I have this code which runs two loops after each other. It works fine for a few thousand rows. But as the number of rows increases, the code runs significantly longer. It should loop over 100.000 rows but this will take hours and hours.
Please let me know if you see a reason why this code is taking so long
Sub BSIS()
Application.ScreenUpdating = False
Application.Calculation = xlCalculationManual
Dim lngRow As Long
Dim counter As Long
'Merge rows with duplicate Cells
With ActiveSheet
.Cells(1).CurrentRegion.Sort key1:=.Cells(1), Header:=xlYes 'change this to xlYes if your table has header cells
For lngRow = ActiveSheet.UsedRange.Rows.Count To 2 Step -1
If ActiveSheet.Cells(lngRow - 1, 1) = ActiveSheet.Cells(lngRow, 1) Then
.Cells(lngRow - 1, 4) = .Cells(lngRow - 1, 4) + .Cells(lngRow, 4)
.Rows(lngRow).Delete
End If
Next lngRow
End With
'Delete rows with negative cells
With ActiveSheet
For counter = ActiveSheet.UsedRange.Rows.Count To 1 Step -1
If ActiveSheet.Cells(counter, 4) <= 0 Then
.Rows(counter).Delete
End If
Next counter
End With
Application.Calculation = xlCalculationAutomatic
Application.ScreenUpdating = True
End Sub
one option would be copying the range of data you want to examine into an array. Do what ever data processing you want with that array, then copy the results back into the excel sheet. Here is an example:
Dim i As Integer
Dim j As Integer
Dim flagMatch As Boolean
Dim arrData2Search As Variant
Set arrData2Search = Range(Cells(1, 1), Cells(1000, 2000)).value
flagMatch = False
For j = 1 To 1000
For i = 1 To 2000
If arrData2Search (i, j)= "Target" Then
flagMatch = True
End If
Next i
Next j
The reason for slow run is that you are deleting rows one by one.
It always better to do it in single shot using UNION function
Try the below code it should work,(Tested)
Dim uni As Range
With ActiveSheet
.Cells(1).CurrentRegion.Sort key1:=.Cells(1), Header:=xlYes
For lngRow = ActiveSheet.UsedRange.Rows.Count To 2 Step -1
If ActiveSheet.Cells(lngRow - 1, 1) = ActiveSheet.Cells(lngRow, 1) Then
.Cells(lngRow - 1, 4) = .Cells(lngRow - 1, 4) + .Cells(lngRow, 4)
If Not uni Is Nothing Then
Set uni = Application.Union(uni, Range(.Rows(lngRow).Address))
Else
Set uni = Range(.Rows(lngRow).Address)
End If
End If
Next lngRow
uni.Delete
End With
There are a number of ways to optimize performance of one's VBA code, and a good number of articles and forums have covered the topic. For a great resource, see this.
One of the main things to remember is that every time your code interacts with the UI of Excel, it uses much more overhead than if the interaction had not occurred. That's why (to VBA Programmer's point) it's much faster to load the data to an array, perform your calculations, and then write the array back to a sheet. And that's why (to Sathish's point) it's much faster to delete all the rows at once (one interaction) compared to each one individually (multiple interactions). For more information about deleting rows, see this.
With regards to your code, is there any particular reason you need two loops?
Untested
Sub BSIS()
Application.ScreenUpdating = False
Application.Calculation = xlCalculationManual
Dim lngRow As Long
Dim r As Range
With ActiveSheet
.Cells(1).CurrentRegion.Sort key1:=.Cells(1), HEADER:=xlYes 'change this to xlYes if your table has header cells
'One loop:
For lngRow = .UsedRange.Rows.Count To 2 Step -1
'Merge rows with duplicate Cells
If .Cells(lngRow - 1, 1) = .Cells(lngRow, 1) Then
.Cells(lngRow - 1, 4) = .Cells(lngRow - 1, 4) + .Cells(lngRow, 4)
If r Is Nothing Then
Set r = .Cells(lgnrow, 1)
Else: Set r = Union(r, .Cells(lgnrow, 1))
End If
'Delete rows with negative cells
If .Cells(lngRow, 4) <= 0 Then
If r Is Nothing Then
Set r = .Cells(lngRow, 1)
Else: Set r = Union(r, .Cells(lgnrow, 1))
End If
Next lngRow
End With
'Delete rows
r.EntireRow.Delete
Application.Calculation = xlCalculationAutomatic
Application.ScreenUpdating = True
End Sub
Related
I have one csv file which contains 10.000 rows.
The 2.000 rows have the value "EXPL_1".
The 3.000 rows have the value "EXPL_2".
The 2.500 rows have the value "EXPL_3".
The 1.500 rows have the value "EXPL_4".
The 2.000 rows have the value "EXPL_5".
I am searching a function which will mix (re-sort) alternately the values and will continue to mix them until to finish.
So the final result will be something like:
EXPL_1,
EXPL_2,
EXPL_3,
EXPL_4,
EXPL_5,
EXPL_1,
EXPL_2,
EXPL_3,
EXPL_4,
EXPL_5,
.......... (x times repeat)
EXPL_1,
EXPL_2,
EXPL_3,
EXPL_5, (*EXPL_4 values finished but continue to alternately mix the rest)
*The values are sorted by name (1st all EXPL_1, 2nd all EXPL_2 etc)
*Maybe in the future will appear more values.
*I know how many values I have in the list.
This code adds "manually" the values to the sheet, based on the quantity of the values. So if there are less values of some type, it will leave blank spaces. I used the cells on the speardsheet, but you can make operations on the array with the same logic, instead of creating a non contiguous range, you can add values to the array index using For loop Step
Dim ws As Worksheet
Dim one_rng As Range
Dim a1(), a2(), i As Long, ub As Long
Set ws = ThisWorkbook.Worksheets(1)
'Insert the number of values
For n = 1 To 5
If n = 1 Then
n_array = 20 'insert number of valuer for EXPL_1
ElseIf n = 2 Then
n_array = 30 'insert number of valuer for EXPL_2
ElseIf n = 3 Then
n_array = 25 'insert number of valuer for EXPL_3
ElseIf n = 4 Then
n_array = 15 'insert number of valuer for EXPL_4
ElseIf n = 5 Then
n_array = 20 'insert number of valuer for EXPL_5
End If
ReDim a1(1 To 1, 1 To n_array) As Variant
For i = 1 To n_array
a1(1, i) = CStr("EXPL_" & n)
Next i
ub = UBound(a1, 2)
ReDim a2(1 To ub, 1 To 1) 'resize a2 ("right" shape) to match a1
' "flip" the a1 array into a2
For i = 1 To ub
a2(i, 1) = a1(1, i)
Next i
For i = 5 + n To (5 + n) * (n_array - 1) Step 5
If i = (5 + n) Then Set one_rng = ws.Range("B" & n)
Set new_rng = ws.Range("B" & i)
Set one_rng = Union(one_rng, new_rng)
Next i
Debug.Print one_rng.Address 'Verify the Range
one_rng = a2
Next n
If it is desired to delete the blank spaces, some changes can be done.
You can .Autofilter for blank values on the range used (firstrow to last row) and then delete them.
Sub DeleteBlankRows()
Range("B:B").Cells.SpecialCells(xlCellTypeBlanks).EntireRow.Delete
End Sub
And after create an array and add the range to the array.
CODE EXPLANATION
Loop 5 times for the five types of EXPL_
For n = 1 To 5
Next n
Insert number of values to create array for each type
If n = 1 Then
n_array = 20 'insert number of valuer for EXPL_1
ElseIf n = 2 Then
n_array = 30 'insert number of valuer for EXPL_2
ElseIf n = 3 Then
n_array = 25 'insert number of valuer for EXPL_3
ElseIf n = 4 Then
n_array = 15 'insert number of valuer for EXPL_4
ElseIf n = 5 Then
n_array = 20 'insert number of valuer for EXPL_5
End If
Create Array
ReDim a1(1 To 1, 1 To n_array) As Variant
For i = 1 To n_array
a1(1, i) = CStr("EXPL_" & n)
Next i
ub = UBound(a1, 2)
ReDim a2(1 To ub, 1 To 1) 'resize a2 ("right" shape) to match a1
' "flip" the a1 array into a2
For i = 1 To ub
a2(i, 1) = a1(1, i)
Next i
Create non contiguous Range skipping 5 rows with the same number of rows as the elements of the array
For i = 5 + n To (5 + n) * (n_array - 1) Step 5
If i = (5 + n) Then Set one_rng = ws.Range("B" & n)
Set new_rng = ws.Range("B" & i)
Set one_rng = Union(one_rng, new_rng)
Next i
Insert array to range
one_rng = a2
Do you 'need' vba or can you use excel-standard methods?
If the later the easiest way in my opinion is the following:
Lets say your EXPL_1 etc. is from A1 to A....
Insert a column B and enter =countif($A$1:A1;A1) in B1.
Copy that formula down until the end of column A.
Sort your complete data by column B asc and column A asc
done :)
If you want to do it with vba you can use the same way with code:
Sub Mix_it()
Columns(2).Insert
Range(Range("B1"), Range("A" & Rows.Count).End(xlUp).Offset(0, 1)).Formula = "=COUNTIF($A$1:A1,A1)"
Range(Range("X1"), Range("A" & Rows.Count).End(xlUp)).Sort Range("B1"), xlAscending, Range("A1"), , xlAscending ' change 'X' to last column
Columns(2).Delete
End Sub
Sub MixData()
Dim arr(5) As Long 'IF expl_5 is highest - increase as necessary
Dim r As Range
Dim x As Integer
ActiveSheet.Columns(1).Insert
Set r = Range("A1")
Do
x = Val(Mid(r.Offset(0, 1), 6, 1))
arr(x) = arr(x) + 1
r.Value = arr(x)
Set r = r.Offset(1, 0)
Loop Until r.Offset(0, 1) = ""
ActiveSheet.UsedRange.Sort key1:=Range("a1")
ActiveSheet.Columns("A").Delete
End Sub
Private Sub Worksheet_SelectionChange(ByVal Target As Range)
Dim EXPL_1 As Variant
EXPL_1 = Array("EXPL_1", "EXPL_1", "EXPL_1", "EXPL_1") 'For you it should store the csv content
Dim EXPL_2 As Variant
EXPL_2 = Array("EXPL_2", "EXPL_2", "EXPL_2")
Dim EXPL_3 As Variant
EXPL_3 = Array("EXPL_3", "EXPL_3")
Dim EXPL_4 As Variant
EXPL_4 = Array("EXPL_4")
Dim intCounter As Integer
intCounter = 0 'is our array index
Dim valueInserted As Boolean
valueInserted = False 'With this var we check if any value got inserted
Do
valueInserted = False 'We reset it here so we dont run in an endless loop
'Here we check if the array contains anything if not we just ignore that array until the others finished
If UBound(EXPL_1) >= intCounter Then
Debug.Print (EXPL_1(intCounter)) 'Write this row
valueInserted = True
End If
If UBound(EXPL_2) >= intCounter Then
Debug.Print (EXPL_2(intCounter)) 'Write this row
valueInserted = True
End If
If UBound(EXPL_3) >= intCounter Then
Debug.Print (EXPL_3(intCounter)) 'Write this row
valueInserted = True
End If
If UBound(EXPL_4) >= intCounter Then
Debug.Print (EXPL_4(intCounter)) 'Write this row
valueInserted = True
End If
If valueInserted = False Then
'If we didnĀ“t inserted any value we exit the loop
Exit Do
End If
intCounter = intCounter + 1
Loop
End Sub
This can give you an idea how it would work. You sure will have to put some effort to seperate your CSV File in the 4 array but it should be done in some minutes. Hope it helps you.
Edit: Its now an working example it prints
EXPL_1
EXPL_2
EXPL_3
EXPL_4
EXPL_1
EXPL_2
EXPL_3
EXPL_1
EXPL_2
EXPL_1
I have a performance problem in my VBA-Excel code.
I have 42 rows and 55 columns (it can be increased).
My purpose is to merge the cells (in each 2 rows) that have same value using some steps (I want to make a gantt chart).
Before merge
After merge
The first step is merged on column based (for each 2 rows):
compare cell (row, col) and (row+1, col)
If it has same value, compare cell (row, col) and (row, col+1)
if it has same value, compare cell (row, col+1) and (row+1, col+1), check the next column, and go to step 1
if step 2 or 3 is false, then merge the cells from the first cell (row, col) until the last cell that have same value (cell(row + 1, col + n - 1)
if step 1 is false, then go to the next column
after that, I have to merge on row based (still for each 2 rows).
if the cell(row, col) and cell (row, col + 1) are not merged, if cell (row, col) and cell (row, col + 1) have the same value, go to next column.
if step 1 is false, then merge the cells from cell(row, col) until cell(row, col + n - 1)
I have created the code below, but I am facing a performance issue.
The time to finish this code is at least 4 minutes.
I tried to remove the merge line for checking, and the time is only 1 second.
I concluded that there is something not correct on the merge process, but I couldn't figure it out.
If you have any suggestion regarding my code, please share it.
Thank you very much...
Sub MergeCell()
Dim StartTime As Double, RunTime As Double
StartTime = Timer
Application.ScreenUpdating = False
Application.DisplayAlerts = False
Application.EnableEvents = False
Application.DisplayStatusBar = False
Application.Calculation = xlCalculationManual
Dim i As Long, j As Long, jmax1 As Long, maxRows As Long, maxCols As Long
Dim merge As Long, iMerge As Long, jMerge As Long, Jump As Long
Dim chckst As String
maxRows = 42
maxCols = 55
Dim Rng As Range, Rng3 As Range
Set Rng = Sheets("Sheet1").Range("E5").Resize(maxRows, maxCols)
Dim chk As Long
i = 1
Do While i < maxRows
j = 1
Do While j < maxCols
iMerge = 0
jMerge = 0
merge = 0
Jump = 0
If Rng.Cells(i, j).Value2 = Rng.Cells(i + 1, j).Value2 Then
jmax1 = j
iMerge = i + 1
jMerge = jmax1
merge = 1
For chk = jmax1 + 1 To maxCols - 1
If Rng.Cells(i, j).Value2 = Rng.Cells(i, chk).Value2 Then
If Rng.Cells(i, chk).Value2 = Rng.Cells(i + 1, chk).Value2 Then
jmax1 = jmax1 + 1
Else
Jump = 1
Exit For
End If
Else
Exit For
End If
Next
Else
j = j + 1
End If
If merge > 0 Then
'when I removed this merge line, the speed is good, like I said before
Range(Rng.Cells(i, j), Rng.Cells(iMerge, jmax1)).merge
j = jmax1 + 1
If Jump = 1 Then
j = j + 1
End If
End If
Loop
i = i + 2
Loop
RunTime = Round(Timer - StartTime, 2)
MsgBox "Run Time = " & RunTime & " seconds", vbInformation
Dim colId1 As Long, colId2 As Long
Dim colct As Long
i = 1
Do While i <= maxRows
j = 1
Do While j < maxCols
merge = 0
jmax1 = j
If Rng.Cells(i, jmax1).MergeCells = True Then
colct = Rng.Cells(i, jmax1).MergeArea.Columns.Count - 1
jmax1 = jmax1 + colct
j = jmax1 + 1
Else
For chk = jmax1 + 1 To maxCols
If Rng.Cells(i, j) = Rng.Cells(i, chk) And Rng.Cells(i, chk).MergeCells = False Then
merge = 1
colId1 = j
colId2 = jmax1 + 1
If chk <> maxCols Then
jmax1 = jmax1 + 1
Else
j = jmax1 + 1
Exit For
End If
Else
j = jmax1 + 1
Exit For
End If
Next
End If
If merge > 0 Then
'when I removed this merge line, the speed is good, like I said before
Range(Rng.Cells(i, colId1), Rng.Cells(i, colId2)).merge
End If
Loop
i = i + 1
Loop
Rng.HorizontalAlignment = xlCenter
Rng.VerticalAlignment = xlCenter
On Error GoTo HERE
HERE:
Application.ScreenUpdating = True
Application.DisplayAlerts = True
Application.EnableEvents = True
Application.DisplayStatusBar = True
Application.Calculation = xlCalculationAutomatic
RunTime = Round(Timer - StartTime, 2)
MsgBox "Done!" & vbNewLine & "Run Time = " & RunTime & " seconds", vbInformation
End Sub
The problem is in the conditional formatting.
I only need to remove the conditional formatting before merge, merge it, then put the conditional formatting again.
With this code, everything is fine and fast now. It's only need 2 seconds.
thank you for everyone who contributes to help..
regards,
Suggestion 1
declare variables like this:
Dim i as long, j as long, jmax1 as long, maxRows as long, maxCols as long etc. If you do not specify the type, they get declared as variant. In your line only the last one - Jump is declared as long.
If you redeclare them, it may run faster.
Suggestion 2
Do not use integers in VBA. stackoverflow.com/questions/26409117/
Suggestion 3
Do not use GoTo https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spaghetti_code
Suggestion 4
In general merge is slow in VBA/Excel. But still, to see what you are doing, write this before the merge:
debug.Print Range(Rng.Cells(i, j), Rng.Cells(iMerge, jmax1)).Address
It can be that you are merging more than expected or something else.
I see a lot of VBA code on this site using the Range method with For loops:
Range("A" & i)
As opposed to a proper Cells command:
Cells(i,1)
I always knew the Cells way was faster, partly because Range takes longer to resolve, and partly because concatenation (&) is a relatively slow process (as opposed to any other simple arithmetic operation - AFAIK).
So, the question is, is it really faster? By how much? Sometimes, the Range format is more readable, especially for newbies. Does the speed gain justify the slight discomfort and necessary extra explanation in replies?
I have done some testing to see what's what.
Method
I have tested the speeds of four scenarios. Each test consisted of a For loop doing 100 000 cycles. The core of the test was using a with statement to "grab" a cell.
For i = 1 To 100000
With Cells(i, 1)
End With
Next i
The four tests were:
Cells, variable cells - With Cells(i, 1)
Cells, single cell - With Cells(1, 1)
Range, variable cells - With Range("A" & i)
Range, single cell - Range("A1")
I have used separate subs for the four test cases, and used a fifth sub to run each of them 500 times. See the code below.
For time measurement, I have used GetTickCount to get millisecond accuracy.
Results
From 500 measurements, the results were pretty consistent. (I have run it multiple times with 100 iterations, with pretty much the same results.)
Cells Cells Range Range
(variable) (single) (variable) (single)
avg 124,3 126,4 372,0 329,8
median 125 125 374 328
mode 125 125 374 328
stdev 4,1 4,7 5,7 5,4
min 109 124 358 327
max 156 141 390 344
Interpretation
The Cells method is 2.6 times faster than an equivalent Range method. If concatenation is being used, this adds another 10% execution time, which makes the difference almost 3x. This is a huge difference.
On the other hand though, we are talking about an average of 0.001 ms VS 0.004 ms per cell operation. Unless we are running a script on more than 2-3 hundred thousand cells, this is not going to make a noticeable speed difference.
Conclusion
Yep, there is a huge speed difference.
Nope, I'm not going to bother telling people to use the Cells method unless they process huge amounts of cells.
Test set-up
Win7 64 bit
8 GB RAM
Intel Core i7-3770 # 3.40 GHz
Excel 2013 32 bit
Did I miss anything? Did I cock something up? Please don't hesitate to point it out! Cheers! :)
Code
Public Declare Function GetTickCount Lib "kernel32.dll" () As Long
Sub testCells(j As Long)
Dim i As Long
Dim t1 As Long
Dim t2 As Long
t1 = GetTickCount
For i = 1 To 100000
With Cells(i, 1)
End With
Next i
t2 = GetTickCount
Sheet4.Cells(j, 1) = t2 - t1
End Sub
Sub testRange(j As Long)
Dim i As Long
Dim t1 As Long
Dim t2 As Long
t1 = GetTickCount
For i = 1 To 100000
With Range("A" & i)
End With
Next i
t2 = GetTickCount
Sheet4.Cells(j, 2) = t2 - t1
End Sub
Sub testRangeSimple(j As Long)
Dim i As Long
Dim t1 As Long
Dim t2 As Long
t1 = GetTickCount
For i = 1 To 100000
With Range("A1")
End With
Next i
t2 = GetTickCount
Sheet4.Cells(j, 3) = t2 - t1
End Sub
Sub testCellsSimple(j As Long)
Dim i As Long
Dim t1 As Long
Dim t2 As Long
t1 = GetTickCount
For i = 1 To 100000
With Cells(1, 1)
End With
Next i
t2 = GetTickCount
Sheet4.Cells(j, 4) = t2 - t1
End Sub
Sub runtests()
Application.ScreenUpdating = False
Application.Calculation = xlCalculationManual
Dim j As Long
DoEvents
For j = 1 To 500
testCells j
Next j
DoEvents
For j = 1 To 500
testRange j
Next j
DoEvents
For j = 1 To 500
testRangeSimple j
Next j
DoEvents
For j = 1 To 500
testCellsSimple j
Next j
Application.Calculation = xlCalculationAutomatic
Application.ScreenUpdating = True
For j = 1 To 5
Beep
DoEvents
Next j
End Sub
I expanded upon the testing after seeing an example of .Cells(1, "A") notation which I thought might be a good balance between the readability of .Range("A1") with the speed of .Cells(1, 1)
I tested reads and writes and found for reads, .Cells(1, "A") executed in about 69% of the time .Range("A1") and .Cells(1, 1) executed in half the time of .Range("A1"). For writes there was a smaller difference (~88% and 82% respectively).
Code:
Option Explicit
Sub test()
Dim i, x, y, a, t1, t2, t3, t4
x=1000000
y=x/100
Debug.Print "---Read---" 'Cell A1 contains the number 55
t1=Timer*1000
For i = 1 to x
a = Sheet1.Range("A1")
Next
t2=Timer*1000
Debug.Print t2 - t1 & "ms"
For i = 1 to x
a = Sheet1.Cells(1, "A")
Next
t3=Timer*1000
Debug.Print t3 - t2 & "ms (" & Round(100*(t3-t2)/(t2-t1),1)&"%)"
For i = 1 to x
a = Sheet1.Cells(1, "A")
Next
t4=Timer*1000
Debug.Print t4 - t3 & "ms (" & Round(100*(t4-t3)/(t2-t1),1)&"%)"
Debug.Print "---Write---"
a=55
t1=Timer*1000
For i = 1 to y
Sheet1.Range("A1") = a
Next
t2=Timer*1000
Debug.Print t2 - t1 & "ms"
For i = 1 to y
Sheet1.Cells(1, "A") = a
Next
t3=Timer*1000
Debug.Print t3 - t2 & "ms (" & Round(100*(t3-t2)/(t2-t1),1)&"%)"
For i = 1 to y
Sheet1.Cells(1, "A") = a
Next
t4=Timer*1000
Debug.Print t4 - t3 & "ms (" & Round(100*(t4-t3)/(t2-t1),1)&"%)"
Debug.Print "----"
End Sub
^transcribed by hand, may contain typos...
Platform:
Excel 2013 32 bit
Windows 7 64 bit
16GB Ram
Xeon E5-1650 v2 #3.5GHz
(edit: changed "x" to "y" in write section of code-see disclaimer on hand-typed code!)
It's worth linking this stack overflow question which further explains how to increase performance:
Slow VBA macro writing in cells
I am looking for a simple algorithm which works on the following table:
In the first column you see the constraints. The second column should be used by the algorithm to output the iterations, which should be done like this:
0 0 0
0 0 1
........
0 0 29
0 1 0
........
0 1 29
0 2 0
0 2 1
........
........
27 9 29
28 0 0
........
........
28 9 29
Currently I have the following code:
Dim wksSourceSheet As Worksheet
Set wksSourceSheet = Worksheets("Solver")
Dim lngLastRow As Long
Dim lngLastColumn As Long
With wksSourceSheet
lngLastRow = IIf(IsEmpty(.Cells(.Rows.Count, 1)), _
.Cells(.Rows.Count, 1).End(xlUp).Row, .Rows.Count)
lngLastColumn = IIf(IsEmpty(.Cells(1, .Columns.Count)), _
.Cells(1, .Columns.Count).End(xlToLeft).Column, .Columns.Count)
Dim intRowOuter As Integer
Dim intRowInner As Integer
For intRowOuter = 2 To lngLastRow
.Cells(intRowOuter, lngLastColumn).Value = 0
Next intRowOuter
For intRowOuter = lngLastRow To 2 Step -1
For intRowInner = lngLastRow To intRowOuter Step -1
Dim constraint As Integer
Dim intConstraintCounter As Integer
intConstraint = .Cells(intRowInner, 1)
For intConstraintCounter = 1 To intConstraint
.Cells(intRowInner, lngLastColumn).Value = intConstraintCounter
Next intStampCounter
Next intRowInner
Next intRowOuter
End With
This might be a right approach but something is incorrect. I'm unfortunately stuck so I would appreciate some help on fixing this.
Solution
I would suggest using one array to store the constraints and one to represent the counter.
Dim MaxNum() As Long
Dim myCounter() As Long
ReDim MaxNum(1 To NumDigits)
ReDim myCounter(1 To NumDigits)
Next you need to initialize MaxNum. This will probably involve looping through the cells containing the constraints. Something like:
Dim constraintRange As Range
Dim i As integer
Set constraintRange = wksSourceSheet.Range("A2:A4")
For i = 1 to numDigits
MaxNum(i) = constraintRange.Cells(i,1).Value
Next i
Now we just need to write an increment counter function! The idea is pretty simple we just go from the least significant digit to the most significant. We increment the LSD and, if there is overflow we set it to 0 and then add 1 to the next digit. It looks like this:
Sub IncrNum(ByRef myNum() As Long, ByRef MaxNum() As Long)
Dim i As Integer
For i = LBound(myNum) To UBound(myNum)
myNum(i) = myNum(i) + 1
If myNum(i) > MaxNum(i) Then 'Overflow!
myNum(i) = 0 'Reset digit to 0 and continue
Else
Exit For 'No overflow so we can just exit
End If
Next i
End Sub
Which is just one for-loop! I think this will be the cleanest solution :)
NOTE: To use this function you would simply do IncrNum(myCounter, MaxNum). Which would change the value of myCounter to the next in the sequence. From here you can paste to a range by doing dstRange = myCounter.
Testing
In my own tests I used a while loop to print out all of the values. It looked something like this:
Do While Not areEqual(MaxNum, myCounter)
Call IncrNum(myCounter,MaxNum)
outRange = myCounter
Set outRange = outRange.Offset(1, 0)
Loop
areEqual is just a function which returns true if the parameters contain the same values. If you like I can provide my code otherwise I will leave it out to keep my answer as on track as it can be.
Maybe something like this can be modified to fit your needs. It simulates addition with carry:
Sub Clicker(MaxNums As Variant)
Dim A As Variant
Dim i As Long, j As Long, m As Long, n As Long
Dim sum As Long, carry As Long
Dim product As Long
m = LBound(MaxNums)
n = UBound(MaxNums)
product = 1
For i = m To n
product = product * (1 + MaxNums(i))
Next i
ReDim A(1 To product, m To n)
For j = m To n
A(1, j) = 0
Next j
For i = 2 To product
carry = 1
For j = n To m Step -1
sum = A(i - 1, j) + carry
If sum > MaxNums(j) Then
A(i, j) = 0
carry = 1
Else
A(i, j) = sum
carry = 0
End If
Next j
Next i
Range(Cells(1, 1), Cells(product, n - m + 1)).Value = A
End Sub
Used like:
Sub test()
Clicker Array(3, 2, 2)
End Sub
Which produces:
x%10 or x Mod 10 give the remainder when x is divided by 10 so you will get the last digit of x.
Since your problem is specifically asking for each digit not to exceed 463857. You can have a counter incrementing from 000000 to 463857 and only output/use the numbers the fullfill the following condition:
IF(x%10 <= 7 AND x%100 <=57 AND x%1000 <= 857 AND x%10000 <=3857 AND x%100000 <= 63857 AND x <= 463857)
THEN //perform task.
I am running osx 10.9 and Excel:Mac2011. I have need to count how many of each item I have in an Excel spreadsheet.
For example:
Cat
Fish
Cat
Dog
Cat
Dog
I'm trying to get some output that would look like this
Cat Cat =3
Fish Dog =2
Cat Fish =1
Dog
Cat
Dog
the output does not need to be sorted/ordered. First come first counted/listed is fine, but i can sort the data if it needs to be.(or makes it easier)
If there is any more information I can provide to help you help me please let me know.
First and simplest, if you know that there aren't many different values in the column, you could just use countif():
=COUNTIF(A1:A6, "Cat")
Otherwise, if you've got tons of different items in a column and you want an automated solution, a VBA routine that scans the column, tallies the counts of each item, and deposits those counts in other columns seems reasonable.
Sub CountAll()
Dim searchCol, itemsCol, countCol, sheetName As String
Dim i, j, startRow As Integer
Dim aCounts() As Variant
Dim bAdded, bFound As Boolean
startRow = 1
searchCol = "A"
itemsCol = "B"
countCol = "C"
sheetName = "Sheet1"
ReDim aCounts(2, 1)
With Sheets(sheetName)
For i = 1 To .Range(searchCol & startRow).End(xlDown).Row
For j = 1 To UBound(aCounts, 2)
If (.Range(searchCol & i).Value) = aCounts(0, j) Then
bFound = True
Exit For
Else
bFound = False
End If
Next
If (bFound) Then
aCounts(1, j) = aCounts(1, j) + 1
Else
If (aCounts(1, UBound(aCounts, 2)) <> "") Then
ReDim Preserve aCounts(2, UBound(aCounts, 2) + 1)
End If
aCounts(0, UBound(aCounts, 2)) = .Range(searchCol & i).Value
aCounts(1, UBound(aCounts, 2)) = 1
End If
Next
i = 1
For i = 1 To UBound(aCounts, 2)
.Range(itemsCol & i).Value = aCounts(0, i)
.Range(countCol & i).Value = aCounts(1, i)
Next
End With
End Sub
If all your sheets are similar and you want it to run on each sheet, just change the With Sheets(sheetName) to For Each Sheet in Sheets, change End With to Next, add Sheet before each .Range, and reset the array with each iteration:
For Each Sheet In Sheets()
ReDim aCounts(2, 1)
For i = 1 To Sheet.Range(searchCol & startRow).End(xlDown).Row
For j = 1 To UBound(aCounts, 2)
If (Sheet.Range(searchCol & i).Value) = aCounts(0, j) Then
bFound = True
Exit For
Else
bFound = False
End If
Next
If (bFound) Then
aCounts(1, j) = aCounts(1, j) + 1
Else
If (aCounts(1, UBound(aCounts, 2)) <> "") Then
ReDim Preserve aCounts(2, UBound(aCounts, 2) + 1)
End If
aCounts(0, UBound(aCounts, 2)) = Sheet.Range(searchCol & i).Value
aCounts(1, UBound(aCounts, 2)) = 1
End If
Next
For i = 1 To UBound(aCounts, 2)
Sheet.Range(itemsCol & i).Value = aCounts(0, i)
Sheet.Range(countCol & i).Value = aCounts(1, i)
Next
Next
You could loop through all the sheets creating a pivot table for each one, and then copy and paste the data from each pivot table, back onto the source sheet. It's a weird way of doing it, but it will work. Here is the code:
Option Explicit
Sub PivotTableCreator()
Application.ScreenUpdating = False
Application.DisplayAlerts = False 'Done so excel will delete the pivot table sheet without displaying a messagebox asking you if you are sure
Dim i, WSCount, LastRow As Long
WSCount = ActiveWorkbook.Worksheets.Count
Dim PTCache As PivotCache
Dim PT As PivotTable
For i = 1 To WSCount
Worksheets(i).Activate
LastRow = Range("A1000000").End(xlUp).Row
Debug.Print LastRow
Set PTCache = ActiveWorkbook.PivotCaches.Create(xlDatabase, Range("A1", "A" & LastRow)) 'data from column A is used to create the pivot table
Worksheets.Add 'new worksheet created for pivottable
Set PT = ActiveSheet.PivotTables.Add(PivotCache:=PTCache, TableDestination:=Range("A1"))
With PT
.PivotFields("Animals").Orientation = xlRowField 'Place whatever column A's header is here (Animals is a placeholder)
.PivotFields("Animals").Orientation = xlDataField
.DisplayFieldCaptions = False
End With
ActiveCell.CurrentRegion.Copy
Worksheets(ActiveSheet.Index + 1).Range("B2").PasteSpecial Paste:=xlPasteValues 'Paste results where you want to, I use B2 in this example
ActiveSheet.Delete 'No longer need the pivot table, so this sheet is deleted
Next
End Sub