How to add citations in a web page? - jquery-plugins

I want to add bibliography citations in a web page.
What is the easiest way to do this ?
I have found JQuery plugins for creating footnotes, like this one, but they still require to write some boilerplate html code, and the definition of citation entries (e.g., [Einstein 1939.]) is not automatic :(
I am wondering if there is something in the style of bibtex for html pages.

There are several tools for generating citations and bibliographies in webpages that are based around the Citation Style Language. Which is most useful depends on your platform and desired source of bibliographic metadata. Examples are KCite (for WordPress), Zotpress (for WordPress in combination with Zotero), the Bibliography Module for Drupal, and pandoc.

Related

Laravel gettext or native localization? [closed]

Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
I would like to ask what and why would be the preferred tool for localizing Laravel projects? I have already used a gettext plugin and it worked well. I like using POedit which allows translators using it without programming skills. Plus, the translation hints are cool, too.
Is there any good reason for using Laravel native localization? Or, are there any cons of using gettext?
Thanks!
Why not both: GetText and native localization?
Using GetText with source text is great for developers to work quickly and efficiently on new features without having to "make up" keys, switching files, maintaining consistency between keys and source text etc. Also, using GetText makes it easier to check if everything is translated and you don't need to worry if some keys/values are obsolete.
Using PHP trans() with keys/values is great for copywriting. It's easy for the marketing team or CEO to change the text for all languages (included the source language) without changing the code.
For these reasons, we created https://translation.io/laravel that allows you to use both syntaxes at the same time (and we suggest to only use PHP key/value when the source text needs to be editable through the translation interface).
The package is here is you need more technical info: https://github.com/translation/laravel
The native localization method is described in the Laravel documentation. You basically maintain language files for all languages you want to translate to. To pull them out of the file, you use trans(), trans_choice() (for plural) or __() helpers in Blade template.
Thats the most basic translation handling. At one level higher you might want save all translations to the database. There exists a few packages on Github which doing this. Like:
https://github.com/dimsav/laravel-translatable
https://github.com/barryvdh/laravel-translation-manager
and more. Just search for Laravel Translation.
This method only works as long as you use Blade for the frontend. If you use VueJs, Angular or React, the blade helpers won't work anymore and you have to find different ways how to handle this. This might depend on existent language handling of the aforementioned frontend framework.
I wrote an blog article about that topic.
#Peter Matisko, can you give us a little update on how did you decide, which one are you preferring to use?
Personally I tried quite a couple of different translation libraries, but gettext is still first choice for me:
extract all the translations from code and generate translation files (*.po)
translations editor that runs on Mac, Windows and Unix (Poedit initial release ~20 years ago)
translating plural forms

DOTNETNUKE development [closed]

Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 4 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm developing websites using asp.net. Now, I'm interested in developing a website using dotnetnuke. Big question is:
When using dotnetnuke do I have to develop model for every little thing that is gonna be part of site content (for instance text form and button , datetimepicker, datagrid showing some data from database)?
As far as I can see you can add content like text, images and video using control panel of dotnet nuke but what if I want to put Image gallery that is using jquery, or just div element containing few controls.
Ps: when I create new website usign dotnetnuke control panel, where can I find html code of that site (is it possible to edit it in visual studio). I'm able to open whole dotnetnuke website and run it but I can see only Default.aspx.
In short, yes and no.
You can put HTML and jquery code into a variety of the modules that come with DotNetNuke, primarily the HTML module.
You can also "code" things using the Razor Host module if you want to add custom functionality to a page that isn't easily done with HTML or jquery.
The HTML code for a DNN site is stored in a database, depending on the module you use on a page that code could be in any number of database tables.
I would recommend taking a look at some of the "basic" webinars on our training page they will get you a general overview of things, and how you do development within the platform. http://www.dotnetnuke.com/Resources/Training.aspx#basicWebinars
Also check out the Wiki for more specific development questions and tutorials.
You don't have HTML code for every page in DNN. But if you want then you can create skins for pages and add html modules for the content in the respective pages.
You can create image gallery which uses jquery, for that you need to create visualizer for that section of images. You need to use the concept of liquid content, which allows you to use jquery, css and HTML(Visualizer Template) for that section.

Does an open source markup->HTML tool exist for Confluence wiki markup?

There are many libraries for transforming markups like reStructuredText and markdown to HTML. I have some users who are familiar with the markup used in Atlassian's Confluence wiki product, which is unfortunately proprietary -- is there any open source compiler for the confluence wiki markup format, or possibly something that would transform it to an intermediate format?
I think Confluence uses the Textile markup format. I have used over the last few years a rails application that used the gem RedCloth to do the transformation, and I could switch between the 2 formats. I never checked if it is complete interchangeable, however.
You could check for yourself if it is sufficient at Try RedCloth.

Static site generator based upon directories & files [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 9 months ago.
Improve this question
I am looking for a nice way to generate a nested site structure in ruby. I want something that I can propose to clients instead of msword documents. Something of the form:
Home/
index.txt
About.txt
Services/
index.txt
products.txt
blahblah.txt
with the .txt files being markdown, or whatever.
I actually want to import this into a cms system, and just want to hook into whichever static-site generator that I can use.
Otherwise I will do it myself, but it would be nice to use something else for integration with html preprocessors etc.
Take a look at Jekyll
there is also middleman for generating static sites
How about either of
Ace
nanoc
webby or
StaticMatic?
The simplest of those I have seen is Stacey, though it does not run static content, it generates it on the fly, and its in PHP, but yeah it's just files and folders, even if you drop images or videos or pdf's on the folder they will be managed and added automatically. And they are just .txt files. http://www.staceyapp.com/
But, if I had to choose a static compiler in Ruby I'd go with nanoc. It's the most powerful and flexible I've seen and once you configure it with the rules and such, it's just files and folders too.
There is also Stasis, I haven't tried it but it seems pretty good.
http://stasis.me/
Here's a gist featuring the most popular ones: https://gist.github.com/2254924
Monkeyman (Scala) supports markdown and SCAML, the Scala version of SCAML. It will basically copies and transforms a folder structure, in any way you like. Without any processing it will copy the structure as is, but it has a slew of decorators that not only are able to transform the content, but also the location to anything you like.
It doesn't support compass, SASS or any of that yet (although being based on Scalate, it probably does transform coffeescript embedded into the template pages, but I haven't tried that.)
DocPad works quite well. It supports a broad range of preprocessors.
Let's check my open source static file CMS it's taken markdown or HTML files from directory structure and generates HTML files.
It's written in Nodejs (source codes) and it's very flexible - you can choose to use React, Nunjucks or plain javascript for templates

Disqus and SEO Friendly comments [closed]

Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 11 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm looking for a hosted platform for managing comments on my website.
I came across http://disqus.com/.
Disqus seems to be feature rich, with on my top list requirements support for SEO friendly comments.
So I check many website using Disqus and I cannot find any of theme have friendly SEO comments.
For SEO friendly I mean that comments should be considered plain text and be visible in the HTML source page.
Also I notice that Disqus works only with JAVASCRIPT enabled.
Do you know if the SEO feature for Disqus it is really working and how?
Most important I need this SEO feature working in Universal Code, I use a custom CMS.
The problem with Disqus is that it uses JavaScript to render comments, so, when robots come to your site, they don't find the comments. Even if it uses index-friendly "#!" URLs, those are still not your page, so, they're not applicable here.
They have a REST API you can use. My idea here is to bring all comments from API by code and write it to HTML inside one container then hide this container via JavaScript (not CSS, as I'm not sure whether robots will hate that, but JS is not discover-able).
Then I'd still have the Disqus JS widget, because the API won't bring me all the nice features Disqus direct use has. When a user adds a link, it won't be added to hidden HTML until the page is refreshed, but who cares, it's hidden anyway, Disqus will update their JavaScript and comment will be visible.
The down-side of course is the user is now downloading the comments twice. You can solve this too by doing some checks for request user-agent string or whatever to tell whether the page is requested by robot or not, and display the comments from the API in HTML only in this case (and then you won't even care about hiding it).
Of course there is a trade-off between time implementing this and how effective-nice it can be, but it's at least achievable.
...
P.S. I also heard the WordPress and Drupal plugins render HTML too in addition to JS. So, if you develop semi-dynamic or CMS websites on top of any of them, you can get that already. See Getting Disqus html code to show in source for SEO purposes.
The fact that Disqus script loading the content via AJAX will be less of an issue soon, because Google starts crawling and indexing such content.

Resources