .HEX files) converts these HEX files to an arbitrary-designed binary format that the Linux kernel then picks up with request_ihex_firmware, because they thought reading text files in the kernel was silly (it would slow things down).
On current Linux systems, this is handled via udev and the firmware.agent.
Linux 3.5.7 Gentoo, I have the same issue.
SOLVED:
emerge ipw2200-firmware
Then go to /usr/src/linux
make menucofig
on device driver, remove all wirless drivers don't needed, set Intell 2200 as module and recompile.
make
make modules_install
cp arch/x86/boot/bzImage /boot/kernel-yourdefault
Related
My desktop is Intel x86_64 processor with Ubuntu operating system.
I know there is perf tool to get a list of statistics of a program.
But what I am trying to do is read performance counter directly without using the perf tool.
First Question
First Questions is I downloaded this code from Github: Github Code Reference.
It compiled successfully with linux-headers-5.3.0-40-generic kernel without any errors. Once I use "insmod" the .ko file, the system hangs. The .ko file is not inserted when I checked the dmesg, so I have to cease it after I do "insmod" the .ko file. Does it happen because I attempted unauthorized access? If there are suggestions that I can try, I am glad to hear that.
The corresponding code is below.
static void set_pce(void *arg)
{
int to_val = (arg != 0);
u_int64_t cr4_val;
cr4_val = __read_cr4();
if (to_val) {
cr4_val |= X86_CR4_PCE;
} else {
cr4_val &= ~X86_CR4_PCE;
}
__write_cr4(cr4_val);
}
static int __init user_rdpmc_init(void){
int cpu;
num_cpus = num_online_cpus();
printk(KERN_INFO "Enabling RDPMC from ring 3 for %d CPUs\n", num_cpus);
for (cpu = 0; cpu < num_cpus; cpu++) {
smp_call_function_single(cpu, set_pce, (void *) 1, 1);
}
return 0;
}
Second Question
Second question is I am using linux-headers-5.3.0-40-generic kernel version in my Ubuntu desktop. I downloaded kernel code version 5.5.3 from kernel.org. I followed the perf code given in the 5.5.3 kernel code thoroughly and discovered that core.c file under linux-5.5.3/arch/x86/events/intel directory actually does setting and reading the performance counters. I used the core.c file contents to make it as a module to read the performance counter. When I compile it, it creates a bunch of errors because I use linux-headers-5.3.0-40-generic to build the module but my ubuntu kernel doesn't have all header files linked to the core.c file from kernel code from kernel.org.
How can I make my Ubuntu kernel use all the files linked to core.c from kernel.org and build the .ko file?
Or Is there any module source code that has x86 performance counter reading that I can use as a reference?
Thank you for your help in advance.
I know there is perf tool to get a list of statistics of a program. But what I am trying to do is read performance counter directly without using the perf tool.
If you do not want to use perf tool, you can try to use oprofile tool or intel vtune or https://github.com/RRZE-HPC/likwid or https://github.com/opcm/pcm. Or you can use perf_event_open syscall which is how perf tool works (you can study or modify perf tool sources from https://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/tools/perf/ - and perf tool version may not be equal to kernel version).
If you want to access msr registers as root, use modprobe msr (this is standard kernel module, already compiled for your kernel in ubuntu) and wrmsr and rdmsr tools (msr-tools deb/ubuntu package, by intel), like in slide 27 of Performance Monitoring Chris Dahnken Intel SSG EMEA HPCTC presentation.
I don't understand why do you want to work with performance counters without perf tool. If you want to get counter readings from inside of your program, for example before and after some loops, you can use perf_event_open syscall (with specific ioctls) directly. (Or try to use perf stat + same ioctls PERF_EVENT_IOC_* or try to learn perf + JIT integration)
Or you can use existing kernel module which will export msr register access to root user - the msr.ko. And msr tools - https://01.org/msr-tools. Or with this msr+pmc example https://technicalandstuff.wordpress.com/2015/05/15/using-intels-pcm-in-linux-and-inside-c/ + https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intel-performance-counter-monitor (https://github.com/opcm/pcm)
There are also some examples of perf counters usage in https://github.com/RRZE-HPC/likwid.
You can also use PAPI library to access counters from your code, it will handle most of perf_event_open stuff for you. http://icl.cs.utk.edu/projects/papi/wiki/PAPITopics:Getting_Started
First Questions is I downloaded this code https://github.com/softdevteam/user_rdpmc ... "insmod" the .ko file, the system hangs.
There are too low "Stars" rating and the code is too old (2016) to really doing any investigations on the hang. Direct access of PMC may interfere with NMI watchdog (do echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/nmi_watchdog as root) or other perf session. It is safer to use perf_event_open syscall.
Second question ... discovered that core.c file under linux-5.5.3/arch/x86/events/intel directory actually does setting and reading the performance counters
This file is part of perf_event_open syscall implementation (perf_events subsystem of the kernel, https://github.com/torvalds/linux/tree/master/kernel/events + https://github.com/torvalds/linux/tree/master/arch/x86/events).
To use this code you can use the perf tool or perf_event_open syscall.
You should not compile the perf_events subsystem of the kernel as separate module because it is already compiled into your kernel (intel/amd specific part can be partially ko) and the Subsystem itself does not support compilation as module:
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/tree/master/kernel/events
Makefile: obj-y := core.o ring_buffer.o callchain.o
How can I make my Ubuntu kernel use all the files linked to core.c from kernel.org and build the .ko file?
Your ubuntu kernel already have all perf_events subsystem files compiled, some are linked into the kernel image and other are .ko files already installed like intel-rapl-perf.ko
$ grep _PERF_ /boot/config-`uname -r`
$ ls -l /lib/modules/`uname -r`/kernel/arch/x86/events/intel
I am working on microzed 7010 board, I have manualy compiled kernel, u-boot, fsbl, and .bit (vivado). Board is booting well with all setup (without using petalinux). But i have noticed that kernel is not Uncompressing kernel... with zImage nor uImage. whereas i can see bootlogs with that of petalinux's images.
INPUT :
1 . zImage env is
zImage=tftpboot 0x3000000 zImage && tftpboot 0x2A00000 system.dtb && bootz 0x3000000 - 0x2A00000
2 . Boot log is =>
Zynq> run zImage
[2017-10-25 15:57:11
ethernet#e000b000 Waiting for PHY auto negotiation to complete......... TIMEOUT !
[2017-10-25 15:57:15
Zynq> run zImage
[2017-10-25 15:57:22
Using ethernet#e000b000 device
TFTP from server 172.16.9.187; our IP address is 172.16.9.25
Filename 'zImage'.
Load address: 0x3000000
Loading:#####################################################################################################################################################################################################################################
3.9 MiB/s
done
Bytes transferred = 3913840 (3bb870 hex)
Using ethernet#e000b000 device
TFTP from server 172.16.9.187; our IP address is 172.16.9.25
Filename 'system.dtb'.
Load address: 0x2a00000
Loading: #
3.3 MiB/s
done
Bytes transferred = 13644 (354c hex)
Kernel image # 0x3000000 [ 0x000000 - 0x3bb870 ]
## Flattened Device Tree blob at 02a00000
Booting using the fdt blob at 0x2a00000
Loading Device Tree to 1fff9000, end 1ffff54b ... OK
Starting kernel ...
Booting Linux on physical CPU 0x0
Linux version 4.6.0-xilinx-00003-g2762bc9 (pritam#pritam) (gcc version 5.2.1 20151005 (Linaro GCC 5.2-2015.11-2) ) #3 SMP PREEMPT Wed Oct 25 10:28:387
[2017-10-25 15:57:24
CPU: ARMv7 Processor [413fc090] revision 0 (ARMv7), cr=18c5387d
3 . In u-boot I have given bootz support
4 . uImage is formed by
mkimage -A arm -O linux -T kernel -C none -a 0x10000000 -e 0x10000000 -n "Linux kernel" -d arch/arm/boot/zImage uImage
What causing it not to uncompress kernel ? Is u-boot compressing the kernel and booting ?
Any help will be appreciated.
Thanks and regards,
Pritam
Board is booting well with all setup (without using petalinux). But i have noticed that kernel is not Uncompressing kernel... with zImage nor uImage.
Some kernels can perform this step silently. The fact that you load a zImage (or a zImage in a uImage), and then see the Linux kernel version line means that the kernel has been uncompressed successfully and is executing
What causing it not to uncompress kernel ?
Your presumption that the kernel is not being uncompressed is simply wrong.
The zImage or uImage files that you are using are compressed kernel images. Since the kernel is actually executing (as evidenced by the boot log that you posted), the kernel must have silently uncompressed and proceeded to boot.
If the kernel did not uncompress (as you assert), then the kernel could not boot successfully (as you reported).
Is u-boot compressing the kernel and booting ?
No, U-Boot is not involved in uncompressing a zImage file.
A zImage is a self-extracting compressed Image file.
Depending on how the kernel was configured, the uncompression of the zImage file can be silent or verbose.
I have cloned the source codes from petalinux downloads. The boot logs, I got from images built by petalinux, shows Uncompressing kernel .... message. " Starting kernel ... Uncompressing Linux... done, booting the kernel. Booting Linux on physical CPU 0x0 Linux version 4.6.0-xilinx (pritam#pritam) (gcc version 5.2.1" So i am expecting it to show "uncompressing kernel " message
Using the same source code is only one requisite for building a duplicate kernel.
You also need to build with the same configuration.
The silent or verbose uncompression is selected by kernel configuration.
From arch/arm/Kconfig.debug:
menu "Kernel hacking"
...
config DEBUG_LL
bool "Kernel low-level debugging functions (read help!)"
depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
help
Say Y here to include definitions of printascii, printch, printhex
in the kernel. This is helpful if you are debugging code that
executes before the console is initialized.
Note that selecting this option will limit the kernel to a single
UART definition, as specified below. Attempting to boot the kernel
image on a different platform *will not work*, so this option should
not be enabled for kernels that are intended to be portable.
...
prompt "Kernel low-level debugging port"
...
config DEBUG_ZYNQ_UART0
bool "Kernel low-level debugging on Xilinx Zynq using UART0"
depends on ARCH_ZYNQ
help
Say Y here if you want the debug print routines to direct
their output to UART0 on the Zynq platform.
config DEBUG_ZYNQ_UART1
bool "Kernel low-level debugging on Xilinx Zynq using UART1"
depends on ARCH_ZYNQ
help
Say Y here if you want the debug print routines to direct
their output to UART1 on the Zynq platform.
If you expect a verbose uncompression, then you need to select CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL, CONFIG_DEBUG_LL, and an appropriate serial port.
ADDENDUM (response to comment)
Which one is better way to compress the kernel. zImage or gzipping arch/arm/Image ... are they same ... ???
What metric are you going to use to measure "better"?
In the end, the result is the same: a compressed kernel Image.
How many of these image files to you have to save?
How crucial is saving space and load times (if any) versus self-extraction?
In mkimage if I specified -C "gzip", I noticed that at time of loading image in ram, u-boot uncompresses the gzipped image ... !!!
As I already commented, that is a mislabeling of a zImage file, and therefore wrong. The zImage is self-extracting, and should be labeled as "uncompressed" so that U-Boot does not try to perform uncompression.
Interestingly I cannot duplicate your claim at the shell prompt. A zImage renamed to zImage.gz cannot be gunzip'd:
gzip: zImage.gz: not in gzip format.
More importantly, I cannot replicate the results that you claim you got.
=> bootm 20080000 - 22000000
## Booting kernel from Legacy Image at 20080000 ...
Image Name: Linux kernel
Image Type: ARM Linux Kernel Image (gzip compressed)
Data Size: 5774280 Bytes = 5.5 MiB
Load Address: 20008000
Entry Point: 20008000
Verifying Checksum ... OK
## Flattened Device Tree blob at 22000000
Booting using the fdt blob at 0x22000000
Uncompressing Kernel Image ... Error: Bad gzipped data
gzip compressed: uncompress error -1
Must RESET board to recover
resetting ...
Does u-boot contains external decompresser ... ???
If you had bothered to read the link I had provided previously, the answer would be obvious.
U-Boot can be configured to have gzip, bzip2, lzma, and lzo compression algorithms.
However the Linux kernel supports compressing the Image file using gzip, lzo, lzma, xz, and lz4 compression algorithms, that is, a wider selection of size versus time tradeoffs.
Which one better compression method whether in u-boot or kernel (zImage).
Again, what metric are you going to use to measure "better"?
Of course Wolfgang Denk has his opinion.
Plz explain me with actual example (If any h/w requirement) ... !!!
Example of what?
I've already answered your question, and explained how you can configure your kernel to get the expected message.
The issue was with specifying the compression type "-C" as none.
mkimage -A arm -O linux -T kernel **-C none** -a 0x10000000 -e 0x10000000 -n "Linux kernel" -d arch/arm/boot/zImage uImage
So I tried with vmlinux. and converted it to gzip
mkimage -A arm -O linux -T kernel **-C gzip** -a 0x10008000 -e 0x10008000 -n 'Test' -d vmlinux.bin.gz uImage.
So I have noticed size of both images .
first one is of vmlinux and another of zImage
So please correct me if i am misunderstood .
I have a simple Kernel module:
void GPIO_LED(void) {
printk(" GPIO: set PC8: '0');
at91_set_gpio_value(AT91_PIN_PC8, 1);
}
//
int init_module(void) {
GPIO_LED();
return 0;
}
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
When using it with mdev device management. everything works just fine. But using it with a udev device management, while executing insmod
insmod /usr/modules/measurement_gpio.ko
the following message appeared:
insmod: can't insert '/usr/modules/measurement_gpio.ko': invalid module format
Another test showed that when using a device table instead of mdev/udev leads to the same Error. Every setting stayed the same (especially the kernel version) but the device management changes during this Test, so actually the module should be fine.
How can that be and how to solve it?
[Edit:] after making the kernel be able for load modules for multiple versions i receive the following message, which confuses me even more:
measurement_gpio: version magic '2.6.39 mod_unload modversions ARMv5 ' should be '2.6.39 mod_unload ARMv5
[Edit2:]
The way I build my module is:
with Buildroot I'm generating an Image, on the way a Linux
2.6.39 is installed.
Afterwards I'm compiling the kernelmodule with the path to the Linux 2.6.39, that buildroot has downloaded.
When the module is created I'm putting it into a fs-overlay
directory, so it will be included into the image on next build.
I hit another "make" on buildroot and i got everything together and a bootable Image.
I change nothing, that's why it confuses me even more
eCryptfs is a POSIX-compliant encrypted filesystem that has been part of the mainline Linux Kernel since version 2.6.19.
When I try to insert the module (ecryptfs.ko), I get the following error:
insmod: error inserting 'ecryptfs.ko': -1 Cannot allocate memory
Can some one please help me out?
below is the dmesg
Failed to allocate one or more kmem_cache objects
kmem_cache_create: duplicate cache ecryptfs_auth_tok_list_item
Pid: 3332, comm: insmod Tainted: G O 3.2.2+ #1
Call Trace:
[<c102bfe0>] ? printk+0x15/0x17
[<c10878b6>] kmem_cache_create+0x41c/0x458
[<d0ebd038>] ecryptfs_init+0x38/0x1b1 [ecryptfs]
[<c1001071>] do_one_initcall+0x71/0x118
[<d0ebd000>] ? 0xd0ebcfff
[<c1055703>] sys_init_module+0x60/0x18c
[<c12db9b0>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x36
ecryptfs_init_kmem_caches: ecryptfs_auth_tok_list_item: kmem_cache_create
failed
Failed to allocate one or more kmem_cache objects
Start with the error you are seeing in dmesg:
kmem_cache_create: duplicate cache ecryptfs_auth_tok_list_item
When the ecryptfs module is loaded the first thing it does is create a bunch of memory caches for itself. The error suggests that there is already a cache with that name.
You can check if the cache already exists by looking at sysfs:
$ ls -ld /sys/kernel/slab/ecryptfs*
NB. It may not show up in /proc/slabinfo due to slab merging.
If you see any ecryptfs slabs that suggests the ecryptfs module is already loaded, or it is already built into your kernel.
Normally the module loader would not let you load the same module twice, but perhaps you have done something weird to confuse it.
A likely cause of something like this happening is if one recompiles and installs a kernel and its modules but forgets to mount /boot before installing the kernel. After a reboot, one will then run with the old kernel but new modules. In any event, check that the running kernel is current, and reinstall both the kernel and the modules if in doubt:
mount /boot
cd /usr/src/linux
make && make install && make modules_install
I have done the above steps and error was solved
I am trying to use GDB to debug a Linux kernel zImage before it is decompressed. The kernel is running on an ARM target and I have a JTAG debugger connected to it with a GDB server stub. The target has to load a boot loader. The boot loader reads the kernel image from flash and puts it in RAM at 0x20008000, then branches to that location.
I have started GDB and connected to the remote target, then I use GDB's add-symbol-file command like so:
add-symbol-file arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux 0x20008000 -readnow
When I set a breakpoint for that address, it does trap at the correct place - right when it branches to the kernel. However, GDB shows the wrong line from the source of arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S. It's 4 lines behind. How can I fix this?
I also have tried adding the -s section addr option to add-symbol-file with -s .start 0x20008000; this results in exactly the same problem.
There are assembler macros that print out stuff when compiling with low level debug. You have to make sure the macros are appropriate for your board.
linux-latest/arch/arm$ find . -name debug-macro.S | wc
56 56 2306
Find the file for your board and ensure the correct serial port registers are hit. You can instrument the code with out using JTAG. These macros are used in the decompress code. Of course configure with *CONFIG_DEBUG_LL*.
Most likely the ATAGs are not correct or one of the other requirements. Checkout Documentation/arm/Booting to make sure you have registers set properly. Note there is a new requirement with recent kernels to send a dt list.