All my SSRS knowledge came to nothing, when I need to create a report in SSRS 2005.
I prepared a Matrix report. Class is grouped (In green).
See the images below.
Fig 1: This is what I am trying to create
Fig 2: This is what I have so far created.
Question:
Do we have static column Header option in SSRS 2005. (In 2008/2012 ,we add a row above and outside the group)?
Any ideas to bring the static header (Header in red colored part of the report)
PS:
once again, I am looking for a solution in SSRS 2005
Edit: 04/09
Session and Paper as a group on ROW
Class on Column group
Under Column group, Average, Class Max, Class Min and Attendance
I don't know that there is a good built-in way to do this properly and it seems microsoft fixed the issue in SSRS 2008.
one possible workaround is to add a Rectangle into the top-left cell of the matrix at first, and then add multiple textboxes in to it for displaying column headers.
Related
I have a question similar to this one:
How do you populate an SSRS TextBox with a DataSet value?
I'm on old release 2012 R1 and designing report in Visual Studio 2010 shell.
I want user to enter a specific order number, and thus the query will return just one row. I want to show the fields down the page (better for viewing/printing), instead of across the page like the normal table does (especially if I have so many fields that they don't fit on the width of one screen).
Example:
Don't I just bind the textbox to a database field on the properties using DataElementName. That's what I didn't understand about the post I referenced above.
I think I figured it out. I clicked Action then was able to select the database field from a list. After that, I also noticed I can right click, then click "Expressions", and the following screen appears:
I'm new to Stack overflow and new to SSRS report building. I'm currently building a report that needs to display each option from and option set in a different column I also need to pull date a last and next date range for each option it is page grouped by a company name and then further grouped by the employee's full name. any help would be very much appreciated.
Excel mock-up
Report table layout
I need it to out put like the Excel image ideally if possible, I've found the value id's but i'm stumped as to how if I can at all display them in the columns I've labelled.
It looks like you need to use a matrix control in your report. It will display your values in a pivot view like Excel.
Microsoft Documentation
How do I stop SSRS from hiding a column when previewing if the column has nothing more than empty rows? I have set all columns to be fully visible, yet the report preview does not show the empty columns. I know that this is a default feature within Visual Studio that hides all empty columns by default, so how do I change it so it can show all columns no matter what. Where can I change those settings?
If you mean the preview in the query designer of the dataset:
This is only possible when writing your own MDX since the generated code always generates a SELECT NON EMPTY for the measure axis. So removing the NON EMPTY part will always show your column/measure.
If you mean the ssrs report preview:
Columns only hide when using a table matrix with a column group. In this case make sure your dataset always returns each column group at least once, regardless of your chosen filters. E.g. if using MDX this could mean removing a NON EMPTY from your row axis or using the right-click option "include empty cells".
Clarification for comment plus possible workaround:
This "hiding columns" things is no feature. If the column isn't in the result of the dataset, SSRS can't know that this value even exists, so there is no solution if using a column group except for redesigning your query.
You could work around this by not using a column group and instead of using static "hard-coded" columns which, for example, sum the values depending on your group. See the following example screenshot i made: example
Browsed quite a while for this on the web, trying different things with no luck.
As i understand, there's no support for putting an expression on the width of a table cell/column.
I saw there was a lot of complaining about this, and i could find no proper workaround for my scenario.
I'm creating a custom report designer where the customer can add fields and all they need in a ax form, I the create the report based on all this info.
I have a width property they can fill in the desired width of the field and need this to be reflected dynamically in Ax.
In Visual Studio 2010 i have this:
I have two tables, one for the headers and one for the data, in other words I can't "pad" the headers with empty spaces to make the columns expand it's width as a workaround, nor does it help to put expressions in the padding properties, as this does not expand the with of the column...
Any suggestions on this?
I hope i don't have to modify the XML file for the report in AX, and would this even be possible considering deployment and everything?
Is there anyway to set these properties in ax and make it happen automatically in the report?
Is there any version of ssrs-reports that allows for width-expressions?
Do you mean this padding property? I can see this properties. I'm using SSRS 2008 R2
Are you putting all your headers in one field?
Why not put your headers in Column Grouping so they span across the page?
This seems like a simple question but I cannot find anything on adding a tablix control to an SSRS report.
I don't see this control in the toolbox in bids or in report builder 3.0.
I'm using SSRS 2008 R2.
Can someone kindly tell me how to add this control to a report?
I found the answer here:
The table, matrix, and list data regions are represented on the ribbon by templates for the underlying tablix data region. When you add one of these templates to a report, you are actually adding a tablix data region that is optimized for a specific data layout. By default, a table template displays detail data in a grid layout, a matrix displays group data in a grid layout, and a list displays detail data in a free-form layout.
Could it be any more unintuitive?