I'm writing scenarios for QA engineers, and now I face a problem such as step encapsulation.
This is my scenario:
When I open connection
And device are ready to receive files
I send to device file with params:
| name | ololo |
| type | txt |
| size | 123 |
All of each steps are important for people, who will use my steps.
And I need to automate this steps and repeat it 100 times.
So I decide create new step, which run it 100 times.
First variant was to create step with other steps inside like:
Then I open connection, check device are ready and send file with params 100 times:
| name | ololo |
| type | txt |
| size | 123 |
But this version is not appropriate, because:
people who will use it, will don't understand which steps executes inside
and some times name of steps like this are to long
Second variant was to create step with other steps in parameters table:
I execute following steps 100 times:
| When I open connection |
| And device are ready to receive files |
| I send to device file |
It will be easy to understand for people, who will use me steps and scenarios.
But also I have some steps with parameters,
and I need to create something like two tier table:
I execute following steps 100 times:
| When I open connection |
| And device are ready to receive files |
| I send to device file with params: |
| | name | ololo | |
| | type | txt | |
| | size | 123 | |
This is the best variant in my situation.
But of cause cucumber can't parse it without errors ( it's not correct as cucumber code ).
How can I fix last example of step? (mark with bold font)
Does cucumber have some instruments, which helps me?
Can you suggest some suggest your type of solution?
Does someone have similar problems?
I decide to change symbols "|" to "/" in parameters table, which are inside.
It's not perfect, but it works:
This is scenarios steps:
I execute following steps 100 times:
| I open connection |
| device are ready to receive files |
| I send to device file with params: |
| / name / ololo / |
| / type / txt / |
| / size / 123 / |
This is step definition:
And /^I execute following steps (.*) times:$/ do |number, table|
data = table.raw.map{ |raw| raw.last }
number.to_i.times do
params = []
step_name = ''
data.each_with_index do |line,index|
next_is_not_param = data[index+1].nil? || ( data[index+1] && !data[index+1].include?('/') )
if !line.include?('/')
step_name = line
#p step_name if next_is_not_param
step step_name if next_is_not_param
else
params += [line.gsub('/','|')]
if next_is_not_param
step_table = Cucumber::Ast::Table.parse( params.join("\n"), nil, nil )
#p step_name
#p step_table
step step_name, step_table
params = []
end
end
end
#p '---------------------------------------------------------'
end
end
Related
I am trying to save a file on a library inside a Iseries database using the GxFtpPut on genexus 10 V3 with .net but when sending the file genexus tries to send it to a windows directory instead of sending it to the library which works using the ftp command on the cmd
I've already tried to changing the route is using to no avail and trying to find another way of sending the file through genexus.
for example when using the cmd I just put this :
put C:\FILES\Filename.txt Library/Filename
And it works on sending the file inside the library,
but when doing this on genexus:
Call("GxFtpPut", &FileDirectory , 'Library/'+&FileName,'B' )
Does not work and tries to find a directory with that name inside the windows files of the server
I just want to be able to send it to the server library without issue.
IBM i has two distinct name formats depending on the file system you are trying to use. NAMEFMT 0 is the library/filename format, and is likely unknown to PC FTP clients. NAMEFMT 1 is the typical hierarchical directory path used by non-IBM i computers, and also works with IBM i if you want to put a file anywhere in the IFS (Integrated File System).
Fun fact, the native library file system is also accessible from the IFS. But to address it you need to use a format that might be a little unfamiliar. /QSYS.lib/library.lib/filename.file/membername.mbr You may be able to drop the member name.
To change name format, you can issue the SITE sub-command on your remote host like this:
QUOTE SITE NAMEFMT 0 -- This sets name format 0 (library/filename)
QUITE SITE NAMEFMT 1 -- This sets name format 1 (directory path)
I did some testing with a plain Windows FTP client. The test file on the PC was a text file created in Notepad++. Turns out that we start out in NAMEFMT 0 unless it is changed. It looks like genexus only supports a limited set of commands. So here is the limited FTP script that works:
ascii
put test.txt mylib/testpf
I can now pull up testpf on the greenscreen utilities and read it. I can also read testpf in my GUI SQL client. The ASCII text has been converted properly to EBCDIC.
|TESTPF |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| |
|// ------------------------------------ |
|// Sweep |
|// |
|// Performs the sweep logic |
|// ------------------------------------ |
|dcl-proc Sweep; |
| |
| |
| exec sql |
| update atty a |
| set ymglsb = (select ymglsb from glaty |
| where atty = a.atty) |
| where atty in (select atty from glaty where atty = a.atty); |
|// where ymglsb in (select ymglsb from glaty where atty = a.atty); |
| if %subst(sqlstate: 1: 2) < '00' or |
| %subst(sqlstate: 1: 2) > '02'; |
| exec sql get diagnostics condition 1 |
| :message = message_text; |
| SendSqlMsg('02: ' + message); |
| endif; |
| |
| exec sql |
| update atty a |
| set ymglsb = '000' |
| where not exists (select * from glaty where atty = a.atty); |
| if %subst(sqlstate: 1: 2) < '00' or |
| %subst(sqlstate: 1: 2) > '02'; |
| exec sql get diagnostics condition 1 |
| :message = message_text; |
| SendSqlMsg('03: ' + message); |
| endif; |
| |
|end-proc; |
However, if I try to transfer in binary mode, the resulting data in the file looks like this:
|TESTPF |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|ëÏÁÁø&ÁÊÃ?Ê_ËÈÇÁËÏÁÁø% |
|?ÅÑÄÀÄ%øÊ?ÄëÏÁÁøÁÌÁÄËÉ% |
|ÍøÀ/ÈÁ/ÈÈ`/ËÁÈ`_Å%ËÂËÁ%ÁÄÈ`_Å%ËÂÃÊ?_Å%/È` |
|ÏÇÁÊÁ/ÈÈ`//ÈÈ`ÏÇÁÊÁ/ÈÈ`Ñ>ËÁ%ÁÄÈ/ÈÈ`ÃÊ?_Å%/È`ÏÇÁÊÁ/ÈÈ |
|`//ÈÈ`ÏÇÁÊÁ`_Å%ËÂÑ>ËÁ%ÁÄÈ`_Å%ËÂÃÊ?_Å%/È`ÏÇÁÊÁ/ÈÈ`//ÈÈ |
|`ÑöËÍÂËÈËÉ%ËÈ/ÈÁ?ʶËÍÂËÈËÉ%ËÈ/ÈÁ |
|ÁÌÁÄËÉ%ÅÁÈÀÑ/Å>?ËÈÑÄËÄ?>ÀÑÈÑ?>_ÁËË/ÅÁ_ÁËË/ÅÁ¬ÈÁÌÈ |
|ëÁ>ÀëÉ%(ËÅ_ÁËË/ÅÁÁ>ÀÑÃÁÌÁÄËÉ%ÍøÀ/ÈÁ/ÈÈ`/ |
|ËÁÈ`_Å%ËÂÏÇÁÊÁ>?ÈÁÌÑËÈËËÁ%ÁÄÈÃÊ?_Å%/È`ÏÇÁÊÁ/ÈÈ`// |
|ÈÈ`ÑöËÍÂËÈËÉ%ËÈ/ÈÁ?ʶËÍÂËÈËÉ%ËÈ/ÈÁ |
|ÁÌÁÄËÉ%ÅÁÈÀÑ/Å>?ËÈÑÄËÄ?>ÀÑÈÑ?>_ÁËË/ÅÁ_ÁËË/ÅÁ¬ÈÁÌÈ |
|ëÁ>ÀëÉ%(ËÅ_ÁËË/ÅÁÁ>ÀÑÃÁ>ÀøÊ?Ä |
This has not been converted because we have told IBM i FTP server not to convert to EBCDIC because it is binary.
So try ASCII mode, use the library/filename format. The target file does not need to pre-exist.
I am currently working on deciding a tool for automation an app on react/redux platform.
Most of the scenarios that I have in the app is possible to automate using nightwatch.
There are certain test cases or scenarios which repeat itself for different data sets.
For eg.
Steps to be executed:
Login to the application
Enter search criteria Step
Enter Color 1, Color 2, Color 3
Save and Validate
Test Data:
|UserName|Password|Search Criteria|Color 1|Color 2|Color 3|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|abc | abc | search 1 |red | | |
|abc | abc | search 1 | |green | |
|abc | abc | search 2 |grey |white | |
|abc | abc | search 3 |white |black | yellow|
I have to execute the same set of code/steps multiple times depending the number of rows of test data we have.
I tried reading a lot of documentations but could not find any package which supports this type of automation in nightwatch.
Please help. Please do let me know if you need any more information.
Thanks & Regards,
Mukesh Panda
My suggestion is to place the test data in a JSON file and read it in your testpage file. and call it from testfile. something like,
loginPage.js contains
setCredentials : function (username, password) {
browser.setValue('#username', username);
browser.setValue('#password', password);
}
module.exports=loginPage;
and call the function in your test file like
loginTest.js contains
testData = require('testData.json');
loginPage = require('loginPage.js');
login = new loginPage(browser);
login.setCredentials(testData.username, testData.password);
something like this you can achieve it...
I have a cucumber feature that checks a website has processed payment files correctly (BACS,SEPA, FPS etc). The first stage of the process is to create the payment files which in-turn create expected result data in a database. This data is then used to validate against the payment processing website.
If I process one file, my feature works perfectly validating the expected results. Where I'm stuck is how I get the feature to run (n) number of times depending on the number of records/files that were originally processed.
I've tried an 'Around' hook using a record count iteration with no joy, can't see how I can fit it into an outline scenario and now think that perhaps a rake task to call the feature might work.
Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.
Here's a sample of the feature:
Feature: Processing SEPA Credit Transfer Files. Same Day Value Payments.
Background:
Given we want to test the "SEPA_Regression" scenario suite
And that we have processed a "SEPA" file from the "LDN" branch
And we plan to use the "ITA1" environment
Then we log in to "OPF" as a "SEPA Department" user
#feature #find_and_check_sepa_interchange #all_rows
Scenario: Receive SEPA Credit Transfer Files for branch
Given that we are on the "Payment Management > Interchanges" page
When I search for our Interchange with the following search parameters:
| Field Name |
| Transport Date From |
| Bank |
| Interchange Reference |
Then I can check the following fields for the given file in the "Interchanges" table:
| Field Name|
| Interchange Reference |
| Transport Date |
| File Name |
| File Format |
| Clearing Participant |
| Status |
| Direction |
| Bank |
When I select the associated "Interchange Id" link
Then the "Interchange Details" page is displayed
Update I've implemented nested steps for the feature so that I can call the database records first and feed each set of records (or at least the row id) into the main feature like so:
Feature
#trial_feature
Scenario: Validate multiple Files
Given we have one or more records in the database to process for the "SEPA_Regression" scenario
Then we can validate each file against the system
Feature steps:
Then(/^we can validate each file against the system$/) do
x = 0
while x <= $interchangeHash.count - 1
$db_row = x
# Get the other sets of data using the file name in the query
id = $interchangeHash[x]['id']
file_name = $interchangeHash[x]['CMS_Unique_Reference_Id']
Background.get_data_for_scenario(scenario, file_name)
steps %{
Given that we are on the "Payment Management > Interchanges" page
When I search for our Interchange with the following search parameters:
| Field Name |
| Transport Date From |
| Bank |
| Interchange Reference |
Then I can check the following fields for the given file in the "Interchanges" table:
| Field Name|
| Interchange Reference |
| Transport Date |
| File Name |
| File Format |
| Clearing Participant |
| Status |
| Direction |
| Bank |
When I select the associated "Interchange Id" link
Then the "Interchange Details" page is displayed
Seems a bit of a 'hack' but it works.
If you have batch processing software, then you should have several Given (setup) steps, 1 When (trigger) step, several Then (criteria) steps.
Given I have these SEPA bills
| sepa bill 1 |
| sepa bill 2 |
And I have these BAC bills
| bac bill 1 |
| bac bill 2 |
When the payments are processed
Then these sepa bills are completed
| sepa bill 1 |
| sepa bill 2 |
And I these bac bills are completed
| bac bill 1 |
| bac bill 2 |
It's simpler, easier to read what is supposed to be done, and can be expanded to more. The works should be done in the step definitions of setting up and verifying.
In my scenario outline I have the below
Examples:
| user | password | from | to | amount | date | message |
| joel10 | lolpw12 | bankA | bankB | $100 | 1/30/2015 | Transfer Success. |
in my step definitions I have the below
And(/^the user inputs fields (.*), (.*), (.*)$/) do |from, to, amount|
on(TransferPage).from = /#{from}/
on(TransferPage).to = /#{to}/
on(TransferPage).amount = /#{amount}/
on(TransferPage).date = /#{date}/
end
The FROM, TO, and AMOUNT all comes out correct from the table but when it inputs the date, it comes out (?-mix:1/30/2015)
why is this happening and how do i fix?
When you do /#{date}/ you are taking the value returned from the parsing of the step definition and then turning it into a regular expression:
/#{date}/.class
#=> Regexp
You presumably want to leave the value in its original String format:
on(TransferPage).date = date
I am using a scenario table (multiline step arguments) to check some data from a screen using cucumber, using the in built .diff! method on the Cucumber AST table.
I would like to check the content matches against regular expressions.
Scenario: One
Then the table appears as:
| One | Two | Three |
| /\d+/ | /\d+/ | /\d+/ |
The actual table could look something like
| One | Two | Three |
| 123 | 456 | 789 |
which this scenario is translated to "as long as there are some digits, I don't care"
An example step implementation that fails:
Then /^the table appears as:$/ do |expected_table|
actual_table = [['One','Two', 'Three'],['123', '456', '789']]
expected_table.diff! actual_table
end
Error:
Then the table appears as: # features/step_definitions/my_steps.rb:230
| One | Two | Three |
| /\\d+/ | /\\d+/ | /\\d+/ |
| 123 | 456 | 789 |
Tables were not identical (Cucumber::Ast::Table::Different)
I have tried using step transforms to transform the cells into regular expressions, but they still aren't identical.
Transform code:
expected_table.raw[0].each do |column|
expected_table.map_column! column do |cell|
if cell.respond_to? :start_with?
if cell.start_with? "/"
cell.to_regexp
else
cell
end
else
cell
end
end
end
which provides the eror:
Then the table appears as: # features/step_definitions/my_steps.rb:228
| One | Two | Three |
| (?-mix:\\d+) | (?-mix:\\d+) | (?-mix:\\d+) |
| 123 | 456 | 789 |
Tables were not identical (Cucumber::Ast::Table::Different)
Any ideas? I am stuck.
Using regular expressions in a scenario is almost certainly the wrong approach. Cucumber features are intended to be read and understood by business-focussed stakeholders.
How about writing the step at a higher level, such as as:
Then the first three columns of the table should contain a digit
There is no way to do it without writing your own implementation of diff! method from Ast::Table. Take a look into cucumber/lib/ast/table.rb. Internally it uses diff-lcs library to do an actual comparison which doesn't support regex match.
It seems that you want to write this in a way that provides the cool diff output. Otherwise, I'd look at writing this such that you simply check the rows. It won't be as pretty, and it won't get you the diff of the entire table, but it's something.
Then /^the table appears as:$/ do |expected_table|
actual_table = [['One','Two', 'Three'],['123', '456', '789']]
expected_table.raw.each_with_index { |row, y|
row.each_with_index { |cell, x|
actual_table[x][y].should == cell
}
}
end