So as far as I'm concerned, overflow:hidden does hide the scrollbar, but makes it impossible to scroll (at least scrolling doesn't work in Firefox).
I have a scroller-slider on my homepage - it scrolls automaticaly to lower full-screen elements one by one and then comes back to the first element and starts over. It looks really nice in my opinion, but the scrollbar is visible - I would like to make it invisible. With overflow: hidden the scrolling mechanism doesn't work.
Any idea how to do it?
You can hide scrollbar with CSS - wrap your scrollable container into another one with overflow:hidden and less height/width (depending on scroll you want to hide - vertical or horizontal one). This way helps if you have static container/content sizes. If container can be resized or size depends on content - you will have to use JS solution to calculate container size.
Related
I am not pro developer and have small knowledge of html and css only. I am trying to work on a joomla website. I tried to add Google charts to my page. Actually it's a module that I am inserting to an article through load module function. But there seems to have a conflict and the chart is not displayed correctly. It seems that there are some conflicts with the issues but I am not sure how to figure.
http://goo.gl/v1GVWk
if you go to above link and go to tabs and open trekking map tab you will see the bug. The width of chart is very small. I want to display 100% so that it can be responsive. I tried changing the width to px as well but no luck.
Please help me. ..
The width of elements that are hidden is zero. Therefore, the chart thinks your window has a width of zero and ends up using its smallest width.
Try triggering a resize event on the window when the tab is shown, this should cause the responsive code to run.
I never used Google charts, but what you are experiencing also happens on Google Maps.
You have two options, either you use opacity (or maybe visibility hidden) instead of display: none, this will make the chart to resize automatically when the page opens.
The other option is to trigger the resize event, something like this... Google chart redraw/scale with window resize
Hope it helps
Even though the outer wrapper div#ja-google-chart-wrapper-404 is set to 100% width, two child elements are fixed at 400px. Specifically, the <svg width="400"> element that sets the image at a fixed width, plus the div that wraps it has the width set to 400px. Even though you have their parent set to 100%, if the image itself has a fixed width it won't expand to fill the space.
Check to see if there's a setting in your module or in the Google Chart itself that lets you set a different width (or none at all) on the inserted image.
One solution would be to resize the SVG element when the a#tab1-trekking-map is clicked. I just tested this in the Chrome console and it worked to trigger the map to resize to the full width of the container:
jQuery("#ja-google-chart-wrapper-404 svg").resize();
Add this (or something like it) to your other scripts that are called when your tabs are clicked. If the ID of the chart wrapper is generated dynamically you may need to adjust a bit, but triggering resize() (as stated by Niet and miguelmpn) should do the trick nicely.
I am looking to make a "10 foot" useable site for TV. Ideally it would have a full screen background image a small header where the nav will be placed and under it a container for the content. I would like for the container itself to have a scroll bar, as oppose to the browser having the scroll bar, since this would lose my top header.
Basically top header should be fixed, an image for a background, and a container that scrolls inside itself. I have tried finding templates or a starting point online for this with very poor results. The best i have found so far is http://css-tricks.com/examples/FullPageBackgroundImage/progressive.php
This is almost what I need except the container overflows the screen so the scroll bar is in the browser. Also this article was written in 2010, maybe there is a better way to achieve this now?
You can use CSS to style the div.
div.scroll {
background-color:#00FFFF;
width:100px;
height:100px;
overflow-y:scroll;
}
Then... all you have to do is position that div as you want.
I have the element like below which is nested within other divs.
'holder' contains content which is larger than it can display. But I want to restrict the content to be only inside of 'holder'. Otherwise when hold the mouse down and drag to the left/right border the content will be moved accordingly and this is not wanted.
So I apply the "overflow:hidden" style. But this only works horizontally not vertically. The content still overflowed downwards.
This is under IE8,9
Any ideas?
<div id="holder" style="background-color:white;"></div>
The issue solved with addition of "overflow:hidden;position:fixed" style.
without specifying "position:fixed" the container will be extended fully to accommodate the whole content. Setting "position:fixed" has no effect since the container already displayed everything.
I'm using css animations on my page and Safari seems to change unrelated font weights elsewhere on the page when animations are running. Any idea why this happens? All other browsers work fine, include webkit ones like Chrome.
I've detailed the bug in a video here - http://www.screenr.com/gZN8
The site is also here - http://airport-r7.appspot.com/ but it might keep changing rapidly.
I'm using compass (#transition-property, #transition-duration) on the arrow icons. No transitions applied on the heading that's flashing. On a Mac - so it might be the hardware acceleration, but I'm still trying to figure it out.
When you trigger GPU compositing (eg, through CSS animation), the browser sends that element to the GPU, but also anything that would appear on top of that element if its top/left properties were changed. This includes any position:relative elements that appear after the animating one.
The solution is to give the animating element position:relative and a z-index that puts it above everything else. That way you get your animation but keep the (superior IMO) sub-pixel font rendering on unrelated elements.
Here's a demo of the problem and solution http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Woaz-cKPCE&hd=1
Update: Newer versions of Chrome retain sub-pixel antialiasing on GPU composited elements as long as the element has no transparency, eg has a background with no transparent or semi-transparent pixels. Note that things like border-radius introduce semi-transparent pixels.
Apparently, that's the price you pay for hardware acceleration: all text momentarily turns into images, which causes the drop in render quality.
However, applying html {-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased} to turn off the sub-pixel anti-aliasing makes this problem go away. That's what I'm doing for now.
UPDATE: Since then, I've also come to learn that this happens only when the browser can't be sure if the section being animated is going to affect the text. This can usually be handled by having the text above (higher z-index than) the elements being animated, and/or making sure the text has a fully opaque background.
I've faced this issue numerous times and have had success adding the following css to the animated element:
z-index: 60000;
position: relative;
It seems it needs both z-index and position to be effective. In my case I was using it with Font Awesome animated spinners.
We have a simple modal in our web application.
It's nothing special and is built on twitters bootstrap library.
It contains a backdrop that is a semi transparent white background with position: fixed and width and height set to 100%.
The modal itself, however, is not statically positioned but absolutely positioned, this is because the modal might be taller than the viewport and we don't want scrolling in the modal.
Here's the dilemma, when the backdrop is present the scrolling is far from smooth in Google Chrome, if I change the position of the backdrop to absolute everything is fine.
This has the obvious downside of not covering the entire page.
I tried to reproduce it with a JSFiddle but I couldn't (most likely due to the fact that we a lot more content on our site).
Nonetheless here is my attempt: http://jsfiddle.net/LdC4w/
So, any ideas?
Oh, and I can add that having a background image instead of opacity is not an option.