I have the following tables and the following relationship table too: , which has a composite PK as follow:
UserRole.java
#RooJavaBean
#RooJpaEntity(identifierType = UserRolePK.class, versionField = "", table = "UserRole", schema = "dbo")
#RooDbManaged(automaticallyDelete = true)
#RooToString(excludeFields = { "idApplication", "idRole", "idUserName" })
public class UserRole {
}
UserRole_Roo_DbManaged.aj
#ManyToOne
#JoinColumn(name = "IdApplication", referencedColumnName = "IdApplication", nullable = false, insertable = false, updatable = false)
private Application UserRole.idApplication;
#ManyToOne
#JoinColumn(name = "IdRole", referencedColumnName = "IdRole", nullable = false, insertable = false, updatable = false)
private Role UserRole.idRole;
#ManyToOne
#JoinColumn(name = "IdUserName", referencedColumnName = "IdUserName", nullable = false, insertable = false, updatable = false)
private Users UserRole.idUserName;
But also exist a PK table:
#RooIdentifier(dbManaged = true)
public final class UserRolePK {}
And its identifier class (UserRolePK_Roo_Identifier.aj)
privileged aspect UserRolePK_Roo_Identifier {
declare #type: UserRolePK: #Embeddable;
#Column(name = "IdRole", nullable = false)
private Long UserRolePK.idRole;
#Column(name = "IdUserName", nullable = false, length = 16)
private String UserRolePK.idUserName;
#Column(name = "IdApplication", nullable = false)
private Long UserRolePK.idApplication;
The way how I'm setting the service objec to save is:
UserRole userRole= new UserRole();
userRole.setIdApplication(app);
userRole.setIdRole(invited);
userRole.setIdUserName(user);
appService.saveURole(userRole);
app has been set and saved before (same transaction), as well as invited and user objects.
Since user (from Users table with composite PK: IdUserName which is a String ), is defined as follow, otherwise doesnt work.
#RooJavaBean
#RooJpaEntity(versionField = "", table = "Users", schema = "dbo")
#RooDbManaged(automaticallyDelete = true)
#RooToString(excludeFields = { "quotations", "taxes", "userRoles", "idCompany", "idPreferredLanguage" })
public class Users {
#Id
//#GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.AUTO)
#Column(name = "IdUserName", length = 16, insertable = true, updatable = true)
private String idUserName;
}
So, the error that I'm getting is:
org.springframework.orm.jpa.JpaSystemException: org.hibernate.id.IdentifierGenerationException: null id generated for:class com.domain.UserRole; nested exception is javax.persistence.PersistenceException: org.hibernate.id.IdentifierGenerationException: null id generated for:class com.domain.UserRole
Try this:
public class UserRole {
#PrePersist
private void prePersiste() {
if (getId() == null) {
UserRolePK pk = new UserRolePK();
pk.setIdApplication(getIdApplication());
pk.setIdRole(getIdRole);
pk.setIdUserName(getIdUserName());
setId(pk);
}
}
}
Roo is generating the fields on UserRole entity and its id embedded class, but is not the same thing (UserRole.idRole is not the same than UserRole.id.idRole). In your example, you fill the UserRole fields, but not the id fields. This code makes it for you before entity is persisted.
Good luck!
In my case if the follow example tries to be persisted in DB, then similar Exception mentioned above is thrown:
EntityExample e = new EntityExample();
repositoryExample.save(e);
//throw ex
This is caused due to missing id field values which needs to be set something like that:
EntityExample e = new EntityExample();
e.setId(new EmbeddedIdExample(1, 2, 3));
repositoryExample.save(e);
Related
I have the following usage in JoinColumns
#Entity
public class EntityOne{
private String action;
private String type;
#ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY, cascade = CascadeType.PERSIST)
#NotFound(action = NotFoundAction.IGNORE)
#JoinColumns({
#JoinColumn(name = "action", referencedColumnName = "action_name", updatable = false, insertable = false),
#JoinColumn(name = "type", referencedColumnName = "type_name", updatable = false, insertable = false)
})
private Entitytwo entitytwo;
}
And
#Entity
public class EntityTwo {
#Id
#Column(name = "type_name")
private String typeName;
#Id
#Column(name = "action_name")
private String actionName;
}
This setup causes hibernate error of
Referenced column '" + column.getName()
+ "' mapped by target property '" + property.getName()
+ "' occurs out of order in the list of '#JoinColumn's
If i change the order inside the #JoinColumns it seems to work, but can stop working at the next time the application starts.
The hibernate comments at the begining of the relevant code states:
// Now we need to line up the properties with the columns in the
// same order they were specified by the #JoinColumn annotations
// this is very tricky because a single property might span
// multiple columns.
// TODO: For now we only consider the first property that matched
// each column, but this means we will reject some mappings
// that could be made to work for a different choice of
// properties (it's also not very deterministic)
And on the relevant code itself:
// we have the first column of a new property
orderedProperties.add( property );
if ( property.getColumnSpan() > 1 ) {
if ( !property.getColumns().get(0).equals( column ) ) {
// the columns have to occur in the right order in the property
throw new AnnotationException("Referenced column '" + column.getName()
+ "' mapped by target property '" + property.getName()
+ "' occurs out of order in the list of '#JoinColumn's");
}
currentProperty = property;
lastPropertyColumnIndex = 1;
}
How should i set the #JoinColumn for it to consistently work?
If the action and type attributes of EntityOne are meant to refer to the corresponding attributes of EntityTwo, they are useless and misleading.
The attribute private Entitytwo entitytwo is enough to design the #ManytoOne relation.
Remove these two attributes and if you need to get the action and type value of the entityTwo linked to an entityOne, simply use entityOne.entitytwo.getAction() (or entityOne.entitytwo.getType()).
I just tried the code you posted in Hibernate 6.1, and I observed no error. Even after permuting various things, still no error. So then to make things harder, I added a third column to the FK and tried permuting things. Still no error.
I now have:
#Entity
public class EntityOne {
#Id #GeneratedValue
Long id;
String action;
String type;
int count;
#ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY, cascade = CascadeType.PERSIST)
#NotFound(action = NotFoundAction.IGNORE)
#JoinColumns({
#JoinColumn(name = "count", referencedColumnName = "count", updatable = false, insertable = false),
#JoinColumn(name = "action", referencedColumnName = "action_name", updatable = false, insertable = false),
#JoinColumn(name = "type", referencedColumnName = "type_name", updatable = false, insertable = false),
})
EntityTwo entitytwo;
}
#Entity
public class EntityTwo {
#Id
#Column(name = "type_name")
String typeName;
#Id
#Column(name = "count")
int count;
#Id
#Column(name = "action_name")
String actionName;
}
and the test code:
#DomainModel(annotatedClasses = {EntityOne.class, EntityTwo.class})
#SessionFactory
public class BugTest {
#Test
public void test(SessionFactoryScope scope) {
scope.inTransaction( session -> {
EntityOne entityOne = new EntityOne();
entityOne.action = "go";
entityOne.type = "thing";
EntityTwo entityTwo = new EntityTwo();
entityTwo.actionName = "go";
entityTwo.typeName = "thing";
entityOne.entitytwo = entityTwo;
session.persist( entityOne );
} );
}
}
Perhaps there's something you're not telling us? Like, for example, something to do with the #Id of EntityOne which is missing in your original posted code?
Just in case, also tried this variation:
#Entity
public class EntityOne {
#Id
String action;
#Id
String type;
#Id
int count;
#ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY, cascade = CascadeType.PERSIST)
#NotFound(action = NotFoundAction.IGNORE)
#JoinColumns({
#JoinColumn(name = "action", referencedColumnName = "action_name", updatable = false, insertable = false),
#JoinColumn(name = "count", referencedColumnName = "count", updatable = false, insertable = false),
#JoinColumn(name = "type", referencedColumnName = "type_name", updatable = false, insertable = false),
})
EntityTwo entitytwo;
}
But still no error.
I started to learn spring data rest. I'm doing PUT operation and it's not working for the nested objects for ManyToMany relationship, whereas it works fine for OneToMany relation.
Entities structures:
#Table(name="CONFIG_DTLS",schema = "app_txn")
#Entity
public class Config {
#Id
#GenericGenerator(name = "UUIDGenerator", strategy = "uuid2")
#GeneratedValue(generator = "UUIDGenerator")
#Column(name = "ID", updatable = false, nullable = false)
private UUID id;
#Column(name = "NAME", nullable = false, length = 75)
private String name;
/*Unable to replace the data in the MBR_CONFIG_MAPPING table in the put operation.
When the control comes to #HandleBeforeSave annotated method in PUT operation,
the request data contains the existing Member info instead of the one which i'm passing in the PUT request body */
#ManyToMany(cascade = {CascadeType.PERSIST, CascadeType.MERGE},fetch = FetchType.EAGER)
#JoinTable(schema = "app_txn", name = "MBR_CONFIG_MAPPING",
joinColumns ={#JoinColumn(name="CONFIG_ID",referencedColumnName = "ID")},
inverseJoinColumns = {#JoinColumn(name="MBR_ID",referencedColumnName = "ID")}
)
private Set<Member> members;
//able to replace the notifications completely in PUT operation
#OneToMany(cascade = CascadeType.ALL,fetch = FetchType.EAGER)
#JoinColumn(name = "CONFIG_ID",referencedColumnName = "ID")
private Set<Notification> notifications;
}
Member.java
#Table(name="MBR_DTLS",schema = "app_txn")
#Entity
public class Member {
#Id
#GenericGenerator(name = "UUIDGenerator", strategy = "uuid2")
#GeneratedValue(generator = "UUIDGenerator")
#Column(name = "ID", updatable = false, nullable = false)
private UUID id;
#Column(name = "OTHER_MBR_DATA", updatable = false)
private String otherMbrData;
}
Notification.java
#Table(name="NOTIFICATIONS",schema = "app_txn")
#Entity
public class Notification {
#Id
#GenericGenerator(name = "UUIDGenerator", strategy = "uuid2")
#GeneratedValue(generator = "UUIDGenerator")
#Column(name = "ID", updatable = false, nullable = false)
private UUID id;
#Column(name="LEVEL")
private String level;
#Column(name="EMAIL")
private String email;
}
Interfaces:
#RepositoryRestResource(collectionResourceRel = "configs", path="configs")
public interface ConfigRepo extends PagingAndSortingRepository<Config,UUID> {
}
#RepositoryRestResource(exported=false) // don't want to users to manipulate it directly.
public interface MemberRepo extends PagingAndSortingRepository<Member,Object> {
}
Here I don't want to add or modify anything in the MBR_DTLS table as it is loaded by another backend process. I want to update only the mapping details MBR_CONFIG_MAPPING table whenever user does the PUT/update operation. POST/create operation is working fine. Please share your thoughts on how to fix this and if you have any questions add it in the comment section.
PS: I referred some links online but that does not help much - Spring Data REST - PUT request does not work properly since v.2.5.7
I am creating a simple kanban application as following, each kanban is made out of a sequence of stages and each stage have a level field to define its position. I want to be able to add, move and remove stages at will so I have to keep the level of each stage consistent, simple enough.
#Entity
#Table(name = "kanbans")
data class Kanban (
#Id
#GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.IDENTITY)
#Column(name = "id", nullable = false)
var id: Int? = null,
#get:NotNull
#get:NotBlank
#Column(name = "name", nullable = false)
var name: String? = null,
#get:NotNull
#get:NotBlank
#Column(name = "description", nullable = false)
var description: String? = null,
#get:NotNull
#Column(name = "closed", nullable = false)
var closed: Boolean? = null,
#get:NotNull
#Column(name = "created_at", nullable = false)
var createdAt: LocalDateTime? = null,
#get:NotNull
#Column(name = "updated_at", nullable = false)
var updatedAt: LocalDateTime? = null,
)
#Entity
#Table(name = "stages")
data class Stage (
#Id
#GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.IDENTITY)
#Column(name = "id", nullable = false)
var id: Int? = null,
#get:NotNull
#get:NotBlank
#Column(name = "name", nullable = false)
var name: String? = null,
#get:NotNull
#get:NotBlank
#Column(name = "description", nullable = false)
var description: String? = null,
#get:NotNull
#Column(name = "closed", nullable = false)
var closed: Boolean? = null,
#get:NotNull
#Column(name = "level", nullable = false)
var level: Int? = null,
#OneToMany(fetch = FetchType.LAZY, mappedBy = "stage")
var tasks: List<Task> = ArrayList(),
#get:NotNull
#ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
#JoinColumn(name = "kanban_id", nullable = false)
var kanban: Kanban? = null,
#get:NotNull
#Column(name = "created_at", nullable = false)
var createdAt: LocalDateTime? = null,
#get:NotNull
#Column(name = "updated_at", nullable = false)
var updatedAt: LocalDateTime? = null,
)
When creating the first stage its always assigning its level at 0 and then when adding new ones the level will define the stage position at the list of stages. The problem is that when I try to update the previous existing stages to give place to the new one, the only way I found to make this work is to place a saveAndFlush call in a loop but I find it to be not a good ideia.
#Repository
interface StageRepository : JpaRepository<Stage, Int> {
fun findAllByKanbanAndLevelGreaterThanEqualOrderByLevelDesc(kanban: Kanban, level: Int): List<Stage>
#Modifying
#Transactional
#Query("UPDATE Stage s SET s.level = s.level + 1 WHERE s.kanban = :kanban AND s.level >= :level")
fun incrementLevelForKanbanStagesWhereLevelIsGreaterThan(kanban: Kanban, level: Int)
}
the incrementLevelForKanbanStagesWhereLevelIsGreaterThan method fails as the database have a unique constraint to level and kanban_id with the following error:
Caused by: org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: ERROR: duplicate key value violates unique constraint "stages_kanban_id_level_key"
Detalhe: Key (kanban_id, level)=(337, 1) already exists.
this is obviously happening because it is trying to update level 0 to level 1 before updating level 1 to level 2 and so I have tried:
#Transactional
#Query("UPDATE Stage s SET s.level = s.level + 1 WHERE s.kanban = :kanban AND s.level >= :level ORDER BY s.level DESC")
fun incrementLevelForKanbanStagesWhereLevelIsGreaterThan(kanban: Kanban, level: Int)
which does not compile,
#Service
#Transactional
class StageCrudService: CrudService<Stage, Int, StageRepository, StageValidationService>() {
#Throws(ValidationException::class)
override fun create(model: Stage): Stage {
prepareToCreate(model)
validationService.canSave(model)
incrementKanbanStageLevels(model)
return repository.save(model)
}
private fun prepareToCreate(model: Stage) {
val now = LocalDateTime.now()
val closed = model.closed ?: false
model.closed = closed
model.createdAt = now
model.updatedAt = now
model.level = model.level ?: 0
}
private fun incrementKanbanStageLevels(model: Stage) {
val level = model.level ?: 0
val stages = repository.findAllByKanbanAndLevelGreaterThanEqualOrderByLevelDesc(model.kanban!!, level)
stages.forEach { stage ->
stage.level = stage.level?.plus(1)
}
repository.saveAll(stages)
repository.flush()
}
}
and
private fun incrementKanbanStageLevels(model: Stage) {
val level = model.level ?: 0
val stages = repository.findAllByKanbanAndLevelGreaterThanEqualOrderByLevelDesc(model.kanban!!, level)
stages.forEach { stage ->
stage.level = stage.level?.plus(1)
repository.save(stage)
}
repository.flush()
}
but both fails the same way as the query. Now the question is:
Is there a better way to manage the update order for this kind of situation instead of doing:
private fun incrementKanbanStageLevels(model: Stage) {
val level = model.level ?: 0
val stages = repository.findAllByKanbanAndLevelGreaterThanEqualOrderByLevelDesc(model.kanban!!, level)
stages.forEach { stage ->
stage.level = stage.level?.plus(1)
repository.saveAndFlush(stage)
}
}
It seems to me that you are possibly trying to implement something that can be managed for you via the JPA #OrderColumn annotation:
https://docs.oracle.com/javaee/7/api/javax/persistence/OrderColumn.html
Specifies a column that is used to maintain the persistent order of a
list. The persistence provider is responsible for maintaining the
order upon retrieval and in the database. The persistence provider is
responsible for updating the ordering upon flushing to the database to
reflect any insertion, deletion, or reordering affecting the list.
To use this you would need to make the relationship bi-directional and the level should be maintained by your JPA provider as items are added to and removed from the list
#Entity
#Table(name = "kanbans")
data class Kanban (
.....
#get:NotNull
#get:NotBlank
#OrderColumn(name = "level")
#OneToMany(fetch = FetchType.LAZY, mappedBy = "kanban")
var stage: List<Stage> = ArrayList()
.....
}
So you can then remove and add items (at any position) and the sequence will be maintained for you.
Parent.java:
#Id
#GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.SEQUENCE, generator = "pgroup_generator")
#SequenceGenerator(name="pgroup_generator", sequenceName = "pg_seq", allocationSize=50)
#Column(
name = "group_id",
unique = true,
updatable = false,
nullable = false
)
private Long id;
#Column(name="group_name",unique = true)
private String groupName;
#OneToMany(targetEntity=PermissionsEntity.class, mappedBy = "permissionGroup", cascade=CascadeType.ALL, fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
private List<PermissionsEntity> permissions= new ArrayList<>();
public void setPermissions(List<PermissionsEntity> permissions) {
this.permissions = permissions;
for(PermissionsEntity p:permissions) {
p.setPermissionGroup(this);
}
}
child.java:
#ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY, optional = false)
#JoinColumn(name="group_id", referencedColumnName = "group_id", insertable = false, updatable = false)
private PermissionGroupEntity permissionGroup;
Here is the error log:
org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: ERROR: null value in column "permission_group_id" violates not-null constraint
Detail: Failing row contains (11, null, 2020-11-02 10:52:34.849, null, 2020-11-02 10:52:34.849, Allow the user to create findings, create audit or workpaper findings, null, null, null, null, null, null).
Because you have insertable = false on that permissionGroup, it's not being inserted, leaving it null. Remove that setting to leave it the default true.
I am trying to map the classic bi-directional oneToMany using eclipselink.
My problem is that when i want to insert a new 'child' i get
SQLIntegrityConstraintViolationException.
The database is described like this :
#Entity
#IdClass(KuponPK.class)
#Table(name = "KUPON", schema = "POST", catalog = "")
public class Kupon implements Serializable {
private Integer id;
private String spil;
private Collection<Kombination> kombinationList;
#OneToMany(mappedBy = "kupon", cascade = CascadeType.PERSIST)
public Collection<Kombination> getKombinationList() {
return kombinationList;
}
public class KuponPK implements Serializable {
private Integer id;
private String spil;
#Id
#Column(name = "ID", nullable = false, insertable = true, updatable = true, precision = 0)
public Integer getId() {
return id;
}
#Id
#Column(name = "SPIL", nullable = false, insertable = true, updatable = true, length = 5)
public String getSpil() {
return spil;
}
#Entity
#Table(name = "KOMBINATION", schema = "POST", catalog = "")
public class Kombination {
private Integer id;
private String sorteringOrden;
private Integer sorteringNr;
private Integer antalSpillede;
private BigDecimal odds;
private Kupon kupon;
#ManyToOne
#JoinColumns({#JoinColumn(name = "KUPON_ID", referencedColumnName = "ID", nullable = false, insertable=false, updatable=false),
#JoinColumn(name = "KUPON_SPIL", referencedColumnName = "SPIL", nullable = false, insertable=false, updatable=false)})
public Kupon getKupon() {
return kupon;
}
In my stateless session i have a Kupon object and i create a new Kombination where i set the Kupon and try to merge, but im getting
Internal Exception: java.sql.SQLIntegrityConstraintViolationException: ORA-01400: cannot insert NULL into ("KOMBINATION"."KUPON_ID")
which is obvious since its part of primary key
I am setting the Kombination to Kupon and the Kupon to Kombination, but that doesnt make any difference
How can can i tell that the key is inside the Kupon object which im setting in the Kombination object ??