I have a multi-module maven project.
I hold the version in one location in the parent pom.xml as a property
and then use this in the parent pom.xml:
<project>
<artifactId>autoav</artifactId>
<version>${autoAvVersion}</version>
...
<properties>
<autoAvVersion>19.3.24-SNAPSHOT</autoAvVersion>
</properties>
</project>
And use this in the child module :
<project>
<groupId>com.mycompany.analysis</groupId>
<version>${autoAvVersion}</version>
<artifactId>analysisCore</artifactId>
<parent>
<groupId>com.mycompany.analysis</groupId>
<version>${autoAvVersion}</version>
<artifactId>autoav</artifactId>
<relativePath>../autoAV</relativePath>
</parent>
...
</project>
Maven release plugin, after running prepare+perform on the child project only (just for testing one module), changed my child pom version from
<version>${autoAvVersion}</version>
to
<version>19.3.25-SNAPSHOT</version>
So i suppose the release plugin did not think of cases using a single point version.
(By the way if i omit the version tag in the child, so it effectively gets it from the parent, the version tag without the property [19.3.25-SNAPSHOT] is still added to the child
Is there any solution to this ?
I want to dynamically update my parent version and artefactId.
Let's say I have the following pom.xml
<parent>
<groupId>com.company</groupId>
<artifactId>my-parent</artifactId>
<version>1.0.0</version>
</parent>
<artifactId>my-child</artifactId>
<version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
Is there any possibility to update (set) parent artefactId/version.
I.e. I can set a child version via versions plugin
mvn org.codehaus.mojo:versions-maven-plugin:2.7:set -DnewVersion=1.2.3-SNAPSHOT
Is there something like it for parent updating?
You can use versions:update-parent to update your parent pom to the latest version. I never heard of a plugin to change the artifactId.
I would be interested to know why more than parent pom is required.
I am using Maven for building my code. I created module based maven structure like below:
Parent POM
Child POM
Parent POM:
<project ..>
<groupId>the.company.project</groupId>
<artifactId>Parent-POM</artifactId>
<version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
...
<properties>
<module.version>1.0</module.version>
</properties>
</project>
Child POM:
<project ..>
<groupId>the.company.project</groupId>
<artifactId>Child-POM</artifactId>
<version>${module.version}</version>
...
</project>
When I update the module version from 1.0 to 2.0 in Parent POM, and I run command mvn clean install -Ponline -Dmaven.test.skip=true, I find it still compiles the 1.0 version of module. However, when I run the mvn command again, I find it starts to use the new 2.0 version, I wonder if there is any cache for mvn?
I have parent module A that has module B as its dependency. If I increment version of B for just a simple bug fix, that does not change any API or break anything, do I still need to increment version of A?
Example:
A:1.10.0 --> B:2.5.0
fixing B to 2.5.1
In this case, A on Maven depends on older version of B, therefore, it seems it make sense to increate the version of A, too; so to have:
A:1.10.1 --> B:2.5.1
even though we didnt change anything in A.
Is this correct?
Yes, you are correct. If you change version of any of the dependency, you will need to build and release parent project again. This will create the new released version of your parent module A.
(Here, I am assuming that parent module A packaging type is other than pom. If the packaging type is pom, then its a different story altogether.)
Edited:
When you say parent project, you will declare its packaging as pom. It will have it's own version.
<project>
<modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
<groupId>com.mycompany.app</groupId>
<artifactId>parent</artifactId>
<version>0.1-SNAPSHOT</version>
<packaging>pom</packaging>
<modules>
<module>web-project</module>
</modules>
</project>
You can also refer to some modules (child projects) in your parent pom declaration.
<parent>
<groupId>com.mycompany.app</groupId>
<artifactId>parent</artifactId>
<version>0.1-SNAPSHOT</version>
</parent>
<artifactId>web-project</artifactId>
<packaging>war</packaging>
Then for submodules there is no need to declare any version for it. Parent version will be carried over to the child project. You can override version in the child project but that's not a common practice. So your parent pom version will be incremented automatically when you release it with maven. And this new version will be carried over to child projects (modules) also.
See this - Maven project version inheritance - do I have to specify the parent version?
So parent module A, I was referring to the above case.
And maven repo - can be of two types - local repository and remote repository. Local repo is where maven looks for resolviing dependencies. This is on your machine. If maven doesn't find it there, maven retrieve those depedencies from remote repository.
In maven multi-module projects where I want each of the modules to always keep the same version as the parent, I've typically done something like the following in the module's pom.xml:
<parent>
<groupId>com.groupId</groupId>
<artifactId>parentArtifactId</artifactId>
<version>1.1-SNAPSHOT</version>
</parent>
<groupId>com.groupId</groupId>
<artifactId>artifactId</artifactId>
<packaging>jar</packaging>
<version>${project.parent.version}</version>
<name>name</name>
Since I started using maven 3.0-alpha-5, I get the following warning for doing so.
[WARNING]
[WARNING] Some problems were encountered while building the effective model for com.groupid.artifactId:name:jar:1.1-SNAPSHOT
[WARNING] 'version' contains an expression but should be a constant. # com.groupid.artifactId:name::${project.parent.version}, /Users/whaley/path/to/project/child/pom.xml
[WARNING]
[WARNING] It is highly recommended to fix these problems because they threaten the stability of your build.
[WARNING]
[WARNING] For this reason, future Maven versions might no longer support building such malformed projects.
[WARNING]
I'm curious to know what the real problem with tying a module's version to the parent version is, if any? Or is this a case of a general warning when any expression, regardless of whether it's project.parent.version, is used for the version element.
I'm curious to know what the real problem with tying a module's version to the parent version is, if any? Or is this a case of a general warning when any expression, regardless of whether it's project.parent.version, is used for the version element.
Well, that would be easy to test. Because I was curious, I just did it for you using the following pom:
<project>
<modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
<parent>
<artifactId>parent</artifactId>
<groupId>com.mycompany</groupId>
<version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
</parent>
<groupId>com.mycompany</groupId>
<artifactId>module</artifactId>
<version>${myversion}</version>
<name>module</name>
<url>http://maven.apache.org</url>
<properties>
<myversion>1.0-SNAPSHOT</myversion>
</properties>
...
</project>
And maven is indeed complaining:
[WARNING] 'version' contains an expression but should be a constant. # com.mycompany:module:${myversion}, /home/pascal/Projects/maven-maven3-testcase/module/pom.xml
To be honest, I think that maven is right here, it doesn't make much sense to use a property for the <version> element (at least not for project.version) and it's nice to have maven complaining about it.
And if you want to use the parent pom version in sub-modules, just remove the <version> tag from the child poms, they will inherit the version from the parent. What you are currently doing is unnecessary.
I might be late here to discuss on this. I got a simple solution for this WARNING.
First of all, if you want that all child modules will take same version as parent, then you just remove <version> tag from child POM and as you include <parent> in child POM, that should be there.
In absence of <version> in child POM, it will automatically take Parent POM version.
Now if you want to use property in parent POM version and want to get the same in all child-modules, you can go through as follow.
There is no limitation on using property in <version> part of parent or child POM. But if you use your own xml tag for specifying that or you use your own property, then WARNING comes, (although this is just warning, everything works as expected).
But if you want to get rid of this WARNING, you can follow these steps:
Create <properties> inside POM.xml as below
<properties>
<revision>1.0.0</revision> <!-- Put your version -->
</properties>
In <version> of the POM.xml, put as follow
<version>${revision}</version>
Sample code snippet (for multi-module project):
<groupId>abc.xyz</groupId>
<artifactId>pqr</artifactId>
<!-- <version>1.0.0</version> -->
<version>${revision}</version>
<packaging>pom</packaging>
<description>Parent POM</description>
<properties>
<revision>1.0.0</revision>
</properties>
Note: Instead of <revision>, if you use any other name (for example, <my.version>), you will face that WARNING
Now if you want to pass version during mvn deploy, you can use mvn deploy "-Drevision=1.0.0-SNAPSHOT" and similarly for mvn install also.
Now if above configuration, you want to use as Parent POM, and you want to use same version in all child module, that can also be done. In each child module POM, use below
<parent>
<groupId>abc.xyz</groupId>
<artifactId>Parent</artifactId>
<!-- <version>1.0.0</version> -->
<version>${revision}</version>
</parent>
<groupId>abc.xyz</groupId>
<artifactId>Child</artifactId>
<!-- <version>1.0.0</version> --> <!-- Automatically inherit parent POM version -->
<name>Demo</name>
For reference, you can go through maven multi module setup
It seems that the warning is correct. See MNG-4717: "the pom that gets deployed will not have the property value resolved, so
anyone depending on that pom will pick up the dependency as being the
string uninterpolated with the ${ } and much hilarity will ensue in your
build process." "However, if one uses flatten-maven-plugin the deployed pom gets a resolved value."