So we're using Parse.com's signup, and e-mails of user signups go into the User Class. We're also using MailChimp at the moment for our campaign software. How can we export or link the two so that any e-mails from signups go to our MailChimp lists?
I know that Parse has some Cloud Module integrations with Mandrill and SendGrid, but nothing with MailChimp directly.
Maybe these articles can help you:
https://www.parse.com/questions/mailchimp
Github project: Mailchimp API + Mandrill API optimized for Parse.com Cloud Code
https://github.com/icangowithout/parse-mailchimp/commit/0d75b8be9775347efd939c8715d5d2b13076353c
var api_key = "YOUR_MAILCHIMP_API_KEY";
// use https and last verison
var options = {secure: true, version: "1.3"};
// Set the path to the mailchimp module
// If you cloned the mailchimp lib somewhere else, it's time to set this
// value properly
var module_path = "cloud/libs/mailchimp/";
var MailChimpAPI = require(module_path+"MailChimpAPI.js");
var myChimp = new MailChimpAPI(api_key, options, module_path);
myChimp.ping({}, function(error, data){
// data is a string or JSON parsed object
if(error){
// Oops… there was a problem...
}else{
// Do something with the data
}
// Handle what to do with the ping
});
//or
// Parse callback style
myChimp.ping({}, {
success: function(data){
// data is a string or JSON parsed object
// Howdy! The ping worked!
},
error: function(error){
// Something went wrong...
}
});
Related
I have a question regarding a small issue that I'm having. I've created a widget that will live on the Service Portal to allow an admin to Accept or Reject requests.
The data for the widget is pulling from the Approvals (approval_approver) table. Under my GlideRecord, I have a query that checks for the state as requested. (Ex. addQuery('state', 'requested'))
To narrow down the search, I tried entering addQuery('sys_id', current.sys_id). When I use this query, my script breaks and I get an error on the Service Portal end.
Here's a sample of the GlideRecord script I've written to Accept.
[//Accept Request
if(input && input.action=="acceptApproval") {
var inRec1 = new GlideRecord('sysapproval_approver');
inRec1.addQuery('state', 'requested');
//inRec1.get('sys_id', current.sys_id);
inRec1.query();
if(inRec1.next()) {
inRec1.setValue('state', 'Approved');
inRec1.setValue('approver', gs.getUserID());
gs.addInfoMessage("Accept Approval Processed");
inRec1.update();
}
}][1]
I've research the web, tried using $sp.getParameter() as a work-around and no change.
I would really appreciate any help or insight on what I can do different to get script to work and filter the right records.
If I understand your question correctly, you are asking how to get the sysId of the sysapproval_approver record from the client-side in a widget.
Unless you have defined current elsewhere in your server script, current is undefined. Secondly, $sp.getParameter() is used to retrieve URL parameters. So unless you've included the sysId as a URL parameter, that will not get you what you are looking for.
One pattern that I've used is to pass an object to the client after the initial query that gets the list of requests.
When you're ready to send input to the server from the client, you can add relevant information to the input object. See the simplified example below. For the sake of brevity, the code below does not include error handling.
// Client-side function
approveRequest = function(sysId) {
$scope.server.get({
action: "requestApproval",
sysId: sysId
})
.then(function(response) {
console.log("Request approved");
});
};
// Server-side
var requestGr = new GlideRecord();
requestGr.addQuery("SOME_QUERY");
requestGr.query(); // Retrieve initial list of requests to display in the template
data.requests = []; // Add array of requests to data object to be passed to the client via the controller
while(requestsGr.next()) {
data.requests.push({
"number": requestsGr.getValue("number");
"state" : requestsGr.getValue("state");
"sysId" : requestsGr.getValue("sys_id");
});
}
if(input && input.action=="acceptApproval") {
var sysapprovalGr = new GlideRecord('sysapproval_approver');
if(sysapprovalGr.get(input.sysId)) {
sysapprovalGr.setValue('state', 'Approved');
sysapprovalGr.setValue('approver', gs.getUserID());
sysapprovalGr.update();
gs.addInfoMessage("Accept Approval Processed");
}
...
I am trying to get a Reservation object which contains a pointer to Restaurant.
In Parse Cloud code, i am able to get the restaurants objects associated with Reservations via query.include('Restaurant') in log just before response.success. However, the Restaurants reverted back to pointer when i receive the response on client app.
I tried reverted JSSDK version to 1.4.2 & 1.6.7 as suggested in some answers, but it doesn't work for me.
Parse.Cloud.define('getreservationsforuser', function(request, response) {
var user = request.user
console.log(user)
var query = new Parse.Query('Reservations')
query.equalTo('User', user)
query.include('Restaurant')
query.find({
success : function(results) {
console.log(JSON.stringify(results))
response.success(results)
},
error : function (error) {
response.error(error)
}
})
})
response :
..."restaurant":{"__type":"Pointer",
"className":"Restaurants",
"objectId":"kIIYe7Z0tD"},...
You can't directly send the pointer objects back from cloud code even though you have included it. You need to manually copy the content of that pointer object to a javascript object. Like below:
var restaurant = {}
restaurant["id"] = YOUR_POINTER_OBJECT.id;
restaurant["createdAt"] = YOUR_POINTER_OBJECT.createdAt;
restaurant["custom_field"] = YOUR_POINTER_OBJECT.get("custom_field");
ps: in your code you seem do nothing else other than directly send the response back. I think parse REST api might be a better choice in that case.
It turned out that my code implementation was correct.
I would like to make a simple contact form for my website. I know how to use ajax to send data, but I don't know how to access it on the Node JS server.
If I were to send my data using this code:
var request=new XMLHttpRequest();
request.open("POST","url");
request.send("{value:'10'}");
How can I access my value in the JSON object I pass to the server?
There are a lot of ways to do this.
For example you could create an endpoint on your server e.g. with express http://expressjs.com/. It might look like this
router.post('/your/url', function(req, res, data) {
var value = req.body.value;
// do cool things with value
res.send('cool');
});
You define a post endpoint which will handle your request. Using the request object you can access the JSON object from the request
I used request_.on("data", function(data_){}); to get my data.
If in my client JS I use request.send("my data");
I can access my data by adding a listener to the request_ object in my Node JS server function.
request_.on("data", function(data_){
console.log(data_);// my data
}
I can then slice up my data any way I want to and use it how I see fit. No need for Express.
Here's my client function that is called when the submit button on my contact form is pressed:
function clickSubmit(event_) {
var xmlhttprequest = new XMLHttpRequest();
xmlhttprequest.open("POST", "contact");
xmlhttprequest.send("email=" + html.email.value + "&name=" + html.name.value + "&message=" + html.message.value);
}
And here's my Node JS server function:
function handleRequest(request_, response_) {
switch(request_.url) {
case "/contact":
request_.on("data", function(data_) {
console.log("data: " + data_);// Outputs the string sent by AJAX.
});
break;
}
}
I'm trying to Implement a simple Picture upload from the client to my mongoDB.
I've read many explanations but I can't find a way from start to finish.
My clientside -
function profilePic(input) {
if (input.files && input.files[0]) {
var file = input.files[0];
localStorage.setItem('picture', JSON.stringify(file));
}
}
Later on I take the this JSON from the LocalStorage and send it to my server side like this:
var request = false;
var result = null;
request = new XMLHttpRequest();
if (request) {
request.open("POST", "usersEditProf/");
request.onreadystatechange = function() {
if (request.readyState == 4 && request.status == 200) {
.....//More code to send to Server
request.setRequestHeader('content-type', 'application/json');
request.send(JSON.stringify(localStorage.getItem('picture)));
}
}
On my serverside:
app.post('/usersEditProf/',users.editProfile);
/** Edits the Profile - sends the new one **/
exports.editProfile = function(req, res) {
var toEdit = req.body;
var newPic = toEdit.picture;
And thats where I get lost. is newPic actually holding the picture? I doubt it...
Do I need to change the path? What is the new path I need to give the picture?
How do I put it in my DB? Do I need GridFS?
When trying to simply put that in my collection, it looks like this (example with a image called bar.jpg:
picture: "{\"webkitRelativePath\":\"\",\"lastModifiedDate\":\"2012-10-08T23:34:50.000Z\",\"name\":\"bar.jpg\",\"type\":\"image/jpeg\",\"size\":88929}",
If you want to upload a blob through XMLHTTPRequest(), you need to use an HTML 5 FormData object:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/FormData
It alows you to specify a filename to push, then you handle the incoming file as you would with a mime form post. Note the limitations on browser support when you use the FormData object. Your alternative is a form POST to a hidden frame, which works OK but is not nearly as clean looking in code as FormData.
I am trying to write an activity in Google+ using the dotnet-client. The issue is that I can't seem to get the configuration of my client app correctly. According to the Google+ Sign-In configuration and this SO question we need to add the requestvisibleactions parameter. I did that but it did not work. I am using the scope https://www.googleapis.com/auth/plus.login and I even added the scope https://www.googleapis.com/auth/plus.moments.write but the insert still did not work.
This is what my request url looks like:
https://accounts.google.com/ServiceLogin?service=lso&passive=1209600&continue=https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/auth?scope%3Dhttps://www.googleapis.com/auth/plus.login%2Bhttps://www.googleapis.com/auth/plus.moments.write%26response_type%3Dcode%26redirect_uri%3Dhttp://localhost/%26state%3D%26requestvisibleactions%3Dhttp://schemas.google.com/AddActivity%26client_id%3D000.apps.googleusercontent.com%26request_visible_actions%3Dhttp://schemas.google.com/AddActivity%26hl%3Den%26from_login%3D1%26as%3D-1fbe06f1c6120f4d<mpl=popup&shdf=Cm4LEhF0aGlyZFBhcnR5TG9nb1VybBoADAsSFXRoaXJkUGFydHlEaXNwbGF5TmFtZRoHQ2hpa3V0bwwLEgZkb21haW4aB0NoaWt1dG8MCxIVdGhpcmRQYXJ0eURpc3BsYXlUeXBlGgdERUZBVUxUDBIDbHNvIhTeWybcoJ9pXSeN2t-k8A4SUbfhsygBMhQivAmfNSs_LkjXXZ7bPxilXgjMsQ&scc=1
As you can see from there that there is a request_visible_actions and I even added one that has no underscore in case I got the parameter wrong (requestvisibleactions).
Let me say that my app is being authenticated successfully by the API. I can get the user's profile after being authenticated and it is on the "insert moment" part that my app fails. My insert code:
var body = new Moment();
var target = new ItemScope();
target.Id = referenceId;
target.Image = image;
target.Type = "http://schemas.google.com/AddActivity";
target.Description = description;
target.Name = caption;
body.Target = target;
body.Type = "http://schemas.google.com/AddActivity";
var insert =
new MomentsResource.InsertRequest(
// this is a valid service instance as I am using this to query the user's profile
_plusService,
body,
id,
MomentsResource.Collection.Vault);
Moment result = null;
try
{
result = insert.Fetch();
}
catch (ThreadAbortException)
{
// User was not yet authenticated and is being forwarded to the authorization page.
throw;
}
catch (Google.GoogleApiRequestException requestEx)
{
// here I get a 401 Unauthorized error
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
} `
For the OAuth flow, there are two issues with your request:
request_visible_actions is what is passed to the OAuth v2 server (don't pass requestvisibleactions)
plus.moments.write is a deprecated scope, you only need to pass in plus.login
Make sure your project references the latest version of the Google+ .NET client library from here:
https://developers.google.com/resources/api-libraries/download/stable/plus/v1/csharp
I have created a project on GitHub showing a full server-side flow here:
https://github.com/gguuss/gplus_csharp_ssflow
As Brettj said, you should be using the Google+ Sign-in Button as demonstrated in the latest Google+ samples from here:
https://github.com/googleplus/gplus-quickstart-csharp
First, ensure you are requesting all of the activity types you're writing. You will know this is working because the authorization dialog will show "Make your app activity available via Google, visible to you and: [...]" below the text that starts with "This app would like to". I know you checked this but I'm 90% sure this is why you are getting the 401 error code. The following markup shows how to render the Google+ Sign-In button requesting access to Add activities.
<div id="gConnect">
<button class="g-signin"
data-scope="https://www.googleapis.com/auth/plus.login"
data-requestvisibleactions="http://schemas.google.com/AddActivity"
data-clientId="YOUR_CLIENT_ID"
data-accesstype="offline"
data-callback="onSignInCallback"
data-theme="dark"
data-cookiepolicy="single_host_origin">
</button>
Assuming you have a PlusService object with the correct activity type set in data-requestvisibleactions, the following code, which you should be able to copy/paste to see it work, concisely demonstrates writing moments using the .NET client and has been tested to work:
Moment body = new Moment();
ItemScope target = new ItemScope();
target.Id = "replacewithuniqueforaddtarget";
target.Image = "http://www.google.com/s2/static/images/GoogleyEyes.png";
target.Type = "";
target.Description = "The description for the activity";
target.Name = "An example of add activity";
body.Target = target;
body.Type = "http://schemas.google.com/AddActivity";
MomentsResource.InsertRequest insert =
new MomentsResource.InsertRequest(
_plusService,
body,
"me",
MomentsResource.Collection.Vault);
Moment wrote = insert.Fetch();
Note, I'm including Google.Apis.Plus.v1.Data for convenience.
Ah it's that simple! Maybe not? I am answering my own question and consequently accept it as the answer (after a few days of course) so others having the same issue may be guided. But I will definitely up-vote Gus' answer for it led me to the fix for my code.
So according to #class answer written above and as explained on his blog the key to successfully creating a moment is adding the request_visible_actions parameter. I did that but my request still failed and it is because I was missing an important thing. You need to add one more parameter and that is the access_type and it should be set to offline. The OAuth request, at a minimum, should look like: https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/auth?scope=https://www.googleapis.com/auth/plus.login&response_type=code&redirect_uri=http://localhost/&request_visible_actions=http://schemas.google.com/AddActivity&access_type=offline.
For the complete and correct client code you can get Gus' example here or download the entire dotnet client library including the source and sample and add what I added below. The most important thing that you should remember is modifying your AuthorizationServerDescription for the Google API. Here's my version of the authenticator:
public static OAuth2Authenticator<WebServerClient> CreateAuthenticator(
string clientId, string clientSecret)
{
if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(clientId))
throw new ArgumentException("clientId cannot be empty");
if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(clientSecret))
throw new ArgumentException("clientSecret cannot be empty");
var description = GoogleAuthenticationServer.Description;
var uri = description.AuthorizationEndpoint.AbsoluteUri;
// This is the one that has been documented on Gus' blog site
// and over at Google's (https://developers.google.com/+/web/signin/)
// This is not in the dotnetclient sample by the way
// and you need to understand how OAuth and DNOA works.
// I had this already, see my original post,
// I thought it will make my day.
if (uri.IndexOf("request_visible_actions") < 1)
{
var param = (uri.IndexOf('?') > 0) ? "&" : "?";
description.AuthorizationEndpoint = new Uri(
uri + param +
"request_visible_actions=http://schemas.google.com/AddActivity");
}
// This is what I have been missing!
// They forgot to tell us about this or did I just miss this somewhere?
uri = description.AuthorizationEndpoint.AbsoluteUri;
if (uri.IndexOf("offline") < 1)
{
var param = (uri.IndexOf('?') > 0) ? "&" : "?";
description.AuthorizationEndpoint =
new Uri(uri + param + "access_type=offline");
}
// Register the authenticator.
var provider = new WebServerClient(description)
{
ClientIdentifier = clientId,
ClientSecret = clientSecret,
};
var authenticator =
new OAuth2Authenticator<WebServerClient>(provider, GetAuthorization)
{ NoCaching = true };
return authenticator;
}
Without the access_type=offline my code never worked and it will never work. Now I wonder why? It would be good to have some explanation.