I have hadoop 2.5.2 single mode installation on my Ubuntu VM, which is: 4-core, 3GHz per core; 4G memory. This VM is not for production, only for demo and learning.
Then, I wrote a vey simple map-reduce application using python, and use this application to process 49 xmls. All these xml files are small-size, hundreds of lines each. So, I expected a quick process. But, big22 surprise to me, it took more than 20 minutes to finish the job (the output of the job is correct.). Below is the output metrics :
14/12/15 19:37:55 INFO client.RMProxy: Connecting to ResourceManager at /0.0.0.0:8032
14/12/15 19:37:57 INFO client.RMProxy: Connecting to ResourceManager at /0.0.0.0:8032
14/12/15 19:38:03 INFO mapred.FileInputFormat: Total input paths to process : 49
14/12/15 19:38:06 INFO mapreduce.JobSubmitter: number of splits:49
14/12/15 19:38:08 INFO mapreduce.JobSubmitter: Submitting tokens for job: job_1418368500264_0005
14/12/15 19:38:10 INFO impl.YarnClientImpl: Submitted application application_1418368500264_0005
14/12/15 19:38:10 INFO mapreduce.Job: Running job: job_1418368500264_0005
14/12/15 19:38:59 INFO mapreduce.Job: Job job_1418368500264_0005 running in uber mode : false
14/12/15 19:38:59 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 0% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:39:42 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 2% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:40:05 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 4% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:40:28 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 6% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:40:49 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 8% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:41:10 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 10% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:41:29 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 12% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:41:50 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 14% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:42:08 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 16% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:42:28 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 18% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:42:49 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 20% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:43:08 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 22% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:43:28 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 24% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:43:48 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 27% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:44:09 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 29% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:44:29 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 31% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:44:49 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 33% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:45:09 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 35% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:45:28 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 37% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:45:49 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 39% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:46:09 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 41% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:46:29 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 43% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:46:49 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 45% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:47:09 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 47% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:47:29 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 49% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:47:49 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 51% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:48:08 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 53% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:48:28 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 55% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:48:48 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 57% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:49:09 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 59% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:49:29 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 61% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:49:55 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 63% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:50:23 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 65% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:50:53 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 67% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:51:22 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 69% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:51:50 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 71% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:52:18 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 73% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:52:48 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 76% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:53:18 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 78% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:53:48 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 80% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:54:18 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 82% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:54:48 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 84% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:55:19 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 86% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:55:48 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 88% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:56:16 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 90% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:56:44 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 92% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:57:14 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 94% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:57:45 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 96% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:58:15 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 98% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:58:46 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 100% reduce 0%
14/12/15 19:59:20 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 100% reduce 100%
14/12/15 19:59:28 INFO mapreduce.Job: Job job_1418368500264_0005 completed successfully
14/12/15 19:59:30 INFO mapreduce.Job: Counters: 49
File System Counters
FILE: Number of bytes read=17856
FILE: Number of bytes written=5086434
FILE: Number of read operations=0
FILE: Number of large read operations=0
FILE: Number of write operations=0
HDFS: Number of bytes read=499030
HDFS: Number of bytes written=10049
HDFS: Number of read operations=150
HDFS: Number of large read operations=0
HDFS: Number of write operations=2
Job Counters
Launched map tasks=49
Launched reduce tasks=1
Data-local map tasks=49
Total time spent by all maps in occupied slots (ms)=8854232
Total time spent by all reduces in occupied slots (ms)=284672
Total time spent by all map tasks (ms)=1106779
Total time spent by all reduce tasks (ms)=35584
Total vcore-seconds taken by all map tasks=1106779
Total vcore-seconds taken by all reduce tasks=35584
Total megabyte-seconds taken by all map tasks=1133341696
Total megabyte-seconds taken by all reduce tasks=36438016
Map-Reduce Framework
Map input records=9352
Map output records=296
Map output bytes=17258
Map output materialized bytes=18144
Input split bytes=6772
Combine input records=0
Combine output records=0
Reduce input groups=53
Reduce shuffle bytes=18144
Reduce input records=296
Reduce output records=52
Spilled Records=592
Shuffled Maps =49
Failed Shuffles=0
Merged Map outputs=49
GC time elapsed (ms)=33590
CPU time spent (ms)=191390
Physical memory (bytes) snapshot=13738057728
Virtual memory (bytes) snapshot=66425016320
Total committed heap usage (bytes)=10799808512
Shuffle Errors
BAD_ID=0
CONNECTION=0
IO_ERROR=0
WRONG_LENGTH=0
WRONG_MAP=0
WRONG_REDUCE=0
File Input Format Counters
Bytes Read=492258
File Output Format Counters
Bytes Written=10049
14/12/15 19:59:30 INFO streaming.StreamJob: Output directory: /data_output/sb50projs_1_output
As a newbie to hadoop, for this crazy unreasonable performance, I have several questions:
how to configure my hadoop/yarn/mapreduce to make the whole environment more convenient for trial usage?
I understand hadoop is designed for huge-data and big files. But for a trial environment, my files are small and my data is very limited, which default configuration items should I change? I have changed "dfs.blocksize" of hdfs-site.xml to a smaller value to match my small files, but seems no big enhancements. I know there are some JVM configuration items in yarn-site.xml and mapred-site.xml, but I am not sure about how to adjust them.
how to read hadoop logs
Under the logs folder, there are separate log files for nodemanager/resourcemanager/namenode/datanode. I tried to read these files to understand how the 20 minutes are spent during the process, but it's not easy for a newbie like me. So I wonder is there any tool/UI could help me to analyze the logs.
basic performance tuning tools
Actually I have googled around for this question, and I got a bunch of names like Ganglia/Nagios/Vaidya/Ambari. I want to know, which tool is best analyse the issue like , "why it took 20 minutes to do such a simple job?".
big number of hadoop processes
Even if there is no job running on my hadoop, I found around 100 hadoop processes on my VM, like below (I am using htop, and sort the result by memory). Is this normal for hadoop ? Or am I incorrect for some environment configuration?
You don't have to change anything.
The default configuration is done for small environment. You may change it if you grow the environment. Ant there is a lot of params and a lot of time for fine tuning.
But I admit your configuration is smaller than the usual ones for tests.
The log you have to read isn't the services ones but the job ones. Find them in /var/log/hadoop-yarn/containers/
If you want a better view of your MR, use the web interface on http://127.0.0.1:8088/. You will see your job's progression in real time.
IMO, Basic tuning = use hadoop web interfaces. There are plenty available natively.
I think you find your problem. This can be nomal, or not.
But quickly, YARN launch MR to use all the available memory :
Available memory is set in your yarn-site.xml : yarn.nodemanager.resource.memory-mb (default to 8 Gio).
Memory for a task is defined in mapred-site.xml or in the task itself by the property : mapreduce.map.memory.mb (default to 1536 Mio)
So :
Change the available memory for your nodemanager (to 3Gio, in order to let 1 Gio for the system)
Change the memory available for hadoop services (-Xmx in hadoop-env.sh, yarn-env.sh) (system + each hadoop services (namenode / datanode / ressourcemanager / nodemanager) < 1 Gio.
Change the memory for your map tasks (512 Mio ?). The lesser it is, more task can be executed in the same time.
Change yarn.scheduler.minimum-allocation-mb to 512 in yarn-site.xml to allow mappers with less than 1 Gio of memory.
I hope this will help you.
Related
What is the difference between NameNode heap usage and ResourceManager heap usage? I am trying to find heavy NameNode heap usage cause.
In the ambari dashboard, I see...
when running some sqoop jobs. Not sure what is causing the NN usage to be so high here (not a lot of experience with hadoop admin stuff)? Is this an unusual amount (only noticed recently)?
Furthermore the sqoop jobs appear to be frozen after 100% completion of the mapreduce task for abnormal amount of time than usual, eg. seeing...
[2020-01-31 14:00:55,193] INFO mapreduce.JobSubmitter: number of splits:12
[2020-01-31 14:00:55,402] INFO mapreduce.JobSubmitter: Submitting tokens for job: job_1579648183118_1085
[2020-01-31 14:00:55,402] INFO mapreduce.JobSubmitter: Executing with tokens: []
[2020-01-31 14:00:55,687] INFO conf.Configuration: found resource resource-types.xml at file:/etc/hadoop/3.1.0.0-78/0/resource-types.xml
[2020-01-31 14:00:55,784] INFO impl.YarnClientImpl: Submitted application application_1579648183118_1085
[2020-01-31 14:00:55,837] mapreduce.Job: The url to track the job: http://hw001.ucera.local:8088/proxy/application_1579648183118_1085/
[2020-01-31 14:00:55,837] mapreduce.Job: Running job: job_1579648183118_1085
[2020-01-31 14:01:02,964] mapreduce.Job: Job job_1579648183118_1085 running in uber mode : false
[2020-01-31 14:01:02,965] mapreduce.Job: map 0% reduce 0%
[2020-01-31 14:01:18,178] mapreduce.Job: map 8% reduce 0%
[2020-01-31 14:02:21,552] mapreduce.Job: map 17% reduce 0%
[2020-01-31 14:04:55,239] mapreduce.Job: map 25% reduce 0%
[2020-01-31 14:05:36,417] mapreduce.Job: map 33% reduce 0%
[2020-01-31 14:05:37,424] mapreduce.Job: map 42% reduce 0%
[2020-01-31 14:05:40,440] mapreduce.Job: map 50% reduce 0%
[2020-01-31 14:05:41,444] mapreduce.Job: map 58% reduce 0%
[2020-01-31 14:05:44,455] mapreduce.Job: map 67% reduce 0%
[2020-01-31 14:05:52,484] mapreduce.Job: map 75% reduce 0%
[2020-01-31 14:05:56,499] mapreduce.Job: map 83% reduce 0%
[2020-01-31 14:05:59,528] mapreduce.Job: map 92% reduce 0%
[2020-01-31 14:06:00,534] INFO mapreduce.Job: map 100% reduce 0%
<...after some time longer than usual...>
[2020-01-31 14:10:05,446] INFO mapreduce.Job: Job job_1579648183118_1085 completed successfully
My hadoop version
[airflow#airflowetl root]$ hadoop version
Hadoop 3.1.1.3.1.0.0-78
Source code repository git#github.com:hortonworks/hadoop.git -r e4f82af51faec922b4804d0232a637422ec29e64
Compiled by jenkins on 2018-12-06T12:26Z
Compiled with protoc 2.5.0
From source with checksum eab9fa2a6aa38c6362c66d8df75774
This command was run using /usr/hdp/3.1.0.0-78/hadoop/hadoop-common-3.1.1.3.1.0.0-78.jar
Anyone with more hadoop experience know what could be going on here? Any debugging advice?
Namenode heap is mostly determined by the number of file blocks that are stored in HDFS. In particular, many small files or many files being written at once would cause a large heap.
The ResourceManager is not correlated with the namenode. It's heap would be determinate on the number of YARN jobs that are actively being tracked
In a cluster I've maintained, the namenode heap was 32G, and I think the ResourceManager was only 8GB
We are currently migrating from CDH3u4 to CDH5. We made new cluster and copied all data. Everything went smooth thanks to Cloudera manager. But we have problem with migrating data from HBase 0.90.6 to HBase 0.96.1.1.
I tried to migrate data by using Export/Import feature of HBase (https://hbase.apache.org/book/ops_mgt.html#export. I have managed to export data and copy them to new server (discp). When I used command on destination cluster:
hbase -Dhbase.import.version=0.90 org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.Import ip /user/rtomsej/ip3
Job was completed successfully, but no data was load (table ip is still blank):
14/06/25 09:04:58 INFO mapreduce.Job: Job job_1403615212297_0014 running in uber mode : false
14/06/25 09:04:58 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 0% reduce 0%
14/06/25 09:05:08 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 7% reduce 0%
14/06/25 09:05:11 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 43% reduce 0%
14/06/25 09:05:16 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 45% reduce 0%
14/06/25 09:05:18 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 50% reduce 0%
14/06/25 09:05:20 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 55% reduce 0%
14/06/25 09:05:21 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 57% reduce 0%
14/06/25 09:05:22 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 80% reduce 0%
14/06/25 09:05:23 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 86% reduce 0%
14/06/25 09:05:25 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 91% reduce 0%
14/06/25 09:05:26 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 98% reduce 0%
14/06/25 09:05:28 INFO mapreduce.Job: map 100% reduce 0%
14/06/25 09:05:28 INFO mapreduce.Job: Job job_1403615212297_0014 completed successfully
14/06/25 09:05:28 INFO mapreduce.Job: Counters: 30
File System Counters
FILE: Number of bytes read=0
FILE: Number of bytes written=5172058
FILE: Number of read operations=0
FILE: Number of large read operations=0
FILE: Number of write operations=0
HDFS: Number of bytes read=5452414893
HDFS: Number of bytes written=0
HDFS: Number of read operations=132
HDFS: Number of large read operations=0
HDFS: Number of write operations=0
Job Counters
Launched map tasks=44
Data-local map tasks=44
Total time spent by all maps in occupied slots (ms)=410004
Total time spent by all reduces in occupied slots (ms)=0
Total time spent by all map tasks (ms)=410004
Total vcore-seconds taken by all map tasks=410004
Total megabyte-seconds taken by all map tasks=419844096
Map-Reduce Framework
Map input records=9964456
Map output records=0
Input split bytes=5720
Spilled Records=0
Failed Shuffles=0
Merged Map outputs=0
GC time elapsed (ms)=7648
CPU time spent (ms)=117230
Physical memory (bytes) snapshot=17097363456
Virtual memory (bytes) snapshot=68115570688
Total committed heap usage (bytes)=26497384448
File Input Format Counters
Bytes Read=5452409173
File Output Format Counters
Bytes Written=0
When I look into log no error is here.
I would appreciate any idea, thank you so much!
It seems the problem was in command:
hbase -Dhbase.import.version=0.90 org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.Import ip /user/rtomsej/ip3
When I modified it like this, whole job went OK:
hbase -Dhbase.import.version=0.94 org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.Import ip /user/rtomsej/ip3
Think that import.version=0.90 is not supported.
I have the same problem, but your solution does not works for me.
I tried lots of time, found that once I disable the Table before running the Import task. There are error of "regionserver not online", but during the task is running, I enable the Table. The Import Task ended smoothly and the new data is loaded!!!
I submitted a MapReduce job to Hadoop and watch the progress report on screen. The progress report should be monotonically increasing (for example 0%, 10%, 25%, 60%, 78%, 95% and 100%) for both map tasks and reduce tasks. But as a matter of fact the progress reported was not monotonically increasing:
14/01/21 11:05:37 INFO mapred.JobClient: Running job: job_201401201555_0036
14/01/21 11:05:38 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 0% reduce 0%
14/01/21 11:06:07 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 11% reduce 0%
14/01/21 11:06:10 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 0% reduce 0%
14/01/21 11:06:19 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 9% reduce 0%
14/01/21 11:06:22 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 22% reduce 0%
14/01/21 11:06:25 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 31% reduce 0%
14/01/21 11:06:28 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 39% reduce 0%
14/01/21 11:06:29 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 53% reduce 0%
14/01/21 11:06:30 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 57% reduce 0%
14/01/21 11:06:32 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 50% reduce 0%
14/01/21 11:06:33 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 55% reduce 0%
14/01/21 11:06:34 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 43% reduce 0%
14/01/21 11:06:35 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 48% reduce 0%
14/01/21 11:06:36 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 40% reduce 0%
14/01/21 11:06:38 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 30% reduce 0%
14/01/21 11:06:40 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 40% reduce 0%
14/01/21 11:06:41 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 49% reduce 0%
14/01/21 11:06:43 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 57% reduce 0%
14/01/21 11:06:44 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 70% reduce 0%
14/01/21 11:06:46 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 73% reduce 0%
14/01/21 11:06:47 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 82% reduce 0%
14/01/21 11:06:48 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 93% reduce 0%
14/01/21 11:06:50 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 94% reduce 0%
14/01/21 11:06:52 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 95% reduce 0%
14/01/21 11:06:53 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 96% reduce 0%
14/01/21 11:06:56 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 98% reduce 0%
14/01/21 11:06:59 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 99% reduce 0%
14/01/21 11:07:00 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 100% reduce 0%
14/01/21 11:07:19 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 100% reduce 4%
14/01/21 11:07:22 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 100% reduce 8%
14/01/21 11:07:25 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 100% reduce 66%
14/01/21 11:07:29 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 100% reduce 67%
14/01/21 11:07:32 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 100% reduce 68%
14/01/21 11:07:35 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 100% reduce 69%
14/01/21 11:07:41 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 100% reduce 70%
14/01/21 11:07:47 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 100% reduce 71%
14/01/21 11:07:53 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 100% reduce 72%
14/01/21 11:07:59 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 100% reduce 73%
14/01/21 11:08:02 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 100% reduce 100%
14/01/21 11:08:03 INFO mapred.JobClient: Job complete: job_201401201555_0036
The progress is indicated by the percentage splits already been processed among all the input splits. But why is the progress report not monotonically increasing?
Check the logs of the tasktrackers and the jobtracker. Are there any failures in the map phase? If a machine fails to perform a task, or the master cannot reach it anymore,then the task is performed again, starting from scratch, by another machine; so the progress is not monotonically increased.
I am trying to process XML files from hadoop, i got following error on invoking word-count job on XML files .
13/07/25 12:39:57 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : attempt_201307251234_0001_m_000008_0, Status : FAILED
Too many fetch-failures
13/07/25 12:39:58 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 99% reduce 0%
13/07/25 12:39:59 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 100% reduce 0%
13/07/25 12:40:56 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : attempt_201307251234_0001_m_000009_0, Status : FAILED
Too many fetch-failures
13/07/25 12:40:58 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 99% reduce 0%
13/07/25 12:40:59 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 100% reduce 0%
13/07/25 12:41:22 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 100% reduce 1%
13/07/25 12:41:57 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : attempt_201307251234_0001_m_000015_0, Status : FAILED
Too many fetch-failures
13/07/25 12:41:58 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 99% reduce 1%
13/07/25 12:41:59 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 100% reduce 1%
13/07/25 12:42:57 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : attempt_201307251234_0001_m_000014_0, Status : FAILED
Too many fetch-failures
13/07/25 12:42:58 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 99% reduce 1%
13/07/25 12:42:59 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 100% reduce 1%
13/07/25 12:43:22 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 100% reduce 2%
i observer following error at hadoop-hduser-tasktracker-localhost.localdomain.log file on slave machine .
2013-07-25 12:38:58,124 WARN org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker: getMapOutput(attempt_201307251234_0001_m_000001_0,0) failed :
org.apache.hadoop.util.DiskChecker$DiskErrorException: Could not find taskTracker/hduser/jobcache/job_201307251234_0001/attempt_201307251234_0001_m_000001_0/output/file.out.index in any of the configured local directories
at org.apache.hadoop.fs.LocalDirAllocator$AllocatorPerContext.getLocalPathToRead(LocalDirAllocator.java:429)
This works fine when i ran for text files
Looks like you have hit this issue. Either apply the patch or download the fixed version, and you should be good to go.
HTH
I am running a canopy cluster job (using mahout) on a cloudera cdh4. the content to be clustered has about 1m records (each record is less than 1k in size). the whole hadoop environment (including all the nodes) is running in a vm with 4G memory. the installation of cdh4 is by default. I got the following exception when running the job.
It looks the job client should need a higher jvm heap size according to the exception. However, there are quite a few configuration options for jvm heap size in cloudera manager. I changed "Client Java Heap Size in Bytes" from 256MiB to 512MiB. However, it didnt improve.
Any hints/tips on setting these heap size options?
13/07/03 17:12:45 INFO input.FileInputFormat: Total input paths to process : 1
13/07/03 17:12:46 INFO mapred.JobClient: Running job: job_201307031710_0001
13/07/03 17:12:47 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 0% reduce 0%
13/07/03 17:13:06 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 1% reduce 0%
13/07/03 17:13:27 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 2% reduce 0%
13/07/03 17:14:01 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 3% reduce 0%
13/07/03 17:14:50 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 4% reduce 0%
13/07/03 17:15:50 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 5% reduce 0%
13/07/03 17:17:06 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 6% reduce 0%
13/07/03 17:18:44 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 7% reduce 0%
13/07/03 17:20:24 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 8% reduce 0%
13/07/03 17:22:20 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 9% reduce 0%
13/07/03 17:25:00 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 10% reduce 0%
13/07/03 17:28:08 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 11% reduce 0%
13/07/03 17:31:46 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 12% reduce 0%
13/07/03 17:35:57 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 13% reduce 0%
13/07/03 17:40:52 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 14% reduce 0%
13/07/03 17:46:55 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 15% reduce 0%
13/07/03 17:55:02 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 16% reduce 0%
13/07/03 18:08:42 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 17% reduce 0%
13/07/03 18:59:11 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 8% reduce 0%
13/07/03 18:59:13 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : attempt_201307031710_0001_m_000001_0, Status : FAILED
Error: GC overhead limit exceeded
13/07/03 18:59:23 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 9% reduce 0%
13/07/03 19:00:09 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 10% reduce 0%
13/07/03 19:01:49 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 11% reduce 0%
13/07/03 19:04:25 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 12% reduce 0%
13/07/03 19:07:48 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 13% reduce 0%
13/07/03 19:12:48 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 14% reduce 0%
13/07/03 19:19:46 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 15% reduce 0%
13/07/03 19:29:05 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 16% reduce 0%
13/07/03 19:43:43 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 17% reduce 0%
13/07/03 20:49:36 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 8% reduce 0%
13/07/03 20:49:38 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : attempt_201307031710_0001_m_000001_1, Status : FAILED
Error: GC overhead limit exceeded
13/07/03 20:49:48 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 9% reduce 0%
13/07/03 20:50:31 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 10% reduce 0%
13/07/03 20:52:08 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 11% reduce 0%
13/07/03 20:54:38 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 12% reduce 0%
13/07/03 20:58:01 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 13% reduce 0%
13/07/03 21:03:01 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 14% reduce 0%
13/07/03 21:10:10 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 15% reduce 0%
13/07/03 21:19:54 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 16% reduce 0%
13/07/03 21:31:35 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 8% reduce 0%
13/07/03 21:31:37 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : attempt_201307031710_0001_m_000000_0, Status : FAILED
java.lang.Throwable: Child Error
at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskRunner.run(TaskRunner.java:250)
Caused by: java.io.IOException: Task process exit with nonzero status of 65.
at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskRunner.run(TaskRunner.java:237)
13/07/03 21:32:09 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 9% reduce 0%
13/07/03 21:33:31 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 10% reduce 0%
13/07/03 21:35:42 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 11% reduce 0%
13/07/03 21:38:41 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 12% reduce 0%
13/07/03 21:42:27 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 13% reduce 0%
13/07/03 21:48:20 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 14% reduce 0%
13/07/03 21:56:12 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 15% reduce 0%
13/07/03 22:07:20 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 16% reduce 0%
13/07/03 22:26:36 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 17% reduce 0%
13/07/03 23:35:30 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 8% reduce 0%
13/07/03 23:35:32 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : attempt_201307031710_0001_m_000000_1, Status : FAILED
Error: GC overhead limit exceeded
13/07/03 23:35:42 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 9% reduce 0%
13/07/03 23:36:16 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 10% reduce 0%
13/07/03 23:38:01 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 11% reduce 0%
13/07/03 23:40:47 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 12% reduce 0%
13/07/03 23:44:44 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 13% reduce 0%
13/07/03 23:50:42 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 14% reduce 0%
13/07/03 23:58:58 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 15% reduce 0%
13/07/04 00:10:22 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 16% reduce 0%
13/07/04 00:21:38 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 7% reduce 0%
13/07/04 00:21:40 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : attempt_201307031710_0001_m_000001_2, Status : FAILED
java.lang.Throwable: Child Error
at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskRunner.run(TaskRunner.java:250)
Caused by: java.io.IOException: Task process exit with nonzero status of 65.
at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskRunner.run(TaskRunner.java:237)
13/07/04 00:21:50 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 8% reduce 0%
13/07/04 00:22:27 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 9% reduce 0%
13/07/04 00:23:52 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 10% reduce 0%
13/07/04 00:26:00 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 11% reduce 0%
13/07/04 00:28:47 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 12% reduce 0%
13/07/04 00:32:17 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 13% reduce 0%
13/07/04 00:37:34 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 14% reduce 0%
13/07/04 00:44:30 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 15% reduce 0%
13/07/04 00:54:28 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 16% reduce 0%
13/07/04 01:16:30 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 17% reduce 0%
13/07/04 01:32:05 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 8% reduce 0%
13/07/04 01:32:08 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : attempt_201307031710_0001_m_000000_2, Status : FAILED
Error: GC overhead limit exceeded
13/07/04 01:32:21 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 9% reduce 0%
13/07/04 01:33:26 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 10% reduce 0%
13/07/04 01:35:37 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 11% reduce 0%
13/07/04 01:38:48 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 12% reduce 0%
13/07/04 01:43:06 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 13% reduce 0%
13/07/04 01:49:58 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 14% reduce 0%
13/07/04 01:59:07 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 15% reduce 0%
13/07/04 02:12:00 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 16% reduce 0%
13/07/04 02:37:56 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 17% reduce 0%
13/07/04 03:31:55 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 8% reduce 0%
13/07/04 03:32:00 INFO mapred.JobClient: Job complete: job_201307031710_0001
13/07/04 03:32:00 INFO mapred.JobClient: Counters: 7
13/07/04 03:32:00 INFO mapred.JobClient: Job Counters
13/07/04 03:32:00 INFO mapred.JobClient: Failed map tasks=1
13/07/04 03:32:00 INFO mapred.JobClient: Launched map tasks=8
13/07/04 03:32:00 INFO mapred.JobClient: Data-local map tasks=8
13/07/04 03:32:00 INFO mapred.JobClient: Total time spent by all maps in occupied slots (ms)=11443502
13/07/04 03:32:00 INFO mapred.JobClient: Total time spent by all reduces in occupied slots (ms)=0
13/07/04 03:32:00 INFO mapred.JobClient: Total time spent by all maps waiting after reserving slots (ms)=0
13/07/04 03:32:00 INFO mapred.JobClient: Total time spent by all reduces waiting after reserving slots (ms)=0
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.InterruptedException: Canopy Job failed processing vector
The Mahout jobs are very memory intensive. I don't know whether the mappers or reducers are the culprits, but, either way you will have to tell Hadoop to give them more RAM. "GC Overhead Limit Exceeded" is just a way of saying "out of memory" -- means the JVM gave up trying to reclaim the last 0.01% of available RAM.
How you set this is indeed a little complex, because there are several properties and they changed in Hadoop 2. CDH4 can support Hadoop 1 or 2 -- which one are you using?
If I had to guess: set mapreduce.child.java.opts to -Xmx1g. But the right answer really depends on your version and your data.
You need to change your memory settings for Hadoop, as the memory allocated for Hadoop is not enough to accommodate the job requirement you are running, Try to increase the heap memory and verify, due to over uses of memory OS might be killing the processes due to which job is failing.