I develop with Visual Studio. I have a class library that contains code common to many products I develop, and is now in use by 15+ solutions. I do LOB apps for my non-software company.
I've been adding this class library project directly to the solutions of all the solutions that need to use it. But I've been using NuGet to pull in many 3rd party packages and I really like its way of doings things. I'm thinking about adding this utility library as a NuGet package in our own repository rather than adding it directly as a project reference in the solution.
Is this a good idea? What criteria should I use to determine when to use NuGet vs when not to for internal class libraries? I realize that some might think this is an opinion based question, but I'm looking for specifically what criteria you'd use to decide rather than opinions about which is better.
Internal libraries that used and worked on by multiple teams can be exposed as Nuget packages. This way, multiple teams can work on the library, and each of them can update to a version as and when needed by that particular team.
Related
Failing to extend my existing project with UWP , i search for reason why certain existing projects can't be extended with UWP.
Here i get an answer that all the nuget packages of X.shared project should be the same(with the same version) in the UWP project.
However , even after doing that the project failed to start , so i asked in the
xamarin-docs github and they tell me that the cause is a nuget package supported only in Ios and Android.
So my question is :
Should all the nuget packages be the same for *.ios *.droid, **.\shared and *.uwp ?
And what if i have other projects(not xamarin projects) in my solution ?
You don't understand the architecture of Xamarin and it is hard to answer in one paragraph, further reading of documentation instead of your constant asking of basically the same question on different places (please note that on the github you where warned that it was not the place to ask such a question) is highly advised.
But I'll try to answer. The package may use (or even need to use) native APIs to achieve some functionalities. Those native APIs are available only on one platform and such code is useless on another platform. So the package author in that case must write the separate implementation for each platform that he wants to support. He may cover just one platform or two or three, it is up to the package author. If the platform is not supported by the package and contains the native APIs, there is almost nothing that you can do aside to write your own implementation of the package for that. Even if you succeed in installing it won't work.
I have been working with the HL7 FHIR .NET API reference implementation - utilizing the existing resource models embedded in the library. Now, I am trying to use the Forge tool to modify the resources (contraints/extensions) to suit my requirements.
I noticed that the HL7 publishing mechanism does not generate C# models from DSTU 2 onwards and was wondering - what is the best way of converting profiles created using Forge into C# resource classes such that they may be included into the HL7.Fhir.Model assembly that is part of the reference implementation.
The generation of the models not being part of the official build is correct.
This has now moved to https://github.com/ewoutkramer/fhir-net-api where the rest of the API is maintained more easily.
It is done using T4 templates on the output from the official builds.
There is a simple process for updating the models with the new versions of the spec, and we keep it fresh as people need it, and for each connectathon we publish a new build in NuGet and have a branch of the code in GitHub.
(Its a powershell script that downloads all the latest build outputs and puts them in the appropriate folders, then you need to run the t4 templates in Visual Studio)
Such as this one for the May Connectathon in Montreal
https://github.com/ewoutkramer/fhir-net-api/tree/ft-connectathon-may2016
This is able to be done yourself with a little assistance.
As for generating code for a profile, we haven't done that as yet, but will theoretically be possible.
Don't know that I'd advise this at the moment while the profiles are in so much development and change.
I am using Xamarin and need to use a PCL
However, I cannot install ServiceStack into the PCL other than the PCL package which is classed as no longer being maintained
Has anyone come across this?
I want to use PCL because I dont want to duplicate code
PCLs are supposed to be supported via the latest Service Stack but this does not appear to be the case
I have code which makes use of ToJson which is in ServiceStack.TExt
I know I could create a folder inside my iphone (and android) assemblies but I am not sure this is a good approach because it doesnt feel right (everything all in one place instead of in proper layers)
Does anyone have any ideas about this?
Paul
Your assumptions aren't correct, ServiceStack PCL Packages ARE still being maintained, but instead of being maintained in individual packages, e.g:
ServiceStack.Client.Pcl
ServiceStack.Text.Pcl
ServiceStack.Interfaces.Pcl
They have now been merged as different profiles into the main client NuGet packages, e.g:
ServiceStack.Client
ServiceStack.Text
ServiceStack.Interfaces
I have looked for similar questions, but could find none other than the difference between solutions and projects. Mine is on the same level, I suppose, but is slightly different.
I'm a previous Java developer thrust into C# recently and I am the sole individual charged with setting up source control, project standards, etc. etc. and this is my first go with Visual Studio (using 2010 Pro).
I understand a solution is a "container" for related projects, but I am unsure the best practices of adding projects to a solution which are related, but are of a different type.
For example, would I place a web project in the same solution with a desktop application or mobile app if they are related (rather near identical) in function? They are basically the same app, but in different formats. They may use the same classes (for a contrived example, a Person class).
To me, they seem obviously related, but are different applications, so it would seem they should be in different solutions.
I appreciate any feedback offered.
Thanks in advance.
Those apps should be in one solution, expecialy if they share functionality, common projects etc. Quite good approach is to group projects within a solution using solution folders, for example "Common", "Web", "Mobile", "Setup" etc. This way you can have logical groups inside solution.
I would place them in the same solution, since this makes it easier to have a common class library as one project in that solution.
There are no rules for this so there is no right or wrong answer. It all comes down to how you want to organize your code. We commonly have web apps and console apps in the same solution because they are functionally tied together and share code so the type of project really does not matter.
I would place them in the same solution. You can create different configurations to build each application or build both of them at the same time. This allows you to change the class and verify changes made to the class will work for both applications.
Also if you start to see functionality start to duplicate across applications it is easier to create new classes and project that can apply to both applications.
You can throw everything in one solution. This is convenient if you often have to debug the library and application code together, but if the solution has many projects it can become unwieldy.
One approach is to treat the solution as 'that which will be installed as a unit.' Then your common library will go in one solution, and your mobile and desktop apps in their own solutions. This keeps solutions smaller, but it can be inconvenient when you are developing everything together-- so it works best when the library is very stable.
I had been following this guide to get areas with multiple projects setup:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee307987(VS.100).aspx
I was stumbling on the step where you modify the .csproj files to enable the AfterBuild configuration. My googling led me to this post from Steve Mosely:
http://avingtonsolutions.com/blog/post/2010/04/03/JQuery-AspNet-MVC-2-Multi-Project-Areas-and-Other-News-Minutia.aspx
So far the only hang up I had was that
I had set up my solution to
incorporate multi project areas which
was supported in the MVC 2 preview
releases of Areas. However, when the
RTM came out it was no longer
supported. I searched and searched for
solutions to my dilemma, but the only
thing I could find was post by
Jonathon who basically had the same
experience I had, and a reference to
an obscure message on a message board
saying (by what appeared to be some
one from the ASP Team) that it was not
supported. To date, I haven't found
any more formal post or article saying
that was not the case.
Is this true? Did this feature get removed from 2010 MVC2? I haven't been able to find a definite answer.
They were removed in Preview 2. The only supported use of areas are single-project areas.
You can reference the Build assembly in the "Futures" download for both MVC2 and MVC3. Of course, multiple Areas are supported in the RC within a single project. I completely disagree with Levi that it didn't make sense to merge multiple projects. It makes total sense when you develop large applications and desire to break up the functionality into "modules", or "mini applications". Simply research topics like "OO programming", "composition", "modular", "dependency injection", "inversion of control", "aspects" and related frameworks like "MEF", "Unity", "Prism", "Composite Application Framework", SmartClient application block, etc. (not to mention all of the incredible non-MS frameworks, but mentioning one means not mentioning another and people get all touchy about things like that...).
Notes: 1) The documented MSBuild tasks are not included in the project files in the release, so you must find and add them and 2) The futures assemblies are not strongly named, so you will want to change the MSBuild tasks to use the "PublicKeyToken=null" in the "AssemblyName" paths.