Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
Is there a standard way to share state-machines (that is share the machine and synchronize it's state) between two languages? I'm using the state_machine gem on a server and I need to synchronize the machine with another server that will be written in another language. Is there a standard way of accomplishing this so that I can maximize compatibility despite not knowing the other language? At this point, I'm thinking I'm just going to make my own "protocol" built with REST requests and sharing the initial machine structure using serialization.
I would accept "there is no standard way" as an answer.
There is no standard way for doing that ...
Related
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
This is not directly a question regarding Prolog code, but rather about installing, administrating, and updating Prolog implementations...
Ideally, what I want to have on my machine is:
As many different Prolog implementations as possible
At all times, the most current (development) versions should be available
I might also want to have 2 or more versions side by side (stable / development)
A minimum overhead for installation, administration, etc.
I want to choose which Prolog implementation I use today after I start my machine up.
What can I do? What have you tried in this respect? I run Linux. Thank you in advance!
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
Do we really need to worry about endianness, if we are working on application level which doesn't involve communicating with other machine?
Endianness is also an issue when reading files. All good file formats specify which endianness they are using when writing numbers directly. This is one reason that some people prefer non-binary formats.
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
Just wondering if anyone could point me in the right direction for documentations that specifies what a Window application's file footprint is?
More specifically, I am looking for a documentation that specifies what registry files (and which hive) and files/directories must be created when an application is installed.
#Raymond Chen is totally right, however, there are some pretty common places to put things in the registry\file system based on the programs needs. I.E. Does it start on login or start up? It really depends on how the program interfaces with Windows. Hopefully that points you in the right direction.
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
As the question already suggests,
I'm trying to figure out, if it's possible to force another Application/process to use a specific output device.
Not every Application has a dropdown menu to select which audio device should be used and therefore always uses the standard device.
But when running multiple applications this isn't always the desired solution.
Plus, even if the application has a device-selection, it's almost always buried deep within the menus.
I was thinking of something like faking the change of the standard-device (but only to one application)
Looking forward for you answers :)
Greetings
Audio Hijack Pro already does this and it works great. Rogue Amoeba are the experts at Mac OS X audio.
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
All,
I am proposing the addition of code obfuscation to the standard build process at my organization. One of the questions being asked is whether there is a performance hit to running obfuscated code vs. running unobfuscated code.
What is your experience? Have you seen a reduction in performance at runtime because you obfuscated your Java or C# code?
Thanks,
VI
It depends on how you are obfuscating it. If you use one of the tools that replaces all the names of objets and functions, then there should be no change at all. The compilers don't care what you call anything, whether it's useful to a developer (fetchProjects()) or just (funcA()).
You may wish to read about my over-obfuscation experiments: Impact of Flow Obfuscation on Performance.