So I am having a big table of AbstractID, SentenceID, WordID, and Word. Some words show in multiple files. I would like to count how many files every word shows, and then create a new table of with Word and Count. Below is a piece of my data.
My sql query is below:
CREATE TABLE WORDLIST(WORD, TOTALCOUNT) AS
(
SELECT WORD FROM ASSIGNMENT2 WHERE
(
SELECT WORD, COUNT(*) FROM (select DISTINCT FILEID, WORD FROM ASSIGNMENT2)
GROUP BY WORD ORDER BY COUNT(*) DESC));
It is giving me an error:
"Error report:
SQL Error: ORA-00936: missing expression
00936. 00000 - "missing expression"
*Cause:
*Action:"
How do I correct this? Thanks.
You're rather overcomplicating the query. The error is because your outer where clause doesn't have a condition; you're selecting multiple things, which isn't right anyway, but then not comparing those to anything. And you don't need to enclose the query in a set of parentheses.
You can just do:
CREATE TABLE WORDLIST (WORD, TOTALCOUNT) AS
SELECT WORD, COUNT(DISTINCT FILEID)
FROM ASSIGNMENT2
GROUP BY WORD;
There's no point ordering the query as it won't affect future queries against the new table - you still have to order those, as there is no inherent order of rows within the table. (And I think an order by will cause an error in a create-as statement, but can't immediately check that).
Creating a table to hold this information seems odd though as it will go out of date quickly. Perhaps you wanted a view really?
Related
New to SQL. Pardon me if this question is a basic one. Is there a way for me to do this below
SELECT COLUMN1 as CUSTOM_NAME, <wildcard for remaining columns as is> from TABLE;
I only want COLUMN1 appear once in the final result
There is no way to make that kind of dynamic SELECT list with regular SQL*.
This is a good thing. Programming gets more difficult the more dynamic it is. Even the simple * syntax, while useful in many contexts, causes problems in production code. The Oracle SQL grammar is already more complicated than most traditional programming languages, adding a little meta language to describe what the queries return could be a nightmare.
*Well, you could create something using Oracle data cartridge, or DBMS_XMLGEN, or a trick with the PIVOT clause. But each of those solutions would be incredibly complicated and certainly not as simple as just typing the columns.
This is about as close as you will get.
It is very handy for putting the important columns up front,
while being able to scroll to the others if needed. COLUMN1 will end up being there twice.
SELECT COLUMN1 as CUSTOM_NAME,
aliasName.*
FROM TABLE aliasName;
In case you have many columns it might be worth to generate a full column list automatically instead of relying on the * selector.
So a two step approach would be to generate the column list with custom first N columns and unspecified order of the other columns, then use this generated list in your actual select statement.
-- select comma separated column names from table with the first columns being in specified order
select
LISTAGG(column_name, ', ') WITHIN GROUP (
ORDER BY decode(column_name,
'FIRST_COLUMN_NAME', 1,
'SECOND_COLUMN_NAME', 2) asc) "Columns"
from user_tab_columns
where table_name = 'TABLE_NAME';
Replace TABLE_NAME, FIRST_COLUMN_NAME and SECOND_COLUMN_NAME by your actual names, adjust the list of explicit columns as needed.
Then execute the query and use the result, which should look like
FIRST_COLUMN_NAME, SECOND_COLUMN_NAME, OTHER_COLUMN_NAMES
Ofcourse this is overhead for 5-ish columns, but if you ever run into a company database with 3 digit number of columns, this can be interesting.
I need to work with a SQL result set in order to do some processing for each column (medians, standard deviations, several control statements included)
The SQL is dynamic so I don't know the number of columns, rows.
First I tried to use temporary tables, views, etc to store the results, however I did not manage to overcome the 30 character limit of Oracle columns when using the below sql:
create table (or view or global temporary table) as select * from (
SELECT
DMTTBF_MAT_MATURATO_BILL_POS.MAT_V_COD_ANNOMESE,
SUM(DMTTBF_MAT_MATURATO_BILL_POS.MAT_N_NUM_EVENTI_CHZ +DMTTBF_MAT_MATURATO_BILL_POS. MAT_N_NUM_EVENTI) <-- exceeds the 30 character limit
FROM DMTTBF_MAT_MATURATO_BILL_POS
WHERE DMTTBF_MAT_MATURATO_BILL_POS.MAT_V_COD_ANNOMESE >= '201301'
GROUP BY DMTTBF_MAT_MATURATO_BILL_POS.MAT_V_COD_ANNOMESE
)
Second choice was to use some PL/SQL types to store the entire table information, so I could call it like in other programming languages (e.g. a matrix result[i][j]) but I could not find anything similar.
Third variant, using files for reading and writing: i did not try it yet; i'm still expecting a more elegant pl/sql solution
It's possible that I have the wrong approach here so any advice is more than welcome.
UPDATE: Modifying the input SQL is not an option. The program has to accept any select statement.
Note that you can alias both tables and fields. Using a table alias keeps references to it from producing walls of text in the query. Using one for a field gives it a new name in the output.
SELECT A.LONG_FIELD_NAME_HERE AS SHORTNAME
FROM REALLY_LONG_TABLE_NAME_HERE A
The auto naming adds _1 and _2 etc to differentiate the same column name coming from different table references. This often puts a field already borderline over the limit. Giving the fields names yourself bypasses this.
You can put the alias also in dynamic SQL:
sqlstr := 'create table (or view or global temporary table) as select * from (
SELECT
DMTTBF_MAT_MATURATO_BILL_POS.MAT_V_COD_ANNOMESE,
SUM(DMTTBF_MAT_MATURATO_BILL_POS.MAT_N_NUM_EVENTI_CHZ + DMTTBF_MAT_MATURATO_BILL_POS.MAT_N_NUM_EVENTI) AS '||SUBSTR('SUM(DMTTBF_MAT_MATURATO_BILL_POS.MAT_N_NUM_EVENTI_CHZ +DMTTBF_MAT_MATURATO_BILL_POS.MAT_N_NUM_EVENTI)', 1, 30)
||' FROM DMTTBF_MAT_MATURATO_BILL_POS
WHERE DMTTBF_MAT_MATURATO_BILL_POS.MAT_V_COD_ANNOMESE >= ''201301''
GROUP BY DMTTBF_MAT_MATURATO_BILL_POS.MAT_V_COD_ANNOMESE
)'
I wanted to delete some records which i added recently, from this table mytemp, please tell me what is wrong with this query,
data in selected column had been populated using cursor
DELETE FROM (SELECT ROWNUM RM, S from mytemp) where rm > 20;
error is:
ORA-01732: data manipulation operation not legal on this view
Edited for accuracy...
Here's the description of the error you are getting:
http://ora-01732.ora-code.com/
An attempt was made to use an UPDATE, INSERT, or DELETE statement on a
view that contains expressions or functions or was derived from more
than one table. If a join operation was used to create the view or the
view contains virtual columns derived from functions or expressions,
then the view may only be queried.
So it looks like an updateable view can be substituted for a table, as long as it doesn't join more than one table or use virtual columns. In your case, the problem is the virtual ROWNUM column.
It's the rownum>20 statement.
ROWNUM>x, where x values greater than a positive integer are always false.
select * from ANYTABLE where rownum>(ANY POSITIVE INTEGER)
doesn't return any record.
The first row fetched is assigned a ROWNUM of 1 and makes the condition false. The second row to be fetched is now the first row and is also assigned a ROWNUM of 1 and makes the condition false. All rows subsequently fail to satisfy the condition, so no rows are returned.
Check THIS for further info.
You can do the following:
delete from (select amount from TABLE t where t.amount=1000)
but it's the same as
delete from TABLE where amount=1000
I am new to Oracle and working with a fairly large database. I would like to perform a query that will select the desired columns, order by a certain column and also limit the results. According to everything I have read, the below query should be working but it is returning "ORA-00918: column ambiguously defined":
SELECT * FROM(SELECT * FROM EAI.EAI_EVENT_LOG e,
EAI.EAI_EVENT_LOG_MESSAGE e1 WHERE e.SOURCE_URL LIKE '%.XML'
ORDER BY e.REQUEST_DATE_TIME DESC) WHERE ROWNUM <= 20
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated :D
The error message means your result set contains two columns with the same name. Each column in a query's projection needs to have a unique name. Presumably you have a column (or columns) with the same name in both EAI_EVENT_LOG and EAI_EVENT_LOG_MESSAGE.
You also want to join on that column. At the moment you are generating a cross join between the two tables. In other words, if you have a hundred records in EAI_EVENT_LOG and two hundred records EAI_EVENT_LOG_MESSAGE your result set will be twenty thousand records (without the rownum). This is probably your intention.
"By switching to innerjoin, will that eliminate the error with the
current code?"
No, you'll still need to handle having two columns with the same name. Basically this comes from using SELECT * on two multiple tables. SELECT * is bad practice. It's convenient but it is always better to specify the exact columns you want in the query's projection. That way you can include (say) e.TRANSACTION_ID and exclude e1.TRANSACTION_ID, and avoid the ORA-00918 exception.
Maybe you have some columns in both EAI_EVENT_LOG and EAI_EVENT_LOG_MESSAGE tables having identical names? Instead of SELECT * list all columns you want to select.
Other problem I see is that you are selecting from two tables but you're not joining them in the WHERE clause hence the result set will be the cross product of those two table.
You need to stop using SQL '89 implicit join syntax.
Not because it doesn't work, but because it is evil.
Right now you have a cross join which in 99,9% of the cases is not what you want.
Also every sub-select needs to have it's own alias.
SELECT * FROM
(SELECT e.*, e1.* FROM EAI.EAI_EVENT_LOG e
INNER JOIN EAI.EAI_EVENT_LOG_MESSAGE e1 on (......)
WHERE e.SOURCE_URL LIKE '%.XML'
ORDER BY e.REQUEST_DATE_TIME DESC) s WHERE ROWNUM <= 20
Please specify a join criterion on the dotted line.
Normally you do a join on a keyfield e.g. ON (e.id = e1.event_id)
It's bad idea to use select *, it's better to specify exactly which fields you want:
SELECT e.field1 as customer_id
,e.field2 as customer_name
.....
I am getting
ORA-30926: unable to get a stable set of rows in the source tables
in the following query:
MERGE INTO table_1 a
USING
(SELECT a.ROWID row_id, 'Y'
FROM table_1 a ,table_2 b ,table_3 c
WHERE a.mbr = c.mbr
AND b.head = c.head
AND b.type_of_action <> '6') src
ON ( a.ROWID = src.row_id )
WHEN MATCHED THEN UPDATE SET in_correct = 'Y';
I've ran table_1 it has data and also I've ran the inside query (src) which also has data.
Why would this error come and how can it be resolved?
This is usually caused by duplicates in the query specified in USING clause. This probably means that TABLE_A is a parent table and the same ROWID is returned several times.
You could quickly solve the problem by using a DISTINCT in your query (in fact, if 'Y' is a constant value you don't even need to put it in the query).
Assuming your query is correct (don't know your tables) you could do something like this:
MERGE INTO table_1 a
USING
(SELECT distinct ta.ROWID row_id
FROM table_1 a ,table_2 b ,table_3 c
WHERE a.mbr = c.mbr
AND b.head = c.head
AND b.type_of_action <> '6') src
ON ( a.ROWID = src.row_id )
WHEN MATCHED THEN UPDATE SET in_correct = 'Y';
You're probably trying to to update the same row of the target table multiple times. I just encountered the very same problem in a merge statement I developed. Make sure your update does not touch the same record more than once in the execution of the merge.
A further clarification to the use of DISTINCT to resolve error ORA-30926 in the general case:
You need to ensure that the set of data specified by the USING() clause has no duplicate values of the join columns, i.e. the columns in the ON() clause.
In OP's example where the USING clause only selects a key, it was sufficient to add DISTINCT to the USING clause. However, in the general case the USING clause may select a combination of key columns to match on and attribute columns to be used in the UPDATE ... SET clause. Therefore in the general case, adding DISTINCT to the USING clause will still allow different update rows for the same keys, in which case you will still get the ORA-30926 error.
This is an elaboration of DCookie's answer and point 3.1 in Tagar's answer, which from my experience may not be immediately obvious.
How to Troubleshoot ORA-30926 Errors? (Doc ID 471956.1)
1) Identify the failing statement
alter session set events ‘30926 trace name errorstack level 3’;
or
alter system set events ‘30926 trace name errorstack off’;
and watch for .trc files in UDUMP when it occurs.
2) Having found the SQL statement, check if it is correct (perhaps using explain plan or tkprof to check the query execution plan) and analyze or compute statistics on the tables concerned if this has not recently been done. Rebuilding (or dropping/recreating) indexes may help too.
3.1) Is the SQL statement a MERGE?
evaluate the data returned by the USING clause to ensure that there are no duplicate values in the join. Modify the merge statement to include a deterministic where clause
3.2) Is this an UPDATE statement via a view?
If so, try populating the view result into a table and try updating the table directly.
3.3) Is there a trigger on the table? Try disabling it to see if it still fails.
3.4) Does the statement contain a non-mergeable view in an 'IN-Subquery'? This can result in duplicate rows being returned if the query has a "FOR UPDATE" clause. See Bug 2681037
3.5) Does the table have unused columns? Dropping these may prevent the error.
4) If modifying the SQL does not cure the error, the issue may be with the table, especially if there are chained rows.
4.1) Run the ‘ANALYZE TABLE VALIDATE STRUCTURE CASCADE’ statement on all tables used in the SQL to see if there are any corruptions in the table or its indexes.
4.2) Check for, and eliminate, any CHAINED or migrated ROWS on the table. There are ways to minimize this, such as the correct setting of PCTFREE.
Use Note 122020.1 - Row Chaining and Migration
4.3) If the table is additionally Index Organized, see:
Note 102932.1 - Monitoring Chained Rows on IOTs
Had the error today on a 12c and none of the existing answers fit (no duplicates, no non-deterministic expressions in the WHERE clause). My case was related to that other possible cause of the error, according to Oracle's message text (emphasis below):
ORA-30926: unable to get a stable set of rows in the source tables
Cause: A stable set of rows could not be got because of large dml activity or a non-deterministic where clause.
The merge was part of a larger batch, and was executed on a live database with many concurrent users. There was no need to change the statement. I just committed the transaction before the merge, then ran the merge separately, and committed again. So the solution was found in the suggested action of the message:
Action: Remove any non-deterministic where clauses and reissue the dml.
SQL Error: ORA-30926: unable to get a stable set of rows in the source tables
30926. 00000 - "unable to get a stable set of rows in the source tables"
*Cause: A stable set of rows could not be got because of large dml
activity or a non-deterministic where clause.
*Action: Remove any non-deterministic where clauses and reissue the dml.
This Error occurred for me because of duplicate records(16K)
I tried with unique it worked .
but again when I tried merge without unique same proble occurred
Second time it was due to commit
after merge if commit is not done same Error will be shown.
Without unique, Query will work if commit is given after each merge operation.
I was not able to resolve this after several hours. Eventually I just did a select with the two tables joined, created an extract and created individual SQL update statements for the 500 rows in the table. Ugly but beats spending hours trying to get a query to work.
As someone explained earlier, probably your MERGE statement tries to update the same row more than once and that does not work (could cause ambiguity).
Here is one simple example. MERGE that tries to mark some products as found when matching the given search patterns:
CREATE TABLE patterns(search_pattern VARCHAR2(20));
INSERT INTO patterns(search_pattern) VALUES('Basic%');
INSERT INTO patterns(search_pattern) VALUES('%thing');
CREATE TABLE products (id NUMBER,name VARCHAR2(20),found NUMBER);
INSERT INTO products(id,name,found) VALUES(1,'Basic instinct',0);
INSERT INTO products(id,name,found) VALUES(2,'Basic thing',0);
INSERT INTO products(id,name,found) VALUES(3,'Super thing',0);
INSERT INTO products(id,name,found) VALUES(4,'Hyper instinct',0);
MERGE INTO products p USING
(
SELECT search_pattern FROM patterns
) o
ON (p.name LIKE o.search_pattern)
WHEN MATCHED THEN UPDATE SET p.found=1;
SELECT * FROM products;
If patterns table contains Basic% and Super% patterns then MERGE works and first three products will be updated (found). But if patterns table contains Basic% and %thing search patterns, then MERGE does NOT work because it will try to update second product twice and this causes the problem. MERGE does not work if some records should be updated more than once. Probably you ask why not update twice!?
Here first update 1 and second update 1 are the same value but only by accident. Now look at this scenario:
CREATE TABLE patterns(code CHAR(1),search_pattern VARCHAR2(20));
INSERT INTO patterns(code,search_pattern) VALUES('B','Basic%');
INSERT INTO patterns(code,search_pattern) VALUES('T','%thing');
CREATE TABLE products (id NUMBER,name VARCHAR2(20),found CHAR(1));
INSERT INTO products(id,name,found) VALUES(1,'Basic instinct',NULL);
INSERT INTO products(id,name,found) VALUES(2,'Basic thing',NULL);
INSERT INTO products(id,name,found) VALUES(3,'Super thing',NULL);
INSERT INTO products(id,name,found) VALUES(4,'Hyper instinct',NULL);
MERGE INTO products p USING
(
SELECT code,search_pattern FROM patterns
) s
ON (p.name LIKE s.search_pattern)
WHEN MATCHED THEN UPDATE SET p.found=s.code;
SELECT * FROM products;
Now first product name matches Basic% pattern and it will be updated with code B but second product matched both patterns and cannot be updated with both codes B and T in the same time (ambiguity)!
That's why DB engine complaints. Don't blame it! It knows what it is doing! ;-)