I've been reading about how wonderful Visual Studio 2013's new Sql Server Data Tools are, and about the new localdb database server, etc., so I've been trying to do what would seem to me to be the point of the whole thing - to embed a local test/development database in a VS solution, so that when I check out a project into a clean directory, on a new machine, I can just run my application, connected to the database in the solution.
But I've not been able to figure out how to do it.
Can anyone give me any hints? Or directions to a tutorial?
Adding some clarification
There's a tutorial on how to include a localdb database in a project, on MSDN, here:
Local Data Overview
But, unfortunately, it doesn't work. I followed through the instructions, exactly, and it all seemed to work, until I moved the solution folder to a new location, at which point it lost track of the database.
The problem is the connection string, which contains an absolute path to where the database was when it was created. Which is useless. I need to be able to check out a project to any location, on any machine, and have it build and run there.
<connectionStrings>
<add name="ConnectLocalData.Properties.Settings.SampleDatabaseConnectionString"
connectionString="Data Source=(LocalDB)\v11.0;AttachDbFilename=E:\dev\Experiments\LocalDbWalkthrough\SampleDatabaseWalkthrough\SampleDatabase.mdf;Integrated Security=True;Connect Timeout=30"
providerName="System.Data.SqlClient"
/>
</connectionStrings>
Apparently, this question has been asked before:
Make the connectionstring's AttachDbFilename relative in config file
But that question has no answers.
So, I found the trick.
ADO allows connection strings to start with |DataDirectory| - which is a substitution string that is replaced by the "DataDirectory" setting of the current AppDomain.
This usually defaults to the location of the .EXE, though it varies with websites, click-once installs, etc.
And because EntityFramework builds on ADO, it works in EF, too.
What makes it work is that you can change it, on program start, to point anywhere you like.
What I am doing is putting an appSetting with a path relative to the location of the .EXE, in each project's App.config, and using it to set it on program start:
<appSettings>
<!-- path to the directory containing the database, relative to the location of the .exe -->
<add
key="dataDir"
value="..\..\..\DataBase"
/>
</appSettings>
<connectionStrings>
<add
name="EmbeddedDatabaseConnectionString"
connectionString="Data Source=(LocalDB)\v11.0;AttachDbFilename=|DataDirectory|EmbeddedDatabase.mdf;Integrated Security=True"
providerName="System.Data.SqlClient"
/>
</connectionStrings>
And then in code:
public class ReadWithADO
{
static ReadWithADO()
{
var appSetting = ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["dataDir"];
var baseDir = AppDomain.CurrentDomain.BaseDirectory;
var path = Path.Combine(baseDir, appSetting);
var fullPath = Path.GetFullPath(path);
AppDomain.CurrentDomain.SetData("DataDirectory", fullPath);
}
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var connectionString = ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings["EmbeddedDatabaseConnectionString"].ConnectionString;
using (var con = new SqlConnection(connectionString))
{
con.Open();
var cmd = new SqlCommand("SELECT * FROM Customer", con);
var rdr = cmd.ExecuteReader();
while (rdr.Read())
{
Console.WriteLine(rdr[0]);
}
}
Console.Write("<Press any key>");
Console.ReadKey();
}
}
This works just the same in Entity Framework:
<connectionStrings>
<add
name="EmbeddedDatabaseEntities"
connectionString="metadata=res://*/EmbeddedDatabase.csdl|res://*/EmbeddedDatabase.ssdl|res://*/EmbeddedDatabase.msl;provider=System.Data.SqlClient;provider connection string="data source=(LocalDB)\v11.0;attachdbfilename=|DataDirectory|EmbeddedDatabase.mdf;integrated security=True;connect timeout=30;MultipleActiveResultSets=True;App=EntityFramework""
providerName="System.Data.EntityClient"
/>
</connectionStrings>
<appSettings>
<!-- path to the directory containing the database, relative to the location of the .exe -->
<add
key="dataDir"
value="..\..\..\DataBase"
/>
</appSettings>
And:
public class ReadWithEF
{
static ReadWithEF()
{
var appSetting = ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["dataDir"];
var baseDir = AppDomain.CurrentDomain.BaseDirectory;
var path = Path.Combine(baseDir, appSetting);
var fullPath = Path.GetFullPath(path);
AppDomain.CurrentDomain.SetData("DataDirectory", fullPath);
}
private static void Main(string[] args)
{
using (var db = new EmbeddedDatabaseEntities())
{
foreach (var customer in db.Customers)
{
Console.WriteLine(customer.CustomerId);
}
}
Console.Write("<Press any key>");
Console.ReadKey();
}
}
With this you can have a local database that you use in development, or when running unit tests that aren't really unit tests. (Strictly speaking, if a test is hitting a database, it's an integration test, not a unit test, but such tests can be very useful, even if they do violate doctrinal purity.)
And since your production installations are going to use connection strings that point to real database servers, instead of to local files, none of this messing about with DataDirectory will have any effect.
Take a look into "binary resources". In addition to resources like icons, cursors, and string tables, arbitrary binary blobs can be added to the executable. One example would be to embed precompiled hlsl shaders. Another example is sysinternals processes explorer. The 64bit executable is a resource inside the 32bit executable.
If your database api expects a file to mount you may need to copy out this resource to disk. Otherwise use directly. Examples can be found in the platform sdk.
Related
I'm currently trying to load embedded ViewComponents from external assemblies.
I've included this in my project file:
<EmbeddedResource Include="Views\**\*.cshtml" />
so when I inspect the actual assembly and run GetManifestResourceNames() I see that the file is embedded.
I'm then calling this method in ConfigureService() in Startup.cs:
public static IMvcBuilder GetModules(this IMvcBuilder mvcBuilder)
{
var embeddedFileProviders = new List<EmbeddedFileProvider>
{
new EmbeddedFileProvider(Assembly.GetCallingAssembly())
};
mvcBuilder.ConfigureApplicationPartManager(apm =>
{
foreach (string modulePath in Directory.GetFiles(Configuration.Settings.Path, "*.Module.dll"))
{
var assembly = Assembly.LoadFrom(modulePath);
var startUpType = (from t in assembly.GetTypes()
where t.GetInterfaces().Contains(typeof(IModuleStartup))
select t).FirstOrDefault();
RegisterModuleServices(mvcBuilder, startUpType);
apm.ApplicationParts.Add(new AssemblyPart(assembly));
embeddedFileProviders.Add(new EmbeddedFileProvider(assembly));
Modules.Assemblies.Add(assembly);
}
var compositeFileProvider = new CompositeFileProvider(embeddedFileProviders);
mvcBuilder.Services.AddSingleton<IFileProvider>(compositeFileProvider);
});
return mvcBuilder;
}
I'm also not using
mvcBuilder.Services.Configure<RazorViewEngineOptions>(o =>
{
o.FileProviders.Add(compositeFileProvider);
});
as this doesn't work at all and the action o.FileProviders.Add(compositeFileProvider) is not even called.
All the embedded file providers are found when I inject IFileProvider but none of the files are found when I run _fileProvider.GetDirectoryContents("");
Does anybody have any idea why?
So i figured out why it wasn't returning anything...
It seems that I didn't set the baseNameSpace parameter when created the new EmbeddedFileProvider. stupid huh.
But there were quite a few examples that didn't set this and it worked.
Hopefully this helps some other people out there if they experience this issue.
Watch also your project root namespace setting. My case was the reverse - I copy-n-pasted a project file and it did not retain the namespace setting from the previous project. This was because I did not explicitly set <RootNamespace>YourNameSpaceNameHere</RootNamespace> in the .csproj settings
(nested under the <PropertyGroup> block at the top), so it took my file name as the namespace! It was quite a "gotcha" moment, and much time lost, to find out my code correctly sets the baseNameSpace parameter, but the whole time the project was storing the files under a different namespace! (you can open the DLL in any text editor, scroll to the bottom, and you should easily be able to make out the embedded text to verify). It was there, just not found. In case someone has this correct, you can also dump ALL files using {Assembly}.GetManifestResourceNames() and make sure your names are correct.
In my case I had '.' (period) in the resource filename.
I had this error in an ASPNET Core 3.0 project, where my external class library had the file correctly embedded, but the web application was not locating them at runtime. It turns out the example I copied from the internet had a namespace provided and I copied that example namespace without considering the implications...
After a bit of research, I was able to fix it by simply using the proper root namespace defined my own Class Library:
var embeddedFileProvider =
new Microsoft.Extensions.FileProviders
.EmbeddedFileProvider(assembly, "ViewComponentLibrary");
changed to
var embeddedFileProvider =
new Microsoft.Extensions.FileProviders
.EmbeddedFileProvider(assembly, "MyProjectLibrary");
We had another root cause leading to this problem. We had migrate our build agents from windows to linux, and FS case-sensitivity of the latter did the trick - it didn't found embedded resources:
<EmbeddedResource Include="swagger\ui\*" />
because on file system we have Swagger\ui\
So the #(EmbeddedResource) path must be the same as the File System path:
<EmbeddedResource Include="Swagger\ui\*" />
(or rename files/directories, to match the #(EmbeddedResource).
I´ve searched the following links:
How to deploy Oracle with EF
Problems deploying Oracle with EF
And many other posts around regarding Oracle deployment.
Basically I have an C# simple test application to insert some rows into a database (this is a test application. The full application uses a lot of EF stuff):
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Threading;
using System.Diagnostics;
using MzDbLib.DataAccessObject;
using MzDbLib.DatabaseContext;
using MzDbLib.DatabaseModel;
namespace TestDbConnection
{
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
Console.WriteLine("This program will generate 10 logs into SYSTEMDATALOG table");
///
/// Do a loop of 10 logs generated
///
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
{
string msg = "TEST GENERATED LOG NUMBER " + i.ToString();
Console.Write("Generating log " + i.ToString() + "...");
//
// Connect to database and to the log table
//
Entities dbContext = new Entities();
SYSTEMDATALOG logTable = new SYSTEMDATALOG();
logTable.DATETIME = DateTime.Now;
logTable.TYPE = "INFO";
logTable.SEVERITY = 0;
logTable.SOURCE = "TESTDBCONNECTION";
logTable.USER = "SYSTEM";
logTable.MESSAGE = msg;
dbContext.SYSTEMDATALOG.Add(logTable);
dbContext.SaveChanges();
Console.WriteLine("Done.");
}
Console.WriteLine ("Data generated at the database. Press a key to end test.");
Console.ReadKey();
//
// Application exit
//
Environment.Exit(0);
}
}
}
The dbContext and SYSTEMDATALOG classes were generated though EF model-first from an Oracle database. I´m using Visual Studio 2012 and ODAC 12.1.0.1.0 with Oracle Developer Tools 32-bit installed on development machine. All fresh install and working pretty fine when developing.
All runs fine in DEVELOPMENT, but neve in production.
I´m using in production WINDOWS SERVER 2012. I have tried the following approaches:
a) Install WS2012 from schatch and install ODAC 32-bit version 12.1.0.1.0 fresh from Oracle site. I did run install
with ODAC 4 version.
I got "The provider is not compatible with the version of Oracle client". After some tries and some hours lost, with different approaches, I decided to go to a new method - non-installating Oracle
b) I fresh installed WS2012 and did no ORacle installation. Copied the DLLs stated in the above links and now I´m getting "Unable to find the requested .NET data provider". I´ve copied all the available Oracle DLLs from DEV machine to the WS2012 EXE directory of my application and still getting that error.
My connection string (auto-generated by VS2012) is:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<configuration>
<startup>
<supportedRuntime version="v4.0" sku=".NETFramework,Version=v4.5" />
</startup>
<connectionStrings>
<add name="Entities" connectionString="metadata=res://*/DatabaseModel.DatabaseModel.csdl|res://*/DatabaseModel.DatabaseModel.ssdl|res://*/DatabaseModel.DatabaseModel.msl;provider=Oracle.DataAccess.Client;provider connection string="data source=//ORACLESERVER1:1521/MEZAMES;password=xxx;persist security info=True;user id=MZMESDB"" providerName="System.Data.EntityClient" />
</connectionStrings>
</configuration>
This string is being generated into 2 files: TestDbConnection.exe.config and TestDbConnection.vshost.exe.config (I´m copying the bin/Debug folder to the server).
So, I need help to deploy my app to the new server. Some questions:
a) Which DLL is needed to go with the application for ODAC 12.1.0.1 ? Does that changed from ODAC 11 ?
b) Is that last error regarding EF or Oracle ?
c) Why does VS generated 2 config files ?
d) Does "providerName="System.Data.EntityClient" is the cause of the error ? If so, what DLL should be copied together.
e) Is there any tool/way to know what´s missing or with incompatible version, avoiding copying and trying methods ?
f) Is something missing on the config file ?
Thanks all for any kind of help. This is making me crazy as I´m stuck on that since the beggining of the week...
I'm not sure about the installation options for ODAC in a server environment. I know you need the Transaction module only if you're using TransactionScope in your code.
The problem you're seeing from not being able to find the provider is because Oracle changed the provider name from Oracle.DataAccess.Client to Oracle.ManagedDataAccess.Client with the 12c bits.
You need to change this in both the connection strings and in the SSDL section of the EDMX file: you will go from
<edmx:StorageModels>
<Schema Namespace="Model.Store" Alias="Self" Provider="Oracle.DataAccess.Client" (...)
to
<edmx:StorageModels>
<Schema Namespace="Model.Store" Alias="Self" Provider="Oracle.ManagedDataAccess.Client" (...)
With VS 2010 SP1 I created an ASP.NET MVC4 project from the "internet" template. I then created a connection string for SQL Server CE 4.0:
<add name="DefaultConnection"
connectionString="Data Source=|DataDirectory|MyDatabase.sdf;Password=123456"
providerName="System.Data.SqlServerCe" />
With the web application successfully debug-launched in cassini, I choose the "Register" user option. Immediately this causes the InitializeSimpleMembershipAttribute filter to execute. The filter crashes the site when it reaches this code:
Database.SetInitializer<UsersContext>(null);
using (var context = new UsersContext())
{
if (!context.Database.Exists())
{
// Create the SimpleMembership database without Entity Framework migration schema
((IObjectContextAdapter)context).ObjectContext.CreateDatabase();
}
}
//This line never executes. It is meant to configure my custom user table.
WebSecurity.InitializeDatabaseConnection("DefaultConnection", "Users", "ID", "UserName", true);
The Exists() check throws an ArgumentException stating:
Unable to find the requested .Net Framework Data Provider. It may not be installed.
Now I wanted to be sure that (1) there was nothing wrong with my connection string and (2) there was nothing wrong with my provider. To do that, I inserted a snippet of code before the Exists() check. The snippet used a new SqlCeEngine to create the database, and Dapper calls to setup user tables. That code worked just fine, just before exploding on the Exists() check again.
I then considered that EF might need some additional setup help. I tried replacing the EF defaultConnectionFactory in my web.config:
<entityFramework>
<defaultConnectionFactory type="System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.SqlCeConnectionFactory, EntityFramework">
<parameters>
<parameter value="System.Data.SqlServerCe.4.0" />
</parameters>
</defaultConnectionFactory>
</entityFramework>
Still the exception I received did not change.
I'm now wondering if EF needs a "special" connection string to work with SQL Server CE. I will be checking here and here. But at first glance I'm not sure that is the issue.
Thoughts?
EF requires the providers to be installed.
Use one the connect to DB options to check. eg ADD Entity DAta Model to Project. Just to the providers available to it. Do you see your preferred connection Client ?
Seems Compact edition should work with some restrictions...
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc835494.aspx
So then I think its The "DEFAULT CONNECTION" issue
See the Context constructor. EF looks for a connection by that name unless you pass an alternative in.
try...
<connectionStrings>
<add name="MyContextName" connectionString="bla";App=EntityFramework"
providerName="System.Data.SqlServerCe.4.0" />
You need to install Sql Server Compact edition. You can download it from here.
I'm using MSTest under Visual Studio 2010 to test an ASP.NET MVC 3 project. I have a SQL Express 2005 DB that I'd like it to use and I want a fresh instance of the DB every time, copied from a template I've included in the project. Pretty standard requirements, I would have though, but I can't get this to work.
I've created a .testsettings file which enables deployment and my connection string looks like this:
<add name="MyDb" connectionString="Data Source=.\SQLEXPRESS2005;Database=MyDbTest;AttachDBFilename=|DataDirectory|MyDbTest.mdf;User Instance=true;Integrated Security=SSPI;" providerName="System.Data.SqlClient" />
The test runs OK the first time, but after that it fails with errors like this:
Test method ... threw exception: System.Data.DataException: An exception occurred while initializing the database. See the InnerException for details. ---> System.Data.EntityException: The underlying provider failed on Open.
---> System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Database '...\bin\Debug\MyDbTest.mdf' already exists. Choose a different database name. Cannot attach the file '...\Out\MyDbTest.mdf' as database 'MyDbTest'.
The accepted answer in this MSDN thead says to remove the "Database=" connection string parameter. However, if I do that it fails with this error:
Test method ... threw exception:
System.InvalidOperationException: Unable to complete operation. The supplied SqlConnection does not specify an initial catalog.
How do I get this to work?
So far I've come up with a hack to change the DB name at runtime, at test assembly initialization time. This requires a further hack - using Reflection to enable modifying the configuration at runtime (thanks to David Gardiner).
[TestClass]
public static class TestHelper
{
[AssemblyInitialize]
public static void AssemblyInit(TestContext context)
{
RandomizeDbName();
}
private static void RandomizeDbName()
{
// Get the DB connection string setting
var connStringSetting = ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings["TheDbSetting"];
// Hack it using Reflection to make it writeable
var readOnlyField = typeof(ConfigurationElement).GetField("_bReadOnly",
BindingFlags.Instance | BindingFlags.NonPublic);
readOnlyField.SetValue(connStringSetting, false);
// Randomize the DB name, so that SQL Express doesn't complain that it's already in use
connStringSetting.ConnectionString = connStringSetting.ConnectionString.Replace(
"Database=MyTestDb", "Database=MyTestDb_" + new Random().Next());
}
}
Edit: It's actually even a bit worse than this: I'm having to call TestHelper.RandomizeDbName() at the start of every test that requires a fresh DB, otherwise it gets data left over from previous tests.
Can someone please post a confirmed example using linq to retrieve and update a record in CRM Dynamics 2011.
Microsoft claims this is "unsupported" but I have a suspicion it is possible.
I use the "early bound" approach where you generate C# entity classes using the CrmSvcUtil.exe tool, but make sure you use the /codecustomization switch that you'll find in various examples. You'll need the latest version of the CRM 2011 SDK, and must run CrmSvcUtil.exe from the \bin folder of that (don't use the version that installs with CRM).
Your project will need to reference Microsoft.Xrm.Client, Microsoft.Xrm.Sdk and Microsoft.Crm.Sdk.Proxy plus a few others from the .Net framework (look at the build errors to see what you're missing, then add them until it builds).
Here is a basic code snippet that retrieves a Contact entity, updates one of its fields, then saves it back to CRM:
CrmDataContext dc = new CrmDataContext("Xrm");
Contact contact = (from c in dc.ContactSet
where ...whatever...
select c).FirstOrDefault();
contact.FirstName = "Jo";
dc.SaveChanges();
(Note that CrmDataContext is the name of my data context. You can set this name using one of the CrmSvcUtil command line switches).
You'll also need to add a few things to your web.config:
<configSections>
<section name="microsoft.xrm.client" type="Microsoft.Xrm.Client.Configuration.CrmSection, Microsoft.Xrm.Client" />
</configSections>
<connectionStrings>
<add name="Xrm" connectionString="Server=http://<your crm url>; Domain=<your domain>; Username=<a crm user id>; Password=<their password>" />
</connectionStrings>
<microsoft.xrm.client>
<contexts>
<add name="Xrm" type="" />
</contexts>
</microsoft.xrm.client>
This is assuming you are running CRM on your corporate network, so the account and domain specified in the connection string would be an AD account, who is set up as a CRM user with relevant permissions to retrieve and update entities.
This is a rough example of using the ODATA provider connected to the online provider
var serverConfig = GetServerConfig(sessionKey);
// Connect to the Organization service.
// The using statement ensures that the service proxy will be properly disposed.
using (var serviceProxy = new OrganizationServiceProxy(serverConfig.OrganizationUri, serverConfig.HomeRealmUri, serverConfig.Credentials, serverConfig.DeviceCredentials))
{
// This statement is required to enable early-bound type support.
serviceProxy.ServiceConfiguration.CurrentServiceEndpoint.Behaviors.Add(new ProxyTypesBehavior());
using (var orgContext = new CrmServiceContext(serviceProxy))
{
return orgContext.AccountSet.Where(item => item.Id == id).Select().Single();
}
}
there's also a good example in the SDK:
CRM2011Sdk\sdk\samplecode\cs\wsdlbasedproxies\online