I'm trying to learn elasticsearch with a simple example application, that lists quotations associated with people. The example mapping might look like:
{
"people" : {
"properties" : {
"name" : { "type" : "string"},
"quotations" : { "type" : "string" }
}
}
}
Some example data might look like:
{ "name" : "Mr A",
"quotations" : [ "quotation one, this and that and these"
, "quotation two, those and that"]
}
{ "name" : "Mr B",
"quotations" : [ "quotation three, this and that"
, "quotation four, those and these"]
}
I would like to be able to use the querystring api on individual quotations, and return the people who match. For instance, I might want to find people who have a quotation that contains (this AND these) - which should return "Mr A" but not "Mr B", and so on. How can I achieve this?
EDIT1:
Andrei's answer below seems to work, with data values now looking like:
{"name":"Mr A","quotations":[{"value" : "quotation one, this and that and these"}, {"value" : "quotation two, those and that"}]}
However, I can't seem to get a query_string query to work. The following produces no results:
{
"query": {
"nested": {
"path": "quotations",
"query": {
"query_string": {
"default_field": "quotations",
"query": "quotations.value:this AND these"
}
}
}
}
}
Is there a way to get a query_string query working with a nested object?
Edit2: Yes it is, see Andrei's answer.
For that requirement to be achieved, you need to look at nested objects, not to query a flattened list of values but individual values from that nested object. For example:
{
"mappings": {
"people": {
"properties": {
"name": {
"type": "string"
},
"quotations": {
"type": "nested",
"properties": {
"value": {
"type": "string"
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
Values:
{"name":"Mr A","quotations":[{"value": "quotation one, this and that and these"}, {"value": "quotation two, those and that"}]}
{"name":"Mr B","quotations":[{"value": "quotation three, this and that"}, {"value": "quotation four, those and these"}]}
Query:
{
"query": {
"nested": {
"path": "quotations",
"query": {
"bool": {
"must": [
{ "match": {"quotations.value": "this"}},
{ "match": {"quotations.value": "these"}}
]
}
}
}
}
}
Unfortunately there is no good way to do that.
https://web.archive.org/web/20141021073225/http://www.elasticsearch.org/guide/en/elasticsearch/guide/current/complex-core-fields.html
When you get a document back from Elasticsearch, any arrays will be in
the same order as when you indexed the document. The _source field
that you get back contains exactly the same JSON document that you
indexed.
However, arrays are indexed — made searchable — as multi-value fields,
which are unordered. At search time you can’t refer to “the first
element” or “the last element”. Rather think of an array as a bag of
values.
In other words, it is always considering all values in the array.
This will return only Mr A
{
"query": {
"match": {
"quotations": {
"query": "quotation one",
"operator": "AND"
}
}
}
}
But this will return both Mr A & Mr B:
{
"query": {
"match": {
"quotations": {
"query": "this these",
"operator": "AND"
}
}
}
}
If scripting is enabled, this should work:
"script": {
"inline": "for(element in _source.quotations) { if(element == 'this' && element == 'these') {return true;} }; return false;"
}
Related
I need to add a parameter to my search that filters results containing a specific word in a value. The query is searching for user history records and contains a url key. I need to filter out /history and any other url containing that string.
Here's my current query:
GET /user_log/_search
{
"size" : 50,
"query": {
"match": {
"user_id": 56678
}
}
}
Here's an example of a record, boiled down to just the value we're looking at:
"_source": {
"url": "/history?page=2&direction=desc",
},
How can the parameters of the search be changed to filter out this result.
You can use the filter param of boolean query in Elasticsearch.
if your url field is of type keyword, you can use the below query
{
"query": {
"bool": {
"must": {
"match": {
"user_id": 56678
}
},
"filter": { --> note filter
"term": {
"url": "/history"
}
}
}
}
}
I found a way to solve my specific issue. Instead of filtering on the url I'm filtering on a different value. Here's what I'm using now:
{
"size" : 50,
"query": {
"bool" : {
"must" : {
"match" : { "user_id" : 56678 }
},
"must_not": {
"match" : { "controller": "History" }
}
}
}
}
I'm still going to leave this question open for a while to see if anyone has other ways of solving the original problem.
I'm adding documents with the following strutucte
{
"proposta": {
"matriculaIndicacao": 654321,
"filial": 100,
"cpf": "12345678901",
"idStatus": "3",
"status": "Reprovada",
"dadosPessoais": {
"nome": "John Five",
"dataNascimento": "1980-12-01",
"email": "fulanodasilva#fulano.com.br",
"emailValidado": true,
"telefoneCelular": "11 99876-9999",
"telefoneCelularValidado": true,
"telefoneResidencial": "11 2211-1122",
"idGenero": "1",
"genero": "M"
}
}
}
I'm trying to perform a search with multiple field values.
I can successfull search for a document with a specific cpf atribute with the following search
{
"query": {
"term" : {
"proposta.cpf" : "23798770823"
}
}
}
But now I need to add an AND clause, like
{
"query": {
"term" : {
"proposta.cpf" : "23798770823"
,"proposta.dadosPessoais.dataNascimento": "1980-12-01"
}
}
}
but it's returning an error message.
P.S: If possible I would like to perform a search where if the field doesn't exist, it returns the document that matches only the proposta.cpf field.
I really appreciate any help.
The idea is to combine your constraints within a bool/should query
{
"query": {
"bool": {
"should": [
{
"term": {
"proposta.cpf": "23798770823"
}
},
{
"term": {
"proposta.dadosPessoais.dataNascimento": "1980-12-01"
}
}
]
}
}
}
I'm using Elasticsearch with the python library and I have a problem using the search query when the object become a little bit complex. I have objects build like that in my index:
{
"id" : 120,
"name": bob,
"shared_status": {
"post_id": 123456789,
"text": "This is a sample",
"urls" : [
{
"url": "http://test.1.com",
"displayed_url": "test.1.com"
},
{
"url": "http://blabla.com",
"displayed_url": "blabla.com"
}
]
}
}
Now I want to do a query that will return me this document only if in one of the displayed URL's a substring "test" and there is a field "text" in the main document. So I did this query:
{
"query": {
"bool": {
"must": [
{"exists": {"field": "text"}}
]
}
}
}
}
But I don't know what query to add for the part: one of the displayed URL's a substring "test"
Is that posssible? How does the iteration on the list works?
If you didn't define an explicit mapping for your schema, elasticsearch creates a default mapping based on the data input.
urls will be of type object
displayed_url will be of type string and using standard analyzer
As you don't need any association between url and displayed_url, the current schema will work fine.
You can use a match query for full text match
GET _search
{
"query": {
"bool": {
"must": [
{
"exists": {
"field": "text"
}
},
{
"match": {
"urls.displayed_url": "test"
}
}
]
}
}
}
In our Elasticsearch collection of products, we have an an array of hashes, called "nutrients". A partial example of the data would be:
"_source": {
"quantity": "150.0",
"id": 1001,
"barcode": "7610809001066",
"nutrients": [
{
"per_hundred": "1010.0",
"name_fr": "Énergie",
"per_portion": "758.0",
"name_de": "Energie",
"per_day": "9.0",
"name_it": "Energia",
"name_en": "Energy"
},
{
"per_hundred": "242.0",
"name_fr": "Énergie (kCal)",
"per_portion": "181.0",
"name_de": "Energie (kCal)",
"per_day": "9.0",
"name_it": "Energia (kCal)",
"name_en": "Energy (kCal)"
},
{
"per_hundred": "18.0",
"name_fr": "Matières grasses",
"per_portion": "13.5",
"name_de": "Fett",
"per_day": "19.0",
"name_it": "Grassi",
"name_en": "Fat"
},
In the search, we are trying to bring back the products based on an exact match of two of the fields contained in the nutrients array. What I am finding is the conditions seemed to be OR and not AND.
The two attempts have been:
"query": {
"bool": {
"must": [
{ "match": { "nutrients.name_fr": "Énergie" } },
{ "match": { "nutrients.per_hundred": "242.0" } }
]
}
}
}
and
"query": {
"filtered": {
"filter": {
"and": [
{ "term": { "nutrients.name_fr": "Énergie" } },
{ "term": { "nutrients.per_hundred": "242.0" } }
]
}
}
}
Both of these are in fact bringing back entries with Énergie and 242.0, but are also match on different name_fr, eg:
{
"per_hundred": "242.0",
"name_fr": "Acide folique",
"per_portion": "96.0",
"name_de": "Folsäure",
"per_day": "48.0",
"name_it": "Acido folico",
"name_en": "Folic acid"
},
They are also matching on a non exact match, i.e: matching also on "Énergie (kCal)" when we want to match only on "Énergie"
On your first problem:
You have to make the nutrients field nested, so you can query each object inside it for itself Elasticsearch Nested Objects.
I have a query that works fine when I need the property of a document
to match just one value.
However I also need to be able to search with must with two values.
So if a banana has id 1 and a lemon has id 2 and I search for yellow
I will get both if I have 1 and 2 in the must clause.
But if i have just 1 I will only get the banana.
{
"from": 0,
"size": 20,
"query": {
"bool": {
"should": [
{ "match":
{ "fruit.color": "yellow" }}
],
"must" : [
{ "match": { "fruit.id" : "1" } }
]
}
}
}
I haven´t found a way to search with two values with must.
is that possible?
If the document "must" be returned only if the id is 1 or 2, that sounds like another should clause. If I'm understanding your question properly, you want documents with either id 1 OR id 2. Additionally, if the color is yellow, give it a higher score.
Here's one way you might achieve what you're looking for:
{
"query": {
"bool": {
"should": {
"match": {
"fruit.color": "yellow"
}
},
"must": {
"bool": {
"should": [
{
"match": {
"fruit.id": "1"
}
},
{
"match": {
"fruit.id": "2"
}
}
]
}
}
}
}
}
Here I put the two match queries in the should clause of a separate bool query. This achieves the OR behavior you are looking for.
Have another look at the Bool Query documentation and take note of the nuances of should. It behaves differently by default depending on whether or not there is a sibling must clause and whether or not the bool query is being executed in filter context.
Another key option that is adjustable and can help you achieve your expected results is the minimum_should_match parameter. Have a look at this documentation page.
Instead of a match query, you could simply try the terms query for ORing between multiple terms.
Match queries are generally used for analyzed fields. For exact matching, you should use term queries
{
"from": 0,
"size": 20,
"query": {
"bool": {
"should": [
{ "match": { "fruit.color": "yellow" } }
],
"must" : [
{ "terms": { "fruit.id": ["1","2"] } }
]
}
}
}
term or terms query is the perfect way to fetch the exact text or id, using match query result in search inside the id or text
Ex:
id = '4'
id = '44'
Search using match query with id = 4 return both 4 & 44 since it matches 4 in both. This is where terms query come into play.
same search using terms query will return 4 only.
So the accepted is absolutely wrong. Use the #Rahul answer. Just one more thing you need to do, Instead of text you need to analyse the field as a keyword
Example for indexing a field both as a text and keyword (mapping is for flat level for nested change it accordingly).
{
"index_patterns": [ "test" ],
"mappings": {
"kb_mapping_doc": {
"_source": {
"enabled": true
},
"properties": {
"id": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword"
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
using #Rahul's answer doesn't worked because you might be analysed as a text.
id - access a text field
id.keyword - access a keyword field
it would be
{
"from": 0,
"size": 20,
"query": {
"bool": {
"should": [{
"match": {
"color": "yellow"
}
}],
"must": [{
"terms": {
"id.keyword": ["1", "2"]
}
}]
}
}
}
So I would say accepted answer will return falsy results Please use #Rahul's answer with the corresponding mapping.