Siemens MC35 + ATcommand - avr

I would like to do 2 things.
Recognize when someone is calling - In terminal will appear RING and to answer I have to send command ATA. But How can I recognize it when I am doing something else. Should I use new thread and read port until send RING? Is there any beter solution?
What is a symbol of end of response? I'm reading char using for(), but I do not know number of signs. Example below doesn't work properly
while(readCharUART()!=10) {};
while(readCharUART()!=13)
{
getchar() = ..
}

You are on the right track.
For RING then yes, the correct way to do it is to have one thread just read modem responses until you get the Unsolicited result code RING. If you from time to time want to run AT commands (say ATA), then you should let this thread do that as well, e.g. you have one thread that takes care of both issuing AT commands and monitor for UR codes.
Regarding formatting of responses from the modem, this is well described in chapter 5.7.1 Responses in the ITU V.250 standard. Short summary (reading the spec is highly recommended!):
<header>RING<trailer>
where header and trailer is both "\r\n" (unless the modem is configured strangely).

Related

53C94 SCSI IC as target - Cannot handle WRITE(10) command from Initiator

I am building a SD card/SCSI adapter using NCR 53CF94 IC and STM32.
All goes pretty well, even manged to make my device work to some degree, i.e. accepting all basic commands and even booting from it to DOS. BUT i have a problem, when asking initiator (PC) to write something to my device , all goes well i get the block address and the data. Then i write the data to SD card and finally responding with status=0 and message=0 to complete the write command, but the initiaor never increasing the secoor number to continue to write proccess and always tries to write the first one, then after few attempts it gives error on the PC (Error writing to drive...). I can't figure it out why the initiaor is not satisfied with the GOOD status and message. Do i need to send some specific data back to the initiator ? Linke CRC ? Or there is some specific command i need to issue for 53C94 ?
Banging my head for few days now.
Need your assistance please.
Thanks !
Artiom.
I figured it out. I was writing 512 byte blocks to a 256 byte array. I'm not sure how this is related to the issue, but after fixing the size everything started to work.

XCB: How to "free" XID allocated by xcb_generate_id

(1) In XCB, we must manually allocate XID before some requests. For example,
xcb_window_t win = xcb_generate_id(conn);
xcb_create_window(conn, XCB_COPY_FROM_PARENT, win, ...);
Then, what should we do to free (or unallocate) the XID? Is it enough to invoke xcb_destroy_window?
(2) How about in a case xcb_create_window fails? For example,
xcb_generic_cookie_t cookie = xcb_create_window_checked(conn, XCB_COPY_FROM_PARENT, win, ...);
if(xcb_request_check(conn, cookie)) ... // xcb_create_window failed.
In the example above, xcb_create_window failed. So, the XID win is allocated but not used. What should we do for win in this case?
Is it enough to invoke xcb_destroy_window?
Yup. Sadly, I don't have any authoritative docs to link to, so I can just say "trust me".
That's the simple answer for question 1. Answer 2... uhm, I guess it does not have a simple answer. So I guess you need "the full truth".
When an X11 client connects to the X11 server, it is assigned a range of XIDs to use. These are the fields resource-id-base and resource-id-mask in the server response here: https://www.x.org/releases/X11R7.6/doc/xproto/x11protocol.html#server_response
Conceptually, these two fields describe something like "all XIDs from 0x100 to 0x200 are for you".
xcb_generate_id() now simply returns the next entry from this range and marks it as used. So, after the first call and staying with the example above, "all XIDs from 0x101 to 0x200" are still available.
This is quite a simple data structure and there is no way to return XIDs as "no longer used".
So, what happens after all XIDs were used? For this, the XC-MISC extension exists: https://www.x.org/releases/X11R7.7/doc/xcmiscproto/xc-misc.html
When it is out of XIDs, libxcb will send a XCMiscGetXIDRange request to get a "new" batch of XIDs and then starts handing out them.
I write "new" in quotes since it is actually a sub-range of the original XID range: The X11 server knows which range it originally assigned this client. It knows which XIDs are in use. Thus, it can pick a free range and return it to the client.
Thanks to this mechanism, libxcb does not have to track used XIDs in any way. Stuff just works automatically.

Arduino serial sometimes gives random values

I am using a MMA7361 accelerometer from sparkfun that is connected to my arduino uno and it is in turn connected to my pc.
I am simply reading the values from each axis(x,y,z) and sending them straight through the serial port to my pc with a series of Serial.print and Serial.write. From there I have set up a program to read and display the info with myPort.readString();
Now it works fine 80% of the time and it gives the right results and all, but sometimes I get some random value sent through the serial port and it messes up the receiving program making me unable to use the signal properly.
I am pretty sure its not the sensor itself sending the disturbing signal because I have tried to save 10 different readings and then sending an average to minimize the effect with no luck. The receiving pc still got the weird value spikes around 0-200 (from what I saw as output).
I tried with pulling out the cable that connects from the sensor to the analog in port and weirdly it gave out some random value instead of the expected 0, I'm not sure but for me it seems like that has something to do about my problem.
I have read about some kind of pull down resistor but that only works for buttons, right?
I just got my arduino and I'm trying to learn how to use sensors and what you can do with them and what can go wrong so I'd appreciate if someone could help me with this :)
Heres an example of the random value messing up the output:
252:236:218
251:202:215
2 <-- this is where it begins
59:231:245
28
4:144:142 <-- messing up the order of the values
251:19
2:187
246:235
:244
240:190:
238
250:202:2
32
248:243:224
245:227:240
251:228:244
253:223:241
If you want I got the code for sending and recieving too:
Serial.print(analogRead(xpin));
Serial.write(":");
Serial.print(analogRead(ypin));
Serial.write(":");
Serial.println(analogRead(zpin));
I'd really like the sending to be just one line of code but I haven't been able to join all numbers and strings to a one line string on the arduino.
Recieving:
if ( myPort.available() > 0) {
result = myPort.readString();
println(result);
}
Looking at your output, it seems that the values are all received, but somehow a CR and/or LF character is added to the output. And that comes from the println statement:
if ( myPort.available() > 0) {
result = myPort.readString();
println(result);
}
What happens is that the receiving end gets some characters (not necessarily all), it prints them, adding a linefeed character then exits the function.
Then it enters the if statement again and prints the available characters in the buffer. And so it goes.
If you wish to ensure a consistent output you have to either
1. build a packet of the data or
2. Count the received bytes and print them when all are received.
As to 1. it would be my preferred method, add a start- and end-character to the data. The receiving end will then know that all data between the start- and end-character is the data to be printed.
I seem to have fixed this by using readChar and checking if the current character inputted is the delimiter. It is a bit slower but it works.

Rs232 software flow control

I have a general question about Rs232 Software Flowcontrol (aka XOn/XOff)
The .Net implementation (and the nativ win32 api) bothe define a property called WriteTimeout / ReadTimeout, which is a time in ms after which a communication is considered to be overdue.
No my problem is this: If I send, lets say a 5 Byte string to the device I don't see any WriteTimeout, as expected. How is this implemented? Everything I find about Software flow control is that XOFF is to be set, when the recieve buffer is full; XOn when it is ready to recieve again.
But from the behavior I see, I would suspect, hat the device sends XON, after it has processed the 5-Byte information that I send, thus creating the information for windows to generate the corresponding events.
So when to send XON on a two-wire only RS232 implementation? Only if the buffer was full and to restart recieving; Or to signal, that we are "still ready" to receive after every chunk we processed?
How to implement?
Cheers & thx in advance!
Corelgott
Send an XON any time you are ready to receive data (your receive buffer is empty or nearly so). Send an XOFF any time you cannot accept more incoming data (your receive buffer is full or nearly so). The process is documented on the Wikipedia software flow control page.

Is it possible to use midiOutLongMsg to play a chord? (Win32 API)

This guys says yes:
http://web.tiscalinet.it/giordy/midi-tech/lowmidi.htm
Same with a really old book from 1998 (Maximum MIDI).
MSDN doesn't mention it.
I'm not getting any sound.
I fill a char buffer with status|note|velocity|status|note|velocity...
Set lpData, dwBufferLength, and dwFlags of a MIDIHDR struct
call midiOutPrepareHeader (MMSYSERR_NOERROR)
call midiOutLongMsg (MMSYSERR_NOERROR)
Still no sound! Spamming midiOutShortMsg is working but will that work for slower machines? Did they change the functionality?
Thanks.
I'm an idiot! I figured it out: Microsoft GS Wavetable Synth does NOT support sending multiple short messages in midiOutLongMsg. The MIDI Mapper DOES!
midiOutShortMsg should be plenty fast, even on slow machines. MIDI interfaces themselves (hardware that is, but some software will limit themselves) run at 31,250 baud. This of course is ignoring any slow code you may have wrapped around where you call midiOutShortMsg.
Anyway, technically you should also be able to get away with one status byte, if the following notes use the same status byte. So, if you want to do note on/off (using velocity 0 for off) and those notes are on the same channel, you could do this:
status|note|velocity|note|velocity|note|velocity|note|velocity
This is called running status.

Resources