I have a requirement where in if a PO_ID range is given then I need to do the following:
If a PO_ID from the PO_ID range is present in PS_DISTRIB_LINE then print PO_ID and Voucher ID and if not then print PI_ID and PO_DT from PS_PO_HDR.
How to achieve this.
Union is not working and I am not able to use break logic because if data is present in PS_DISTRIB_LINE then I am printing Sum of PO_AMT Total below the PO_IDs but in other case i am not.
UNION is possible in SQR, but the syntax is difficult.
You will need to put the UNION in parenthesis and make sure to put commas after the selected items. In the example below, I put commas after a.name, a.first_name, and a.last_name. Repeat this for b.name, b.first_name, and b.last_name.
I've run this example and this works for me:
begin-SELECT
employee_name.name
employee_name.first_name
employee_name.last_name
Show 'employee_name.name: ' &employee_name.name
Show 'employee_name.first_name: ' &employee_name.first_name
Show 'employee_name.last_name: ' &employee_name.last_name
from
(
select
a.name,
a.first_name,
a.last_name
from ps_names a
where name_type = 'PRI'
and emplid = '000000001'
union
select
b.name,
b.first_name,
b.last_name
from ps_personal_data b
where emplid = '000000001'
) employee_name
end-SELECT
Related
FOR the ISBN['9780495809135'] if CATEGORY_EXISTS column return as 1234,3454 then query is throwing below error.if it returns single row then its not throwing error.
I want to write in the topmost query say if CATEGORY_EXISTS ='Category Not Found' then FILE_NAME column then should display as 'files not found' otherwise pass the CATEGORY_EXISTS values with comma separated to top most most query.
Please note that this is just pseduo query,in the actual query lot of other tables and joins are there,
ORA-01722: invalid number
01722. 00000 - "invalid number"
*Cause: The specified number was invalid.
*Action: Specify a valid number.
SELECT ISBN ,
(SELECT LISTAGG(ANP.FILE_NAME, ',') WITHIN GROUP (
ORDER BY ANP.FILE_NAME)
FROM TABLE1 T
WHERE T.NODE_ID IN( CATEGORY_EXISTS)
)FILE_NAME
FROM
(SELECT ISBN,
(SELECT (
CASE
WHEN COUNT(DISTINCT AN.ID) > 0
THEN LISTAGG(AN.ID, ',') WITHIN GROUP (
ORDER BY AN.ID)
ELSE 'Category Not Found'
END )
FROM TABLE1 aca
JOIN TABLE2 AN
ON ACA.CHILD_NODE_ID=AN.ID
WHERE PARENT_NODE_ID=GT_CHILD_NODE_ID
) CATEGORY_EXISTS
FROM
(SELECT ISBN,
(SELECT ID FROM TEMP_CHILD_ASSOC ac WHERE CHILD_NODE_NAME=GT.ISBN
) GT_CHILD_NODE_ID
FROM MAIN_TABLE GT
WHERE ISBN='9780495809135'
)
);
The listagg() function generates a string of comma-separated values (if there is more than one ID). The case expression gives you either that generated string, of the fixed text literal (if there are no IDs). You are then trying to compare that string to a number; effectively one of these:
WHERE T.NODE_ID IN ('4321')
WHERE T.NODE_ID IN ('1234,3454')
WHERE T.NODE_ID IN ('Category Not Found')
You are implicitly converting the string to a number to compare it with NODE_ID. The first one will work as the implicit conversion is valid. The second will give you ORA-01722 (unless you have exactly two values, and your NLS decimal separator is a comma; but still won't give a match), and the third will also give that error - because those strings cannot be converted to numbers.
It's possible you are expecting the second one to be magically treated as two numbers inside the IN() clause, but that isn't how it works; it's getting a single string literal, not an actual list of numbers it can understand.
The IN condition does accept a list of multiple comma-separated expressions, but you are passing in a single string. The fact that string happens to consist of comma-separated values is irrelevant: it is itself still just a single expression. And that cannot be converted implicitly to a number.
If you have, or can create, a schema-level table type like:
create type my_number_tab as table of number
/
then you could use the collect() function to convert the IDs into a collection instead of a string, and then use member of to find matches; something like (with a bit of interpretation of your pseudocode):
SELECT ISBN ,
(SELECT LISTAGG(ANP.FILE_NAME, ',') WITHIN GROUP (
ORDER BY ANP.FILE_NAME)
FROM TABLE3 ANP
WHERE ANP.NODE_ID MEMBER OF CATEGORIES -- use collection
)FILE_NAME
FROM
(SELECT ISBN,
(SELECT CAST(COLLECT(AN.ID) AS my_number_tab) -- create collection not string
FROM TABLE1 aca
JOIN TABLE2 AN
ON ACA.CHILD_NODE_ID=AN.ID
WHERE PARENT_NODE_ID=GT_CHILD_NODE_ID
) CATEGORIES
FROM
(SELECT ISBN,
(SELECT ID FROM TEMP_CHILD_ASSOC ac WHERE CHILD_NODE_NAME=GT.ISBN
) GT_CHILD_NODE_ID
FROM MAIN_TABLE GT
WHERE ISBN='9780495809135'
)
);
It looks like you could also join to anp inside the inner query instead, so in that you generate the string list of file names rather than (or as well as) the string list of IDs. It's hard to tell from the pseudocode though; but perhaps something like:
SELECT ISBN,
(SELECT (
CASE
WHEN COUNT(DISTINCT AN.ID) > 0
THEN LISTAGG(ANP.FILE_NAME, ',') WITHIN GROUP (
ORDER BY ANP.FILE_NAME)
ELSE 'Category Not Found'
END )
FROM TABLE1 aca
JOIN TABLE2 AN
ON ACA.CHILD_NODE_ID=AN.ID
JOIN TABLE3 ANP
ON ANP.NODE_ID=AN.ID
WHERE ACA.PARENT_NODE_ID=GT_CHILD_NODE_ID
) FILE_NAME
FROM
(SELECT ISBN,
(SELECT ID FROM TEMP_CHILD_ASSOC ac WHERE CHILD_NODE_NAME=GT.ISBN
) GT_CHILD_NODE_ID
FROM MAIN_TABLE GT
WHERE ISBN='9780495809135'
);
You could probably also do the same thing with left outer joins (though perhaps they don't all need to be), although your comment suggests you have a reason for using subqueries instead:
SELECT GT.ISBN,
CASE WHEN COUNT(AN.ID) = 0 THEN 'files not found'
ELSE LISTAGG(ANP.FILE_NAME, ',') WITHIN GROUP (ORDER BY ANP.FILE_NAME)
END AS file_name
FROM MAIN_TABLE GT
LEFT JOIN TEMP_CHILD_ASSOC ac ON CHILD_NODE_NAME=GT.ISBN
LEFT JOIN table1 aca ON aca.parent_node_id = ac.id
LEFT JOIN table2 an on an.id = ACA.CHILD_NODE_ID
LEFT JOIN table3 anp on anp.node_id = an.id
WHERE GT.ISBN = '9780495809135'
GROUP BY GT.ISBN;
or something like that; again hard to tell from the pseudocode...
I need output from the below two queries simultaneously in one output window.
QUERY 1
SELECT C.SERVICENAME, C.SERVICEID , B.SOAPIN, B.SOAPOUT, A.TIMESTAMP
FROM Schema1.LG_LOGENTRIES A, Schema1.LG_SOAPREQUESTS B, Schema1.CFG_SOAPSERVICES C
WHERE B.SERVICEID =C.SERVICEID AND
C.SERVICENAME <>'UploadAndPrepareDocumentEx1__sdweb_services_preload' AND
A.ID=B.LOGENTRYID AND B.TIMESTAMP BETWEEN TO_DATE('02/01/2018 11:55:00','dd/mm/yyyy hh24:mi:ss')
AND TO_DATE('02/01/2018 12:03:59','dd/mm/yyyy hh24:mi:ss') AND A.USERID IN (SELECT ID FROM Schema1.CFG_USERS
WHERE NAME=UPPER(TO_CHAR('CGBXGVSG')));
Query 2
SELECT B.JSONIN, B.JSONOUT, A.TIMESTAMP, B.EVENT_MESSAGE, A.PROCESSID, A.status, A.SERVERNAME
FROM Schema1.LG_LOGENTRIES A, Schema1.LG_EVENT B
WHERE B.EVENT_MESSAGE NOT IN ('getFileImage','submitBase64','loadDocumentToSign','getRefData') AND
A.ID=B.LOG_ENTRYID AND B.TIMESTAMP BETWEEN TO_DATE('31/12/2017 13:43:00','dd/mm/yyyy hh24:mi:ss')
AND TO_DATE('31/12/2017 13:53:59','dd/mm/yyyy hh24:mi:ss') AND A.USERID IN (SELECT ID FROM Schema1.CFG_USERS
WHERE NAME=UPPER(TO_CHAR('CTHX8Y2G')));
Run with F5 - you'll get both queries' output in the script panel.
I talk about how this differs here
UNION might be one option, but you'll have to
uniform both column lists (i.e. they have to return the same number of columns which have to be of the same data type), which means that you'd have to add certain NULL columns to both queries
include additional identifier so that you'd know which SELECT returned which values
If you wanted to have them side-by-side, huh, that's not that easy. Thinking loudly: you'd have to have a column that joins those values. Those SELECTs would be inline views. You'd use an aggregate function (such as MAX) along with a DECODE (or CASE) to select values from both queries. Shortly: too much pain.
Now, why do you want to do that? What's wrong with two separate windows, placed side by side?
[EDIT] Showing example of how UNION might look like
select c.servicename, c.serviceid, b.soapin, b.soapout, a.timestamp, to_char(null), to_char(null), to_char(null) , to_number(null), to_char(null), to_char(null)
from ... the rest of your 1st query
union
select null , null , null , null , a.timestamp, b.jsonin , b.jsonout , b.event_message, a.processid , a.status , a.servername
from ... the rest of your 2nd query
CURSOR BULKUPDATE IS
SELECT SUM(B.ACCOUNT_BALANCE) AS ACCOUNT_BALANCE,C.CIF AS CIF_ID FROM _ACCOUNTS_STAGING2 B JOIN _RELATION_STAGING2 C
ON B.ACCOUNT_IDENTIFICATION_NUMBER = C.ACCOUNT_IDENTIFICATION_NUMBER AND B.SOURCEID=C.SOURCEID JOIN _CUSTOMER_STAGING2 A ON A.CIF=C.CIF AND A.SOURCEID=C.SOURCEID WHERE C.ROLE_ON_ACCOUNT IN
(Select Rollonaccount From _Roleaccount_Master Where Aggregatebalance='Y')
And upper(B.Scheme_Type) In (Select Scheme_Type From _Schema_Type_Master Where
Depository_Account = 'Y') Group By C.Cif;
Rec_Bulkupdate Bulkupdate%Rowtype;
I am using this query to sum account balances based on different cif and source. The question is I want to calculate four different types of sum on the basis of _Schema_Type_Master. For example I want to check now current_account='Y' instead of Depository_Account='Y'
_ACCOUNTS_STAGING2 B JOIN _RELATION_STAGING2 C
ON B.ACCOUNT_IDENTIFICATION_NUMBER = C.ACCOUNT_IDENTIFICATION_NUMBER AND B.SOURCEID=C.SOURCEID JOIN _CUSTOMER_STAGING2 A ON A.CIF=C.CIF AND A.SOURCEID=C.SOURCEID WHERE C.ROLE_ON_ACCOUNT IN
(Select Rollonaccount From _Roleaccount_Master Where Aggregatebalance='Y')
And upper(B.Scheme_Type) In (Select Scheme_Type From _Schema_Type_Master Where
current_account='Y') Group By C.Cif;
Rec_Bulkupdate Bulkupdate%Rowtype;
Is there any way or do I need to write four different cursors for that??
You can remove dipository_account='Y' and current_account='Y' and use case in select as -
SELECT SUM(CASE WHEN Depository_Account = 'Y' THEN B.ACCOUNT_BALANCE ELSE 0 END) AS DIPOSITORY_ACCOUNT_BALANCE,
SUM(CASE WHEN current_account = 'Y' THEN B.ACCOUNT_BALANCE ELSE 0 END) AS CURRENT_ACCOUNT_BALANCE
and then rest of your code. You will get two different columns for sum of Depository account and Current account.
And if filter for dipository_account='Y' and current_account='Y' is required, then use them in where condition with or operator :
AND (dipository_account='Y' or current_account='Y')
I know the "how to limit" or "how to get 1st row" has been posted many times but I can't find a solution to my specific issue.
I have a inventory balance table that contains bin # with quantities
I want on my row the bin # that contains the highest quantity
The real queries are much bigger and complex than this but this example shows the issue I am facing
I first I did
select itemnumber,
(select binnumber from inventory_balance where current_balance = (select max(current_balance) from inventory_balance where inventory_balance.itemnumber = item_table.itemnumber)) as binnumber
from item_table;
This will work when there is only one "bin" with the highest quantity.
If there are 2 bins for the same item with a quantity of 10 (which is the highest quantity), the sub query will return 2 rows, triggering a oracle error
Then I tried this :
select
itemnumber,
(select binnumber from (select binnumber from inventory_balance where current_balance = (select max(current_balance) from inventory_balance where inventory_balance.itemnumber = item_table.itemnumber)) where rownum =1) as binnumber
from item_table;
Now this will not work because it seems that the references to item_table.itemnumber is invalid when inside the from (...). I get "invalid column name" error when trying to do so.
I can't use ROW_NUMBER() because the "OLAP Window functions" do not seem to be activated on the database.
Something like this:
SELECT t.itemnumber,
MIN( b.binnumber ) KEEP ( DENSE_RANK LAST ORDER BY b.current_balance ASC ) AS binnumber
FROM item_table t
LEFT OUTER JOIN inventory_balance b
ON ( t.itemnumber = b.itemnumber )
GROUP BY t.itemnumber;
Looking at the explain plan then this will only scan inventory_balance once whereas doing nested selects to get the MAX balance and then filter an outer query based on that requires two scans of inventory_balance.
Although all the required output for you minimal working example seems to be contained in the inventory_balance table so you can do (if you are not interested in the itemnumbers where there are no entries in the inventory_balance table):
SELECT itemnumber,
MIN( binnumber ) KEEP ( DENSE_RANK LAST ORDER BY current_balance ASC ) AS binnumber
FROM inventory_balance
GROUP BY itemnumber;
If you want the highest binnumber (instead of the lowest) then you can just change it to:
MAX( binnumber ) KEEP ...
chaps and chapettes
Just a quick question. I need to return only one row from a stored proc., but no matter where I place the WHERE clause, I get errors. Can somebody take a look at the (cut-down due to sheer length) code and let me know where it should go, please?
SELECT **values**
INTO **variables**
FROM **table**
_WHERE ROWNUM = 1_
INNER JOIN **other table**
ON **join target**
ORDER BY **sort criteria**;
_WHERE ROWNUM = 1_
Thanks
I believe this is the way to structure rownum queries
SELECT * FROM
INTO **Variables * *
( SELECT * FROM X
WHERE Y
ORDER BY Z
)
WHERE ROWNUM = 1;
You were almost correct. You put the WHERE clause after the JOINs, but before the ORDER BY.
SELECT **values**
INTO **variables**
FROM **table**
INNER JOIN **other table**
ON **join target**
_WHERE ROWNUM = 1_
ORDER BY **sort criteria**;
However, this won't do what you might think - the ORDER BY is evaluated AFTER the where clause; which means this will just pick the first record it finds (that satisfies the join criteria), and will then sort that row (which obviously is a no-op).
The other answers (e.g. IvoTops') give ideas of how to get the first record according to the sort criteria.
SELECT **values**
INTO **variables**
FROM
( SELECT **values**
, ROW_MUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY **sort criteria**) AS rn
FROM **table**
INNER JOIN **other table**
ON **join target**
) tmp
WHERE rn = 1 ;
Check also this blog post: Oracle: ROW_NUMBER() vs ROWNUM
little bit late, but I got a similar problem and I solved it like this:
SELECT **values**
INTO **variables**
FROM **table**
WHERE **condition**
ORDER BY **sort criteria**
FETCH FIRST 1 ROW ONLY;
Regards