I'm trying to write a regex to validate a string and accepts only a series of four comma-separated digits, each up to 100. Something like this would be valid:
20,30,40,50
and these invalid:
120,0,20,0
20,30,40,ss
invalid_string
Any thoughts?
They're used for CMYK colours. We just need to store them here, not use them.
Number Range and Subroutine
In Ruby 2+, for a compact regex, use this:
^([0-9]|[1-9][0-9]|100)(?:,\g<1>){3}$
Explanation
The ^ anchor asserts that we are at the beginning of the string
The parentheses around ([0-9]|[1-9][0-9]|100) match a number from 0 to 100 and define subroutine #1
(?:,\g<1>) matches one comma and the expression defined by subroutine # 1
The {3} quantifier repeats that three times
The $ anchor asserts that we are at the end of the string
I'd save myself the headache of using regex for a number related problem. Also the validation message will look akward so it's better to make your own:
validate :that_string_has_only_4_numbers_upto_100
def that_string_has_only_4_numbers_upto_100
errors.add(:str, 'is not valid.') unless str.split(/,/).all? { |n| 1..100 === n.to_i }
end
Unless you a re regex jedi guru like #zx81 :p.
^(?:\d{1,2},){3}\d{1,2}$
Try this
Related
I've printed the code, wit ruby
string = "hahahah"
pring string.gsub("a","b")
How do I add more letter replacements into gsub?
string.gsub("a","b")("h","l") and string.gsub("a","b";"h","l")
didnt work...
*update I have tried this too but without any success .
letters = {
"a" => "l"
"b" => "n"
...
"z" => "f"
}
string = "hahahah"
print string.gsub(\/w\,letters)
You're overcomplicating. As with most method calls in Ruby, you can simply chain #gsub calls together, one after the other:
str = 'adfh'
print str.gsub("a","b").gsub("h","l") #=> 'bdfl'
What you're doing here is applying the second #gsub to the result of the first one.
Of course, that gets a bit long-winded if you do too many of them. So, when you find yourself stringing too many together, you'll want to look for a regex solution. Rubular is a great place to tinker with them.
The way to use your hash trick with #gsub and a regex expression is to provide a hash for all possible matches. This has the same result as the two #gsub calls:
print str.gsub(/[ah]/, {'a'=>'b', 'h'=>'l'}) #=> 'bdfl'
The regex matches either a or h (/[ah]/), and the hash is saying what to substitute for each of them.
All that said, str.tr('ah', 'bl') is the simplest way to solve your problem as specified, as some commenters have mentioned, so long as you are working with single letters. If you need to work with two or more characters per substitution, you'll need to use #gsub.
I have a string:
'my_array1: ["1445","374","1449","378"], my_array2: ["1445","374", "1449","378"]'
I need to match all sets of digits from my_array2: [...] and count how many of them there.
I need to do something like this with regex and ruby MatchData
string = 'my_array1: ["1445","374", "1449","378"], my_array2: ["1445","374", "1449","378"]'
matches = string.match(/my_array2\:\s[\[,]\"(\d+)\"/)
count_matches = matches.size
Expected result should be 4.
What is the correct way of doing it?
If you are guaranteed that the content of my_array2 is always numeric you could simply use split twice. First you splitby my_array2: [" and then split by ,. This should give you the amount of items you are after.
If you are not guaranteed that, you could still split by my_array2 and instead of splitting again, you use a pattern such as "\d+" (or "\d+(\.\d+)? if you have floating point values) and count.
An example of the expression is available here.
I Looking for an Regex to capture this examples of strings:
first_paramenter, first_hash_key: 'class1 class2', second_hash_key: true
first_argument, single_hash_key: 'class1 class2'
first_argument_without_second_argument
The pattern rules are:
The string must start some word (the first parameter) /^(\w+)/
The second parameter is optional
If second parameter provided, must have one comma after fisrt parameter
The second argument is an hash, with keys and values. Values can be true, false or an string enclosed by quotes
The hash keys must start with letter
I'm using this regex, but it matches with the only second example:
^(\w+),(\s[a-z]{1}[a-z_]+:\s'?[\w\s]+'?,?)$
I'd go with something like:
^(\w+)(?:, ([a-z]\w+): ('[^']*')(?:, ([a-z]\w+): (\w+))?)?
Here's a Rubular example of it.
(?:...) create non-capturing groups which we can easily test for existence using ?. That makes it easy to test for optional chunks.
([a-z]\w+) is an easy way to say "it must start with a letter" while allowing normal alpha, digits and "_".
As far as testing for "Values can be true, false or an string enclosed by quotes", I'd do that in code after capturing. It's way too easy to create a complex pattern, and then be unable to maintain it later. It's better to use simple ones, then look to see whether you got what you expected, than to try to enforce it inside the regex.
in the third example, your regex return 5 matches. It would be better if return only one. It's possible?
I'm not sure what you're asking. This will return a single capture for each, but why you'd want that makes no sense to me if you're capturing parameters to send to a method:
/^(\w+(?:, [a-z]\w+: '[^']*'(?:, [a-z]\w+: \w+)?)?)/
http://rubular.com/r/GLVuSOieI6
There is frequently a choice to be made between attacking an entire string with a single regex or breaking the string up with one or more String methods, and then going after each piece separately. The latter approach often makes debugging and testing easier, and may also make the code intelligible to mere mortals. It's always a judgement call, of course, but I think this problem lends itself well to the divide and conquer approach. This is how I'd do it.
Code
def match?(str)
a = str.split(',')
return false unless a.shift.strip =~ /^\w+$/
a.each do |s|
return false unless ((key_val = s.split(':')).size == 2) &&
key_val.first.strip =~ /^[a-z]\w*$/ &&
key_val.last.strip =~ /^(\'.*?\'|true|false)$/
end
true
end
Examples
match?("first_paramenter, first_hash_key: 'class1 class2',
second_hash_key: true")
#=>true
match?("first_argument, single_hash_key: 'class1 class2'")
#=>true
match?("first_argument_without_second_argument")
#=>true
match?("first_parameter, first_hash_key: 7")
#=>false
match?("dogs and cats, first_hash_key: 'class1 class2'")
#=>false
match?("first_paramenter, first_hash_key: 'class1 class2',
second_hash_key: :true")
#=>false
You've got the basic idea, you have a bunch of small mistakes in there
/^(\w+)(,\s[a-z][a-z_]+:\s('[^']*'|true|false))*$/
explained:
/^(\w+) # starts with a word
(
,\s # the comma goes _inside_ the parens since its optional
[a-z][a-z_]+:\s # {1} is completely redundant
( # use | in a capture group to allow different possible keys
'[^']*' | # note that '? doesn't make sure that the quotes always match
true |
false
)
)*$/x # can have 0 or more hash keys after the first word
Apparently I still don't understand exactly how it works ...
Here is my problem: I'm trying to match numbers in strings such as:
910 -6.258000 6.290
That string should gives me an array like this:
[910, -6.2580000, 6.290]
while the string
blabla9999 some more text 1.1
should not be matched.
The regex I'm trying to use is
/([-]?\d+[.]?\d+)/
but it doesn't do exactly that. Could someone help me ?
It would be great if the answer could clarify the use of the parenthesis in the matching.
Here's a pattern that works:
/^[^\d]+?\d+[^\d]+?\d+[\.]?\d+$/
Note that [^\d]+ means at least one non digit character.
On second thought, here's a more generic solution that doesn't need to deal with regular expressions:
str.gsub(/[^\d.-]+/, " ").split.collect{|d| d.to_f}
Example:
str = "blabla9999 some more text -1.1"
Parsed:
[9999.0, -1.1]
The parenthesis have different meanings.
[] defines a character class, that means one character is matched that is part of this class
() is defining a capturing group, the string that is matched by this part in brackets is put into a variable.
You did not define any anchors so your pattern will match your second string
blabla9999 some more text 1.1
^^^^ here ^^^ and here
Maybe this is more what you wanted
^(\s*-?\d+(?:\.\d+)?\s*)+$
See it here on Regexr
^ anchors the pattern to the start of the string and $ to the end.
it allows Whitespace \s before and after the number and an optional fraction part (?:\.\d+)? This kind of pattern will be matched at least once.
maybe /(-?\d+(.\d+)?)+/
irb(main):010:0> "910 -6.258000 6.290".scan(/(\-?\d+(\.\d+)?)+/).map{|x| x[0]}
=> ["910", "-6.258000", "6.290"]
str = " 910 -6.258000 6.290"
str.scan(/-?\d+\.?\d+/).map(&:to_f)
# => [910.0, -6.258, 6.29]
If you don't want integers to be converted to floats, try this:
str = " 910 -6.258000 6.290"
str.scan(/-?\d+\.?\d+/).map do |ns|
ns[/\./] ? ns.to_f : ns.to_i
end
# => [910, -6.258, 6.29]
i have a string like
/root/children[2]/header[1]/something/some[4]/table/tr[1]/links/a/b
and
/root/children[2]/header[1]/something/some[4]/table/tr[2]
how can i reproduce the string so that all the /\[\d+\]/ are removed except for the last /\[\d+\]/ ?
so i should end up with .
/root/children/header/something/some/table/tr[1]/links/a/b
and
/root/children/header/something/some/table/tr[2]
No loops for you. Use a lookahead assertion (?= ... ):
s.gsub(/\[\d+\](?=.*\[)/, "")
There's a reasonable explanation of the very useful lookaround operators here
We will have to use while loop, I guess. And here comes good ol' C-style-loop solution:
while s.gsub!(/(\[\d+\])(.*?)(\[\d+\])/, '\2\3'); end
It's a bit hard to read, so I'll explain. The idea is that we match the string with a pattern that requires two [\d+] blocks to persist in a string. In the replacement, we just delete the first one. We repeat it until string doesn't match (so it contains only one such block) and utilize the fact that gsub! doesn't perform substitution when string is unmatched.
I'm absolutely certain there's a more elegant solution, but this ought to get you going:
string = "/root/children[2]/header[1]/something/some[4]/table/tr[1]/links/a/b"
count = string.scan(/\[\d+\]/).size
index = 0
string.gsub(/\[\d+\]/) do |capture|
index += 1
index == count ? capture : ""
end
Try this:
str.scan(/\[\d+\]/)[0..-2].each {|match| str.sub!(match, '')}