What's the difference on a mvn dependency-tree output between a '+' and a '\'. It seems fairly arbitrary to me, but I'm sure it's not...
+- com.tom:artifact:pom:6.0.0:compile
| +- com.tom:artifact2:jar:1.0.4:compile
| \- com.tom:artifact3:jar:6.0.0:compile
| \- (com.tom:artifact4:jar:1.0.4:compile - omitted for duplicate)
[I've obviously removed the actual group/artifact ids...]
It's only ASCII-Line-Drawing. It only appears at the bottom line (last leave) of a branch as a kind of a south-west corner.
+- first entry first level
| +- 1.1 second level
| \- 1.2 second level
+- second entry first level
\- last entry first level
It also clarifies that 1.2 second level has nothing to do with second entry first level which otherwise mayby considered connected with the south pin of the plus.
Related
I'm using a .mrc script to add a data output to irc currently I'm outputting like this -----> [iNFO] - 12 / 125M/S. What I would like to do is output like this [iNFO] - 12F / 125M/S, so what I need is to add the "F" after the 12.
Here's the code snippet I use
`scon 19 msg #test [iNFO] - $remove($strip($4),$chr(44)) F / $remove($strip($6),$chr(44))`
As you can see that outputs like this [iNFO] - 12 F / 125M/S so I need to remove the space between the "12" and the "F".
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
I am working in a djangocms project that uses the djangocms_text_ckeditor https://github.com/divio/djangocms-text-ckeditor
I would like to integrate a wordcount plugin similar to this https://github.com/w8tcha/CKEditor-wordcount-Plugin
Have someone of you did this before successfully? It would be great if I could get the plugin via pip or so, not downloading and including it in the project. And also, how would the CKEDITOR_SETTINGS look like?
I couldn't find any workaround, just a similar post but that does not use this djangocms text editor for that purpose.
Thanks in advance!
The extension is a javascript plugin for the ckeditor (as opposed to a djangocms plugin).
To load a javascript plugin two steps are needed:
Make the js plugin resources available to ckeditor. This is done through static folder in your project wich includes all js, css etc. files. In the static folder create the folders djangocms_text_ckeditor/ckeditor/plugins. Copy the js plugin into this folder. In your case thats the whole folder wordcount. The directory tree should look like
static
|
+---djangocms_text_ckeditor
| |
| +---ckeditor
| | |
| | +---plugins
| | | |
| | | +---wordcount
| | | | |
| | | | +---css
| | | | +---lang
| | | | +---plugin.js
Let the djangocms plugin ckeditor know about the js plugin. To this end, look for the setting CKEDITOR_SETTINGS in your project's settings.py file. If it is not there create it. It's a dictionary that is used, e.g., to configure the toolbars. In this dictionary have a key extraPlugins with a string value that consists of comma separated names of plugins to load, e.g.,
CKEDITOR_SETTINGS = {
...,
'extraPlugins': 'cmsplugins,wordcount,glyphicons,...',
...,
}
Hope that works for you.
Is it possible to use different tables based on previous steps?
So suppose I have something like
When I choose from a <list> of things
And I run a <test> from that thing chosen with special <parameter>
Examples:
|list|
| a |
| b |
| a |
| test | parameter |
| mytest1 | myparameter1 |
| mytest2 | myparameter2 |
| b |
| test | parameter|
| mytest1 | myparameter3 |
| mytest2 | myparameter4 |
Is this possible and what would be the correct structure?
No its not, and it is a very bad idea. Generally when you want to do programming in your scenarios, you should do it by
Giving it a name
Pushing the programming down into the step definitions
In this particular case you seem to want to be doing some sort of exhaustive testing, where you try a single operation under a number of different conditions. Cucumber is not appropriate for this sort of testing. Instead find a way to do these sort of tests at a lower level of abstraction e.g. a unit test.
The main reason for not doing exhaustive testing in Cucumber is the runtime cost. As a rough rule of thumb each integration test (Cucumber) has a run time cost of hundreds of unit tests (maybe thousands of good unit tests).
Hi I have downloaded the Standard Set from the JMeter plugin site.
I installed it as it says here:
http://jmeter-plugins.org/wiki/PluginInstall/
The problem is that I don't get to see any option in the Listener Menu that let me add a new Graphs Generator Listener as described here:
http://jmeter-plugins.org/wiki/GraphsGeneratorListener/
I need to create a Transactions per Second graph , but I don't know how to do it.
I really appreciate if you could help me out.
Thanks in advance.
If you do not see the extra elements in the menu, there is something wrong with your jmeter-plugins installation.
Make sure you unpacked the zip in the folder above 'bin', that is not clear in the instructions.
At the same folder level as 'bin' there should also be a 'lib', and beneath this, 'ext'.
Check that the 'ext' folder contains the jmeter plugin jar and other support files.
it should look like this:
|-apache-jmeter-2.11
| |-bin
| | |-jmeter.bat
| | |-ApacheJMeter.jar
| | |-...
| |-lib
| | |-ext
| | | |-JMeterPlugin-Standard.jar
| | | |-...
| | |-...
| |-...
|-...
Make sure you restart jmeter after moving these files. If you have the jar in the right place, the extensions will be loaded and available from menu options.
To install the JMeter Plugins,
-> Copy the JMeterPlugins.jar file from JMeterPlugins-VERSION.zip
-> Paste the file to JMETER_INSTALL_DIR/libexec/lib/ext
Here's the structure of my templates:
master
#yield('master1')
#yield('master2')
dashboard
#extends('master')
#section('master1')
#include('sub-1')
submaster
#yield('submaster1')
sub-1
#extends('submaster')
#section('submaster1')
#section('master2') <-- this is what I am trying to do
Here's a more visual representation
master submaster
#yield('master1') #yield('submaster1')
#yield('master2') |
| |
|___ dashboard |
#extends('master') |
#section('master1') |
#include('sub-1') |
| |
|_______ sub-1 _______|
#extends('submaster')
#section('submaster1') <-- from the right
#section('master2') <-- from the left
Is this kind of thing possible with Blade? when I remove the implementation of master2 from sub-1, everything works fine. when I add it back in, the code from submaster continues to render, the code in master2 seems to work and get included in the expected place, but the code in submaster1 stops getting included in the appropriate sections in submaster.